Video: Nutjob Michael Moore: Americans Desire Guns Because They’re Racist

He just doesn’t get it. The reason why there is no crime in rural areas is PRECISELY BECAUSE almost everyone owns guns. And stop it with the racism, you fat racist.

Related posts:

  1. Michael Moore: People Own Guns Because They’re Racist … Continue to Post…
  2. Surprising: Michael Moore Says Romney Will Defeat Obama In November Talking to the people at The Huffington Post, Michael Moore…
"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. So, he thinks people have guns because they're always afraid and have race issues. Then he condones the act of unlawful entry. This tells me that Michael Moor lives in his own little world where he's the one that writes history and he decides what people are like. Over all in this little world he lives in, he has the final say on everything and he's not wrong (even when he is). Like Obama, this is another man that has never grown up. How about this, Michael? A lot of gun owning Americans carry them because they want to be prepared to defend themselves and the people they love. They don't live in a controlled and predictable world. They're not living with a constant state of paranoia like they're afraid everybody else is out to get them. Get real. They're not afraid that the next time they go to a BBQ that some masked man will jump over the fence and massacre everybody. But, they do want to be prepared for the off chance that happens. They want to be able to protect the ones they care about even at the expense of their own lives, if need be. That's not cowardice, that's bravery. The people using guns for crimes, they're the cowards hiding behind those weapons. That is the half that have guns because they are afraid; afraid of being caught, being stopped, and being corrected. The same sort of people that would invade Michael Moor's lavish home because they envy his wealth. They'll be carrying guns and they wouldn't hesitate to use them on a defenseless fat man in his bed.

  2. Michael Moore is an anti-capitalist idiot. Actually I want to call him an A**, a big one at that.

  3. VirgoVince says:

    Hey, Mike, you're too easy a target to piss off so many people, you must have a death-wish!!
    Don't even think about being a martyr, we won't allow it!!

    • If he tries to walk in my door, he better be wearing a Bullet Proof Vest and a Combat helmet, because I'm a big believer in 2 taps to the chest and one to the head!!

  4. Seeks_the_truth says:

    In 1982, Kennesaw GA passed a law that every citizen MUST own a firearm. The city unanimously passed a law requiring "every head of household to maintain a firearm together with ammunition." After passage of the law, the burglary rate in Kennesaw declined and even today, the City has the lowest crime rate in Cobb County. It took until 1997, that's right 15 YEARS, to have it's FIRST murder with a firearm. There were only two other murders during this time. 1984 and 1987 both saw a murder committed with KNIVES. Not too shabby for a population of around 13,000 by a 1997 average. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.
    Now lets compare to the firearm murder rate in Chicago, IL. A town that has THE MOST restrictive gun laws in the NATION. In Chicago, there have been 470 murders within its city limits in 2012, as of Dec. 2, a 19 percent increase in homicide from 2011, when there were 394 murders. That's an average of 1.28 murders a DAY in Chicago alone.
    So 1 murder in 15 YEARS as opposed to 1.28 murders a DAY.
    If these FACTS don't tell it how it is, nothing will.

    • The only issue that I have with your comment is the Years for Kennesaw (1997 and 1998) compared to 2012 in Chicago, along with the Population Density of both places (13,000 vs 2,707,120).

      I agree with what you were saying and showing, about having more citizens armed helps to deter crime, it just would have more impact if the 2 Cities were closer in Population Density and yearly average murders of a "Restrictive Gun Law" city compared to a "Sane Gun Law" City.

      • Seeks_the_truth says:

        I was comparing the city with the least restrictive gun laws with the city with the strongest.
        It appears the larger the town, the more restrictive the laws. Major cities like Chicago and New York which has restrictive laws have high murder rates with firearms while towns like Phoenix which has carry permit laws has low murder rate with a firearm.
        Virgina is a perfect example of gun ownership and low gun related violent crimes. Gun-related violent crime in Virginia has dropped steadily over the past six years as the sale of firearms has soared to a new record. The total number of firearms purchased in Virginia increased 73 percent from 2006 to 2011. When state population increases are factored in, gun purchases per 100,000 Virginians rose 63 percent. But the total number of gun-related violent crimes fell 24 percent over that period, and when adjusted for population, gun-related offenses dropped more than 27 percent, from 79 crimes per 100,000 in 2006 to 57 crimes in 2011.
        It's also worth noting that Virginia's homicide rate, like violent crime generally, has dropped from 5.21 killings per 100,000 Virginians in 2006 to 3.77 per 100,000 in 2011.

        The overall statistics recorded for all towns show that no matter the size of the city, those with least restrictive gun laws and high ownership have the lowest crime rates while those with restrictive laws and lower ownership are quite higher.
        I hope this clarified my position.

        • Thank you for the new stats. I think it makes the comparisons of "Restrictive Gun Law" Cities versus "Sane Gun Law" Cities more relevant. It makes the point more relevant, and shows how Restrictive Gun Laws don't work, and they don't lower Crime as their proponents try to say, but does exactly the opposite since with "Restrictive Gun Laws" the Criminals don't fear being shot.

  5. Edwardkoziol says:

    His mother if she is still living must hate her self for giving birth to this turd. Here is a fatty who cries about the rich should pay higher taxes so what does blubberbutt do runs to Canada to avoid taxes.Because we believe in owning firearms we're racist is this fat ass telling his body guards to use slingshots instead of guns.

  6. vinylman1955 says:

    Talk about a two faced racist, Moore is it.Whatever is popular this week Moore is onboard.This guy wouldn't know the truth if it kicked him in the nuts. He does stories exposing big companies and their stocks and bonds and then you find out he owns their stocks and bonds. Moore is the piece of shit liar that he is always trying to expose. What a joke moore.You can fool alot of people with your bullshit lies and rants, but everyone isn't stupid. We have your number fool so go elsewhere with your lies and rhetoric.

Speak Your Mind

*