WASHINGTON — The White House has agreed to give the Senate Intelligence Committee documents related to the attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, a congressional aide said Friday.
Republicans had demanded the documents as a condition of voting on the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director.
The White House has said it has already turned over more than 10,000 pages of Benghazi-related documents, along with witness interviews, staff briefings and hours of testimony.
Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the National Security Council, said the administration was talking with members of Congress about their requests regarding both the Benghazi attacks and the use of drone strikes, but he declined to say whether those requests had been granted.
Read more at Official Wire. By Kimberly Dozier.
Get Informed! Read More About this topic::
- Video: Malkin Congratulates Fox News For Getting White House To End Benghazi Cover-Up Conservative columnist Michelle Malkin joined the hosts of Fox and...
- Video: Fallen Seal’s Father: “White House Has Blood On Their Hands” Over Benghazi The other night, Charles Woods appeared on Sean Hannity’s show...
- Video: Contentious Liberal Jon Stewart Rips White House Over Benghazi Inconsistencies I’ve always considered Jon Stewart to be a more honest...
- White House Told Of Militant Claim Two Hours After Libya Attack: Emails (Reuters) – Officials at the White House and State Department...
- Video: Krauthammer: White House “Held Affair Over Petraeus’s Head” Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer on Tuesday said the White House...
blackmail and treason…impeach this pos
Since Democrats control the Senate this is probably wishful thinking but the Senate Intelligence Committee needs to demand that the White House provide a simple answer to this simple question:
Did the President order an AFRICOM U.S. Army General and a U.S. Navy 6th Fleet Admiral to “STAND DOWN” and then order them “Relieved of Command” when they hestitated doing so immediately, and if not who did?
If he did he is guilty of treason. If he did not, then he as well as whoever did are both guilty of treason.
Racer, you are absolutely right! There is nothing else to add to your comment…