The Third And Final Phase Of Islam: ‘Islam As The Civilization Alternative’

The third and final phase of Islam involves widespread violence against the non-Muslim world Muhammad called “dar al-harb” (House of War). Under Islamic totalitarianism, world peace, “Dar el- Salam,” is achieved once every country is Shari’a-ruled.

The third phase of Islam is evidenced by dramatically increased attacks on non-Muslims, widespread massacres, and ongoing militia warfare when Muslims represent roughly 40 percent of a population. Reaching 60 percent, persecution of non-Muslims becomes constant. At around 80 percent, all non-Muslims are driven out of their homes and country through oppressive and unceasing violence.

This phase mirrors Chapter 9 in the Qur’an, which Muslim scholars believe is its final or nearly final revealed chapter. Chapter 9 abrogates the longer, earlier “peaceful” passages of the Qur’an, mirroring Muhammad’s actions in Medina when he initiated military raids and sieges. Muhammad biographer Ibn Ishaq, in Sira of Ibn Ishaq, describes a litany of violent acts committed by Muhammad and his followers.

In verse 5, known as the “Verse of the Sword,” Muhammad commands Muslims to proactively fight everyone who rejects Islam, to “slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive)…” The Yusufali translation clarifies, “fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war).”

In 9:29, Muhammad instructs:

Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger [Muhammad] have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth [Islam], out of those [Christians and Jews] who have been give the Book [the Bible], until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of [Muslim] superiority and they [Christians and Jews] are in a state of subjection [dhimmitude, third-class legal status].

In the third phase, Muslims are neither oppressed nor attacked. Their mission is to follow Muhammad’s example and instructions. Muhammad claimed he was “ordered [by Allah] to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped other than Allah…” (“la ilaha illallah,” Sahih al-Bukhari 6924). He ordered Muslims to “fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah…” (Sahih Muslim 30).

Well-known and respected Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir best explains this phase: “Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizyah, they should be fought till they are killed.”

Phase three is evidenced by the murder of more than 3,000 Americans on American soil in more than 75 terrorist attacks over the last 40 years. And Jews are the most targeted victims of hate crimes in America.

Muhammad describes Christians and Jews as “unjust,” the “worst of creatures” who will “dwell in Hell-Fire” (5:51; 9:30). Muhammad declared, “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim” (Sahih Muslim 4366).

In order to stop all three phases of Islam in America, the efforts of the Muslim Brotherhood and their affiliated organizations must be exposed and terminated. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood Memorandum, “General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” outlines its “long-term plan” for America. In it, Mohamed Akram (Mohamed Adlouni) writes:

For the] enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and a stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic State wherever it is. (emphasis added)

Highlights of the memo reveal Islamic reasoning:

“…the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry out [sic] this grand mission as a ‘Civilization Jihadist’ responsibility” (pg 5).

“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”

“[W]e must possess a mastery of the art of ‘coalitions’, the art of ‘absorption’ and the principles of ‘cooperation’” (pg 7).

The Memorandum lists organizations operating in America (pg 18, including CAIR, ISNA, and ICNA) representing both Shi’a and Sunni Muslims committed to following the Qur’an and creating Islam as a “civilization alternative.” These organizations must be closed and their members tried for treason.

It is a Muslim’s duty to transform all governments to Shari’a law. Muslims who follow the Qur’an reject the very principles, rights, and laws protected by the U.S. Constitution. Belgian leader Abu Imran explains: “democracy is the opposite of Islam. A Muslim who supports democracy is equivalent to a Jewish Muslim. It’s impossible to be both Jewish and Muslim and impossible to be a Muslim against Shari’a.”

World peace according to Islam, “Dar el- Salam,” is achieved once all non-Muslims convert or die. The ultimate goal of Islamic totalitarianism is achieved first by Muslims pretending to be peaceful, then by subjugating and killing all non-Muslims.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

The Subversive Second Phase of Islam: Lawfare And Shari’a Compliance

Recognizing the second of the three phases of Islam is critical for concerned American citizens to stop the ongoing subversive expansion of Islamic and totalitarian ideology throughout America.

All phases of Islam evidence regulation of religious, political, legal, and social norms, through judicial, militia, and/or military means under Shari’a law.

In phase two, the shorter chapters located towards the back of the Qur’an supersede the earlier transcribed texts, according to the Islamic doctrine of abrogation. They parallel the time in Muhammad’s life when he formed alliances with groups outside of Mecca and began fighting non-believers who rejected Islam (22:39,40).

Mirroring this time in Muhammad’s life, these texts apply to Muslims who have become or are becoming a majority in a neighborhood, city, or region. They outline the groundwork necessary to develop a totalitarian political system that eliminates a country’s existing laws.

This second phase is often referred to as “defensive Jihad” or “civilization jihad,” implemented once a Muslim population reaches between 10 and 20 percent.

One predominant approach of defensive Jihad is legal. Muslims seek to de-legitimize existing laws, redefine legal terms related to human rights, and silence and punish free speech through “lawfare.” Threats increase against non-Muslims via lawsuits and dissemination of false and/or misinformation.

For example, Dearborn, Mich., “protesters” assert that their “civil rights” justify stoning Christians. Muslim communities argue their “civil rights” enable them to use their own de facto legal system (Islamic tribunals) instead of state law. Muslims successfully and intentionally censor media coverage while promoting shari’a on public school property—without consequence due to intimidation, legal threats, and blatant discrimination.

The ultimate goal is to eliminate constitutionally protected rights under the guise of “Shari’a compliance.”

The Center for Security Policy reported earlier this year that in 32 states, 146 cases existed where litigants sought to resolve a dispute applying Shari’a law instead of state law. Previously, in 2011, it discovered that in 23 states, American courts applied Shari’a law to rulings that infringed the constitutional rights of women and/or children.

Last month, Michigan’s Taylor City Council unanimously approved a resolution supporting a campaign for shari’a under the guise of “hate based on religion.” Last year, Michigan’s transit authority, SMART, banned “Leaving Islam?” bus ads designed to help Muslim girls (American citizens) who are threatened and killed—on American soil— according to Shari’a apostasy and blasphemy laws.

Eliminating constitutional rights extends to the public school classroom. Under the guise of “world religions,” Common Core teaches Islam, violating at a minimum the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Taxpayers fund “Arabic Immersion” for public schools, teaching even kindergarteners in Arabic 50 percent of the time and about “Middle Eastern culture.”

Likewise, Jew hatred on American college campuses is actively encouraged, as is the teaching of Islamic ideology in Gulen Charter Schools, both funded by taxpayers.

The results of “defensive Jihad” perverting American law are devastating:

  • Increased honor killings of young girls by their fathers are occurring (girls are killed for being “too American” or for refusing to participate in arranged marriages)
  • Beheading coworkers for rejecting Islam is becoming more common, as is
  • Attacking soldiers on military bases because they meet the Qur’an’s “mischief-making” criterion; and
  • “Asylum seekers” justify bombing marathon runners to prove a point; or
  • Children are punished and shamed for opposing being taught Islam in school.

This legal approach is only one of many efforts to infiltrate and transform every area of society with Islamic ideology. Phase two involves:

Phase two clarifies a simple fact: Islamic political ideology encompasses every area of life rooted in Shari’a—for the worse. Shari’a demands totalitarianism, which only offers two choices: comply or die.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Phase One Of The Three Phases Of Islam: Tolerance And Taqqiya

It’s important for concerned American citizens to understand that Islam, which means “submission,” is not a religion. It is a totalitarian ideology that exists in three phases, all of which exist in 2015 America.

The definition of tyranny is “a political system in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.”

Islam, like totalitarianism, incorporates a complete system of life, integrating religious, political, legal, and social norms, regulated and implemented by judicial, militia, and/or military oversight, rooted in the teachings of the Qur’an, which means “recitation.”

The basis for legal and moral guidance, second only to the Qur’an, is the Sunnah, which outlines a system of obligations derived from the Hadith. The Hadith are canonical volumes of recorded traditions and sayings of Muhammad. Islamic scholars also reference within this framework the widely respected Sira of Ibn Ishaq, the earliest and most comprehensive biography of Muhammad.

Muslims consider the Qur’an to be the literal words of their god Allah (Sura 76:34) communicated by Muhammad, his prophet, to a scribe who later penned them to paper. The chapters are not categorized by topic, but its textual chronology parallels each phase of Islam.

Most important to understanding the Qur’an is the Islamic doctrine of abrogation (2:97, 106; 16:101, 102). Abrogation refers to a verse, sign, or miracle (“ayah” sing./“ayat” plr.) that supercedes another text with “appropriate or legal authority.” Verses transcribed later overrule previously transcribed verses.

The Qur’an’s longer passages towards the front of the book generally represent the “sacred” first phase of Islam, reflecting the earlier part of Muhammad’s adult life. Muhammad first introduced Islam in 610 AD to people living in Mecca and its surrounding regions who worshipped over 350 gods. They had never heard of Allah, didn’t believe Muhammad, and ran him out of Mecca after failing to kill him.

The first phase incorporates assertions of tolerance and peace to a society that may tolerate Islam while also not embracing or rejecting it. The longer, earlier texts in the Qur’an specifically apply to Muslims who emigrate and live as a minority in a new country. These “peaceful” or “moderate” Muslims generally equate to less than or roughly 5 percent of the population.

Despite their smaller population’s size, Muslims will still assert disproportionate changes, first through demands, then threats. Minority populations demand that food banks and food stamps be halal, that offensive bacon signs be removed, or that a pig farmer living on his own private property move elsewhere to “cleanse the land.”

While asserting disproportionate changes, Muslims also will communicate messages of “tolerance” (“You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion” (109:6), “there is no compulsion in religion” (2:256)), fully aware of their minority status similar to Muhammad’s when he lived in Mecca.

It’s essential to understand that those who claim Islam is peaceful are either practicing taqqiyaQur’an sanctioned deceit (3:185)–or are afraid. Muhammad’s companion, Abu Ad-Darda, said, “we can smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”

Fear is due to the known punishment for apostasy and blasphemy under Shari’a law. Harvard Chaplain Taha Abdul-Basser and Ground Zero’s Imam Abdallah Adhami clarify the necessity for the death penalty and imprisonment, respectively, for those who leave Islam. (“Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him” (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, Book 84, No. 57; punishment for rejecting Islam is death including crucifixion and dismemberment “wage war against Allah and his apostle and strive to make mischief in the land” (2:191, 5:32,33; 9:5, 123, 29)).

Over time, and several generations later, Muslims gentrify neighborhoods legally as citizens but still view themselves and their new society as foreign, philosophically rejecting the West’s definition of citizenship.

In phase one, Muslims follow the Qur’an texts applicable to their minority status living in their particular socio-political environment.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Gay Mafia Targets Christian Pastors, Ignores Muslim Imams Calling For Their Death

In 2015 America, a remnant of faithful Christian pastors, not imams, are being targeted by gay activists. No Christian pastor I know has ever proclaimed or financially supported the beheading of anyone, let alone gays.

The “Gay Mafia,” as Bill Maher calls them, are like fools flouting their own folly. They impose standards (that they don’t follow) solely on Christians through discriminatory legal measures— but completely ignore imams who advocate their death.

No gays are protesting, subpoenaing, or demanding that Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) be arrested, tried, or deported. He asserts:

Homosexuality is a moral disorder. It is a moral disease, a sin and corruption… No person is born homosexual, just like no one is born a thief, a liar or murderer. People acquire these evil habits due to a lack of proper guidance and education.

There are many reasons why it is forbidden in Islam. Homosexuality is dangerous for the health of the individuals and for the society. It is a main cause of one of the most harmful and fatal diseases … It is the most un-natural way of life. Homosexuality leads to the destruction of family life.

Gay activists aren’t protesting ISNA, an organization directly linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and recently lauded by former president Jimmy Carter.

Muslims who follow the Qur’an understand its words as literal, from Allah. The Qur’an states that those who act on same-sex attraction and behavior make a “god (ilah) of there own lusts,” reject Allah’s will, and practice “wickedness” (Qur’an 26.165-166; 27.055; 29.028-29).

There is no such thing as a gay Muslim. Nor is there any public acceptance for the gay lifestyle in any Muslim majority country—or in any Muslim neighborhood or no-go zone in a Muslim minority country.

According to Shar’ia law, the sodomizer and the sodomized both deserve death. Likewise, the rules and punishment for zina (adultery) are applied to lesbians—death for married, lashes for unmarried.

It is common knowledge throughout the Muslim world that no one can be gay and follow Allah. It is also widely acknowledged that the “people of the book,” Jews and Christians—whose laws actually seek to safeguard human rights—must be killed.

Yet, no gays are protesting, subpoenaing, or asserting the arrest, for example, of Imam Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi of Memphis, Tenn., who publicly asserts: “Jews and Christians are filthy; their lives and property can be taken in jihad by the Muslims.”

Anyone who believes they are immune from the outworking of Islamic ideology does not understand it. Qadhi asserts, according to the Qur’an, that everyone–not only in America, but worldwide– “must bear witness that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah”; and because of this “principle of monotheism … the prophet has been commanded to do jihad.”

Likewise, Brooklyn, N.Y., Imam Tareq Yousef Al-Masri recently declared at the Oulel-Albab mosque: “We, the Muslims … the Muslims of the religious sector are time bombs.”

These imams are not alone.

According to the Mapping Sharia Project, 51 percent of mosques in America had “texts that either advocated the use of violence in the pursuit of a Shari’a-based political order or advocated violent jihad; another 30 percent had texts that were moderately supportive of violence.” Distribution of anti-Western literature, videos, and textbooks is documented, as are the Islamic centers that operate as front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Imam advocacy for the extermination of non-Muslims has existed in America for decades; yet these imams have not been deported, let alone investigated by the IRS or any other government organization for their alleged constitutional violations.

In 1999, Naqshbandi Sufi Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani testified in front of the State Department that eighty percent of mosques in America had “extremist leaders.” In 2006, Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom exposed widespread dissemination of hate ideology in literature and sermons by mosques nationwide. And in 2007, during the Holy Land Foundation trial, perhaps one of the most important documents discovered—the Muslim Brotherhood’s manifesto—revealed its “General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” to destroy it from within.

Gays’ civil rights, human rights, or even lives for that matter are irrelevant to imams. If gays want to live, they should consider redirecting their vitriol toward imams who preach their death, and toward a silent—yet active—political and legal system perpetuating and enabling treasonous hate speech to their detriment.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

REUTERS: Local Bill On Muslim Tribunal In Texas Stirs Sentiments

According to Reuters, Muslims were unhappy when the city of Irving, Texas, codified their support of a bill in the Texas legislature that proposes to bar the implementation or application of any foreign laws on citizens in the state of Texas.

Some Muslins interviewed by reporters argued that ‘Muslims are not seeking to implement or change U.S. laws in favor of Sharia-Islamic law.’ However, if those statements by Muslims are true, then why are Muslims so unhappy about this bill, which is in agreement with these ‘statements’? It seems that Muslims are simply following the instructions in the Quran, where it instructs followers that it’s OK to lie to the infidels (unbelievers) in order to further the Islamic religion (a form of soft Jihad).

One Muslim attorney asserts that Muslims have instituted the Islamic Tribunal in order to prevent needless expense in divorce actions and family law. I think that any such tribunal (notice there are no women on the Tribunal) that seeks to skirt the legal protections for women under State family law is outrageous–and typifies the foundational thinking that forms the underpinnings of the Islamic Theocracy.

It is very well-known that women under Sharia (Islamic Law) are treated as inferior to men. In fact, women in many Muslim countries are treated in ways that are illegal in America for animals. And thus, any tribunal that seeks to firewall Muslim women from their rights as American citizens flies in the face of the fact that equality for men and women is the law–American law. Women who have come to America to gain equality of rights and freedoms should never be exposed to the injustice of Sharia law while in America, let alone anywhere else. And Muslim men who seek to continue the oppression of women must be taken to task under American law for the violation of women’s rights.

As an American, I am insulted when foreigners come to America, practically begging to get in, and then, once they are comfortable here, want to impose the ways of their former countries on all Americans in America.

Regardless of what Muslim apologetics (who are instructed to lie to non-believers by their Koran) claim, many Muslims seem to be guilty of doing this in every country that they immigrate into. Over many decades, America provided its legal immigrants with the same protections and rights that all other Americans enjoy, including the right to practice any chosen religion. Islam is not a religion; it is in fact a socialist Theocracy.

For more than a century, America has been a safe haven for immigrants who are desperate for the economic opportunities, freedoms, and rights that have long made America a place of opportunity and refuge for immigrants. Many immigrants coming to America are looking to escape the injustices of foreign governments, despots, and ‘their’ laws, or lack thereof. This includes Persians (and former Muslims) who have become American citizens and who intentionally escaped the barbarisms of Islamic law (Sharia) when they left their former countries. The last thing they need now is to have that barbaric Sharia law follow them to America like an evil stalker to their place of refuge.

Muslims (and other immigrants) need to understand at least this much: if America is so much better than their former countries, the ones ‘they’ left, then why would any immigrant want to try to make America like the place they couldn’t wait to leave?

American citizens are not interested in having their freedoms and rights subverted by any foreign laws, especially Sharia law, which treats women and girls like they are the property of men. Muslim men who come to America need to be alerted to the fact that women are equal with men under American laws, and they have all the same rights as men–which is in stark contrast to how women are treated under Islamic laws (Sharia).

Muslims who come to America need to do one of two things; accept the American way of life and its laws, or go back to where they came from–and there, they can have all the Sharia Law they want. Sharia Law is not American law, nor will it ever become even part of American law; Americans will not suffer a disparity in law or equality among any of its People. America has fought long and hard to put down ‘rulers’ and governments who abuse the rights of people, and Sharia law is an affront to all that America stands for. Sharia law stems from the intolerance of the Islamic Theocracy, which demeans and tortures women and girls and enslaves people to one religion, Islam.

The Muslim community in Irving, Texas, (and elsewhere in America) needs to make a decision: do they want to be Americans or someone else? Americans all observe Federal and State Laws, not Islamic-Sharia Law. If Muslims came to America to be something other than Americans, then they don’t belong here and should go back to a country of their choice–where they can be subject to Islamic-Sharia or some other law, or lawlessness.

The Mayor of Irving, Texas, and the legislative body there have done the correct thing in making it crystal clear that Islamic-Sharia law will not be tolerated in Texas, or in America.

Maybe if someone made Muslim men wear burkas in the heat of the day, prohibit them from driving a car, forced them to submit to being beaten for disobedience, or cut parts of their genitals off, maybe such men wouldn’t be so enthusiastic about establishing Islamic-Sharia law anywhere in the world (just a thought).

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom