Watch: Here’s How A Surging GOP Contender Just Handed A Hostile Interviewer Her Head

Image Credit: ABC News

With Mitt Romney out of the race for the White House in 2016, supporters of the GOP’s failed 2012 presidential candidate are looking for someone else they can get behind.

And if a new preference poll is any indicator, that someone may be Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker.

As reported by Townhall:

…a new Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll released over the weekend shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker jumping out to a small lead in the state — followed by Rand Paul, Mitt Romney (now out of the race), Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson. Jeb Bush pulls eight percent, with Chris Christie struggling at four percent….

Though he has shown his ability to stand tall and fight tough against unrelenting liberal attacks and union opposition in Wisconsin, the Republican governor has been viewed by some in the GOP establishment as lackluster, even uninspiring.

That view, however, is not shared by conservative radio talker Rush Limbaugh, who recently hit quite a few high notes in singing Walker’s praises:

“…I believe Scott Walker is the blueprint for the Republican Party if they are serious about beating the left.  Scott Walker has shown how to do it.

Scott Walker has shown the Republican Party how to beat the left. Scott Walker has the blueprint for winning and winning consistently and winning big in a blue state with conservative principles that are offered with absolutely no excuses.”

Although Walker has not formally declared his intention to seek the GOP nomination for the 2016 race, he is widely expected to throw his hat into the presidential ring.

So how does the Wisconsin governor fare in the media ring, especially when facing off with a not-so-friendly interviewer who, by the nature and tone of her questioning, was looking to trip up the Iowa front-runner?

There was a chance this past weekend for Governor Walker to show how he can handle what could be called a mainstream media “inquisition” when he appeared on ABC’s “This Week” with substitute host Martha Raddatz.

As noted in a post on Biz Pac Review: “Whether she was in search of her ‘Katie Couric moment,’ or just trying to take advantage of the opportunity to shore up her liberal bona fides, Raddatz was gunning for Walker from the start.”

It was a challenging interview about the governor’s “big, bold ideas” for the country; but Walker took the fire and shot back effectively, as you can see from watching the video above.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Rush Limbaugh: Hillary And Jeb ‘Perfect Ticket’ For Establishment

Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush

On his syndicated radio program Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh argued that the “perfect ticket” for the establishment of both the Republican and Democratic Parties would consist of former Governor Jeb Bush and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asserting that “both parties agree the Tea Party has got to be dealt with somehow, some way.”

Limbaugh said Wednesday that Clinton had “a little problem.” The former Secretary of State “has to run for the presidency away from Obama, because Obama is death politically to Democrats seeking office.

“I give you the 2014 elections. Every Democrat senator [who] voted for Obamacare [is] toast. They’re gone, one way or the other; defeated, quit, retired, or dead. Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, all kinds of controversies and scandals, Hillary Clinton was tied. She’s got to distance herself.

The syndicated radio host argued that Clinton needs to win in another fashion because the Democratic base belongs to Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who Limbaugh claimed is playing coy about running for President. Limbaugh gave his perfect solution for 2016 for those in the establishment:

“The ideal perfect ticket for the 2016 election: Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush. Now they can figure out who’s on top of the ticket on their own. But when you compare their positions, Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, on the key important issues, they are two peas in the same pod.”

Limbaugh buttressed his argument by noting that both Bush and Clinton are pro-amnesty candidates. “Jeb Bush wants it; Hillary wants it. Both parties want to win the nomination, Hillary by running away from the Democrat base, Jeb by running away from the Republican base.”

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder?

Photo credit: US Embassy (Flickr)

After 5 1/2 bumpy years of controversial service, the besieged but bolstered attorney general, Eric Holder, resigned. But is this close friend and confidant of President Barack Obama really stepping down for some benign reason at a critical time for our country, or is there a sinister and strategic plan behind it all?

First, it’s far more than a coincidence that the United States’ chief lawyer is leaving office with more unanswered questions about crucial life-and-death national dilemmas than any previous attorney general. Though most have been accused of sitting on issues, none has been so assailed as Holder for personally stonewalling investigations, covering up government involvement, and refusing to deal with politically explosive controversies. Holder has not prosecuted such monumental and rights-infringing crimes as the Fast and Furious debacle; the Benghazi, Libya, tragedy; National Security Agency wiretappings; press infringements; drone attacks on U.S. citizens; and the Internal Revenue Service scandal.

The Bronx, New York-born 63-year-old Holder proudly boasted that he had “taken steps to protect the environment”; taken swift action in Ferguson, Missouri; and even opened a broad probe into the police department in Ferguson. However, he — like our president and even Secretary of State John Kerry — hasn’t said a single word over the past six months about Marine reservist Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi’s being wrongly imprisoned in Mexico.

Eric Holder Might Not Say A Word About Sgt. Tahmooressi, But There’s Nothing Stopping You From Signing This Petition To Demand His Release!

Sadly, it has been recently reported that Tahmooressi, who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, is “highly despondent” because of the drastic deterioration of his mental health. And still, Holder refuses to speak up on behalf of this suffering, imprisoned American patriot.

Can you say resignation of denial and avoidance?

If Obama invoked executive privilege when Holder sat before Congress to protect him from his role in Fast and Furious, who’s to say he isn’t protecting him again — or vice versa — through Holder’s resignation? What better way to avoid the line of fire than to move completely out of the way? And what if Obama and Holder are not only protecting themselves from some past public sin through his resignation but also prepping Holder for some future position by his absence from the public stage?

That’s exactly what Rush Limbaugh proposed this past week. He explained the scary scenario this way:

“After you perform your six years of government service, you then retire to the private sector and get paid off for it. People hire you who are grateful for what you did, or you go back to your law firm, where you are a rainmaker, don’t even have to do any work.

“They put your name on the letterhead, on the door, and you attract clients and get a percentage of what walks in the door. There is any number of ways this can happen. But there’s also another possibility regarding Eric Holder. I just want you to prepare yourself. It may happen. We still have two years to go.

Pages: 1 2

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Rush Limbaugh Just Walked All Over Obama In This Crushing Tirade

limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh made a great point: how can Obama manage to shut down all kinds of government, but  for some reason he can’t shut down the border? He points out that Obama is picking and choosing which laws to ignore, and also “selectively choosing” which of his powers to use.

“Obama was able to close down Washington Mall, he was able to stop veteran’s ceremonies, he’s able to shut down a Blue Ridge Parkway, he was even able to shut down the Grand Canyon, visits to the Grand Canyon, he’s able to shut down visits to Jellystone National Park, he was able, while the World War II memorial was shut down, he allowed for a pro immigration rally… yet he tells us that he can’t shut down the border!”

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

What Rush Limbaugh Just Said About Birth Control Made Liberals Go Crazy

Rush.Limbaugh SC

Though he is surely accustomed to attacks from his political rivals, the left nevertheless responded to talk radio icon Rush Limbaugh’s latest remarks regarding contraception with a concerted burst of manufactured outrage.

Following his 2012 allegation that Sandra Fluke, a woman who claimed the federal government should financially support her promiscuous lifestyle, was a “slut,” a firestorm erupted among opponents who characterized him as a misogynist and otherwise insulted his character.

During his show Wednesday, however, Limbaugh once again covered the issue of birth control by weighing in on the recent Supreme Court decision allowing companies to opt out of providing ObamaCare coverage that violates their owners’ religious values.

Responding to a previous caller who wondered when contraception became “so important to the human condition the federal government requires every insurance provider to cover them,” he noted there are plenty of health-related procedures the healthcare law does not force employers to provide.

“Which is worse, to go blind from lack of regular eye exams or to get pregnant?” he asked.

Further contrasting contraception from other medical coverage, he asserted that “pregnancy is something you have to do to cause,” explaining that in the “everyday flow of events” a woman is complicit in her own pregnancy by engaging in sex.

“Yet we treat it as a great imposition that women need to be protected from,” he said. “It’s a sickness, it’s a disease, it’s whatever, and there’s got to be a pill for it.”

His statement of biological fact was apparently all radical leftists needed to once again target Limbaugh as a bigoted woman-hater.

A Huffington Post headline called his position “gross,” and the author went on to claim his “comments come as no surprise considering the infamous remarks he has made about birth control in the past.”

That article prompted other like-minded individuals to lash out at the stalwart conservative on Twitter.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom