Obama: The Lester Maddox of Gay Marriage

Ben Johnson, The White House Watch

Although he has grown Washington more than any president in a generation, Barack Obama is talking like a Jeffersonian states rights champion — in the one night, in the one state, on the one issue that would promote his top-down rejection of traditional morality. As Barack Obama prepares to attend a sold out, $1,250-per-plate campaign fundraiser before a large homosexual group in New York (the “Gala with the Gay Community”), the state legislature in Albany seems poised to pass a bill approving same-sex marriage. Some speculate this evening Obama will endorse marriage destruction. But Obama’s handlers are rolling out a new and, for him, novel tactic: wrap himself in states rights. An unnamed White House official told The Huffington Post, “Although the president believes that this is an issue best addressed by the states, he also firmly believes that committed gay and lesbian couples should receive equal protection under the law.” (Emphasis added.)

(Update: Here’s video of the speech. Obama has done precisely as I reported. Story continues following the video.)

At last, Barack Obama has discovered states rights, which constitutes a significant act of rhetorical hypocrisy even by his standards. Obama’s left-wing allies have equated a belief in the Founders’ view of government with “racism” and derided those who believe in states’ rights as “Tenthers.”

The Obama administration is suing Indiana on behalf of Planned Parenthood, since that state prohibited tax dollars from funding abortion providers. The showdown could cost the state $4.3 billion. Obama not only sued but hauled the state of Arizona before the UN Human Rights Council over its immigration law. He sent 400 federal agents to harass poll watchers enforcing state election laws during the 2010 midterms. (It didn’t help, much.) His National Labor Relations Board is suing (see a trend?) Boeing, because it planned to build one plant in South Carolina, a state that has chosen to adopt “Right to Work” laws. ObamaCare marks his largest legislative trampling of states rights. Now that Republicans control the House, Obama is increasingly ruling by executive fiat.

But allow a blue state to consider redefining the fundamental building block of society, and suddenly Barack Obama is the Lester Maddox of gay marriage. (Both constituencies have significant experience bicycling backwards.)

The move is a down payment on the debt Obama owes this voting bloc. The LGBT lobby has been a pillar of his re-election fundraising. As 2012 draws closer, Obama has hinted his views on same-sex marriage will “evolve.” White House spokesman Jay Carney followed this line when pressed for clarification on Monday. Obama “was very clear in the campaign,” when he claimed to oppose it, Carney said. “He’s very clear about the fact that his position is evolving.”

For those who are confused, Obama’s position on same-sex marriage is simple….

Read more.

The Leadership Lie

Michael Oberndorf, FloydReports.com

The liars in the Ministry of Propaganda, aka, the “mainstream” media, have long been aware that if you tell a lie often enough, people will come to believe it. Concomitantly, a working premise for them is that a lie is as good as the truth, if you can get people to believe it.

A word these congenital liars constantly use that should immediately raise huge red flags in voters’ minds, when applied to politicians, is “leader.”

For years, the leftist propagandists have pushed the false notion that those elected to government are our leaders, instead of the public servants the Constitution intended. The fundamental premise that our republic was built upon is that government derives its authority, and only exists, through consent of the governed. Thus, those who physically make up the government – individuals elected, appointed, or hired – are there not to tell us, the citizens, what we must do, but the exact opposite. They are not there to lead us, but to follow our wishes as to what we believe are our best interests, and to act accordingly.

This is not to say that we are to micromanage every issue by voting on a referendum. That is pure democracy, which is really no more than mob rule, and it eventually leads to totalitarian dictatorship. To the contrary, in a republic we are supposed to elect people whom we trust to be intelligent enough to listen to us, their constituents, and then use their judgment as to how best to accomplish our goals. They are intended to act as our representatives.

That government officials are our “leaders” is a leftist, statist, totalitarian concept that assumes all rights are granted by the State. This denies our founding principle that certain rights, codified in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, are granted by God, and cannot – I repeat, cannot – be taken from us by government. Thus, those whom we have given permission to act….

Read more.

A Ground-Up Strategy for Tea Party Victory

Michael Oberndorf, FloydReports.com

As a conservative, I am appalled by the “leadership” of the Republican Party. In spite of voters’ crystal-clear message in the last elections, which only the willfully blind could miss, they are charging ahead with Business as Usual. For all his tough conservative talk, Sun-tan Boehner might as well be a Democrat when it comes to action. Socialist ObamaCare and the Democrat’s addiction to borrowing and spending have nothing to fear, at least as far as Boehner and the Establishment Republicans in the House are concerned. Only about 50 of them are standing up against raising the debt ceiling. The rest just bleat a bit for the hometown papers, and then follow along.

“The Revolution is over, and so as not to inconvenience anyone, nothing has been changed.”

The simple truth is the federal government – elected, appointed, and hired – is no longer a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” They are not taking their marching orders from the electorate but from big-money special interests like environmentalists, unions, globalist multinational corporations, and billionaire globalist neo-fascists like George Soros. More and more, they look to the UN and foreign countries rather than the Constitution for guidance….

Read more.

Montana Leads the Way to Liberty

Suzanne Eovaldi, FloydReports.com

Montana, America’s last best hope, is looking to legislate three common sense initiatives that will point the entire country in the right direction. America as a whole has strayed from the Constitution and our Founding Fathers’ vision of government, and this state is showing the way back. With its Democratic governor and two Democratic U.S. senators, Montana’s Republican legislature plans to introduce a broad state nullification act that will block any federal law Montanans consider unconstitutional.

House Bill No. 382, sponsored by Rep. Derek Skees, is known as “An act prohibiting infringement of the state of Montana’s constitutional right to nullification of any federal statute, mandate, or executive order considered unconstitutional by the state.” The bill provides a retroactive date for its application.

This bill is being championed by Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (ret.), a Bigfork native. The general heads up the Patriots Union, which has distributed this bill as a model to 30 state legislatures through a large, patriotic network of conservatives.

Montana Bill No. 382 is based on the format of the Model State Nullification Reaffirmation Act of Wyoming.

Not content to restore the Tenth Amendment, Montana’s state legislature is also deliberating about the constitutional definition of “a well-regulated militia”….

Read more.

Governors Must Refuse to Implement ObamaCare

Michael F. Cannon, Cato Institute

So far, two Republican governors — Florida’s Rick Scott and Alaska’s Sean Parnell — have announced they will implement no part of ObamaCare. In the interest of both principle and practicality, the other 48 governors should follow their lead.

Governors are understandably confused about their obligations under ObamaCare. When federal Judge Roger Vinson declared last month in Florida v. HHS that the entire law was unconstitutional, he apparently wasn’t clear enough about what his ruling meant.

Vinson granted “declaratory relief” to the plaintiffs, who include 26 states, the National Federation of Independent Business (which represents small businesses) and two individual citizens. Though he did not issue a formal injunction forbidding the federal government to implement or enforce the law, Vinson wrote that declaratory relief is the “functional” and “practical equivalent” of an injunction. Declaratory relief, Vinson wrote, “is adequate and separate injunctive relief is not necessary.”

The Obama administration disagrees, and last week asked Vinson, essentially, “Didn’t you really mean that we can keep implementing and enforcing the law while we appeal your ruling?”

We may not learn Vinson’s answer for weeks, and even then ObamaCare’s legal status won’t be resolved until it reaches the Supreme Court a year or more from today. Yet governors have to decide what to do right now.

Choosing the right course of action is simple for governors who believe ObamaCare is unconstitutional. Every governor takes an oath to support the U.S. Constitution. Implementing a law they believe to be unconstitutional would violate that oath.

At a minimum, then, governors who believe ObamaCare is unconstitutional have a solemn obligation not to implement it. Parnell wisely sought counsel from his attorney general about whether implementing ObamaCare would violate his oath of office. But if Parnell personally believes the law is unconstitutional, then that should tell him what he needs to know.

Swearing an oath to support the Constitution also obligates governors to use lawful means to prevent its unlawful abuse. Governors who believe ObamaCare to be unconstitutional are as duty-bound to stop implementing the law as they are to challenge it in court.

Read more.