Graphics expert Paul Irey had and has the evidence that proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the mysterious Obama Birth Certificate is a forgery.
Next Friday, at or before 11:30 a.m. CST, the decision on oral argument in the Barack Obama eligibility case now under deliberation in the Alabama Supreme Court could come down. Every Friday morning before noon Clerk Weller receives her Friday document release in cases in front of the nine member Alabama Supreme Court.
This case is being brought by high ranking, Alabama Republicans Hugh McInnish and Virgil Goode with the lead appellant L. Dean Johnson asking the court to determine if then Secretary of State Beth Chapman failed to properly verify that all candidates on the 2012 election ballots in Alabama were eligible to serve. The 2012 Constitution Party nominee Virgil Goode and AL Republican leader Hugh McInnish are seeking resolution and/or clarity on just who can appear on ballots given to Alabama voters. Beth Chapman quit her elected position at the end of July and former Secretary of State Jim Bennett, a long time political figure in Alabama, is now back as the state’s 52nd Sec of State as of 7-31-2013. Chapman, age 51, resigned and is now a political consultant with the AL Farmers Federation as a paid consultant seeking out political candidates for this organization’s backing.
Fraud Attorney W.L. Albert Moore, Jr., no relation to Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, filed an Amicus Curiae brief in this case seeking clarity on whether or not sitting President Barack Hussein Obama in fact lost his US citizenship allegedly in or around 1980 when he failed to register with the Selective Service draft as required by U.S. law. Deliberations here in the Friend of the Court filing involve whether or not Barry Soetoro-Barack Hussein Obama repatriated after being adopted by Stanley Ann Dunham’s second husband, Indonesian Lolo Soetoro, sometime prior to the lost 1/2 year decade of 1980-1985. Islamic Indonesia required students enrolling in their school system to be citizens of that country according to web data which may or may not speak to what is going on here. As Attorney Moore told CiR, absent epithelial evidence ordered by a grand jury, we just may never know what is going on.
Now, a web reproduced Selective Service picture shows the following: ” Selective Service System small numbers 08, large numbers 970, small Cap S, then small 06, then large 32.” Other numbers on the form include “080161, Jul 29 80 with a crop at the top of letters 8 0.” Then we have July 30,”. .?? mumble, mumble. Some blogs state that Selective Service won’t release this form any more. Other commenters and posters say something may or may not come down from this federal agency.
Of course, the largest amount of online angst and conjecture has centered on what is meant by “natural born citizen.” But what if, as Attorney Moore’s brief submits, the citizenship issue is the real problem? What if the American people are just left to keep twisting in the wind as legal mumbo jumbo is equivocated. No member of Congress is willing to investigate and with SCOTUS tossing this hot potato out of their doors, where are the American people in all of it? A Georgia judge last year seemed willing to bring the case to courtroom definition, but abruptly he, too, tossed the case. CiR found out that within the week that he bunted, the long rejected nuclear facility in that state somehow was given the go ahead, freeing up huge amounts of federal construction dollars.
You can call Clerk Julia Weller’s office at (334) 229-0700 , but you must ask for this case or you will not receive an answer. Ask for status results in the “Hugh McInnish, Virgil Goode v. Beth Chapman, Secretary of State.” Additionally, you could also call new Alabama Secretary of State Jim Bennett at 1-800-274-8683. They may have something for you.
Photo Credit: Standard Compliant
The matador’s bright red cape and his agile moves to anger and tire the animal are the outstanding metaphor used by Attorney W. L. Albert. Moore, Jr., who is bringing an Amicus Curiae in support of lead appellant L. Dean Johnson in the request for an Alabama Supreme Court oral argument in yet another case dismissed by lower courts in the Barack Obama eligibility saga.
Moore ( no relation to Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore) is a nationally certified fraud attorney who has a completely new angle on the American political nightmare that just will not die. Moore told CiR in a very lengthy phone interview on September 3 that the real issue is not the eligibility clause (2-1-5, US Constitution), but the fact that Obama would not or did not register for Selective Service, thereby signifying his LOSS of US CITIZENSHIP! The issue is not Obama’s status at birth–Obama probably is an NBC–but rather, his abrogation of US CITIZENSHIP, Moore said.
The longtime lawyer extended his metaphor by adding that Obama handlers are more than willing to let truth seekers twist in the wind by running at the false red flags of lack of natural born citizenship status and other sidebars of this unbelievable case. The crux of this case is a little known noun called fealty. Of Old French linguistic derivation, fealty asks “does Obama have allegiance to serve the United States of America?”
Absent the impanelment of a grand jury with its subsequent subpoena powers, Moore doubts he has the ability to obtain epithelial evidence of just who is the father of Barack Obama (nee Barry Soetoro)! Moore is of the opinion that the sitting president may just well have NBC status and that Obama very well could be the direct offspring of the man named as the Obama grandfather, Stanley Dunham. Other web commentators have brought up this theory (i.e. that the grandfather is really the father, the mother is really the 1/2 sister, and Toots, Obama’s beloved grandmother who died shortly before her grandson’s first inauguration as U.S. President, was the only true legacy grandparent!!)
Here is Attorney Moore’s outline of his Amicus Curiae: 1. Status at birth was verifiable by the statements of Dr. Chiyome Fukino, M.D., former director of Hawaii’s Department of Health. She said: “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics. . .have personally seen and verified that the (HDoH) has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record. . .”
Part 2 of the Amicus Curiae alleges for court deliberation that by refusing to register for U.S. Selective Service, Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama relinquished his U.S. citizenship status! The original birth certificate allegedly was amended by a second birth certificate to reflect the young man’s adoption by Stanley Ann Dunham’s new husband, Indonesian Lolo Soetoro.
By the way, Soetoro-Obama had to be listed as an Indonesian citizen to be registered in the elementary school system in that Islamic country.
Incidentally if epithelial evidence can ascertain that President Obama is not now, nor ever has been, an Afro-American, the blow done to the media, the Democrats, the Congressional Black Caucus, and the Black Grievance Industry (BGI) will be palpable, to say the least!
Now, Attorney Moore further alleges that not only did Soetoro-Obama fail to register for Selective Service; the now Commander in Chief allegedly entered the United States as Barry Soetoro under an Indonesian visa at or around 1983. This five year time frame, 1980-1985, are called the “lost” years by researchers unable to tract this very cosmopolitan young man. “Obama admitted his loss of American citizenship when he failed to apply for Selective Service,” says Attorney Moore. No evidence of repatriation apparently has ever surfaced!
A Part II analysis of the Moore interview will follow.
Obama being born out of an apple pie in the middle of a Kansas wheat field as Toby Keith sings the National Anthem—such are the contents of an amicus brief filed by an Alabama Democrat Party that has resorted to ridicule in responding to the Obama eligibility case McInnish-Goode v Chapman, which will be held in front of Judge Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court! In an exclusive story reported by WND reporter Drew Zahn, the flippant nature of this brief indicates that the Obama team will be unable to brush off legitimate questions about how he can serve as a U.S. President without showing legitimate and verifiable evidence of eligibility!
Brought by Virgil Goode and Hugh McInnish, the case seeks to force Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify eligibility of all candidates on the 2012 ballot. Reporter Zahn points out that in 2010, Judge Moore (the “Ten Commandments” judge) remarked to WND about people who rely on their feelings to ascertain the fact that Obama is U.S.-born. “This is the strangest thing…the president has never produced evidence in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country,” said Judge Moore.
A Florida eligibility lawsuit brought by Attorney Larry Klayman on behalf of his client (Michael C. Voeltz) was filed on April 29, 2013 (case no. SC 13-560) in Florida’s First District Court of Appeals. “No physical paper copy has ever been presented to firmly establish Respondent Obama was indeed born within the United States,” maintains Klayman in the suit that asks the Court to direct Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner to issue an opinion regarding BHO’s eligibility to serve as president! This latest action asks for reinstatement of Voeltz v. Obama, ”which was improperly dismissed by court order dated 2-8-2013.” The Florida case points out that Obama’s father was a British subject born in Kenya, which was a British colony at the time of birth of Obama, Jr. “The U.S. Supreme Court has defined this term (NBC) to mean a child born to two citizen parents (R.245-260). . .Obama is not an NBC as required by the U.S. Constitution and therefore ineligible to be President.”
Earlier court filings include the sworn affidavit of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, dated June 12, 2012, stating that Obama’s online birth certificate is a “computer generated document, manufactured electronically, and that did not originate in paper format as claimed by the White House.” Arpaio swears under oath that he and his investigators have found probable cause of document forgery, meaning that the certificate cannot be used as a legal verification for Barack Obama’s date, place, or circumstances of birth!
“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of our American Constitutional Government, were left unresolved for want of the simplest of documents, a birth certificate,” states Klayman in the Alabama suit.
We’ll soon find out if the State Supreme Court agrees with him.
Photo Credit: Andrew Aliferis (Creative Commons)
Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for office.
Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.
“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.