We Will Soon Know The REAL Character Of General David Petraeus

DCIA David Petraeus We will soon know the REAL character of General David Petraeus

The reason for General David Petraeus’ sudden, forced resignation is as plain as the rear-end on a goat. Barack Obama wanted to discredit Petraeus, prejudice the American public against him, and effectively intimidate the general into silence lest he spill the beans to Congress about the Regime’s criminal activities of providing arms, fighters, and support to Syrian terror groups from the Chris Stevens-managed Benghazi mission.

Of course, Obama also didn’t want anyone “in-the-know” testifying about his treacherous betrayal of Stevens and 3 other Americans as he deliberately offered them up to al Qaeda killers. A dead Regime operative can never testify against his boss about gun-running to terrorists, can he Mr. President?

Stevens’ base of operations in Benghazi was NOT a consulate; it was a mission which “…served as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the rebel-led insurgencies in the Middle East…” And “among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with Arab countries on the recruitment of fighters – including jihadists – to target Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

Of course, such goings on at the Benghazi mission would have caused no small amount of political “embarrassment” for Barack Obama had they become widely known. For “U.S. officials [had] stated the White House [was] providing nonlethal aid to the Syrian rebels,” not arms. And lest the American public forget, “…Congress [had] appropriated money, at the behest of Obama, for humanitarian aid, not weapons” and certainly not for al Qaeda linked, Islamic jihadist fighters “…recruited by Saudi Arabia…”

Obama knew of Petraeus’ indiscretions with Paula Broadwell months before the election. But had the president “outed” the general before Election Day, it might have raised questions about Obama’s dealings in Benghazi to which even the Obama-owned media might have had to request answers as the new media would certainly have run with the story.

So when a CIA spokesman clearly heaped blame for the mission deaths on the president by saying, “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate,” Obama could do nothing but bide his time and depend upon the liberal media to bury the story of his having betrayed Stevens and the Benghazi dead (which of course it did.)

But with the election finally over, Obama swiftly introduced the General to countless others he has placed beneath the Regime bus. And now the question becomes:  What kind of man is David Petraeus? He knows it was Obama’s decision alone to betray 4 Americans to their death. He knows assistance could have been provided, the terrorists killed or dispersed, and the mission staff rescued. And as CIA director,  Petraeus must also have known what was going on at the mission: that is, of the weaponry being secretly provided to al Qaeda-connected fighters in direct opposition to the wishes and understanding of Congress.

But will Petraeus testify to all of this (and more), or will he quietly sneak away like so many cowards who have graced the ranks of the Obama Regime? Obama has already worked to destroy the General’s credibility and reputation. And Petraeus has undoubtedly been threatened with consequences far more chilling than a revelation of marital infidelity should he testify before Congress about the president’s criminal dealings.

Therefore, like so many American soldiers before him, David Petraeus must choose between acting with valour or cowardice against his country’s enemies.

We’ll soon discover whether the General chooses to honor or disgrace both his uniform and himself.

Related posts:

  1. The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned It was just a coincidence that the attack on the…
  2. Why Petraeus Was Set Up To Be Obama’s Fall Guy Why did General David Petraeus resign last week after admitting…
"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. Excellent article. We can hope the General remembers he is under oath and that he has an obligation to the men and women of the armed forces and to the people of the US. The Obama regime will stick at nothing to accomplish its evil. I hope there are no threats large enough to intimidate Petraeus.
    IMPEACH OBAMA!!!! Purge the mainstream media!!!

  2. wanda.. mcqueen says:

    Im not so sure Obama did win the, election,, who knows, there was so much voter fraud….. Too bad the votes werent counted and recounted in the swing states Im sorry Romney gave in so quickly . As of this election i have no confidence in our election process, its blatent. everyone should have to show i.d to vote. it was a joke this voting process.

  3. Edwardkoziol says:

    I hope Petraeus up holds true to his military code of honor and tells the truth about the evil Obutthole regime.He has nothing to lose as Delila did in Samson a good looking head did in Dave.Petraeus has to watch his back or he'll end up like Vince Foster a threat to the Clintons.Dead men tell no tales.

    • 2 Live Crew says:

      I'm actually surprized that to date, nobody from within the CIA, the FBI, the Justice Dept. or even the military hasn't terminated Obama with extreme prejudice… But hey, you never know.. There's always tomorrow

      • Edwardkoziol says:

        I'm surprized that half the military in Virginia voted for this piece of shit.What the hell were they thinking,here he wants to screw them but then again it could be just the young women who idloize this tarbaby.

  4. VirgoVince says:

    Gen Petraeus NEVER had a character issue til ovmit came on the scene and ovomit couldn't handle TRUTH from a decorated, honorable military patriot!!
    Recipe for slander and defamation, to us 'real' Americans!!

    • Edwardkoziol says:

      Vince I think the world of Petraeus but he did this to himself did he think after winning the William Jefferson Clinton Golden Penis Award that Obutthole wouldn't use this tidbit against him.Now I believe if it was Obunghole that got caught the press would have come to his aid and said that because the preident had an erection Susan Rice backed into it,he was not mounting her she mounted him.

Speak Your Mind