Video: Graphics Expert: Obama Birth Certificate Forged





Graphics expert Paul Irey had and has the evidence that proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the mysterious Obama Birth Certificate is a forgery.





"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. Edwardkoziol says:

    You'll never get anyone in congress or the press that will do anything about him being a foreign muslim because they'll be accused of being a racist .Can't they go after the white side of him to get to the truth.This guy has most of those illiterate blacks buffaloed that he is for them.

    • The real reason is that Obama really was born in Hawaii—as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 all show.

      • Edwardkoziol says:

        do you think both parties wouldn't be in cahoots.After all the few conservatives wouldn't want to be called racists

        • You are apparently claiming that not only did the two parties in Hawaii (including the former Republican governor) lie about Obama's birth certificate, but so did the public Index Data file and the birth notices that were sent to the Hawaii newspapers back in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and in 1961 the DOH was under a REPUBLICAN governor), and you are apparently claiming that somehow Obama was able to find a teacher who worked in Hawaii when he was born and who had a father named Stanley (she really did, I've checked) and that Obama was able to get this woman to lie and say that she had been told about a birth in Hawaii of a child TO A WOMAN NAMED STANLEY and that she wrote home about it to her father.

          ALL of that is pretty improbable. And, guess what, we do not even know whether Obama's mother HAD A PASSPORT (and very very few 18-year-olds did in 1961) and even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet, people who believe that Obama was born outside of Hawaii assume that both she was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport, and that she was one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—-and that Obama's birth certificate is forged (and so, apparently would be the Index Data and the birth notices) and that the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and the teacher who wrote home are lying.

          Not very likely.

      • If, IF, Obama really was born in Hawaii and that makes him a natural born citizen and that makes him eligible to serve as POTUS then why, in 2008, didn't the Democratic Party of Hawaii submit an "Official Certification Of Nomination" to the Chief Election Official of Hawaii which, like it had in 2004 & 2000, included "under provisions of the United States Constitution" in it's certification statement as required by Hawaii election law? Oh, I see, that was just a mistake.

        Like several domestic and African newspapers saying Obama was born in Kenyan as much as THREE YEARS before he announced his candidacy for POTUS…just mistakes.

        Like members of Kenya's parliament expressing pride that Kenyan born Obama was elected a U.S. Senator, then POTUS…just mistakes.

        Like Obama's publicist leaving "born in Kenya" in Obama's bio for 17-years through multiple revisions…just mistakes.

        Like the Governor of Hawaii, a Democrat who claimed to have known Obama since he was a baby, who promised he would put an end to birtherism by finding Obama's original birth certificate but after two weeks admitted he only found a handwritten notation in the Birth Index…just a mistake.

        Like every image on the DaillyKos, FightTheSmears, FactCheck and Snopes alleged to be of Obama's short-form birth certificate has a JUN 2007 date-stamp on the back despite the fact that Robert Gibbs and Dan Pfiffer both stated, two years apart, that Obama's 2008 campaign requested and obtained a copy of his short-form birth certificate in 2008…just a mistake.

        Like no online image alleged to be of Obama's short-form or long-form birth certificate has a recognizable embossed official seal of the Hawaii Department of Health….just a mistake.

        Just one "mistake" after another.

        OBAMA = OneBigAssMistakeAmerica

  2. YES, O's birth certificate is a fake so what is taking so long for Boehner and congress to remove him from office

    • Seeks_the_truth says:

      Because it's the Senate that removes the liar from office on impeachment. We have to wait to take back the Senate.

      • smrstrauss says:

        Not merely "take back the Senate," conviction in a charge of impeachment requires a TWO-THIRDS vote of the US Senate.

        • smrstrauss says:

          And, in fact, Obama's birth certificate is not a fake. Birther "experts" simply repeat and repeat their CLAIM that it is a fake.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            It is a fact that the birth certificate purported to be that of barrack obama is indeed a fake. Keep repeating the talking lines that the evidence is wrong is just a hopeless attempt to dispel the truth.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Can you disprove the Xerox WorkCentre research:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

            Can you explain why birther sites did not show all (or in fact ANY) of the real experts who said that Obama's birth certificate IS NOT FORGED?

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Nothing you have stated is a fact.
            No one has disproved any facts obtained in the BC investigation done by the CCPMCC. http://www.worldtribune.com/wp-content/uploads/20

            How did obama apply for, and receive, the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship to attend Occidental College?
            You MUST be a foreign citizen to acquire this scholarship to schools in the US?
            Take your time. No one has come up with a good excuse for this one yet. Just denial of facts.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Re Fulbright. You should learn that Fulbright Scholarships are available ONLY to graduate students, and Obama was not a graduate student. BTW, the story that Obama received a Fulbright, and that he registered as a foreign student, was AN APRIL FOOL'S ARTICLE originally published on April 1, 2009—that article sure fooled you.

            Re "NO one has disproved any facts obtained by the CCPMCC. Is that why the National Review has this to say about Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse?
            http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/con

            Is that why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Gingrich and Santorum and Huckabee and all 535 members of Congress do not believe Sheriff Joe—Obama was confirmed by those 535 members of Congress UNANIMOUSLY twice, and that includes Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann.

            Sheriff Joe has not even attempted to answer the evidence of the Xerox WorkCentre:

            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

            And, duh, if birther sites were convinced that their claims of the birth certificate being forged were right, they would at least have discussed the Xerox WorkCenter and published the comments of the real experts who say that there is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate:

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their MOTIVE—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama's birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him. And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.

          • smrstrauss says:

            ALSO, there is the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father's name was Stanley (it really was, I've checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

            And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961—–and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama's mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

            Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts "MATCH."

            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Every theory you have posted has been debunked.
            I don't wish to continue with you spouting talking points.
            Give something substantial and we can continue.

            As for the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship. The Fulbright Foundation Scholarship is financial aid for US students to study in FOREIGN countries and for FOREIGN citizens financial aid to study in AMERICA. Since Occidental College is in America, the ONLY way you can obtain a Fulbright Foundation Scholarship to attend an American school is to be a FOREIGN student.

            You must have missed this part.

            Now again, wish to explain this?

            The birth certificate has been shown with solid forensic evidence to be a fake. Obama acquired a Fulbright Foundation Foreign student Scholarship to attend school in the US.

            You can accept the facts or not. Your choice. Will not change the evidence.

          • Just for a little extra clarification to confirm how Fulbright Scholarships work. From the website itself: http://eca.state.gov/fulbright/facts-and-common-q

          • smrstrauss1 says:

            Fulbright scholarships are available only to graduate students. Moreover, there is an association of Fulbright Scholarship alumni, and they can be called up, and guess what, Obama is not a member.

            This site says that undergraduates can APPLY for Fulbright Scholarships, in their senior year. And that applies to FOREIGN students as well as US students. NO student, USA or foreign, gets a Fulbright Scholarship until she or he is a graduate student (and Obama was an undergraduate at the time).

            Source: http://us.fulbrightonline.org/

            And this is the telephone number of the Fullbright Scholarship Alumni Association:
            Phone: (202) 775-0725 (Call them up and check. Obama is not a member.)

            And, finally, the article that claimed that Obama received a Fulbright Scholarship was AN APRIL FOOL'S ARTICLE originally published on April 1, 2009—there is not a shred of evidence, not a particle—that confirms it.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Thanks for the link. Makes it much easier to get the information across to those who refuse to accept facts.

          • smrstrauss1 says:

            Re: "The birth certificate has been shown with solid forensic evidence to be a fake. "

            NO, that is not true at all. It is merely another nutty birther claim, like the claim that Obama received a Fulbright Scholarships and the deliberated LIE by birther sites that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that Obama was born in Kenya (She actually said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII. Birther sites simply did not quote her and cut off the tape recording just before she was asked "where was he born?" [I wonder why they did that?????].)

            The claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged is simply another LIE, and the birther "experts" who make it haven't shown that they are even experts, and they CERTAINLY have not shown that they are fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why their claims are not believed by such Conservative leaders as Ann Coulter or the National Review or Huckabee or Santorum or Gingrich or Paul Ryan—or for that matter John McCain or Mitt Romney.

            And birther sites have not even attempted to discuss the Xerox WorkCentre research:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            It has been shown with forensic evidence that the birth certificate purported to be that of obama is indeed a fake.
            Whether you accept the facts or not is another subject.

            Feel free to acquire the records by FOIA as others have done that show obama was indeed awarded the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship as a foreign student to attend an American college.
            But even then I doubt you'll accept the facts.

            The 'xerox' lie has been debunked. Just wait for it. :-)

          • smrstrauss says:

            Fulbright scholarships are awarded ONLY to graduate students. Obama did not receive one. And the story that he did was AN APRIL FOOL'S article originally published on April 1, 2009.

            I do not post to change the minds of nuts. I show the facts for the benefit of rational people who desire to see the facts.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            As Fennec politely supplied: http://eca.state.gov/fulbright/facts-and-common-q

            It would do smrstrauss good to actually LEARN about the program they are trying to dispute.
            smrstrauss does not understand that Occidental is a school in AMERICA and therefore only FOREIGN exchange students can acquire a scholarship from Fulbright to attend an American school.

            smrstrauss tries to deny these facts by claiming it's some 'April fools joke' when the document supports the facts.

            smrstrauss has yet to post ANY facts.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Fulbright Scholarships are available only to graduate students. Your link does not say that they are available to undergraduates. This link says that they are available only to graduate students:

            http://www.iie.org/fulbright

            The above link shows that regardless of whether you are a foreign student who wants to study in America or a US student who wants to study abroad, you have to be A GRADUATE STUDENT———and Obama was an undergraduate.

            Moreover, the "he attended college as a foreign student" myth comes from an April Fool's article.
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/06/obama-occi

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            The competition for Fulbright Program grants is merit-based. Eligibility criteria will vary by program and by country. Candidates are selected based on a variety of factors, that may include (but are not limited to) academic qualifications, project feasibility, personal leadership ability, and available grant funds. – See more at: http://eca.state.gov/fulbright/facts-and-common-q

            Try looking under requirements for FOREIGN students. It helps.

          • smrstrauss says:

            There is not a word in there that says that Fulbright Scholarships are available to undergraduates, and this shows that they are available only to graduate students.
            http://www.iie.org/fulbright

        • Seeks_the_truth says:

          That's why I said we have to wait to take back the Senate first.

          • smrstrauss says:

            So, wait. BTW, there has not even been an impeachment committee hearing in the House. And, guess what, say that you could get a two-thirds vote in the Senate to impeach. Then Joe Biden would become president.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            So you do know a little about our laws. Good job.
            Yes, Joe Biden would become President if he is not also impeached for his illegal actions at the same time. Good old 'Uncle Joe'.
            Unfortunately, we have not one good person in the entire hierarchy. From obama to Biden to Boehner, none have the best interest of America in their sights.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Gee too bad Seeks_the_truth. Too bad for you. Obama, having been born in the USA and being a Natural Born Citizen (as are all US citizens who were born in the USA, only naturalized citizens are not Natural Born Citizens) is perfectly eligible to be president, and in fact he is the president. It would take a two-thirds vote of the US Senate in an impeachment trial to have him removed, and that is not going to happen. In fact, there hasn't even been committee hearings in the House of Representatives on the subject of impeachment.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Not really. Actually too bad for smrstrauss. All one has to do is wait for 2014 for this nightmare to be over.
            Dems and libs have revolted against the liar and fraud.

            One huge whopper he has been caught in has done him good. LMAO.

            Too bad. So sad.

          • smrstrauss says:

            So, wait, wait forever. I don't care. You can even hold your breath.

            Nothing will happen in 2014 or 2015. In 2016 there will be another presidential election, and you will have a chance to support a candidate that you like, and I will too, and we will see who wins.

    • smrstrauss says:

      Actually, the claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged, by such birther "experts" as Irey, has been crushed by the research done on the Xerox WorkCentre.
      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh….

      • Linda From NY says:

        To smrstrauss,
        I check out your blog, that proves nothing, there is more proof by Mr. Zullo then what this blog has to offer. Can you please explain why Obama has a C.T. S.S. number? when he has never been there.

        Can you tell me why Obama spent millions, to hide his college records? What is he hiding?

        You can NOT take away the fact that Obama has done many unconstitutional treasonous acts against the American people. Have you forgotten Obama and his cronies left 4 Americans to died, that in itself is treasonous and then lied about it, about a anti muslim video.

        • Re Zullo.

          Here is what the National Review says about him:
          http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/con

          (In other words, he is not considered an impartial person.)

          Re Connecticut SS number. That is an interesting question because it shows how you and other birther NUTS think.

          The answer is so simple that you should have been able to figure it out—if you weren't led by the nose by birther sites that do not give you any facts at all.

          The answer is, duh, that Social Security clerks make mistakes, millions upon millions of mistakes, and that when they enter the zip code for the person wrong, duh, it generates a SS number from a state other than the one that the person was from. Simple, no. And the next question that birthers often ask is "why did the E-Verify" not confirm Obama's SS number? And the answer to that is very simple too. When people's SS numbers have been published, they have the right to cancel them and get a new SS number. So, when the birther sites checked the OLD number, duh, it had been cancelled. (The new number has not been published.)

          Re the nutty idea that Obama "spent millions" (or spent even one cent) on hiding his college records. The answer is that there never was a lawsuit for his college records, so Obama did not spend one cent defending such a lawsuit (ALL the lawsuits against Obama were to have him thrown off of ballots. Obama spent a little money [it costs very little to file the same boilerplate again and again] to stay on the ballot. But he did not spend a cent on "hiding" his college records.)

          More importantly, he does not have to show is college records. No president ever has (Bush's were leaked by a source at Yale, but BUSH did not show them.) And Mitt Romney and John McCain certainly did not show their college records. Nor did Clinton or Bush41 or Reagan or Carter or Ford or Nixon.

          What gave you the nutty idea that Obama had to show his college records?

          Re "treason"—that is your OPINION. So far there is not been proof that there was even a misdemeanor much less an high crime. Yes there should have been more guards at the consulate, but that was a mistake, not a crime.

          • And, as noted:

            The claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged, by such birther "experts" as Irey, has been crushed by the research done on the Xerox WorkCentre.

            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh….

          • Linda From NY says:

            Believe whatever you want of your messiah, when your Dingbat prez throw your AZZ under the bus then perhaps you will wake up.

            Since you are such a believer in fairy tales, can you please enlighten me and tell me what happen to Hope and Change? He did promise the American people Hope and Change in 2007, What Happen? Where is it?

            What Happen?

          • smrstrauss says:

            "Hope and change" comes slowly. The more the opposition to Obama in the House of Representatives, the slower that it can come.

            If things are so bad, why is the stock market soaring? Why are US companies making RECORD PROFITS?

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Because the economy is failing. Jobs are dwindling. Expansion of companies is almost nonexistent.
            When a company drops employees to part time work, when the number of employees drop, when a company doesn't reinvest in their corporation, it all adds up to record profits.
            Also contributing is the Feds pumping out money artificially holding up the economy.
            We'll see more destruction of the middle class when more of the monster obamacare unfolds.

            And only half of Congress wants to turn America into a socialist nation. That's the 'opposition' you speak of.

          • smrstrauss says:

            So, you will have a chance to elect a president that you prefer in 2016. Until then Obama will remain president, and if anything should happen to him, Joe Biden would become president. Rave on about the destruction of the Middle Class. We know that the cause of that destruction was the Bush Administration—the crash that those polices caused.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            America has woke up and will put in the WH the best one to turn this country around from the socialist cliff it sits on now.
            You can HOPE obama stays in the WH. The way it looks now, it's a rather bleak outlook.
            You just assume Biden will not be impeached for his actions in the Benghazi scandal, NSA, IRS, The AP and Rosen Scandal, Fast and Furious etc. etc.

            Obviously you ignore history and instead take what you're told to heart. Anyone with intelligence knows the crash of 2008 was DIRECTLY caused by the Democratic passing of the CRA of 1977 and obama personally with his representation of ACORN in the suit against Citibank forcing them to give subprime loans to marginally qualified applicants.

            Bush's first budget warned that "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets." In 2003, the Administration began calling for a new GSE regulator. Despite resistance from Congress, President Bush continued to call for GSE reform until Congress finally acted in 2008 to provide the additional oversight the President requested five years earlier. Unfortunately, the reform came too late to prevent systemic consequences.
            Everyone also knows that 9/11 would never had happened if Clinton had taken out Bin Laden just one of the 7 chances he had. They knew there was to be a strike but did nothing about it.

            It was the Bush tax cuts that returned the economy to growth in the fourth quarter of 2001 and it continued to grow for 24 consecutive quarters. The economy grew at a rapid pace of 7.5 percent above inflation during the third quarter of 2003 – the highest since 1984. The Bush tax relief reduced the marginal effective tax rate on new investment, which encourages additional investment and, in the long-term, higher wages for workers.
            This is why obama carried them over. In the hope that it would encourage the economy he had stalled.

            The Bush policies also created 52 months of uninterrupted job growth, the longest run on record.

            Not bad for a President that really DID inherit the unprecedented triple shock of a recession following the dot-com bust, economic disruption due to the terrorist attacks of September 11, and corporate accounting scandals.
            Unprecedented economic GROWTH and record uninterrupted job GROWTH.

            Democrats caused the financial and housing bubbles that crashed. Just wait for the student loan bubble about to burst caused by Democrats.

            Facts just don't support your fantasies.

          • smrstrauss says:

            You have every right to disagree with the policies of a president. But that does not make him born in a foreign country, nor does it make the birth certificate forged. I am not saying that I like all of Obama's policies or that they have worked out. I am saying that he was NOT born in a foreign country.

            For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

            (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1971], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

            (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

            (3) got the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, she would have had to have found one of the very few women with fathers of that name to do it).

            If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

            So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            The fake birth certificate he put out as his own makes him ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

            Just because you refuse to accept the facts, doesn't change them.

            All it takes is have a team of computer professionals that can design a birth certificate and knows how to wipe information off the web.
            Then pass a law that it is illegal to release ANY information of a sitting 'president' from any school or other facility.
            Hey!! Just like obama did on his FIRST day!!

            Too bad, just like with the obamacare website, he hired 'buddies' instead of real experts who could do the job well.
            They made a bad fake and missed many things on the web. They also had no control on certain documentation.

            If you can't follow the facts and come to the conclusions that the majority of anyone who has looked at them have come to, then you are either blind or willfully ignorant.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Obama's birth certificate is not fake.

            Only birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

            One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

            Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

            And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

            Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

          • smrstrauss says:

            The evidence remains overwhelming that Obama was born in Hawaii.

            The evidence for Obama being born in Hawaii is:

            (1) the two Hawaii birth certificates (of which the first, the short form, is the official birth certificate, used by thousands of people to get their passports every year);

            (2) the repeated confirmations of them by the officials of both parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor;

            (3) the public Index Data file;

            (4) the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (which, BTW, was under a REPUBLICAN governor in 1961, and which at the time sent out birth notices ONLY for children born in Hawaii);

            (5) the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley;

            (6) Kapiolani Hospital has confirmed that Obama was born there now—twice in fact (naturally birther sites do not show either of them);

            (7) no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961;

            (8) it was rare for 18-year-olds to have passports or for women to travel abroad late in pregnancy at the time;

            (9) the Kenyan government said that it investigated and that Obama certainly was NOT born there (birther sites did not show that either);

            (10) birther sites LIED about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said (she never said that he was born in Kenya; she in fact said that he was born in HAWAII;

            (11) Birther sites having lied about what Obama's grandmother said, and other things too, makes it highly likely that their "document experts" are lying too—and numerous real document experts say that the birth certificate is not forged, and that is confirmed by the evidence of the Xerox WorkCentre (which shows how that product scans documents and compresses them using layers and pixillaton).

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            The site you supplied offered theories without evidence.
            One point. There was no explanation how during a time when typewriters, not computers, were used to enter text on the document how there are different typeset on the document and 'overlay' of characters.
            Another point. They claim the 'halo's' were already there and of no concern when they can obtain the original file the same that was used showing the fact the birth certificate is fake.
            The ORIGINAL download from WH.gov was used in the CCP investigation and should have been used in this supposed 'debunking' of the evidence, which it was not.

            There are more discrepancies on your site, but the website you posted offered only theories without concrete evidence as the CCP has.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Yes, it explained the "different fonts."

            The answer is that the pdf image is not a photograph of the original. It is the way that the software trys to represent the original. In doing that it makes mistakes in representing fonts.

            And, birther sites have not shown you all the real experts who say that the birth certificate is not forged. (In fact, they have not shown you ANY of them—-I wonder why not?????)

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            Re the Cold Case Posse:
            http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/con

            And, talk about biased. Did you know that Paul Irey continued to claim that Obama did not attend Columbia College even after Columbia University said twice that Obama attended and graduated from Columbia College. (I wonder why he did that????)

            The answer is this:

            Birthers’ claims that Obama’s birth certificate is forged are caused by their own motives. Their motives are that they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            No, it did not 'explain' the different fonts. They gave a 'theory' which is much different than facts.

            No one has yet, with FACTS, disprove all the descrpencies found in the BC purported to be that of obama.

            Can you name one STUDENT that claims to have attended class at Columbia College with obama? Just ONE will do.

            Can you explain how obama applied for, and RECEIVED, the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship to attend Occidental College? I'm sure you know to be awarded this scholarship, one MUST be a foreign student.

            So now following the Constitution, our ruling document, is considered 'hate'? Interesting.
            It was Hillary Clinton after all, that first brought up that obama is not native.

          • smrstrauss says:

            You are showing that you are nutty. You are underlining it. You are proclaiming it—look how nutty I am.

            Before asking "how obama applied for, and RECEIVED, the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship to attend Occidental College? " you should have checked on whether Fulbright Scholarships are even available to undergraduates. The answer is that they aren't. So the story that Obama received one is, duh, false, and so is the story that he applied to college as a foreign exchange student. The story comes from AN APRIL FOOLS ARTICLE originally published on April 1, 2009. It sure fooled you, and other gullible birthers.

            Re: "Can you name one STUDENT that claims to have attended class at Columbia College with obama? Just ONE will do. "

            You wouldn't take two?

            "Michael J. Wolf, who took the seminar with him and went on to become president of MTV Networks, said: “He was very smart. He had a broad sense of international politics and international relations. It was a class with a lot of debate. He was a very, very active participant. I think he was truly distinctive from the other people in that class. He stood out.”

            And this: "I was Barack Obama ’83’s roommate at Columbia College in fall 1981. I met him in 1979, when we were freshmen at Occidental College (Oxy) in Los Angeles and our dorm rooms were directly opposite each other."

            And that, by the way, is published in an official Columbia publication <a href="http://(http://www.college.columbia.ed..” target=”_blank”>(http://www.college.columbia.ed...

            Another link:
            http://www.wikicu.com/Barack_O...

            Moreover, supposing I wasn't able to find a student or two who remembered Obama as I just showed. Rational people, not necessary you, but rational people would accept the statement of COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY that Obama had attended Columbia College and graduated.

            Your allegations about the birth certificate being forged come from the same hatred and lack of information as the two points above. No one has disproved the research done into the way that the Xerox WorkStation works:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

            Re "following the Constitution…is considered 'hate."

            You are not following the Constitution. You are following YOUR NUTTY IDEA of what the Constitution says, and you are wrong about it.

            Hillary CHECKED on whether Obama was born in Hawaii (as did John McCain), and when she found out the evidence that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii was overwhelming, she stopped checking (as did John McCain):

            The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama's birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him. And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.

            THAT is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father's name was Stanley (it really was, I've checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

            And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961—–and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama's mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

            Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts "MATCH."

            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Actually, you are showing how brainwashed you are and how unwilling you are to accept facts that go against your messiah.

            Let's make that very clear.

            Explain how an American citizen is awarded a Fulbright Foundation Scholarship to attend an American school when it is an exchange program.

            You must have missed that part.

            That is, to be awarded a Fulbright Scholarship, you must be an American citizen, with the required requisites, and to attend a FOREIGN school. OR Be a FOREIGN student, with the required requisites, and attending an American school, which Occidental College is.

            As for your 'theory' about an 18 year old, it's just that, a theory. You claim that it would be UNUSUAL for Stanley Dunham, an 18 year old woman, to hold a passport but it is a FACT she did.
            Since the microfiche for that time period is 'missing' (how convenient), it is impossible to know if she did, or did not, travel during that time.

            There has been no verification from Hawaii that a valid birth certificate for obama is on file.
            Did you forget this headline? "Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery."
            Or that he also said "He also confirmed to KS SOS Kris Kobach that the information contained in the White House image is NOT “identical to” that in the official record."
            "Onaka’s disclosure – the only one made by a HI official under oath –negates all other 'claims' and fits the vast legal and forensic evidence collected so far, some of which is in an affidavit (privately posted at for NE criminal case #B2-119."

            You can spout all the wacko left wing nut jobs you want. I'll follow the evidence.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Re: alleged headline that says"Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery."

            That is a birther lie. Onaka never said any such thing. In fact, he and all the other officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that all the facts on the copy that the White House put online are exactly the same as on what they sent him.

            Birther sites are simply lying about Onaka the way that they did about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said (she never said that Obama was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly that Obama was born "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time." Birther sites simply did not quote her and cut off the tape on their sites just before she was asked "where was he born."

            So birther sites are lying about Onaka too.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Yet AGAIN smrstrauss fails to understand the facts.

            Just shows the desperation of obot sheeple in defending their messiah.
            It also explains why they don't accept the facts. They just don't understand.

            Onaka has NEVER verified the BC is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your files”.

            Explains why high intellectual people accept that the birth certificate is a forgery and low intellect people still defend obama.
            We understand the evidence.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Onaka and the other officials of Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form BCs to Obama and that all the facts on the copy that the White House has put online are exactly the same as on what they sent to him.

            Here is a link to SOME (by no means all) of the documents in which the officials of the government of Hawaii (officials of BOTH parties) repeatedly confirm that Obama was born in Hawaii and that they sent birth certificates from Hawaii to Obama and that ALL the facts on the birth certificate put online by the White House are exactly the same, repeat EXACTLY the same, as on what they sent to him:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

            Notice that several of the documents state that the facts MATCH.

            Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.
            http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-ob

            Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed.

            And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital
            http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/0

            And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:
            http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://

            Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabi

            (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

            Here is the Index Data file:
            http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            NO ONE has verified that there is a valid birth certificate on file for barack obama.
            If so, why not show it instead of the fraudulent one that has been posted on WH.gov?

            EVERYTHING you have provided is nothing but OPINIONS. You have been supplied with actual evidence which you have yet to 'debunk'.
            In case you have forgotten, here again is an official affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Maricopa County CCP: http://www.worldtribune.com/wp-content/uploads/20

            I'm sure you have equal evidence which you will supply instead of just 'OPINIONS'.

            Unless you supply legally binding documentation disputing the findings of forensic document examiners used, what you supply is merely 'here-say' and not permitted in a court of law.

            I also see you wish to pit a 'witness' of a nonexistent action against that of obama's own grandmother. You seem to forget the original tape of the conversation is still around and has been translated by many people and they all say his grandmother swears obama was born at her home.
            I really don't care about where he was born. I only know as FACT obama was NOT born in Hawaii with the birth certificate presented.

            I'll wait for your court documents that show your 'facts'.

          • smrstrauss says:

            The birth certificate shown by the White House is not fraudulent and the officials in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent it to him and that all the facts on it are correct. Hawaii cannot show anything. That is the law. It can only send out copies of the birth certificate and only to specific people on a list of those eligible. It HAS sent the short form and long form BC to Obama and repeatedly confirmed that it did.

            The evidence remains overwhelming that Obama was born in Hawaii.

            The evidence for Obama being born in Hawaii is:

            (1) the two Hawaii birth certificates (of which the first, the short form, is the official birth certificate, used by thousands of people to get their passports every year);

            (2) the repeated confirmations of them by the officials of both parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor;

            (3) the public Index Data file;

            (4) the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (which, BTW, was under a REPUBLICAN governor in 1961, and which at the time sent out birth notices ONLY for children born in Hawaii);

            (5) the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley;

            (6) Kapiolani Hospital has confirmed that Obama was born there now—twice in fact (naturally birther sites do not show either of them);

            (7) no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961;

            (8) it was rare for 18-year-olds to have passports or for women to travel abroad late in pregnancy at the time;

            (9) the Kenyan government said that it investigated and that Obama certainly was NOT born there (birther sites did not show that either);

            (10) birther sites LIED about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said (she never said that he was born in Kenya; she in fact said that he was born in HAWAII;

            (11) Birther sites having lied about what Obama's grandmother said, and other things too, makes it highly likely that their "document experts" are lying too—and numerous real document experts say that the birth certificate is not forged, and that is confirmed by the evidence of the Xerox WorkCentre (which shows how that product scans documents and compresses them using layers and pixillaton).

          • smrstrauss says:

            Oh, and Obama DID NOT RECEIVE a Fulbright Scholarship. Fulbright Scholarships are available only to graduate students.
            http://www.iie.org/fulbright

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            In all sincerity, are you REALLY that DENSE? Are you honestly THAT STUPID?

            Can you read? Do you understand?
            I have to ask since you refuse to accept the very basis of what the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship actually IS.

            Here again: http://eca.state.gov/fulbright/facts-and-common-q

            For the last time. Hopefully I have DUMBED this down ENOUGH for you.
            Obama received the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship as a FOREIGN student. As you can see by the Fulbright Foundation site, it nowhere states that a FOREIGN student must be a graduate student.

            If you must insist on this false idea, provide the facts to support your allegation.

            Do NOT supply any information for AMERICAN citizens. ONLY foreign.
            I seriously doubt you will understand and will yet again attempt to post information for American citizens.

          • smrstrauss says:

            The link that you have shown DOES NOT SAY THAT FULBRIGHT SCHOLARSHIPS ARE AVAILABLE TO UNDERGRADUATES.

            This link says that they are available only to GRADUATE STUDENTS. And that refers to BOTH US students and foreign students. Neither can get Fulbright Scholarships unless they are GRADUATE STUDENTS.
            http://www.iie.org/fulbright

            And, of course, Obama was not a graduate student. He was an undergraduate.

          • Linda From NY says:

            Some mistake? 4 Americans dead begging for their lives for hours and ignore by obama and his administration, who gave the order to stand down? was it obama? or was it Jarrett? or was it Hillary?

            which one gave the order to stand down? and you call this a MISTAKE? Especially when there were military help not to far away to help, which could have been sent in to help these 4 Americans.

            Fast and Furious Debacle A dead American border patrol Agent and 17 Navy Seals dead and you call it a mistake. How many more mistakes is this Fool is going to make?

            Obama should be remove for his stupidity alone, either this man is evil or very stupid

          • smrstrauss says:

            Yes, a mistake. There was no order to "stand down." A president cannot be removed for "stupidity"—only for high crimes and misdemeanors. If such a thing were proved (and it isn't at all likely since they have not even called hearings on the matter in the House and it would take a two-thirds vote of all the US senators), then Joe Biden would become president.

            No order to stand down. Not enough guards = a mistake. Fast and Furious = a mistake.

          • Linda From NY says:

            Mistake? how many mistakes is this clown going to make? how many more lives will be lost to his mistake? Yes there was a order to stand down, here is an article in regards to a witness that was there.

            “A witness Gregory Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission in Libya, told a House Oversight Committee the blunt reaction he received from U.S. military personnel after the order to stand down on a rescue mission for those in Benghazi.

            The fact that two inexplicable stand-down orders were given that left Hicks and Special Forces personnel in stunned disbelief and outrage, and left their brothers in Benghazi to fend for themselves.
            Stand-down order #1 was when Hicks requested deployment of the special incident Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST), which is specifically designed to handle such attacks. Hicks testified that the FEST team had dedicated aircraft capable of responding within four hours

            Stand-down order #2 was when the Special Forces team in Tripoli was all set to jump on a C-130 and fly to Benghazi and rescue their brothers”

          • smrstrauss says:

            Re: "Special Forces team in Tripoli was all set to jump on a C-130 and fly to Benghazi and rescue their brothers."

            Two things. First that never happened. Second, it is a nutty idea that it could have happened. Why? Because in that situation they could not know that the airport in Benghazi was clear. Perhaps it also had been attacked by the terrorists–or was just about to be, or they were surrounding the airport and ready to shoot down the plane. And, nobody sends a single team of special forces into a situation when as far as anyone could know there were hundreds of terrorists.

            There was no "stand down order." It never happened.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Yes there was an order to 'stand down'. Or are you calling Hicks, Gen. Ham, Col. Gibson and the many others liars?

            How many more high crimes and misdemeanors must obama commit to finally be impeached? How many more acts of treason? How many more times must he give aid and comfort to the enemy?

            From his illegal appointments of 35+ czars to violating the War Powers Act of 1973 by conducting a war against Libya without Congressional authorization.
            How about when he was telegraphing troop reductions to enemies – against the consult of his experienced field commanders – while embracing negotiations with our enemy, the Taliban, and recognizing another, the Muslim Brotherhood?

            His failure to enforce US Law, from immigration to DOMA, is a clear betrayal of the oath he took to "..preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
            Obama has been found to have illegally solicited funds from within the White House.
            Obama and his Administration leaking previously classified information about our intelligence communities’ efforts to slow down Iran’s march to nuclear weaponry.

            We will not forget his criminal cover up by the White House over BengaziGate, where four Americans, including Ambassador Stevens were murdered by Islamic Extremists.
            Against Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution, Obama sat as head of the UN Security Council.

            I could continue. There is a laundry list of treasonous acts and high crimes and misdemeanors in which to impeach obama. None of which have to do with his stupidity.

          • smrstrauss says:

            There was NO order to "stand down."

            BTW, what gives you the nutty idea that it was possible to send significant numbers of troops from Tripoli (or anywhere) to Benghazi AT NIGHT over roads where they could be ambushed?

            Try to get the facts into your tiny brain. There were not sufficient guards in Benghazi. That was the mistake. The guards were not told to "stand down."

            The troops in Tripoli were kept there to protect the people when they reached Tripoli, and they were never told to "stand down." And they could not have reached Benghazi at night over those roads ANYWAY.

            The notion that planes could have dropped bombs to stop the attack is also fairly silly (again, it was at night), and there weren't any available anyway. And the notion that a single attack team of special forces could have "jumped into" a plane and flown to Bengazi is also nutty. They did not know whether or not the airport was already in terrorist hands or was surrounded by terrorists, and sending a single team is also absurd—when you do not know whether they would be facing hundreds of terrorists.

            There was NO ORDER TO STAND DOWN. No troops in Benghazi that could have been ordered to "stand down." Sending them by road or plane would have been nutty since they did not know what they were facing. It all boils down to not enough guards at the consulate—a mistake.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            There WAS a STAND DOWN ORDER GIVEN.
            Argue all you wish. There WAS a stand down order.

            "BTW, what gives you the nutty idea that it was possible to send significant numbers of troops from Tripoli (or anywhere) to Benghazi AT NIGHT over roads where they could be ambushed?"

            Are you for FUCKING REAL??? I hope you are FUCKING KIDDING! I know now you NEVER served in the Military. Therefore you know NOTHING about it.

            End of story. You know NOTHING about the situation. You have learned EVERYTHING (what little it is) from TALKING POINTS fed to you.

            There was a STAND DOWN order given. SEAL Teams were told to stand down. Aid was NOT sent. Requests for reinforcements were IGNORED.
            They were able to send an UNARMED drone to watch in REAL TIME what was going on but yet they never bothered to send one of the ARMED drones they send all the time to MURDER American citizens.

            There WAS a stand down order given. Only ONE person can give that order. Figure it out.
            At a minimum it is dereliction of duty.

      • Linda From NY says:

        To smrstrauss,
        And lets not forget on August of 2011 17 Navy Seals shot-down of a helicopter in Afghanistan on the last minute, 8 muslims were remove from this aircraft, before being shot down.

        Obama invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah and then without the family’s consent they were cremated and the black box till this day has never been recovered. The families of these 17 Navy Seals are still looking for answers and thy have not been told the truth.

        Have you forgotten the Fast and Furious debacle where gun were allow to walk across the border into the hands of drug cartels and one American border agent was murder and this administration still has no answer for the parents of this agent.

        There is a whole lot more treasonous acts from this bogus potus that I don’t have the time to name them all, but if you insist on being a imbecile, then so be it, it is still a Free Country to be a Imbecile even for trolls like you.

        God Still Bless America even the Trolls

        • You are changing the subject. Some of those things are stupid mistakes, like Fast and Furious. The story about eight Muslims being removed from the aircraft before it was shot down, and your implication that Obama had something to do with the shooting down is an example of how LOONY birthers are.

          • Linda From NY says:

            My point is even if it is true of Obama's B.C, were to be authentic, which is NOT, obama stupid mistakes as you call it are way too many. Therefore the man is NOT qualify to be our leader and he is incompetent and a FOOL, either way he is a loser.

            The only thing obama has manage to do is add 5 Trillion to the deficit and his FAILED POLICIES has cost Americans jobs and their health insurance. Obama is a DISATOR!!!!,
            A LOSER

            He is indefensible, he is THE WORST PRESIDENT this Country ever had.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Obama's birth certificate IS authentic. And you cannot remove a president for mistakes, only for high crimes and misdemeanors. You have the right not to like him because of the deficit, and for his mistakes, but that is all.

          • Linda From NY says:

            your phony potus is not only incompetent he is also a muslim and a dictator, you need to get your head out of your AZZ and wake up!!!!

          • smrstrauss says:

            Rational people will notice that Linda has not responded to the facts. And she has made stupid and unverified claims such as Obama being a Muslim and a "dictator." Neither is true.

    • Because, duh, it is NOT a fake.

  3. MuslimLuvChrist says:

    277 courts are owned by Obama. Are there any unbiased Judges left in this country???

    • Obama and his Marxist and/or Muslim cohorts have put the FEAR OF SERIOUS RETRIBUTION into anyone/everyone who could possibly expose him.

      • Actually, the reason is much more simple. Obama' s birth certificate is not a fake, and birther "experts" simply claim that it is over and over again. And they are hardly fair and impartial, and in most cases they aren't even experts.

        One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

        Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

        And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

        Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

        Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

        John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

        Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

        Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

        Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

        And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

        Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

        And then there is the research on the Xerox WorkCentre:
        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

        • Seeks_the_truth says:

          Still trying to disprove the experts evidence that the birth certificate purported to be that of obama is indeed a fake?
          The evidence doesn't lie and all evidence says it's fake.

          • smrstrauss says:

            There is no evidence. There is only birther "experts" claiming that there is evidence. Their CLAIMS are just their way of trying to hurt Obama. IF birther sites were really interested in the truth, they would discuss the Xerox WorkCentre research (they haven't even mentioned it). And they would run the statements of the many real experts who say that Obama's birth certificate is not forged. See above.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            There is plenty of forensic evidence. You just choose to ignore it.
            The xerox hoax has been debunked. All you need to do is wait now.

            You make an off the wall claim that no 'experts' have found it to be fake.
            Do you then say Reed Hayes is not an expert? Is he only an 'expert' when arguing on obama's side but not when he states it is, without a doubt, a fake?
            Quote: " “There is something wrong with this,” Hayes had said. … In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,”

            Continue on with your 'real' experts. The REAL experts have already said it is without a doubt fake.

        • Hey…isn't this the same comment you made many months ago? I checked out all those sources and found holes in them, not to mention conflicting results. A lot of your sources have biased viewpoints and like to belittle "birthers" which, by the way are not entirely made up of Republicans. To think that "birthers" and Tea Party people are only Republicans is very narrow minded. I also looked into the issue of the Xerox machine and determined for myself that even that explanation has holes in it. For example, Obama's BC has 12 layers. If it was scanned in by a Xerox machine with the aid of OCR, it would produce multiple layers. The machine does NOT make changes to the document, such as different type faces, fonts (sometimes duplicated in different parts of the document, but not others), and other typographical errors. I've looked at the document myself and I can verify that the document in question was NOT produced by a typewriter, and my experience with image software is basic. I'm a novice and I can tell you the same thing the experts are claiming. Mind you, that's no small amount of experts saying the same thing with consistency. I could go on and on about this, but that will take forever. The fact that you keep coming up with the same sources in exactly the same sentence structure (and even some broken English) suggests to me that you're out of touch, behind the times, haven't been paying attention (and don't want to), ignore new evidences, don't bother verifying claims made on both sides of the argument, and you hate us with extreme prejudice. There's no getting through to you because you've already made up your mind (as evidence by you're constant assumption that Obama is already eligible) and you continually rationalize away the issue. Speaking of rationalizing, stop using that term. It does not mean what you think it does. "Reasonable" is the term you're looking for. But, you're copy-pasta doesn't allow for corrections so, my bad. Seriously, you're responses look so coached, one dimensional, and pre programmed. Oh, don't bother posting the wikipedia article anymore. I found out where the information came from for that article and it's just as reliable as a broken toe in a marathon.
          But, hey. If you think you've got the bombshell to stop this effort in its tracks, bring it. Come on. Birthers want answers, so give 'em. If you think you know it all, by all means put this puppy to bed without a shadow of a doubt. If you can do that, I'll drop my claim that Obama is a criminal. Mind you, you would have to prove EVERYTHING Obama has ever done was NOT a criminal act and you would also have to prove 100% that he is who he says he is. Zullo and the others have a head start on you and guess who I'm more inclined to believe right now. You?

  4. smrstrauss says:

    The claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged, by such birther "experts" as Irey, has been crushed by the research done on the Xerox WorkCentre.
    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

    • Linda From NY says:

      This is a article that I found in regards to your theory, it debunks your blog, obama’s B.C is A FRAUD!!

      “A researcher has discovered that, in some cases, Xerox scanners are altering numbers on documents. A PhD candidate at the University of Bonn posted several scans on his blog showing that numbers had been changed by the tested Xerox machines. The researcher, David Kriesel, said he used a Xerox WorkCentre machine to scan building floor plan documents in order to create PDFs. The documents contained construction drawings of rooms, each indicated by a box with a name and the area in square meters.”

      “Kriesel reported that, when he scanned the documents as TIFFs, they came out as exact replicas, but problems emerged when he used image compression on a Xerox WorkCentre 7535 and a 7556. Instead of the rooms having the original dimensions, the rooms showed some dimensions repeated erroneously.”

      • Linda From NY says:

        "Mr. Kriesel described the errors as being "a lot worse" than an optical character recognition problem. Instead, he said, "patches of the pixel data are randomly replaced in a very subtle and dangerous way." The scans look correct, Mr. Kriesel said, but the numbers may be incorrect."

        "Mr. Kriesel said the problem was compounded by the fact that it exists on different WorkCentre models, using the current software release, and Xerox appears to have been initially unaware of the issue until his report. He said he has received e-mails from other users of the same equipment and software who have encountered similar problems." He indicated that there appears to be a relationship between font size and scan dpi in that he was able to reproduce the error for PDF scans at 200 dpi without OCR, using Arial 7-point and 8-point font sizes. Xerox has recently confirmed his assessment that the problem is related to how the JBIG2 image compression works on the scanner, because it looks for similar areas to compress and reuse throughout an image. Numbers in a small font are apparently being mistaken for the same information, and are thus being reused by the compression.“

        • smrstrauss says:

          Kissel is saying that Xerox WorkCentre makes mistakes. That is what the research is all about. The "anomalies"–for example the "wrong fonts"—-are caused by Xerox WorkCenter mistakes. The product does not scan an image and create a photographic impression. It scans, divides the result into layers, pixilates when necessary, compresses the results and puts the result into a pdf file.

          Hawaii has repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama's birth certificate are identical to those on the one that they sent to him.

          And that is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father's name was Stanley (it really was, I've checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

          And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961—–and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama's mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

          Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts "MATCH."

          http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

      • Sure it is. Would you like to buy a bridge?

        Why didn't the jerk who made those claims scan floor plan documents and not a birth certificate on security paper?????

        The claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged, by such birther "experts" as Irey, has been crushed by the research done on the Xerox WorkCentre.
        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh….

        For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

        (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1971], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

        (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

        (3) got the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, she would have had to have found one of the very few women with fathers of that name to do it).

        If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

        So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

        • The above should read:

          "Why DID the jerk who made those claims scan floor plan documents and not a birth certificate on security paper????? "

    • Thank you so much for acknowledging our claim is valid. The very fact that you keep coming back and merely saying they've been debunked and proceeding to hurl insults at people heavily suggests you are on the defensive and therefor find our points valid. Do you really believe what you're telling us, or are you hoping so hard that we'll believe you? Seriously, you're like a battered housewife that comes back for more. Is this ALL you strive for? Trying so hard to convince people that Obama is eligible by belittling and putting them down? Is this ALL you have to defend this guy? If that's all, then you're really missing the big picture. In effect, you're giving this man a free pass while he strips away your freedoms and liberties. Just look at what he's doing with the power he took. Or are you blind to anything he does that is illegal, immoral, treasonous, and just plain wrong? What kind of standards are you holding here? Are you the kind of guy that sees bullies beat up on a little kid and then stand by them? Are you the guy that helps a bank robber get away? Seriously, what kind of a person are you? Why do you so zealously guard Obama? What are you getting out of it?

      • smrstrauss says:

        Nuts. I'm simply irritated by nutty claims. This one is about as stupid as the idea that the bodies of space aliens are stored in Rosewell, NM, or that the earth is flat.

        No matter how much you dislike Obama that does not make him born in another country. It simply doesn't. You have a right not to like Obama. I support your right to express your dislike of Obama. But that does not make Obama born in a foreign country.

        You have to be truly nutty to think that he was born in a foreign country. And you have to be gullible to believe birther sites——which have lied so many times in the past (for example, they blatantly lied when they said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. The tape recording shows that she said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII "where his father was studying at the time". Birther sites simply did not quote her and cut off the tape just before she was asked where he was born.) You have to be truly gullible to believe sites that lied like that.

        Obama was born in Hawaii, and the only "proof" that is birth certificate is forged are the claims of birther experts on sites that have lied and which did not run the opinions of real experts who say that Obama's birth certificate is not forged, and which have not even discussed the results of the Xerox WorkCentre research.

        • Irritated? You're losing it. I can tell just by reading your response. I remember those copy-pasta insults from your earlier posts, nearly half a year ago. That's the automated response you give when you know you're losing ground. Looks like a struck a nerve. Very well, reprobate. It's your life. But, I would strongly urge you to quit while you've got a shred of something that resembles decency.

          • Rational people will notice that the above is not a response to the facts. The fact that the facts have been said before and are repeated here does not make them any less THE FACTS.

            The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama's birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him. And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.

            THAT is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father's name was Stanley (it really was, I've checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

            And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961—–and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama's mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

            Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts "MATCH."

            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

          • Hey, reprobate. I'm over here. This is another sign that you're losing it. You talk around me rather than directly respond to me. Your appeal to anyone still possibly reading is a clear sign that you know you're losing ground. It's a move of desperation. It's a typical politician's ploy. There's no point in addressing your so-called facts because they're full of holes and big ones. Once again, your post looks pre programmed. As such, I'm calling you out as what you are: a smoke screen. This is just what Obama would do: attack the opposition, attack their evidences, attack their witnesses, attack their testimonies and ultimately lead people away from the trail. You might as well wear a yellow uniform and see if Obama will name you as Propaganda Minister, if not Council for Misdirection.

          • smrstrauss1 says:

            I do not attempt to change the minds of nuts. I post the facts for the benefit of any rational person who might be visiting this site and seeking to see the facts. Rational people will notice that Fennec did not reply to any of the facts shown above. Not one. Fennec claims that there are "holes" in the facts—but Fennec did not show any holes.

            The basic fact is simply that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate has been confirmed repeatedly by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii. Moreover, it is confirmed by the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers (which, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm) could only come from the DOH and at the time the DOH only sent birth notices to the papers for births IN Hawaii.

            Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabi

            (And as you can see the section of the paper is called “Health Bureau Statistics”. Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

            And, here is the Index Data file:
            http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04

            And, here is the statement of the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman NAMED STANLEY, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:
            http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://

          • Um, yeah you do. Why else would you keep spamming the same misinformation on a site full of people that wouldn't believe you? Why don't you just post your findings on your own website? Why do you not present your findings in a non-biased fashion rather than belittling and demeaning the people you're presenting it to? If you want people to believe you or even hear you out, you don't call them "nuts", gullible, and you don't talk about them in the third person.
            The reason I have not even attempted to address your claims that you call facts, is because I don't have to. Besides that, I did so months ago and I see no reason to bend over backward for you citing those same findings again. Additionally, you've made up your mind that any source I cite is automatically a lie to you. Again, what would be the point in going over the same dog and pony show with you all over again? You didn't acknowledge or address my findings all those months ago. Why should I do the same for you? You're just a smoke screen, remember? Your job is to waste people's time and distract them from the real issue. You don't care about these people. You want to spite them for daring to challenge Obama. For what? What should it matter to you what we think or believe? If Obama is so great, what does he need your help defending his reputation for? Time will tell whether we're right or wrong and if you're the one who's right, what do you have to worry about? Do you not have confidence? Are you not certain you are right? By all rights, you should just be able to sit back, relax, go about your routine, secure in the knowledge that Obama is infallible…unless he isn't. That's the lingering doubt you have, isn't it? If you knew you were right, you wouldn't have even bothered with this site. Nah, this is personal for you, isn't it? You feel threatened by us. This was never about the birth certificate issue. That's just something for you to latch on to. You don't really care about that. What you care about is who you can hurt. Who can you knock away at? Who's time can you waste? How can you get at the people that don't fall in line with Obama? How can you get them to itch? Your delusion has been attacked and you must fight back. That's what this is about for you. The claims, the sources, the links, they all mean nothing really. I can imagine you wont leave here with any sense of satisfaction until you get somebody to crack. Joke's on you as it appears you're the one who's losing it.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Once again. I do not try to change the minds of nuts. I simply post the facts on the chance that there may be a rational person visiting the site and desiring to see the facts.

            Here is a link to SOME (by no means all) of the documents in which the officials of the government of Hawaii (officials of BOTH parties) repeatedly confirm that Obama was born in Hawaii and that they sent birth certificates from Hawaii to Obama and that ALL the facts on the birth certificate put online by the White House are exactly the same, repeat EXACTLY the same, as on what they sent to him:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

            Here is the long form birth certificate in the photographs taken by the NBC reporter Savannah Guterie, and which she stated she had felt the seal on:
            http://www.google.com/imgres?num=10&hl=en&amp

            Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.
            http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-obama-hawaii_N.htm

            Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed.

            And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital
            http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/0

            And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:
            http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://

            Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabi

            (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

            Here is the Index Data file:
            http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04

            Re allegations of forgery. It turns out that ONLY birther "experts"—who have not shown that they are even experts, and who CERTAINLY have not shown that they are fair and impartial—have CLAIMED that there is anything wrong with Obama's birth certificate, and birther sites have not quoted the numerous real experts who say that there is nothing wrong with it. Besides, for the claim that the birth certificate being forged to have any effect, it would have had to have been forged and inserted into the Hawaii DOH files, because that is where the officials of both parties have stated that they saw it (and that document is the one that the clerk in Hawaii used to enter the facts on the form that generated the short-form birth certificate), and what are the chances of that happening? Besides, even that would not account for the teacher who wrote home or the birth notices sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.

            Hawaii is THOUSANDS of miles away from the nearest foreign country and that women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days. Oh, and by the way, Kaiploani Hospital is confirming that Obama was born there (want to see the two citations of that?) and Obama's Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii and she said in another interview that the first that her family had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter from Hawaii.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            After your very eloquent reply, smrstrauss STILL posts the same old dry 'talking points'.
            And people wonder what has happened to America.
            SMH

          • smrstrauss says:

            Rational people will notice that Seeks_the_truth has not responded to the facts. (Their being "dry" does not make them any less the facts.)

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            I find it hilarious that when obot sheeple lose the debate they resort to the 'rational people' shift when it's rational people who follow and believe the evidence.
            We've seen the liberals redefining of 'common sense' and 'fair share'. Seems they wish to redefine 'rational' to mean ignore the facts, believe what you're told.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Rational people will notice that Seeks_the_truth did not reply to the facts above.

          • Rational people know that the reason Seeks_the_truth did not reply to smrstrauss above is because "You can lead a horse [Obot] to water [truth] but you can't make it drink [see]"

          • smrstrauss says:

            Rational people will also notice that RacerJim ALSO did not respond to the facts above.

            Okay, here is another chance for Seeks_the_truth or RacerJim to respond to the facts. What do you bet that they don't?

            For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

            (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1971], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

            (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

            (3) got the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, she would have had to have found one of the very few women with fathers of that name to do it).

            If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

            So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Since there are mainly, in your opinion ONLY, 'irrational' people on a site with facts, what are you doing here spouting your obot sheeple talking points?

            We continually show how wrong you are but you refuse to accept facts.

          • smrstrauss says:

            "Mainly" does not mean "only" so there is always a chance that a rational person will visit this site. If one of them is reading this, she or he will notice that Seeks_the_truth did not reply to the question above.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            ;-) Obot sheeple are fun at times aren't they?

          • smrstrauss says:

            Rational people will notice that Seeks_the_truth has not responded to the facts.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Rational people already know the birth certificate is a fake.

            Rational people will notice that smrstrauss continues to do nothing more but repeating the same old talking points and not offer any proof that contradicts the evidence that the birth certificate they claim is of barack obama is a forgery.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Although the facts are old that, duh, does not make them any less the facts. The are still the facts, and if you want to disprove them you have to show that they are false—-and Seeks_the_truth has not even tried to do that.

            Seeks_the_truth simply claims that Obama's birth certificate is "a fake." But the "birth certificate is forged" story is not believed by such conservatives as Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review, and not a single member of Congress has called for hearings claiming that Obama's BC is forged.

            Birthers simply have recruited a group of people who hate Obama and are willing to lie about the birth certificate in an attempt to harm him. But, since birther sites have lied so many times in the past (In particular about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said—-she NEVER said that Obama was born in Kenya. Birther sites simply claimed that she did, despite her having said repeatedly that he was born in Hawaii "where his father was studying at the time).

            So why believe the birther "experts"—who are equally biased to the birther sites?

            Especially since birther sites have not shown all the many experts who say that the birth certificate is not forged, and have not been able to respond to this:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            http://youtu.be/yuSvFoPNLA0 http://youtu.be/yft0kz_fbnA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLrWI3vQ7Kc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35rnliYemWU http://youtu.be/alVzyfptF80

            Law Enforcement officials evidence of a forgery.
            Supply the same caliper evidence. That is, evidence that the birth certificate is real as per a Law Enforcement official or equal.
            http://www.worldtribune.com/wp-content/uploads/20
            A legally binding document admitted into evidence in a court case.

            Provide the same caliper of evidence showing the birth certificate is real by an affidavit submitted to a court of law or equal.

            When you can't provide the requested evidence, it shows all you have are theories and opinions.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Re "law enforcement officials." You mean Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse:
            http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/con

            Re allegations of forgery:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

            Re belief in the crazy notion that Obama was born outside the USA:
            http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/paul-ryan-

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Must be some fantasy world you live in when you start trying to communicate in a third person.
            You have YET to supply the facts.
            Please supply ANY facts that I could reasonably respond to.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Re: "Please supply ANY facts that I could reasonably respond to. "

            First, you have not responded to this yet:

            For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

            (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1971], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

            (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

            (3) got the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, she would have had to have found one of the very few women with fathers of that name to do it).

            If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

            So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

            Then:

            The evidence for Obama being born in Hawaii is:

            (1) the two Hawaii birth certificates (of which the first, the short form, is the official birth certificate, used by thousands of people to get their passports every year);

            (2) the repeated confirmations of them by the officials of both parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor;

            (3) the public Index Data file;

            (4) the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (which, BTW, was under a REPUBLICAN governor in 1961, and which at the time sent out birth notices ONLY for children born in Hawaii);

            (5) the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley;

            (6) Kapiolani Hospital has confirmed that Obama was born there now—twice in fact (naturally birther sites do not show either of them);

            (7) no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961;

            (8) it was rare for 18-year-olds to have passports or for women to travel abroad late in pregnancy at the time;

            (9) the Kenyan government said that it investigated and that Obama certainly was NOT born there (birther sites did not show that either);

            (10) birther sites LIED about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said (she never said that he was born in Kenya; she in fact said that he was born in HAWAII;

            (11) Birther sites having lied about what Obama's grandmother said, and other things too, makes it highly likely that their "document experts" are lying too—and numerous real document experts say that the birth certificate is not forged, and that is confirmed by the evidence of the Xerox WorkCentre (which shows how that product scans documents and compresses them using layers and pixillaton).

  5. Barrack Hussein Obama is an imposter in the USA. impeach him now before he sell us to another country. he is telling the people in the USA all false statements in affordable care act, when are the democrats going to wake up and smell the roses as they must be sleeping when he talks.DEMOCRATS YOU ARE GOING TO SEVERLY HURT YOUR CHILDREN, RELATIVES, & EVERY ONE WHO VOTED FOR YOU & YOUR SELF READ IN BETWEEN HIS LINES DON'T EXPECT PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR YOU NEXT TIME!!!

    • smrstrauss says:

      You have every right to recommend that the US Congress impeach, but so far the House of Representatives hasn't even held hearings on the subject—and conviction would take a two-thirds vote of the US Senate, and if it were done (which is highly unlikely), then Joe Biden would take over as president.

      Obama is, by the way, not an imposter. He really was born in Hawaii as his birth certificate (short form and long form) and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties, and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 all show.

  6. the only ones that believe it's not a fake are the dumocats. an a lot of them know but want say it

    • The only ones who believe that Obama's birth certificate is forged are a few birther nuts. Not one single member of the US Congress (535 members) voted against Obama's confirmation either after the 2008 or the 2012 elections. ALL of them, more than 1,000 counting both confirmations, neither believed that Obama was born in Hawaii nor believed that two citizen parents are required in order to be a Natural Born Citizen—and that includes Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann.

      Here is Paul Ryan's reaction to the birther lunacy:
      http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/paul-ryan-

      And it is even more crazy to think that Obama's birth certificate is forged despite the evidence that he was born in Hawaii, and that evidence is overwhelming.

      The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama's birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him. And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.

      THAT is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father's name was Stanley (it really was, I've checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

      And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961—–and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama's mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy—and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

      Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts "MATCH."

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

      • AND birther sites have lied many times in the past (for example when they said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that Obama was born in Kenya—-when the tape recording shows that she said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII "where his father was studying at the time"), and their "experts" are simply lying as well. They have lied in their claim that the pdf scan would not show layers—when that is how pdf works. And they have not shown all the real experts who say that Obamas' birth certificate is not forged:

        Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

        Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

        John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

        Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

        Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

        Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

        Nor have the birther sites discussed the research on the Xerox WorkCentre:
        http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-sh

      • Seeks_the_truth says:

        Still trying to pass the obot lies off as some kind of fact I see.

        The only GULLIBLE one is people like you that take the word of the liar at face value. Does it scare you now that the whole world has now caught him in his web of lies?

        You still have yet to explain two pieces of forensic evidence.

        How did obama apply for, and be awarded, a Fulbright Foundation Scholarship when these scholarships are for an EXCHANGE program? (i.e. must be American student attending a foreign school or a FOREIGN student attending an American school)
        Reed Hayes, the expert that was on the obama defense council, states evidence shows the birth certificate to be a fake. Not only just a fake, but a woefully BAD fake.

        Have you found just ONE classmate that admits to attending class with obama in Occidental OR Columbia yet? Didn't think you could.

        All evidence shows it's fake. You just continue to buy the lies coming out of the WH.
        Where is your evidence disproving these facts?

        • smrstrauss1 says:

          Rational people will notice that seeks_the_truth has not responded to any of the facts shown above.

          Fulbright scholarships are available ONLY to graduate students. Foreign or US, regardless, ONLY graduate students. And Obama was an undergraduate at the time.

          Re Columbia. Supposing that I could not find one or two students who attended class with Obama. That would not make him not attend Columbia. It would only show that I was not able to find it. So, how do we know that Obama attended Columbia??? Because, duh, Columbia University confirmed that Obama attended and graduated from Columbia College. In fact, it did so twice.

          However, I have found two people who stated that they attended Columbia with Obama. First, his roommate.

          "The next day he moved into the apartment with fellow Occidental College transfer Phil Boerner. Boerner, who remained Obama's friend throughout his college years, describes the apartment as a third story walkup with a railroad layout and a missing doorbell. It had a walkthrough layout, and Boerner had to walk through Obama's room to get to his own. The heating frequently failed, one of the reasons Obama wound up spending so much time in Butler Library. At other times, the two roommates read their books under blankets. Their hot water was also irregular, and they often made use of the Columbia gym showers. They frequently hosted guests from their Occidental days, and Obama was reportedly a gracious host, doing grocery shopping and making chicken curry (which he'd learned to cook from Pakistani friend Sohale Siddiqi).[3][4]"
          http://www.wikicu.com/Obama

          And:

          "Obama's professors and classmates, including former international politics professor Michael Baron and current MTV president Michael Wolf,"

          Same citation as above.

          Seeks_the_truth has attempted to show that the experts cited above are wrong and that Obama's birth certificate is forged based on the CLAIM that Obama received a Fulbright Scholarship (which is false) and the CLAIM that students at Columbia do not recall Obama attending (which also is false and what is even more false is the implication that Obama did not attend Columbia College because, as stated, Columbia University has confirmed that Obama did attend and did graduate twice—-of course, a few nuts may believe that Columbia, which has long had Republicans on its board of trustees, is lying. But then, they are nuts ).

          The facts continue to show that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that the officials of BOTH parties have confirmed that fact (and so does the Index Data and the birth notices). And the birther claims that Obama's birth certificate is forged are disproved by the Xerox WorkCentre research cited above, that Seeks_the_truth did not even attempt to discuss.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            Rational people believe the OVERWHELMING evidence that shows the birth certificate purported to be that of barack obama is indeed a fake.

            Only obot sheeple are the ones trying their hardest to continue with the lie that has found sunlight.

            Rational people see you have YET to offer any VALID evidence to the contrary. A newspaper article is not valid evidence. Neither is wikipedia.
            The MAJORITY of Americans KNOW obama is NOT a native born citizen and is therefore usurping the office of President.

            Follow the evidence is all one needs to do to see the facts. The fact that obama has perpetrated the biggest lie on America in it's history.

            And anyone with BASIC computer skills sees through the xerox hoax and has no basis with facts. The xerox hoax is a THEORY. MUCH different than a fact.
            In the first lines it states they DID NOT use the ORIGINAL download off WH.gov. This means any results they have does not pertain to the document in question.

          • smrstrauss says:

            Seeks_the_truth CLAIMS that anyone with basic computer skills can "see through the xerox 'hoak'." But in fact Seeks_the_truth has not written a word that disproves it. Not a word.

            Only birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

            One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

            Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

            And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

            Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

          • Seeks_the_truth says:

            smrstrauss likes to PRETEND that the forensic evidence proving the birth certificate purported to be that of barack obama has been debunked but has YET to supply ANY tangible evidence of such.
            All that smrstrauss does is spout standard talking points and supply unproven THEORIES and opinions.

            The obama regime has YET to supply any expert witnesses that can attest the birth certificate is real.
            The obama regime has YET to show there is a valid birth certificate on file in Hawaii. In fact, it has been proven there is NO VALID birth certificate on file for obama in Hawaii.

            Ones like smrstrauss are nothing more than obot sheeple that do nothing more than scream racism, bigotry and hate because they KNOW the birth certificate is a fake and they have NO evidence to show otherwise.
            They can't defend against the truth so out comes the tired worn race card.

            These idiots want you to believe that a newspaper article is a LEGAL form of identification. They want you to believe that experts in the field really aren't 'experts', even though they were considered experts when they were on the defense.

            Law Enforcement officials, Congresspeople, experts in the computer/programming/software have come out in mass and stated there is NO DOUBT the document is not ONLY fake, but is an EXTREMELY BAD fake.

            Even Hawaii State Registrar Onaka has REFUSED to verify the BC is a “true and accurate representation of the original record in your files”.
            Most ALL experts in the field of forensic document examiners all AGREE that the birth certificate claimed to be that of obama IS a FAKE.

            The expert Reed Hayes, a highly touted forensic document examiner, in an extensive and scathing forty page report on Obama’s birth certificate stated:
            "…Based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources. In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated."

            Even one of obama's own ATTORNEY has stated that the document is NOT evidence of either Mr. Obama’s identity or place of birth.
            "Judge Masin also asked Obama’s attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate, agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama’s place of birth and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding his place of birth."

            Obot sheeple also try to use the indefensible diversion by claiming that 'no 18 year old women had a passport during that time.' when Stanley Dunham did in FACT have one. They also try to divert the attention that Stanley Dunham came from an 'affluent' family and was an unmarried White woman impregnated by a Black married man during a time of great racial animosity. Her family would do anything in an attempt to hide this fact.
            In fact, it was the parents of Stanley that placed the much touted 'birth announcement' in the local paper with THEIR address. Stanley did not even live at the address listed on the announcement.

            No one can answer how obama applied for, and RECEIVED the Fulbright Foundation Exchange student Scholarship.

            All a rational, intelligent person needs to do is follow the evidence. If they do, they can come to no other conclusion but the birth certificate presented as that of barack obama is a forgery. That even the Selective Service card presented is a fake.
            That obama has NOT supplied the American people ANY evidence of his legal standing to be POTUS.

            Obot sheeple are so shamed for being so gullible they refuse to accept the facts and must continue to ignore the truth.

            It is the biggest HOAX ever perpetrated on the American public in our history. 70% of America wants the obama 'administration' to come clean. http://www.westernjournalism.com/document-expert-http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/obama-attohttp://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborho

          • smrstrauss says:

            Those are birther sites, birther sites LIE.

            Only birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

            One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

            Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

            And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

            Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

            Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

            John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

            Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

            Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

            Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

            And it is irrational (to say the least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

            Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.

            Obama did not receive a Fulbright. That is simply another lying birther CLAIM. Fulbright scholarships are, BTW, ONLY for graduate students.
            http://www.iie.org/fulbright

          • smrstrauss says:

            Here is a link to SOME (by no means all) of the documents in which the officials of the government of Hawaii (officials of BOTH parties) repeatedly confirm that Obama was born in Hawaii and that they sent birth certificates from Hawaii to Obama and that ALL the facts on the birth certificate put online by the White House are exactly the same, repeat EXACTLY the same, as on what they sent to him:
            http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-

            Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.
            http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-07-27-ob

            Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed.

            And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital
            http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/0

            And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:
            http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://

            Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabi

            (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

            Here is the Index Data file:
            http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04

            Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
            http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabi

            (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

Speak Your Mind

*