Former CIA Director Just Named This ‘Big Threat’ That Could ‘Paralyze’ America

According to recent comments by Barry Royden, who previously headed the CIA’s counterintelligence division, there is an often-neglected and difficult-to-prevent threat poised to bring the U.S. to its knees.

In a warning published by Business Insider among other media outlets, Royden elaborated on the potentially catastrophic implications of a cyberattack against America. First of all, he said, the dependence we have on technology makes the effects of such an attack unavoidable.

“The trouble is,” he said, “it’s extremely difficult – in fact, it’s impossible. Everyone is connected to everyone; and as long as you’re connected, you’re vulnerable.”

Even firewalls designed to shield against such attacks are not impervious, he warned, explaining the lingering threat constitutes a “nightmare” scenario.

“You have to think that other governments have the capability to bring down the main computer systems in this country: power grids, hospitals, or banking systems – things that could cause great economic upheaval and paralyze the country.”

The mutually assured destruction that nations involved in cyberattacks would face, Royden noted, “would almost be like a nuclear standoff.”

While traditional forms of terrorism remain high on the list of concerns for millions of Americans, Royden’s warning was one of several in recent days pointing out more infrequently discussed – but similarly destructive – threats.

As Western Journalism reported, two Republican candidates – Ben Carson and Mike Huckabee – have voiced concerns about the potential devastation associated with an electromagnetic pulse attack. Several nations hostile toward the U.S. have already expressed a desire to launch such an attack; and, as Carson explained, civilization could likewise be destroyed “naturally” by an overdue electromagnetic pulse emanating from the sun.

h/t: The Blaze

Do threats like a cyberattack or EMP concern you? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Police Militarization Is More Than Tanks And Rifles: It’s A Cultural Disease

“If we’re training cops as soldiers, giving them equipment like soldiers, dressing them up as soldiers, when are they going to pick up the mentality of soldiers? If you look at the police department, their creed is to protect and to serve. A soldier’s mission is to engage his enemy in close combat and kill him. Do we want police officers to have that mentality? Of course not.”— Arthur Rizer, former civilian police officer and member of the military

Talk about poor timing. Then again, perhaps it’s brilliant timing.

Only now—after the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security (DHS), and Defense have passed off billions of dollars worth of military equipment to local police forces, after police agencies have been trained in the fine art of war, after SWAT team raids have swelled in number to more than 80,000 a year, after it has become second nature for local police to look and act like soldiers, after communities have become acclimated to the presence of militarized police patrolling their streets, after Americans have been taught compliance at the end of a police gun or taser, after lower income neighborhoods have been transformed into war zones, after hundreds if not thousands of unarmed Americans have lost their lives at the hands of police who shoot first and ask questions later, after a whole generation of young Americans has learned to march in lockstep with the government’s dictates—only now does President Obama lift a hand to limit the number of military weapons being passed along to local police departments.

Not all, mind you, just some.

Talk about too little, too late.

Months after the White House defended a federal program that distributed $18 billion worth of military equipment to local police, Obama has announced that he will ban the federal government from providing local police departments with tracked armored vehicles, weaponized aircraft and vehicles, bayonets, grenade launchers, camouflage uniforms, and large-caliber firearms.

Obama also indicated that less heavy-duty equipment (armored vehicles, tactical vehicles, riot gear, and specialized firearms and ammunition) will reportedly be subject to more regulations such as local government approval, and police being required to undergo more training and collect data on the equipment’s use. Perhaps hoping to sweeten the deal, the Obama administration is also offering $163 million in taxpayer-funded grants to “incentivize police departments to adopt the report’s recommendations.”

While this is a grossly overdue first step of sorts, it is nevertheless a first step from an administration that has been utterly complicit in accelerating the transformation of America’s police forces into extensions of the military. Indeed, as investigative journalist Radley Balko points out, while the Obama administration has said all the right things about the need to scale back on a battlefield mindset, it has done all the wrong things to perpetuate the problem:

  • distributed equipment designed for use on the battlefield to local police departments,
  • provided private grants to communities to incentivize SWAT team raids,
  • redefined “community policing” to reflect aggressive police tactics and funding a nationwide COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services) program that has contributed to dramatic rise in SWAT teams,
  • encouraged the distribution of DHS anti-terror grants and the growth of “contractors that now cater to police agencies looking to cash DHS checks in exchange for battle-grade gear,”
  • ramped up the use of military-style raids to crack down on immigration laws and target “medical marijuana growers, shops, and dispensaries in states that have legalized the drug,”
  • defended as “reasonable” aggressive, militaristic police tactics in cases where police raided a guitar shop in defense of an obscure environmental law, raided a home looking for a woman who had defaulted on her student loans, and terrorized young children during a raid on the wrong house based on a mistaken license plate,
  • and ushered in an era of outright highway robbery in which asset forfeiture laws have been used to swindle Americans out of cash, cars, houses, or other property that government agents can “accuse” of being connected to a crime.

It remains to be seen whether this overture on Obama’s part, coming in the midst of heightened tensions between the nation’s police forces and the populace they’re supposed to protect, opens the door to actual reform or is merely a political gambit to appease the masses, all the while further acclimating the populace to life in a police state.

Certainly, on its face, it does nothing to ease the misery of the police state that has been foisted upon us. In fact, Obama’s belated gesture of concern does little to roll back the deadly menace of overzealous police agencies corrupted by money, power, and institutional immunity. And it certainly fails to recognize the terrible toll that has been inflicted on our communities, our fragile ecosystem of a democracy, and our freedoms as a result of the government’s determination to bring the war home.

Will the young black man guilty of nothing more than running away from brutish police officers be any safer in the wake of Obama’s edict? It’s unlikely.

Will the old man reaching for his cane have a lesser chance of being shot? It’s doubtful.

Will the little girl asleep under her princess blanket live to see adulthood when a SWAT team crashes through her door? I wouldn’t count on it.

It’s a safe bet that our little worlds will be no safer following Obama’s pronouncement and the release of his “Task Force on 21st Century Policing” report. In fact, there is a very good chance that life in the American police state will become even more perilous.

Among the report’s 50-page list of recommendations is a call for more police officer boots on the ground, training for police “on the importance of de-escalation of force,” and “positive non-enforcement activities” in high-crime communities to promote trust in the police such as sending an ice cream truck across the city.

Curiously, nowhere in the entire 120-page report is there a mention of the Fourth Amendment, which demands that the government respect citizen privacy and bodily integrity. The Constitution is referenced once, in the Appendix, in relation to Obama’s authority as president. And while the word “constitutional” is used 15 times within the body of the report, its use provides little assurance that the Obama administration actually understands the clear prohibitions against government overreach as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

For instance, in the section of the report on the use of technology and social media, the report notes: “Though all constitutional guidelines must be maintained in the performance of law enforcement duties, the legal framework (warrants, etc.) should continue to protect law enforcement access to data obtained from cell phones, social media, GPS, and other sources, allowing officers to detect, prevent, or respond to crime.”

Translation: as I document in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the new face of policing in America is about to shift from waging its war on the American people using primarily the weapons of the battlefield to the evermore-sophisticated technology of the battlefield where government surveillance of our everyday activities will be even more invasive.

This emphasis on technology, surveillance, and social media is nothing new. In much the same way the federal government used taxpayer-funded grants to “gift” local police agencies with military weapons and equipment, it is also funding the distribution of technology aimed at making it easier for police to monitor, track, and spy on Americans. For instance, license plate readers, stingray devices, and fusion centers are all funded by grants from the DHS. Funding for drones at the state and local levels also comes from the federal government, which in turn accesses the data acquired by the drones for its own uses.

If you’re noticing a pattern here, it is one in which the federal government is not merely transforming local police agencies into extensions of itself but is in fact federalizing them, turning them into a national police force that answers not to “we the people” but to the Commander in Chief. Yet the American police force is not supposed to be a branch of the military, nor is it a private security force for the reigning political faction. It is supposed to be an aggregation of the countless local civilian units that exist for a sole purpose: to serve and protect the citizens of each and every American community.

So where does that leave us?

There’s certainly no harm in embarking on a national dialogue on the dangers of militarized police, but if that’s all it amounts to—words that sound good on paper and in the press but do little to actually respect our rights and restore our freedoms—then we’re just playing at politics with no intention of actually bringing about reform.

Despite the Obama Administration’s lofty claims of wanting to “ensure that public safety becomes more than the absence of crime, that it must also include the presence of justice,” this is the reality we must contend with right now:

Americans still have no real protection against police abuse. Americans still have no right to self-defense in the face of SWAT teams mistakenly crashing through our doors, or police officers who shoot faster than they can reason. Americans are still no longer innocent until proven guilty. Americans still don’t have a right to private property. Americans are still powerless in the face of militarized police. Americans still don’t have a right to bodily integrity. Americans still don’t have a right to the expectation of privacy. Americans are still being acclimated to a police state through the steady use and sight of military drills domestically, a heavy militarized police presence in public places and in the schools, and a taxpayer-funded propaganda campaign aimed at reassuring the public that the police are our “friends.” And to top it all off, Americans still can’t rely on the courts, Congress, or the White House to mete out justice when our rights are violated by police.

To sum it all up: the problems we’re grappling with have been building for more than 40 years. They’re not going to go away overnight, and they certainly will not be resolved by a report that instructs the police to simply adopt different tactics to accomplish the same results—i.e., maintain the government’s power, control, and wealth at all costs.

This is the sad reality of life in the American police state.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Ben Carson Reveals Little-Known Threat That Could Cripple America

Of the many security threats that could potentially affect the U.S. in the near future, an electromagnetic pulse attack is one with a vocal and growing group of concerned citizens sounding the warning bell.

At least one Republican presidential candidate, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, has raised awareness of the technology-driven threat. Shortly after announcing his intention to seek the GOP nomination, Huckabee described an EMP attack as an event that “could fry the entire electrical grid and take this country back to the Stone Age in a matter of minutes.”

Another early contender vying for the Republican nod in 2016 subsequently addressed the issue of EMPs in a recent speech. [Scroll down for video footage from that speech.]

Explaining such strikes can occur “naturally or intentionally,” Dr. Ben Carson noted that the negative effects of an electromagnetic pulse might not come from an enemy nation but from the sun.

He cited scientific studies showing an EMP emanating from the sun occurs roughly every 150 years, with the solar system currently about five years overdue for the next one. While this is one distinct possibility, Carson also acknowledged several countries are already exploring the possibility of such an attack.

“There have been mentions from North Korea, China and Russia,” he said, “about using such techniques; so, I mean, it’s not out of the questions. And what could happen, particularly with an electric grid that is outdated, that is not protected?”

As the Washington Examiner reported earlier this year, Iran has also engaged in a plot to attack the U.S. with an electromagnetic pulse. An English translation of a clandestine Iranian military guide reportedly recommends an EMP strike, prompting other U.S. officials to recommend proactive measures to deal with such a threat.

Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney referred to the threat as “increasingly frightening” and something that must be addressed immediately.

Does the possibility of an EMP attack concern you? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Breaking: Largest Automobile Recall In History Just Announced, Brands Named

Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx announced today the largest and “most complex” auto recall in United States history.

The recall involves the Takata Corporation, which is the manufacturer of air bags for Honda and Toyota automobiles. The number affected by the recall has nearly doubled from 18 million to 34 million vehicles.

Fox News reports that the company was being fined $14,000 a day since late February, which now amounts to $1.2 million.

The defect that has been identified by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) involves the propellant canister used to inflate front and side airbags. Rather than simply releasing gas into the airbags, in some instances the canister has exploded, sending metal shrapnel into the passenger compartment.

Police responding to accident scenes have described those who have sustained injuries as appearing to have been shot or stabbed. At least five fatalities and 100 injuries have been tied to the faulty airbags, according to CNN Money and Fox News.

“From the very beginning, our goal has been simple: a safe air bag in every vehicle,” said NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind. “The steps we’re taking today represent significant progress toward that goal. We all know that there is more work to do, for NHTSA, for the auto makers, for parts suppliers, and for consumers. But we are determined to get to our goal as rapidly as possible.”

The Department has established a new website, www.SaferCar.gov/RecallsSpotlight, to provide regular updates on the status of this and other recalls and of NHTSA’s investigation.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

What This Hacker Claims He Did To An Airplane With Just His Laptop Is Alarming

Image for representational purposes only.

A search warrant issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) says that cybersecurity professional Chris Roberts told an agent he was able to control an airplane engine from his seat by gaining access to the computer system.

According to BBC News, the document asserts that Roberts, of One World Labs, was able to make the plane “climb” and “move sideways” with his laptop while seated. Roberts tweeted the following ahead of the flight:

05182015_Chris Roberts Flight Tweet_Twitter

IFE stands for “In Flight Entertainment.”

Wired Magazine gives the details of what happened after Roberts took a United flight from Chicago to Syracuse last month:

The Feds were waiting when Roberts landed in Syracuse. As passengers stood in the aisle to deplane, a flight attendant instructed everyone to take their seats. Two Syracuse police officers and two FBI agents boarded the plane. Before they even looked at him, Roberts knew they were after him. ‘Shall I get my luggage?,’ he asked.

He spent the next four hours in an airport conference room on the business end of an interrogation. Before he left, agents seized his company-issued laptop, backup disks and other electronics without a warrant.

When Roberts attempted to board another United flight to San Francisco days later, he was barred by the airline and had to book a flight with Southwest.

Roberts is now being represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). The FBI noted that Roberts “exploited” IFEs in airplanes between 2011 and 2014.

Wired Magazine noted that due to the incident, both the FBI and the TSA have issued warnings to passengers:

  • Report any suspicious activity involving travelers connecting unknown cables or wires to the IFE system or unusual parts of the airplane seat.
  • Report any evidence of suspicious behavior following a flight, such as IFE systems that show evidence of tampering or the forced removal of covers to network connection ports.
  • Report any evidence of suspicious behavior concerning aviation wireless signals, including social media messages with threatening references to Onboard Network Systems, ADS-B, ACARS, and Air Traffic Control networks.
  • Review network logs from aircraft to ensure any suspicious activity, such as network scanning or intrusion attempts, is captured for further analysis.

“Over the last 5 years my only interest has been to improve aircraft security…given the current situation I’ve been advised against saying much,” Roberts tweeted Saturday.

Still, Roberts has a sense of humor about the incident, retweeting the following photos:

05182015_Barrel Roll Tweet_Twitter

05182015_Chris Roberts Flight Tweet 1_Twitter 05182015_Roberts Retweet 1_Twitter
What do you think about this? Share your thoughts in the comments section.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth