Disturbing: Online Ad Requires Job Seekers Carry Out Shariah Law By Doing THIS

Image for representational purposes only.

It is all-too-well-known by now that a favorite way for radical Islamists to show the world just how barbaric and determined they are to spread terror and death is to post videos of beheadings — shocking executions of captives conducted in the name of Allah. According to Islamic Shariah law, beheading is a preferred way of carrying out a death sentence in the Muslim world.

Still, it might strike many as gruesome that a country such as Saudi Arabia would, in this day and age, routinely order the beheading of convicts when capital punishment is their sentence. And now, it seems, there’s a shortage of qualified executioners in the Middle Eastern nation that, as The New York Times reports, went ahead with its 85th such execution this year just this past Sunday — putting to death a man convicted of a drug offense.

Job seekers in Saudi Arabia who have a strong constitution and endorse strict Islamic law might consider new opportunities carrying out public beheadings and amputating the hands of convicted thieves.

If Wikipedia is accurate, crimes for which public beheading may be the punishment in Saudi Arabia include:
– Murder
– Apostacy
– Blasphemy
– Idolatry
– Homosexuality
– Sedition
– Witchcraft and sorcery
– Adultery
– Drug use/trafficking

The Times article points out that the Saudi Ministry of Civil Service posted eight job openings for professional “swordsmen,” so to speak, who might face a heavy workload as more and more people are sentenced to die in the public squares of various cities around the country.

Thirty-eight of this year’s executions, including the one on Sunday, were for drug-related crimes with no allegations of violence, according to Adam Coogle, a researcher with Human Rights Watch.

According to coverage in The Guardian of the online solicitation for executioners, Saudi Arabia may be scheduling more beheadings in the upcoming months due to “a tough response by the judiciary to regional turbulence.”

The Islamic kingdom is in the top five countries in the world for putting people to death, rights groups say. It ranked third in 2014, after China and Iran, and ahead of Iraq and the United States, according to Amnesty International figures.

In case you’re wondering about the status of government executioners in Saudi Arabia, The Guardian report notes that — in the online application for the eight positions — “the jobs were classified as ‘religious functionaries’ and…they would be at the lower end of the civil service pay scale.”

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Uncovered: The Untold Story Of Garland, Texas, And Media Tolerance of Gender Violence

Two separate but related events held at the Independent School District’s Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas, evidence media coverage that selectively expresses tolerance of sexism, gender violence, and hate crimes.

The Center first hosted on January 17th Sound Vision Foundation’s Stand with the Prophet, which it stated was more than an event. It was “a movement to defend the Prophet Muhammad, his person, and his message,” directly responding to the murder of 16 people, mostly Charlie Hedbo satirists, in Paris.

The Center next hosted on May 3 the American Freedom Defense Initiative’s (AFDI) Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest, which paid tribute to Charlie Hedbo satirists. It also responded to Sound Vision’s event, which in coordination with the Council on Islamic Relations (CAIR) was part of a greater effort advocating Shari’a compliance thoughout American laws.

The Dallas Morning News, and many news organizations, described AFDI’s May 3 contest as “anti-Islam.” However, I can’t recall news organizations labeling Charlie Hedbo “anti-Islam.”

Despite Charlie Hedbo’s and AFDI’s efforts to expose Shari’a law, reporters and public figures criticized and blamed AFDI and its founder, Pamela Geller, for the Islamic gunmen’s acts. I can’t recall these same news organizations and public figures blaming Charlie Hedbo satirists for their own murders.

Coverage of the January 17th event focused on “Islamaphobic” protestors “picketing an Islamic conference.” Yet most reporters never mentioned the speakers who have publicly affirmed “killing as an essential element of Islam” and have known ties to terrorism.

To be “anti-Islam” and “anti-Shari’a” is to reject submission to Allah and the legislation outlined in the Qur’an. There is nothing bigoted, racist, or personal in rejecting a political ideology that opposes the U.S. Constitution. Even the European Court on Human Rights has ruled more than once that Sharia law is “incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.”

By labeling people “anti-Islam” are reporters supporting Islamic ideology, Shari’a law, which legalizes wife-abuse, child marriage, FGM, and honor killings, and Jew-hatred?

This type of reporting also promotes a culture that normalizes gender violence, which ranges from sexism to blaming the victim for her abuser’s crime. For example, instead of reporting on Shari’a law in Irving, Texas, Dallas Morning News reporter Alvi Selk asked its mayor, Beth Van Duyne, bizarre and sexist questions about her child custody arrangements and her boyfriend, and how she “balances work life, family life, and life in general.” I can’t recall any reporter in my lifetime asking a male politician how he “balances” fatherhood and life and public duties, or to disclose his child custody terms. Attempting to shame women, not men, is only one of many stigmas with which women in public positions must deal.

If women’s rights were an issue, reporters might cover abuse of women and girls permitted by Shari’a. The Times of London first exposed and helped bring to justice a pedophile ring hidden by city officials and police for 16 years. News organizations also played a helpful role in Scandinavian and Western European countries grappling with near-bankrupted budgets largely due to welfare and crime costs associated with Shari’a compliant communities.

Reporters could also write about good news occurring worldwide. Christians are outpouring love towards Muslims from Chapel Hill to Upsalla, bringing healing to the voiceless and oppressed.

Instead, by blaming Geller, a Jewish woman, for the failed hate crimes committed by Islamic gunmen on May 3, the media only reinforces well-known stigmas associated with “Battered Wife Syndrome.” Blaming the victim for the offender’s crime and making excuses for the offender hurts vulnerable women and girls who, unlike Geller, have no resources or voice to defend themselves.

I asked questions after the January 17th Culwell Center event to feminists and human rights groups, which still remain unanswered.

Are there any other feminists and human rights advocates like Geller who are demanding that women and girls in America be protected from Shari’a law? Why is there silence about Shari’a, which legalizes:

  • Fathers killing their daughters or forcing them into child marriage,
  • Imams marrying girls – even for one hour– to men, which American criminal laws define as sex trafficking, prostitution, and pedophilia,
  • Husbands beating and raping their wives,
  • A woman’s legal right to equate to only half of a man’s legal right,
  • Discrimination, punishment, and death based on sexual and religious orientation?

By ignoring these facts and blaming Geller, the media enables and permits—even ensures—that hate crimes will increasingly occur and victims’ voices remain silent.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Top 5 Ways Liberals Are Already Submitting To Sharia Law

Here’s the deal: Sharia law doesn’t work in the US. Period. The end. In fact, Sharia law stands in direct opposition to the Constitution in many areas. Strike that, most areas.

Yet, for some reason, liberals have decided we need to cower at the tenents of Islam as though we believe in and support them. Let’s not be provocative! We must not upset the (false) Prophet! Seriously, how on earth did our society reach a point where we’re more upset about people drawing cartoons than the fact that two terrorists tried to murder them for doing so?

How far down the slope will we go? At what point will leftists say, “Oh my goodness! Free, American women are an affront to Islam! Ladies, break out the burkas!”?

Our cowering is dangerous. It’s anti-freedom. It’s un-American. And it needs to stop.

For starters, here are 5 tenants of Islam that liberals in the US are already subjecting us to, which need to end. Now.

1.  Thou shalt not draw Muhammadyour name’s Michelangelo? WHO CARES? Drawing the prophet is against the rules. Rules is rules. Liberals would have us believe that not offending Muhammad is more important than your American right to free speech. Jerks. Who kills people over a cartoon, anyway? And if your imaginary moon-god is offended at a picture… he sounds like a hissy-fit prone, drama queen. You probably need to find a new one.


2.  Thou shalt sympathize with terroristsyou may not be able to personally give them 72 virgins, but you will put their faces on the front of your magazines; and you will mourn the deaths of those who try to kill you! That’s for real! I believe that practicing terrorists deserve the business end of an M16. Leftists believe they deserve counseling.


3.  Thou shalt not be friends with Israelsilly Americans! The Jewish people have no rights – not to a homeland, not to anything! Israel is the great Satan and must be destroyed! Yet again, the media couldn’t be more incorrect. Not only is Israel our strongest ally as Americans, but it’s the only ally to human rights in the middle east. (And its Prime Minister should always be welcome in the White House.)


4.  Thou shalt not use the word “Christian”we are killing infidels. Prisoners. Stop trying to make this religious! Allahu Akbar! Uhm, helllllllo? Anybody home? CHRISTIAN men, women, and children are being raped, kidnapped, and murdered all across the Middle East in the name of Islam… because they are Christians. Jesus loves you, this you know? Muslims kill you because the Qur’an tells them so. We’re just not allowed to talk about it.


5.  Thou shalt not use the words “terror” and “Islam” in the same sentenceit’s a religion of peace, you infidel! Now convert, or off with your head! There’s a consistent theme liberals are constantly trying to shove down our throats: Christians are evil because of crusades, and you offend me. Muslims are awesome because peace and terrorists… YOU BIGOT! The second you try to equate the teachings of Islam with the actions of Islamic extremists, you’re instantly dubbed a racist, intolerant hate-monger. Stop it, liberals. Maybe you should actually compare the teachings of Muhammad himself… with the teachings of Jesus. Then we’ll talk. Whassup, Islam?


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

5 Reasons The Qur’an Can Never ‘Coexist’ With The Constitution… Ever

In case you were wondering about that “peaceful religion” thing… or why having Sharia courts here in the US is a bad idea…we’re here to help. Despite what bumper stickers tell you, The Qur’an stands in direct opposition to the Constitution. The two can never co-exist.

See? Simple.

Sharia law doesn’t work here because we already have our own rules for living – and they’ve worked out pretty well for us the last 200+ years. They work so well, in fact, America stands as a world superpower – despite our flaws and sometimes petty infighting, there are quite a few reasons why the US remains the beacon of hope for the world… while Middle Eastern countries living under Sharia keep, uhm, beheading people, abusing women, and live in an overall squalor that only Islam seems to be able to so consistently produce.

So here’s your list. Top 5 reasons the Qur’an stands in direct opposition to the Constitution:

1.  It disallows free speech. First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law… abridging freedom of speech.” Qur’an: “Allah likes not the uttering of unseemly speech in public, except on the part of one who is being wronged…” (4:49) And, free speech expressed in the form of cartoons of Muhammad is a very, very bad idea. Unless you want to… you know.


2.  Women are to be second-class citizens. Nineteenth Amendment: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” Not only do many Sharia-adhering countries not allow women to vote; they also don’t allow them to drive, or be educated, or hold government offices. War on women, maybe? To quote the Qur’an: “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.  (Sura 2:282). If you’ve got a strong stomach, check out this lengthy list of anti-woman verses from the Qur’an. Muhammad wasn’t too kind to the ladies…


3.  The Qur’an allows for violence against one’s fellow man, if he’s not a Muslim. The preamble to the US Constitution makes it kinda clear what we’re going for in this country: “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty…”  Domestic tranquility. Common defense. General welfare. Contrast that with the Qur’an: “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” (8:12)  Yikes.


4.  Slavery’s cool. Especially if it involves women. Thirteenth Amendment of the Constititution: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Interestingly, the Qur’an actually devotes more verses to ensuring Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves (4) than it does telling them to pray five times a day (0). “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee.”  (33:50)


5.  Freedom of religion. According to the US Constitution’s First Amendment, Americans are guaranteed this: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” It can probably go without saying, considering hundreds of Christians have been brutally murdered by ISIS due to their faith in Christ; but the Qur’an doesn’t make quite the same allowances: “slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush.” (9:5) In fact, the Quran contains 109 passages that call Muslims to war against those who choose any other faith. Does that sound like a loving God; or maybe, could it be…



The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

There’s A New Sheriff In Town–The ‘Constitutional Sheriff’!

It’s a sad and shocking fact that the Constitutional rights of Americans are becoming tattered and torn through the socialist-Marxist assault upon America today that is embodied in the multitude of autocratic government agencies that operate as administrative fiefdoms. Many of these ‘fiefdoms’ now exist to serve their own needs, as opposed to the needs of the American taxpayers who foot the bill.

If things don’t take a turn for the better, and very soon, a lot of other things may change for the worse.

One concerning trend is the disproportionately high number of socialist extremists, and Muslims as a percentage of the total population, that are suddenly holding many positions of great power in numerous U.S. agencies and organizations. These appointees are not in any way representative of the average cross-section of American demographics and their values and beliefs. And under Obama, more than 300,000 Muslims have emigrated into the U.S. already, with many more expected. In fact, Obama seems to prefer Muslims to other fully (and more qualified) candidates for some of the most important positions in government.

We are already seeing the beginnings of more serious future problems with Islamists (Islam is a socialist theocracy) meddling in American politics and using open threats of violence in an attempt to influence American thinking and decisions. And when they cannot get their way, they resort to lawlessness and violence, which is not the American way. As far-fetched as that statement may seem to some uninformed readers, we need only look to the events that are unfolding around the world–and now, right in the streets of America!

For the first time in American history, many cities in America are under civil attack by Muslims who want to fundamentally change American law to Sharia Law (Islamic Law). The proof is everywhere to be seen–and now in America’s heartland, Texas! When confronted on these facts, most Muslims will claim the opposite. Of course, the Quran tells Islamists that it’s OK to lie to the infidels (that would be all non-believers), especially if it will help further the Islamic agenda of a worldwide caliphate.

Fact: Muslims (most Muslims follow Islam) in Irving, Texas, protested Mayor Van Duyne’s move to support Texas House Bill 562, which serves to prevent any integration of Sharia Law into the laws of Texas, which is consistent with the U.S. Constitution. The Mayor’s move to support that bill via Irving, Texas, resolution RES-2015-83 narrowly passed in a 5-4 vote. So any real Americans have to ask this question: Who were the council members who seem to support Islamic and Sharia Law being allowed in Irving, Texas–in America? According to the Minutes from the City meeting, those members are: Dennis Webb, Joe Putnam, Allan Meagher, and John C. Danish. If I lived in Irving, Texas, I would make it a point to ensure these people are never elected to any public post again, since they are clearly not honoring American or Texas heritage–nor the U.S. Constitution. Of course, the reason they are holding these posts on the city council and voting the way they are is because of the ‘very active’ Muslim population supporting them.

Fact: Pamela Geller, who is an American, is now under threat of ‘slaughter’ by ISIS, who claims to have Islamic followers trained and ready to kill her for having a cartoon contest, and, generally, because she will not follow the rules of Islamic and Sharia law. This as ISIS also threatens America and Americans in general in a statement made online, which states: “The attack by the Islamic State in America is only the beginning of our efforts to establish a wiliyah in the heart of our enemy.”

This is America, and our laws and U.S. Constitution protects Geller’s right (as well as anyone’s right in America) to draw pictures of Mohammed or any other deity; it protects the rights of all Americans. Our U.S. Constitution also makes clear that it forms the basis of the law of the land, NOT Islamic Sharia law, which has no place anywhere in America, ever! Americans should never have to be concerned about breaking Islamic or Sharia law, or any other foreign law while in America.

So the question of the day is: who is going to protect Ms. Geller from these Islamists and their unlawful terrorist threats? I wouldn’t want to depend upon people like the four ‘Sharia Promoters’ on the city council in Irving, Texas. Will the FBI protect Ms. Geller? We would hope so! We probably don’t even need to ask if Obama will protect her; he seems to be more interested in protecting the Islamists and thugs who see any political discourse, or the police dealing with a known criminal who runs afoul of the law, as an opportunity to riot, burn, plunder, and pillage their own communities!

So where can Americans look for real protections under the U.S. Constitution in their homes, on their property, and in their counties?

One answer stems from the time-honored heritage of America: our Constitutional Sheriffs!

What is a ‘Constitutional Sheriff’? This website outlines their resolution and intentions when it comes to protecting the rights of Americans. Please read this resolution and please sign it if you agree that no entity should be able to stand between you and your rights as an American. And please show your support for these brave men and women, our Sheriffs and Peace Officers, who want nothing more than to protect you and your rights! And in the name of Liberty, please share this article!

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth