The Left’s Orwellian Censorship Campaign

George Orwell 2 SC The Left’s Orwellian Censorship Campaign

Liberal theologian William Ellery Channing once observed, “The cry has been that when war is declared, all opposition should be hushed. A sentiment more unworthy of a free country could hardly be propagated.”

War has indeed been declared. Channing’s contemporary liberal counterparts have declared a war for our culture. But while Channing presumably held to the oft-bandied supposition that “dissent is the highest form of patriotism,” today’s secular-progressive has no choice but to endeavor that “all opposition should be hushed.”

Liberals recognize that when arguing on the merits, they cannot prevail. Not only are their morally relative, redistributionist philosophies untenable and utopian, but they read the same polls demonstrating that reasonable people reject their ideas outright. In fact, Americans identify as conservative over liberal by a two-to-one margin. Even those who call themselves “moderate” lean conservative.

It makes sense. The “progressive” movement wars against natural law, pushes perpetually failed secular-socialist policies, and places — above constitutionally safeguarded individual liberty — thickheaded tenets of postmodern political correctness. Liberal elites demand tolerance for all things perverse and find intolerable all things righteous.

And so, the final, desperate act of the left-wing, lemon-hocking charlatan is to marginalize, smear, and ultimately shut down the competition. As a result, liberals obfuscate, propagandize, and strive to silence all dissent. They no longer even try to hide it.

The evidence of this calculated assault on free speech is overwhelming, but the most recent and high-profile examples include carefully orchestrated campaigns by three well-funded, interconnected, George Soros-linked organizations: Media Matters for America (MMFA); the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC); and the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD).

After years of trying to censor the conservative voice of Rush Limbaugh, for instance, the George Soros-funded Media Matters recently pulled out all the stops to get him booted from the airwaves.

The pretext was Limbaugh’s unfortunate word choice in describing Georgetown “reproductive justice” radical Sandra Fluke’s attempt to compel the Jesuit university to violate its own Catholic doctrine. Democrats held a mock hearing in the Capitol building wherein Fluke demanded that Georgetown underwrite her admitted fornication practices and fork out free birth control. Limbaugh said this made her sound like a “sl*t” and a “prostitute.”

The hard-left Media Matters pounced, rolling out a pre-packaged campaign against Limbaugh. It has targeted radio stations with ads and continues a floundering crusade to get Limbaugh’s radio sponsors to drop him. Ironically, this has resulted in a revenue increase for Limbaugh, and his already millions-strong listening audience has grown significantly.

Another example of this Orwellian censorship crusade involves the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center, an outfit that, until recent years, was viewed as a relatively credible civil rights organization. Unfortunately, the SPLC has now cashed in most of its remaining political capital, taking the same cynical path as its fellow travelers over at Media Matters. The SPLC too has become little more than a mouthpiece for left-wing extremism.

In a “too cute by half” attempt to marginalize those who observe the traditional Judeo-Christian sexual ethic, or who embrace a constitutionalist view of government, the SPLC has moved from monitoring actual hate groups like the KKK and Neo-Nazis to slandering mainstream Christian and tea party organizations with that very same “SPLC-certified hate group” label. Indeed, in its promotional materials and on its website, the SPLC indiscriminately lumps well-respected, highly influential Christian organizations like the Family Research Council and the American Family Association together with domestic terrorist and white supremacist groups.

But the SPLC’s transparent guilt-by-false-association ploy has largely backfired. Whereas the strategy was intended to discourage media outlets from engaging these Christian groups, the scheme has, instead, had the unintended effect of significantly marginalizing the SPLC. You can only cry wolf so many times before people ignore you.

Finally, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) has picked up where the SPLC left off. This radical homosexual pressure group recently ramped up its tried-and-true practice of employing the very outrage it purports to oppose: defamation.

One of the left’s favorite pejoratives is “McCarthyism,” yet liberals employ it — as they mean it — masterfully. In an effort to strong-arm mainstream media outlets — already sympathetic to their cause — into blacklisting, once and for all, conservative and Christian professionals who oppose liberal sexual identity politics, GLAAD has issued an enemies list of 36 top pro-family leaders and luminaries (a list upon which yours truly is most honored and humbled to be included).

Engaging a scheme eerily reminiscent of the former Soviet Union, GLAAD’s euphemistically and paradoxically tagged “Commentator Accountability Project” enlists fellow progressives to dutifully report on a designated website anytime a pundit identified on the blacklist appears in media.

Because “hate is not an expert opinion,” GLAAD then takes the reports and browbeats the offending media outlet into disengaging the “inappropriate” conservative pundit.

As feeble justification for its censorship efforts, GLAAD provides a list of out-of-context, cherry-picked quotes — some accurate, some not — the organization finds offensive. This is paint-by-numbers, Saul Alinsky style: Rule 12, “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.”

In their manuscript, “After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ’90s” (1989, Doubleday/Bantam), Harvard-educated marketing experts Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen meticulously laid out GLAAD’s approach — something they called “jamming.”

“Jamming” refers to the public smearing of Christians, traditionalists or anyone else who opposes left-wing sexual identity politics. “Jam homo-hatred [i.e., the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic] by linking it to Nazi horror,” wrote Kirk and Madsen (sound familiar, SPLC?). They go on to suggest that activists should try to associate all who oppose homosexuality with images of “Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered,” “hysterical backwoods preachers,” “menacing punks,” and “Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.’”

“In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector,” they wrote. “The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable.”

George Orwell famously said: “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” Today, conservative truth tellers are revolutionaries, fighting a guerilla war against an elitist establishment that blankets free speech with bunker-buster bombs.

Their motives are disgraceful, their tactics are cowardly, and their actions are un-American. But these things rank high among the progressive “book of virtues.”

Paraphrasing Voltaire, British author Evelyn Beatrice Hall wrote, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

It’s little wonder that today’s progressives reject this noble sentiment. The success of the left-wing socio-political agenda relies upon deliberate suppression of the reality-based conservative alternative.

Such is life for the pamphleteer of bad ideas.

Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves as Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action (LCA on Facebook).

Photo credit: Think-N-Evolve (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. The Left’s Vicious Smear Campaign Against Clarence Thomas Turns 20 by Floyd and Mary Beth Brown Twenty years ago this…
  2. Citizen Groups Organize To End “Soft Censorship,” Guarantee Freedom Of Expression Today Latin American governments rarely exercise direct censorship of the…

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. Is the United States Government is Attempting to legalize

  2. This woman tells the truth about muslims & Barack Hussein Obama
    aka Barry Soetoro.

  3. So you think your kid is talented!
    You ain't seen nothing yet. :-)

  4. Betsy K. Larsen says:

    Changing our history, this has been going on for ages now, along with our concepts of right and wrong. Long ago my mother told me that this would one day happen, and when it did, to remember what I had been taught. Right will always be right, and wrong will also be just as wrong as it has down through history. They can rewrite all they want of our history, but what was, was, and no wording in any books on earth can change the facts of what was. Slavery WAS. The word N…… was used, and to try to change it is a fools errand. The books Tom Sawyer, and Huck Finn were wrote about a white boy and his friend, N…..Jim. That was what WAS, and how they spoke in those days, and to try to make it “politically correct” as if the word never existed is so stupid that it is beyond stupid! Yet, we have these same “black” fools calling one another by this name that they want abolished from a couple of books. Now, tell me how much sense this makes!!! By doing this, these fools are doing exactly as Orwell said, “obliterating their understanding of themselves”. How can anyone ever move forward, when these fools want to stay both in the past, and keep it in the future, by screaming of an injustice from so long ago? Jesse Jackson says that “blacks are under attack”. If they are indeed “under attack”, then it is by their own hands, and not the whites of this nation. However, if they insist on continuing in this self destructive behavior, then they will be under attack in a very real sense of the word, for white people are sick and tired of their constant whining, and complaining of “how badly” they are treated everywhere, by everyone. Back us into a corner, keep your sickening behavior up, and pretty soon, an attack will happen, for what choice will any of us have but to retaliate? No one in their right minds feels the least sympathy for a one of them, and those who do feel any at all, may soon lose what little they do have. It will be then that what they have brought upon themselves will be exactly what this idiot Jackson said, “black people under attack”. And the general public has allowed this to happen by their lack of gumption and laziness. People of America have fallen prey to this “silver tounged devil” and his agenda, to divide and conquer us all, whites and blacks alike! Destroy us by lulling us into forgetting histoy, even that as such a short a time as September 11, 2001! If we allow this, then all those who caused this will sit back in their comfortable offices and homes, and laugh at how utterly stupid the American people are! Are we really that stupid? Right now, I’d have to say that yes, we truly are! And to allow ourselves to be so divided over this race issue is quite the stupidest of all, for how many died in the first Civil War? How many will die for another Civil War, which WILL come to America soon, if we do not unite and stand as one people, Americans, all of us, not just white, or just black! Either race, and we are still Americans! Or, are we? Have we forgotten that much history, and lost so many morals that we are no longer what we were even just 10 short years ago? Wise up people, or we are truly doomed to a future that is not something any of us would wish upon our children, or grandchildren and certianly, not upon ourselves!!

Speak Your Mind