Will Connecticut Declare War On 300,000 Second Amendment Supporters?

To date, a reported 50,016 people have guaranteed the eventual confiscation of their firearms by obeying the “Assault Weapons” registration requirements of Connecticut’s new gun law.

But according to a 2011 study commissioned by the Connecticut Office of Legislative Research, it is estimated that more than 300,000 additional weapons have NOT been registered, their owners refusing to relinquish either their semi-auto rifles OR their liberty to Connecticut lawgivers. (Given recent record sales years, that 300,000 could today be 400,000 or more.)

So in spite of the threats of Connecticut’s left-wing politicos to imprison those with the courage to defy unconstitutional legislation, the overwhelming majority of gun owners in the Constitution State have effectively told their elected officials to shove it.

And it’s this wholesale repudiation of unjust legislation that spells disaster for lawmakers in Connecticut as it will for like-minded  legislators throughout the nation. For it has always been the case that compliance with enacted legislation is essentially voluntary. Police are capable of dealing with the small minority who refuse to obey statutes against murder or robbery. But law enforcement does not have the resources to handle millions–or even the 300,000 plus who have refused to register their guns according to the demands of a dangerous state government.

And dangerous is the word, for governments dedicated to the enforcement of legislation believed by the people to be unfair and illegitimate “…will be stuck in a pattern of escalating brutality and declining legitimacy.” It is governance by intimidation, dispensed by arrogant, unthinking politicians who have effectively declared war on the people they were elected to serve.

From Governor Dannel Malloy to Under Secretary for Criminal Justice Mike Lawlor, Connecticut officials have put themselves in a Jackpot. With bluster and threat, they expected American gun owners to behave like sheep and willingly surrender their rights and eventually their guns. Only liberals could fail to know that such expectations were doomed from the start; that intimidation would never, ever succeed.

And now they have to choose between enforcing a detested law on a resolved populace, outright repeal, or just looking the other way as though their kneejerk statute never really existed. The smart choice would be repeal. But the left are incapable of retreating on such an important agenda item as gun confiscation. After all, it’s not as though THEY will be looking down a barrel one day. That’s left to police, and goodness knows politicians consider them as expendable as any other commoner.

To liberals, the important thing is that the law is on the books. Eventually, some lunatic will pick out another gun-free zone and murder a few dozen defenseless people. With any luck, maybe a Day Care center! And then the left can begin their assault against the law-abiding with fresh ammunition!

Of course, by that time, another 150,000 AR 15s will have found their way to Connecticut residents.

Makes you wonder why liberals don’t work on separating guns from criminals rather than from the rest of us.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. It would not hurt my feelings if the citizens in Connecticut start to reduce the number of idiots. We all know Its going to happen some where sooner or later might as well start there and Get er Done! Maybe then the rest of these morons will get the message loud and clear! No one wants blood shed or to have to defy the law but some times sane people know right from wrong and this BS these idiots keep pushing is very WRONG! Time they learned the hard way as god knows they seem not to be able to learn the easy way.

  2. MuslimLuvChrist says:

    obama failed once to take our guns, but sand monkey will go behind our backs. When the United States joins an international treaty, may Congress pass laws toward its implementation that violate the Constitution? obama says yes, once a treaty is signed by Obama and ratified by the Senate, Congress has the power to pass any law necessary and proper to implement the treaty. ANY law! The constitutional limits on Congressional power may be ignored at the whim of lawmakers. As a result, the United Nations would effectively make the laws by which the American people are governed. The UN Small Arms Treaty would wipe out the 2nd Amendment as international police acquire authority to order, even carry out, the disarming of the American people. The Bill of Rights will become the former law of the land. Express an opinion insulting to pro-Islamic UN doctrine, and an American citizen could be imprisoned (or, should the terms of a treaty call for it, perhaps even be beheaded as an infidel!) For elected DC representatives may fashion and pass legislation based solely upon upholding the terms of any treaty with any nation for any purpose. John Roberts (being blackmailed by obama) has already betrayed the American people by ignoring the Constitution in his decision on obamacarelessjobkiller. Will this corrupt and cowardly justice now participate in a majority ruling that would put that document to death and finally take our guns? FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!!! If they use the background check database, tell them you through the gun away, they need a class action law suit.  

Speak Your Mind