Why Did Secretary Of Defense Leon Panetta Disarm Marines In Afghanistan?

 Why did Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta disarm Marines in Afghanistan?

Photo: Courtesy United States Marine Corps.

This is beyond incredible but you heard it first from Kris Zane at the Western Center for Journalism.

This reporter has looked into it further and would like to shed some additional light. To say the liberal anti-war movement is in the pockets of the progressives running our country is a sad understatement indeed.

Apparently, they have forgotten about the tragedy caused by another mad man, Pol Pot when he ran “year zero” and exterminated innocent civilians in his “Killing Fields.”   The result of another “contrived loss” by U.S. forces when nothing could be further from the truth.

 

Let’s be clear about the brokered withdrawal and so-called loss in Vietnam. The only thing the North Vietnamese won was the Political war as then President Lyndon Johnson was all set to wave the white flag and cut and run. That’s just what liberals do it must be in the genetic make up.

Here are the facts,  one must look no further than the casualty numbers of the North Vietnamese to see the facts supporting this conclusion. The United States lost around 60,000 soldiers in Vietnam. The North Vietnamese released a statement in 1995 suggesting that 1.5 million North Vietnamese combatants were killed in the Vietnam War.

Seriously folks, would you want your son or daughter to be a member of our United States Military led by complete politically correct morons?

For my money I say let Karzai pound sand, wait for the Taliban to chop off his head and put it on a stick. It’s a sad day for the civilians of Afghanistan, as they will quickly be forced to live under Sharia law.

File this situation as another failed promise, leaving civilians to die by the ever politically correct fools in the party in the pockets of the anti-war movement. Yep, mount up warriors, grab your weapons, and pick up your toys you are going home.  We are proud of you. Our administration is an absolute disgrace.

In closing, we must not forget the complete hypocrisy of the anti-warriors on the left. When William Jefferson Clinton was President, Clinton favored forcible intervention in the Bosnian civil war to punish aggressive Serbs.  Of course the anti-war movement remained silent.

That’s my story and I’m sticking to it, I’m J.C. and I approve this message.

See more of Jim’s articles at his site: We The People

Related posts:

  1. Leon Panetta’s Explicitly Authoritarian Decree Only authoritarian governments target and kill their own citizens. We…
  2. U.S. News Agencies ‘looking To Disarm American People’ U.S. news agencies do not have the safety and security…


Get Informed! Read More About this topic::

  1. The Sad State Called Afghanistan This week, the Taliban said that the transfer of U.S....
  2. Karzai: Terrorism In Afghanistan ‘Has Not Gone Away. It Has Increased’ (CNSNews.com) – “The reason for the NATO and American intervention...

Comments

  1. hammocks uk says:

    Maybe that new is correct. In Afghanistan there is need of defense.

  2. rabbit runs says:

    I think that, American Army have to change their policies….

  3. ftth says:

    I think there are more force need in Afghanistan.

Speak Your Mind

*