The Media’s Vile Attacks On Conservative Assimilationists

I have had enough of smug liberal elites wrapped in their “Celebrate Diversity” banners tearing down minority conservatives.

Look in the mirror, media and academia bigots. Your own reflexive racism and divisive rhetoric are poisoning public discourse. There’s nothing “progressive” about attacking the children and grandchildren of immigrants who proudly embrace an American identity.

We are not “self-hating.” You just hate what we believe.

The most recent grenade tossed by the jack-booted Enforcers of Ethnic Authenticity came from The Washington Post this week. The Beltway fish-wrapper hyped a 2,100-word investigation of GOP Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal with a condescending quote from Professor G. Pearson Cross, who sneered: “There’s not much Indian left in Bobby Jindal.”

Has pallid Professor Cross invented an ambient diagnostic test to measure sufficiently acceptable levels of ethnicity?

The Post quoted a grand total of one disgruntled Democratic donor who railed against Jindal for “forgetting” his “heritage” and his “roots.” But that was more than enough for the apartheid-lite adherents to heed the dog whistle immediately. The Post’s splashy attack on Jindal’s assimilationist ethic spawned a vile Twitter hashtag game: #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite.

Left-wing racists mocked his skin color, his kids, and his decision to change his name from “Piyush” to “Bobby.” A New York Times digital editor, Shreeya Sinha, gleefully linked to a BBC compilation of “The best of #BobbyJindalisSoWhite.” NBC News gloated over tweets from liberal Indian-Americans who mocked the accomplished governor, Rhodes scholar, and father of three as a “Jindian.”

It’s the same old, same old from radical academics and reporters who spurned assimilation as a common goal long ago. As I’ve long observed, the media-ivory tower complex’s fidelity lies with bilingualism (a euphemism for native language maintenance over English-first instruction), ethnic militancy, extreme multiculturalism, and a borderless continent.

If we conservatives “of color” refuse to promote the welfare state, unfettered abortion, affirmative action, and massive immigration, we are guilty of “selling out.”

Conversely, if I point out that my skin is far darker than that of the TV progressives of pallor who presume to know more than me about what it’s like to experience prejudice, I’m accused of exploiting my ethnicity.

We’re coconuts, bananas, and Oreos (brown, yellow, or black on the outside and “white” on the inside).

We’re accused of “thinking” and “acting” white if we quote the Constitution, shoot, hunt, oppose high taxes, homeschool, take personal responsibility, or demand that government leave us alone.

You can’t win with these insane identity-mongers who preach compassion and peace while practicing vicious demagoguery. Black conservatives are “Uncle Toms.” Jindal is an “Uncle Bobby.” And GOP Gov. Nikki Haley, born to Indian Sikh parents, has been derided as a “female Uncle Tom.” Jindal is “trying to be white” even though his parents are Indian and his wife’s parents are both from India. Meanwhile, haters have accused me of being an “Auntie Tomasina” for marrying outside my race and taking my husband’s name.

Marriage choice and marriage equality are sacred rights for everyone except minority conservatives.

Jindal and Haley are just the latest targets. Last month, it was son of Cuban immigrants Ted Cruz. White liberal journalist Mark Halperin took it upon himself to drill Texas GOP Sen. Cruz on his “favorite Cuban food” and demanded that he welcome socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders to the presidential race “en Espanol.”

Que estupido.

The civility police and tolerance mob find nothing wrong with their ad hominem assaults and vulgar litmus tests. They’re just trying to make the world safe from the liberated minds of minority conservatives. Those of us who dare to succeed in America without relying on tribalist entitlements must be dragged back and down by the resentful, seething crabs in the collectivist bucket.

We are scorned for abandoning the militant hyphenated fetishism of the left.

We are punished for rejecting rigid boxes and boundaries and one-drop blood rules and permanent castes.

Assimilation is a Class A felony in the liberal rulebook and a threat to the Democratic grievance racket. Tell me who the real racists and bigots are again.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

This Black Theology Prof Just Called Obama A Shocking N-Word On National TV…And The Outrage?

Here’s one of those double-standard situations where one must ask: “What would happen if a white conservative said this about Barack Obama?”

The heartbreaking Charleston church massacre that left nine black worshipers dead as they attended a Bible study class — all allegedly gunned down by a hate-filled 21-year-old white man — seems to have provoked a curious phenomenon. Three times in the last few days, prominent individuals have seen fit to use the n-word, or a variation thereof, in media discussions of race relations in America.

First, it was America’s first black president, Barack Obama himself, who tossed out the “forbidden” word during a podcast called “WTF” with a comedian named Marc Maron. “Racism,” said Obama, “we are not cured of it. And it’s not just a matter of it not being polite to say n*gger in public.”

Next, CNN anchor Don Lemon appeared to be angling for maximum social media buzz when he kicked off his news program CNN Tonight by holding up a Confederate flag, followed by a large sign with the racial slur Obama had casually used only hours before. As the media industry website Deadline noted of Lemon’s primetime provocation:

“’Does this offend you? This word?’ Lemon asked, hopefully, as he teased his show’s upcoming topic, being careful not to obscure his face with the sign, so as to maximize his made-for-social-media moment.”

The third instance of the use of a potentially inflammatory N-word came when black activist and leftist theology professor Cornel West went on CNN and charged that Barack Obama is the country’s first “n*ggerized” president. After saying that “the vicious legacy of white supremacy is shot so deep in the culture” that it’s taken a long time for the Confederate flag to be removed from public spaces, West turned his ire on the president.

As Downtrend notes of West’s CNN appearance, this leftist professor who spouts his socialist views at Union Theological Seminary said of his race and his president:

“…too many black people are n*ggerized, I would say the first black president has become the first n*ggerized black president,” said West.

The CNN host crinkles her brow and asks West to explain what he means:

“A n*ggerized black person is a black person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy,” explained West.

What this frequent CNN guest — this man who teaches philosophy and Christian practice — apparently meant to suggest is that President Obama has been reluctant to play the race card and hasn’t been forceful enough in promoting issues and policies and programs that would benefit African Americans.

One can reasonably suppose there are many Americans of many races who would disagree with that.

And as for the outrage generated on CNN or among its viewers over this radical black activist calling the black president “n*ggerized,” well, we’ll be sure to report it when it develops…or when Al Sharpton calls for a march on West’s employer, where ministers have been educated since 1836, Union Theological Seminary.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

The New York Times’ Reckless Report

“It seemed pretty glaringly obvious to me that the ‘news fit to print’ was pretty much the news that’s fit to serve the powerful… The way that the paper’s senior staff think is exactly like those in power — in fact, it’s their job to become their friends.” – former NYT correspondent Daniel Simpson

We see right through the propaganda. As one possibly left-leaning commentator astutely noted in response to a stereotypical hit piece against those who lean politically right:

No doubt there are people infuriated with the government but to suggest that these Faux News watchers are going to take up arms against the government is not supported by the facts. Moreover, those few examples cited appear to be unstable individuals, not politically motivated but listening to audio hallucinations found in young male schizophrenics. Better research and an editor with a sharp pencil might are needed here.

Words matter and loose labels are highly irresponsible. Too much mainstream reporting is perpetuating a hidden agenda in their political projections and culture war aggression. Maybe if all crimes were reported equally – black on black, black on white, and everything in between – rather than fanning the flames in a unilateral direction, the right wing news outlets would not feel the need to overcompensate.

If you only followed mainstream media, you would think Obama was the second coming of Jesus. Well, Jesus does not play favorites and neither should we. We are either for Him or against Him. Faithful believers of every color, race, background, gender, and ethnicity are fit for the Kingdom. He is an equal opportunity redeemer. Look in the mirror, see past your complexion, and decide where you stand!

“If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.” – James 1:5

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

WATCH: Black Man Goes On An EPIC Rant Against Liberals In Wake Of Charleston Shooting

A black man had a few things to get off his chest after seeing some of the liberal coverage of the Charleston shooting.

In an approximately 6-and-a-half minute video, Eric July takes white liberals to task for fueling racism in America and using the Charleston shooting to promote their flawed worldview.

His remarks are very much in the spirit of Kisa Jackson, who also, as Western Journalism reported, made a video sitting in her car earlier this month regarding the conduct of the police in McKinney Texas.

July opens his video stating the things which all Americans (minus some fringe elements) must surely agree. “This situation that happened in South Carolina is disgusting, it’s sickening. That somebody would walk up in a church, a house of God. They out there praisin’ His name, and somebody would come out there and shoot these brothers and sisters…” he says.

“But hold up right on cue, right on cue,” July continues, “here came that white liberal! And I knew it was going to happen…Where this white liberal would come and try to use this as political game or a reason to say, ‘Hey black folks, I’m different.’”

July makes it clear that he means not a particular white liberal, but many.

“[Y]ou fuel racism! White liberals fuel racism!” July shouts in the video. “Rather than try to stomp out the fire of racism, you fuel racism.”

This should be a moment to unify, July explains. “Most white folk aren’t commending this coward going up in a house of God and shooting these folks. They are equally sickened by this situation.”

“Rather than use this as a tool to say, ‘Hold up, maybe racism ain’t alive as we think it is,’ rather than use this as a situation to say, ‘All right, let’s unify, let’s be together because this is crazy,’ these white liberals would rather fuel racism,” he said.

Jules goes on, stating: “I didn’t make this video to just highlight that. I made this video to encourage brothers and sisters of color to use your own logic.”

That white liberal is “going to use this as a tool, to say ‘Hold up, you black folk can’t do it. That world is out to get you all. So I got to help you all.’ Nah, no, shut up. You don’t think on our behalf; quit fueling racism.”

Chicks on the Right identified some examples of white liberals going off the rails in the aftermath of the Charleston shooting. One editorial was titled: Charleston Church Massacre: The Violence White America Must Answer For. Another was in the Washington Post, titled: Charleston, Dylann Roof, and the Racism of Millennials.

The latter states: “It shouldn’t be lost on anyone that this massacre occurred in a state that flies the Confederate battle flag, a symbol of white supremacy, at its state house. These symbols and tactics remain in our national conscience, passing on from generation to generation, like a sinister genetic code in America’s DNA.”

Chicks on the Right concludes:

“All of these examples are not signs of individual mental illness.” Um – YES THEY ARE! This is ONE person. ONE idiot. ONE racist piece of garbage. ONE anomaly out of thousands of millennials who do NOT routine[ly] run out and shoot up black churches.

July’s general feelings about this sort of liberals are clear: “They have been doing it for some long, and I’m sick of it. Shut the hell up! You don’t speak on my behalf.”

h/t: Bizpac Review

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

The Creepy Consequences Of Oppression Chic

Why was America so shocked by homegirl hoaxer Rachel Dolezal?

The spray-tanned con artist, who resigned this week as head of the Spokane chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of (Artificially) Colored People, is the inevitable outcome of academia’s cult of manufactured victimhood.

College campuses have been grooming a cadre of professional minority fakers and fraudsters for decades.

The notorious pretendians Ward Churchill and Elizabeth Warren faked their Native American status to bolster their faculty credentials at the University of Colorado and Harvard, respectively. It was a mutually beneficial racket for all poseur parties involved. Churchill and Warren basked in their tenured glory. The schools racked up politically correct points for adding the right flavors to their employment rolls.

Churchill was specifically granted a “special opportunity” position that his school created to increase “diversity” on the teaching staff. Warren falsely listed herself as a minority professor in a law school directory. Harvard officials eagerly touted Warren’s bogus background, the Boston Herald reported, to “bolster their diversity hiring record in the ’90s as the school came under heavy fire for a faculty that was then predominantly white and male.” Based solely on what Warren later admitted was unsubstantiated “family lore,” the Fordham Law Review called her the “first woman of color” at Harvard Law.

The pressure to conform and cash in on the cult of oppression chic is even more virulent among the student body. Race-based affirmative action is a primary catalyst.

Take Vijay Chokal-Ingam, brother of TV star Vera Mindy Chokalingam (Mindy Kaling). He pretended to be black in 1998-99 in order to gain admission to St. Louis University School of Medicine.

“In my junior year of college, I realized that I didn’t have the grades or test scores to get into medical school, at least not as an Indian-American,” he wrote. “So, I shaved my head, trimmed my long Indian eyelashes and applied to medical school as a black man. … Vijay the Indian-American frat boy become Jojo the African-American Affirmative Action applicant to medical school.”

From the moment they apply to the nation’s elite institutions of higher learning, applicants are rewarded for playing up racial division, ethnic strife, and identity politics.

“I told Harvard I was an undocumented immigrant,” Dario Guerrero bragged in The Washington Post last fall. “They gave me a full scholarship.”

In the 1990s, top-tier schools introduced a “diversity essay” requirement for undergrad admissions. The online “Common Application” used by hundreds of colleges and universities directs prospective students to “describe an experience that illustrates what you would bring to the diversity in a college community, or an encounter that demonstrated the importance of diversity to you.”

More recently, the University of California at Berkeley mandated that all graduate school hopefuls supply a “personal history statement” with “information on how you have overcome barriers to access opportunities in higher education.”

And that’s not enough. Applicants for every U.C. Berkeley graduate program must provide “evidence of how you have come to understand the barriers faced by others, evidence of your academic service to advance equitable access to higher education for women, racial minorities and individuals from other groups that have been historically underrepresented in higher education, evidence of your research focusing on underserved populations or related issues of inequality, or evidence of your leadership among such groups.”

These “progressive” schools then herd their young charges into color-coded dorms and segregated academic departments, where they can stew even deeper in their “otherness” and gripe about “white privilege.”

We’ve moved from “separate, but equal” to “separate is superior.”

In addition, I’ve chronicled dozens of cases of minority students over the years who have faked hate crimes when they were dissatisfied with their level of systemic oppression. Instead of being punished, many of these p.c. performance artists have been praised by college administrators and faculty for “raising awareness” of social injustice.

Is it any wonder, then, that lying liar Rachel Dolezal learned from historically black Howard University to loathe the skin she was born in?

After receiving a full art scholarship based on her portfolio of “exclusively African-American portraiture,” she reportedly encountered bigotry from campus officials who had assumed she was black when she applied. She lost a lawsuit against the university in which she described an atmosphere “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule and insult” for being white. Soon after, according to her family, she began to make her creepy transition and continues to “identify as black.”

If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. If you can’t make it, fake it. In the ivory tower, the most afflicted and the most offended are at the top of the food chain.

Oppression Olympics breeds grievance grifters.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth