Watch: Angry Sheriff Clarke Just Had This EPIC Response To Dems’ Reaction To On-Air Killings

It took only a matter of hours after the horrific on-air killings of two TV journalist in Virginia for top Democrats to try to politicize the tragedy. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others wasted no time in calling for greater federal gun control after a former colleague of two employees of WDBJ-TV shot and killed them at point-blank range.

Speaking with Sean Hannity Thursday night, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke threw the book at liberals for what he called their shameless attempt to exploit the shocking murders.

“Shame on the left, shame on the Democrats for once again exploiting misery and tragedy to pursue a political agenda,” Clarke said on the Fox news show Hannity. “Shame on the president of the United States to invoke terrorism into this horrific incident that happened in Virginia.”

The outspoken lawman who has consistently criticized Obama on a number of issues, including the president’s handling of racial strife, pointed to the U.S. Constitution in his argument that Democrats are trying to use the grief surrounding the Virginia killings as a motivator to restrict liberty.

“This document, the Constitution, protects freedom and liberty. It does not prevent horrific acts done by human beings,” Sheriff Clarke told Hannity.

And what would the popular law enforcement figure do to try to prevent gun violence, without trying to restrict access and ownership of personal firearms?

“You identify the bad guys, you arrest the bad guys, you adjudicate them and once they’re convicted, you lock them up for the longest period of time allowed by law,” Clarke asserted.

By clicking on the video above, you can watch the exchange between Sean Hannity and Sheriff David Clarke in which the Wisconsin lawman sharply criticized President Obama’s reaction to the murders that shocked viewers who saw them on live TV:

“This was a chance for the president to bring the country together, and once again, the divider-in-chief goes out and further separates us.”

Do you agree with Sheriff Clarke’s criticism of Obama, Hillary and others? Join the conversation by leaving your comment below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Rand Paul Has A Common Sense Solution For #BlackLivesMatter…And They’re Probably Going To Hate It

One political group will need to be more inclusive if it wants to draw more support from both the public and government leaders, according to Sen. Rand Paul. Paul, running in the 2016 presidential race, talked about the group Black Lives Matter during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News.

“I think they should change their name maybe….if they were ‘All Lives Matter’ or ‘Innocent Lives Matter,” Paul said.

Paul said he recognized the African-American community faces a lot of challenges from poverty to discrimination and a lack of justice within the court system. However, Paul also said the Black Lives Matter movement isn’t really addressing any of those problems.

“I am about justice and, frankly, I think a lot of poor people in our country, and many African-Americans, are trapped in this war on drugs and I want to change it. But commandeering the microphone and bullying people and pushing people out of the way, I think, really isn’t a way to get their message across,” Paul said.

Paul said he is the candidate who has worked with black groups to improve the lives of Americans. He joined members of the Congressional Black Caucus to review options for criminal justice reform and has ventured to speak in areas, such as Howard University and urban Chicago, that often get ignored by other candidates. The senator said minority communities are listening to his message.

The Black Lives Matter movement began last year after several incidents were reported where white police officers shot unarmed black men in criminal incidents. Although investigations in some of the cases have cleared officers, the movement has continued to show up to 2016 presidential campaign events to spread its message. Members of the movement interrupted events for former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and Sen. Bernie Sanders. Paul said he wouldn’t tolerate that kind of behavior. Paul said he “wouldn’t let them take my microphone.”

The Black Lives Matter movement has brought various reactions from people around the country. Two Trinity, Texas, police officers responded to the movement with a Facebook photo that has gone viral. In the photo, Donald Givens Sr, who is African-American, and Chief Steven Jones, who is white, pose with their hands outstretched, palms showing. Each man printed “His life matters” on their palms in black ink, with an arrow pointing to the other officer.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Watch: Judge Jeanine Uncovers Something Hillary Hoped No One Would – Then Has 5 Huge Words…

Fox News’ Judge Jeanine Pirro appeared on Hannity Thursday night and shared her legal assessment of the Hillary Clinton Emailgate scandal, and it is not good for the presidential contender.

Pirro told Sean Hannity there are at least seven laws she has found that Clinton broke in regard to using her personal server for government emails while serving as secretary of state. 

First and foremost, Clinton stored classified information on a non-government server. “She knew she wasn’t supposed to do that,” said Pirro. 

The judge also noted how Clinton’s story keeps changing regarding what was on the server. First, it was that she never sent or received classified information on her personal server (which the intelligence community’s inspector general has proven to be false). Then she changed her story to say she never sent or received emails “marked classified” at the time. “She keeps pulling back from it,” the judge told Hannity.

Among the additional crimes Pirro listed beyond the mishandling of classified information are destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, and Federal Records Act violations.   

Judge Jeanine’s five word conclusion: “The woman should be indicted.”

Hannity raised another concern Americans should keep in mind if Hillary Clinton’s White House bid is successful. He said if cyber security experts are right (some of whom had appeared on his program immediately prior to Pirro), the Russians, Chinese, and Iranians may well have hacked into the former secretary of state’s server. 

Hannity laid out a potential scenario that would put the nation’s commander-in-chief in a compromising situation: “Vladamir Putin comes to the White House. He has the 33,000 emails she deleted, some of which would be damning to her and contradict everything she said and show violation of law.” Pirro jumped in: “Blackmail.” Hannity agreed.   

The judge said criminal culpability likely extends beyond Clinton to her aides. “Was this a mass criminal conspiracy?” she asked. “You’ve got co-conspirators, you’ve got people taking ‘top secret’ off of emails, you’ve got everything a grand jury should be investigating right now.”

Hannity marveled at the hubris of Clinton’s actions, which he described as “Too cute by half.” The host added, “The Clintons have gotten away with so much over the years, she arrogantly believed that this would go away, and I don’t think she is going to survive.”

Pirro agreed that Clinton has “danced around” federal prosecutors her entire career. That said, “If Gen. Petraeus, a four star general, can be indicted and convicted” for a far lesser infraction of the law, it does not bode well for Hillary Clinton, the judge concluded.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Watch: Sheriff Clarke Just Made A Brutal Tweak To ‘Black Lives Matter’ Sure To Spark A Firestorm

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke just locked up what he calls the “Frankenstein” monster that is the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement — and then he threw away the key. In an appearance on the Fox News show Hannity Wednesday night, the outspoken and brutally honest black lawman explained how liberals like Hillary Clinton have created the “beast” that now threatens to consume them.

“Now they realize that if you cannot continue to feed the beast, the beast will turn on you and eat you. And that’s what’s going on here,” Clarke said in the discussion about Clinton’s recent backstage meeting with BLM representatives — an encounter that proved to be tense and packed with racially charged innuendoes and accusations.

Sheriff Clarke says he has made a small but significant tweak to the name of the activist group, now calling it “Black Lies Matter” because it’s a faux movement.

“The whole thing is built on a lie,” charges the sheriff. “It’s a conglomeration of misfits. Alright, you have the Occupy movement, you have organized labor in on it now, you have criminals, you have black racialists, you have cop-haters and anarchists….”

By clicking on the video above, you can watch this must-see video featuring Sheriff David Clarke in his best form, pointing out that “If black lives really mattered, they’d be protesting all of the black-on-black crime.”

Blacks in America, says Clarke, can claim to be victims of only one thing — the Democrat Party and “what modern liberalism has done to the black family.”

Join in the conversation. Leave your comment below on what you think about Sheriff Clarke’s opinion of the Black Lives Matter movement.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Watch: This Controversial Trump Plan Has Mark Levin Calling Donald’s Critics ‘Dead Wrong’

When GOP front-runner and outspoken firebrand Donald Trump issued his immigration reform plan several days ago, one element of the 5-page proposal that stirred a lot of emotional controversy was Trump’s call to stop conferring birthright citizenship on so-called “anchor babies.” Many advocates and defenders of the practice argue that granting automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. — even when their parents are here illegally — has always been a constitutional right.

However, a legal analyst for generally left-leaning CNN concedes that the longstanding assumption about anchor babies and their birthright is not so clear-cut — the constitutional questions surrounding the practice of conferring automatic citizenship are layered and complex. When promoters of the practice point to the 14th Amendment as the foundation for their support, the CNN analyst, Danny Cevallos, cautions that the meaning of the “jurisdiction clause” is fuzzy, given that the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868.

On the Fox News show Hannity Wednesday night, radio host, author, lawyer, and constitutional scholar Mark Levin weighed in on the issue that’s now a hot topic in the GOP presidential race.

Fox New reported Levin “said that those claiming that the 14th Amendment allows birthright citizenship are dead wrong, pointing to Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, which grants absolute power to Congress to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.”

“If you want a policy of open borders, that anybody born here should become a United States citizen, you amend the Constitution. We don’t have to amend the Constitution. It says what we say it says,” Levin forcefully argued. “The Supreme Court has never ruled that the children of illegal aliens are American citizens.”

By clicking on the video above, you can hear the entire interview with Mark Levin, who declared, “Of course Trump is right,” regarding the issue of anchor babies born in America to parents who are not U.S. citizens.

What do you think? Should anchor babies be granted automatic U.S. citizenship, even though their parents are illegal immigrants? Join the conversation by commenting below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth