Why Do We Continue To Accept Obama’s Corruption As The Norm?

May 8, 2012 By 8 Comments

President Obama face WH photo SC Why Do We Continue To Accept Obamas Corruption As The Norm?

I have been shouting about our government’s actions from the rooftops for more than three years, while so many US voters just hide from the limelight and say “But Fox News says….” Fox News is owned by Murdoch, who is more concerned with ratings than the truth and has so much power over Fox commentors that they all had to parrot the liberal media or leave, like Beck. Besides, I would still like to know his connections with Soros, the Illuminati, and the Bilderbergs). (For those of you who are uninformed about the Illuminati and Bilderbergs–just Google them.)

I have been an investigative reporter for many years and found newspaper articles and photos of Obama while he was still a young man posing with his cabal of Communist organizers–joining clubs and advertising meetings. Plus, Obama is ineligible for President for three reasons: his British-citizenship father; his Indonesian stepfather who bestowed Indonesian citizenship on “Barry,” which allowed him to use his foreign passport to go to countries that did not allow Americans in; and his foreign birthplace, about which there is more than sufficient evidence to prove he is NOT an American.

As “Barry Soetoro,” he applied for student foreign aid at one of his colleges; at Columbia University, not one of his supposed classmates recognize him. He lied about being a Constitutional Professor–he was just a guest lecturer. He is using an illegal Social Security number. I could go on and on. Finally, enough judges are being convinced to order him to unseal all of his records–which he has spent $2 million of taxpaper money on legal fees to seal and keep hidden.

Pray to God that his Traitorous actions, plus all those of the people who helped him get elected, will cause them all to be imprisoned and tried for Treason this summer before the election. I know that might throw the country into chaos, but that might just be the way that we can clean house and get rid of all corrupt local, state, and national politicians, judges, and even civilians.

Then we can start over with a restored Constitution and Bill of Rights. At least we will then be able to undo all the damage inflicted by Obama during the past four years, and we can start making new rules to protect us from this happening again…No ObamaCare! Give us back access to our own energy sources and provide the jobs we need. Throw out the UN and denounce our membership. Strengthen our Military personnel and bring them home from countries that we are not fighting.

Give term limits and civilian perks to all politicians. No public employee unions. No FED, Fannie May, or Freddie Mac. No corporate handouts–they sink or swim on their own. No government departments that do nothing but harm, like the Depts. of Energy and Education as well as alphabet soup agencies such the EPA, IRS (only flat tax). Go back to the Gold Standard and LOCK the lockbox for good… a secured border and all illegals deported, TORT reform with a cap of 10% for lawyers, workfare at minimum wage instead of welfare, no unemployment without training/classes attendance to learn a needed skill. No aid to foreign countries except directly to starving people who are victims of their own hierarchy or a natural catastrophe. No financial aid to any countries.

If we do all this and get rid of the corruption, we can catch up on our debt and keep a balanced budget for all of us. The problems for us is that we have become a country of “give-aways” to deadbeats or those we want to buy for friends. We need to go back to our original work ethics, God as our Savior, Golden Rule standards, and stop letting the corrupt rule us with “Political Correctness,” Elitist mentalities.

Related posts:

  1. Why Progressive Socialist Ideas Continue To Fail Have you had enough of the politics of Hope and…
  2. Help Nail Obama For Corruption Congressional Republicans are gearing up to investigate Barack Obama’s corruption…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , ,

Obamacare’s Latest Scam

May 8, 2012 By 3 Comments

Obamacare Medicare SC Obamacares Latest Scam

America’s senior citizens deserve to enjoy their golden years in security rather than be faced with the uncertainty of having their beloved Medicare benefits yanked away thanks to provisions within the Democratic Party’s darling, Obamacare.

Mathematicians Congressional Democrats are not. Democrats failed to inform seniors nearly half of Obamacare’s cost would be funded initially by taking more than $500 billion from Medicare. When this information was made public, Democrats promised the cost-shifting would not in any way lead to benefit cuts. In addition, they were told Obamacare would reduce the deficit and were told everyone could keep their doctors. If Democrats genuinely believed what they were saying, they obviously failed to factor into their quirky calculations that pesky little fact that Medicare reimbursement cuts to doctors would send them packing in droves, making it a bit tricky to use the same doctor if he or she no longer treats Medicare patients.

Moreover, another side effect from this pernicious legislation is what seems to be the ultimate destruction of the Medicare Advantage (MA) program as seniors know it today. It is to no surprise that this program elected by millions of seniors has been in Obama’s crosshairs for quite some time. After all, MA allows beneficiaries the ability to receive Medicare benefits via private health insurance plans. In Obama’s world, MA is a waste of money but spending countless tax dollars on green energy pipedreams is considered smart investing.

Obviously, Democrats failed to consider the timing of these cuts when Obamacare was enacted. Many seniors are in the process of losing their MA plans or will discover they are about to lose them — just before the 2012 election. Most sadly, according to the Heritage Foundation, low-income seniors and minorities will be the hardest hit by these cuts. Once again, Democrats claim to be the party for minorities and the poor, but contradict their claims with stunts like this.

More than 25 percent of Medicare recipients are MA participants. Of those, a large percentage lives in key swing states like Pennsylvania, Florida and Ohio. The Obama administration knew they had to do something to protect the senior citizen vote so they pulled another trick out of their trusty Chicago politics top hat when they conjured up $8.3 billion taxpayer dollars to supplement MA benefits until after the 2012 elections. After the election, all bets are off and seniors will be left to figure it out.

The Weekly Standard suggests this ploy is illegal in that “a president isn’t generally thought to possess the power to reallocate American’s resources to shore up his political vulnerabilities.” The Government Accountability Office (GAO) apparently concurred, recently telling the administration to stop this charade the administration fronts as a “demonstration project.”

This Medicare funds siphoning will continue, according to a January 3, 2011 Wall Street Journal article, “Obamacare’s Medicare Cuts in the New Year.” The article discloses that Obamacare will extract from “Medicare and related federal programs,” $638 billion over the next ten years, and an additional $1.6 trillion in the seven years thereafter, “for a total of $2.2 trillion” in cuts.

Democrats will use their best “Mediscare” tactics to deflect the blame to Republicans for the mess they’ve created. You can read an informative article about this “mess” at the Galen Institute online at: http://www.galen.org/topics/obamacare-a-dozen-more-damaging-disclosures/.

In stark contrast, Republicans have common sense solutions that will leave Medicare benefits intact for today’s seniors and those nearing retirement. The plan also gives younger Americans the opportunity for a far superior program to work toward, while allowing today’s seniors the ability to rest in the promises America made to them long ago.

Susan Stamper Brown is an opinion page columnist, motivational speaker and military advocate who writes about politics, the military, the economy and culture. Email Susan at writestamper@gmail.com or her website at susanstamperbrown.com.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Related posts:

  1. A Clever Response To Obama’s “Mediscare” Ads Remember the Democrats’ ads last year warning that if Paul…
  2. Dissecting Team Obama’s Latest Campaign “Strategy” I awoke to a hilarious new trend on Twitter surrounding…

Filed Under: Floyd Reports Tagged With: ,

Obama Could Finally Acquire Elusive Internet “Kill Switch”

May 7, 2012 By Leave a Comment

Barack Obama 8 SC 300x199 Obama Could Finally Acquire Elusive Internet “Kill Switch”

For three years Barack Hussein Obama and his handlers have labored to create a functioning dictatorship in the midst of a constitutional republic. It was shamefully easy at first. With unassailable majorities in House and Senate, even a Republican leadership unafraid to contest the excesses of the first black president would have been powerless to slow the implementation of his agenda.

The left passed ObamaCare, giving itself the means of executing a calculated program of attrition against millions of reliably Republican seniors. At the same time, a corrupt Department of Justice worked to undermine the 2nd Amendment, interfered with the effort of states to legislate against voter fraud and facilitated the entry of millions of illegals by refusing to enforce immigration law.

Even a disastrous midterm election has not slowed Obama’s acquisition of power as 190 House Republicans helped vote into law the infamous National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), providing the Commander and Chief unlimited authority to detain and imprison without due process any American he considers a threat to national security.

But one vitally important power has eluded the usurper in the White House, that being the legal means to control the world-wide web. Countless attempts have been made to provide Obama that longed for internet “kill switch,” many of them originating with Senator Joe Lieberman. Yet from Net Neutrality to the 2010 “Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act,” all have met with such an outcry from left and right alike that they have died in Congress.

All, that is, until now. A week ago the House of Representatives passed the latest Congressional attempt to nullify the last remaining exercise of American freedom, the “cyber-security” bill called CISPA—the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act.

According to lawmakers, the purpose of CISPA is to make it easier for companies and the federal government to share information about methods of thwarting hackers. Until now, such information sharing about individual web users could have provided the grounds for a law suit. CISPA, however, “… would allow companies to freely share “cyber-threat information” without consequence.” (1)

Critics of the bill point to the fact that, in the form passed by the House, “…any web-related service provider may share ‘cyber threat information with any other entity,’ including the military and National Security Agency NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW…” In short, once enacted the terms of CISPA would take precedence over any existing state or federal law. Privacy laws would be a thing of the past. (1)

Though Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security has “monitored” the mood of the public for some time, the enactment of CISPA would transform the now shadowy Department methods of spying on the enemies of Barack into a full-time, executive branch operation. (2) As civil liberties groups have claimed, the bill is so broadly written that it “would allow companies to share private consumer information with the government under the guise of sharing information about potential hacker threats.” (3)

For a would-be despot of Barack Obama’s ilk, the possibilities for abuse inherent in such a law are staggering. He would have the authority to flagrantly spy on any group or individual under the pretense of concern for national security. And as he may, under the powers afforded him by the NDAA, declare such groups or individuals a threat to the United States, the chilling effect upon any declared opposition to his nefarious schemes would be enormous. What better way to kill the internet than to clear it of all dissent!

Some claim that CISPA will have a difficult time in the US Senate. We must hope that will be the case.

By Doug Book, Coach Is Right

To read more use these links:

 (1) http://theweek.com/article/index/227172/cispa-a-guide-to-the-big-brother-cyber-security-bill

(2) http://epic.org/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-monitoring/

(3) http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-27/news/31422019_1_private-sector-privacy-bill


Related posts:

  1. New Bill Gives Obama ‘Kill Switch’ To Shut Down The Internet The federal government would have “absolute power” to shut down…
  2. As Egypt Goes Offline US Gets Internet ‘kill Switch’ Bill Ready As Egypt’s government attempts to crackdown on street protests by…

Filed Under: Coachisright, Featured Stories Tagged With: , , , ,

Dissecting Team Obama’s Latest Campaign “Strategy”

May 5, 2012 By 4 Comments

Barack Obama 5 SC Dissecting Team Obamas Latest Campaign Strategy

I awoke to a hilarious new trend on Twitter surrounding a digital/fake American citizen named “Julia” that was featured on BarackObama.com detailing how awesome life would be if Obama were re-elected this upcoming November. Hence, shaping the narrative of the President’s new “Forward” re-elect slogan.  It also details how she is on the verge of a dismal existence if Mitt Romney were to be elected president. While this powerpoint presentation is meant to illustrate a stark contrast between the president and his presumptive Republican opponent, the dystopia Team Obama depicts is grossly inaccurate and fraught with hyperbole. For example, “at age 65 Julia enrolls in Medicare.”

Under President Obama: Julia enrolls in Medicare, helping her to afford preventive care and the prescription drugs she needs.

Under Mitt Romney: Medicare could end as we know it, leaving Julia with nothing but a voucher to buy insurance coverage, which means $6,350 extra per year for a similar plan.

I understand that the shaping the narrative around Republicans getting old people would mobilize the geriatric brigade, but sadly, neither Congressman Ryan or Mitt Romney are the enemies of Medicare.  It is Mr. Arithmetic.  The system is simply not able to sustain itself due to increased longevity spawned by competent medicine.  As I’ve stated in the past, this is a great human achievement, but it’s also incredibly expensive.  Our current system will fail to cover Medicare recipients’ hospital bills by 2024.  However, all is well if Obama is still on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue because everything falls into place with his boyish charm.

When “Julia” retires at age 67 and begins receiving Social Security, the narrative of “Obama good and Mitt bad” is reiterated again.

Under President Obama: Julia retires. After years of contributing to Social Security, she receives monthly benefits that help her retire comfortably, without worrying that she’ll run out of savings. This allows her to volunteer at a community garden.

Under Mitt Romney: Julia’s benefits could be cut by 40%.

Again, people are living longer, and the system’s original parameters are fiscally unsustainable with our county’s future demographic projections.  For example, when Social Security was instituted under FDR, the average time between retirement and death was two years.  That figure has increased by two decades.  Additionally, the fastest growing segment of our population are the “very elderly,” people who are people 85 or older, who will total more than the combined populations of New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles by 2050. Moreover, today, tomorrow, and every day for the next two decades, 10,000 baby-boomers will be eligible for Medicare and Social Security benefits.  George Will has discussed this problem ad nauseam, and it’s about time that President Obama takes notice. By 2025, there will be a paltry two workers per retiree, which is staggering, considering it used to be fourteen workers per retiree in 1950.  That is only if we can assume a steady influx of immigration into this country.  Where is that mentioned in your little slideshow, Team Obama?

Conservatives should mock this 6th grade presentation of the two Americas we will be voting on come November. It’s an utterly sophomoric presentation since Obama’s record doesn’t provide much hope (no pun intended).  Kevin Williamson delivered a rather hilarious repudiation of this “Julia” slideshow on National Review writing:

10 years: Trapped in a failing and dangerous public school, Julia (another Julia, not the dead one) is terrified and miserable. Under the Obama administration, protecting the government education monopoly from competition and accountability is almost as sacrosanct as abortion. School-choice programs are severely constrained or eliminated. Julia falls behind.

57 years: Julia (different Julia, not one of the dead ones) has been paying very high taxes for most of her life, mainly to support three federal programs: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. In fact, the payroll tax diverts about 12 percent of her income — income she might have saved — into the entitlements. Under President Obama, stubborn refusal to reform these unsustainable entitlements means that the programs have to be radically cut or entirely eliminated, and Julia and her whole generation get hosed in spite of the fact that they have been taxed for decades under the phony promise that they were “paying into” the programs. The only alternative to massive cuts was an 88 percent increase in all federal taxes, which already have been rising to offset costs from Obamacare, which were wildly underestimated.

88 years: Julia (different Julia) passes away in 2022. And she got out just in time: Policies adopted by the Obama administration sent the national debt to $71,000 per person and climbing.

In all, this magical mystery tour is the personification of Mitt’s warnings about Obama’ s government-centered society that tramples individual liberty and makes every citizen dependent on government for everything from health care to toilet paper.  In every slide, it details a fake woman and her warm, cuddly relationship with big government programs (I think Julia took some Soma) that will ruin us financially, but you don’t get that impression due to the hyper-emotional text and lack of facts and numbers on the “what Obama would do” section. In addition, Dana Loesch aptly pointed out this rather embarrassing flaw in their narrative:

OH: “Does anyone else notice that Obama is president for all of #Julia ‘s life?”

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) May 3, 2012

In all, if stick figures are part of the Obama push to sway independent voters, 57% of which think America is generally fair and are concerned about the debt, the size of government, and blame Congress for the legislative intransigence, then he will miss the mark on this one. The flawless campaign operation we witnessed in 2008 is starting to look like its success rested on a bed of hot air.  Oh wait…that’s exactly what happened.

Related posts:

  1. Dissecting The Results Of The Super Tuesday Republican Primaries Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was looking for a clear…
  2. AFP Unleashes New Attack Campaign On Obama We all remember the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, also…

Filed Under: Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , ,

Public Comments Overwhelmingly Oppose HHS Anti-Conscience Mandate

May 3, 2012 By 1 Comment

Sebelius SC 300x219 Public Comments Overwhelmingly Oppose HHS Anti Conscience Mandate

The federal website Regulations.gov released the first round of public comments on the administration’s proposed anti-conscience mandate on Wednesday. The comments were overwhelmingly opposed to the measure: out of 211 comments submitted, only six, less than 3%, offered support for the mandate.

The mandate would require all organizations that offer health insurance to facilitate coverage of contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs, even if such drugs violate those organizations’ religious or moral beliefs.

The vast majority of the comments submitted focus on the mandate’s violation of Americans’ right of conscience, while a few discuss the health hazards of the medical procedures the mandate covers, and some call for full Obamacare repeal.

“As a Democrat, I will vote Republican if religious freedom is not protected and respected,” said one commenter, who identified herself as Arlene from Colorado.

An anonymous commenter from Missouri insisted that the mandate constitutes “a religious freedoms issue, not a women’s issue.”

Read More at heritage.org. By Lachlan Markay.

Related posts:

  1. Catholic Bishops Call ObamaCare Mandate “Unprecedented Threat” To “Religious Freedom”  In implementing the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act…
  2. Conservatives Encouraged By Justice Kennedy’s Comments On Individual Mandate (CNSNews.com) – A conservative civil liberties group says it is…

Filed Under: News Tagged With: ,
« Older Posts