As North Korea Crisis Deepens, Obama Raises Campaign Cash

Barack Obama Change sign SC As North Korea Crisis Deepens, Obama Raises Campaign Cash

(CNSNews.com) – As North Korea announced it has approved a nuclear strike on the United States, President Barack Obama was back on the campaign trail, raising money for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in San Francisco, California.

The first two DCCC fundraising events for the 2014 election cycle had Obama appearing with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and DCCC Chairman Steve Israel (D-N.Y.).

According to the official White House schedule, Obama delivered remarks at a private residence in San Francisco at 9:15 p.m. ET, followed by a second event at 10:55 p.m.

The first event was a cocktail reception hosted by Tom Steyer, a billionaire hedge fund manager and environmentalist. According to the Associated Press, about 100 donors paid a minimum of $5,000 to attend.

The guest list was smaller for a dinner later Tuesday at the home of billionaires Ann and Gordon Getty, but the price was higher — $32,400, the maximum individuals may give to a national party committee each year.

Read More at CNS News . By Elizabeth Harrington.

Photo Credit: Dustin C. Oliver Creative Commons

Myths And Realities Of Obamacare

Barack Obama 6 SC Myths And Realities Of Obamacare

Three years ago on March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordability Act (Obamacare) was signed into law. With the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on June 28, 2012 that the individual mandate is constitutional under Congress’ power to tax and the November 6 election results, the law is in effect. It is noteworthy that 52 percent of Americans would still like to see the law repealed and replaced. There is no question that affordable, accessible, quality care is the key goal for everyone.

Eleven days before the bill was passed, then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi made her famous statement “We have to pass this bill so we can find out what’s in it.” The American people are now finding out what is in it. Between now and 2014, many Americans and employers are going to be shocked by what this law means for their future health care. The question is: what can be done to reduce the impact of Obamacare between now and January 2017? I decided that it would be useful to present the myths and realities of the law in a format that all Americans could understand.

MYTHS AND REALITIES

Universal Coverage
Myth 1: Obamacare will achieve universal coverage.

Reality: According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), there will still be 30 million uninsured in 2016. This is even after adding 12 million people to the Medicaid program and 18 million who will receive subsidies from the federal government.

Read More pacificresearch.org . By Sally Pipes.

Obamacare: Hatched By Mostly ‘Tea Party Activists’

Tea Party SZ Obamacare: Hatched by mostly ‘Tea Party Activists’

Once again, the Tea Party has become the favorite “whipping boy” of the left — this time with the ridiculously laughable and delusional assertion by Douglas Zeigler in the Roofers and Waterproofers Local 81 newsletter from Oakland, California, that Obamacare was “hatched in congress by mostly ‘Tea Party activists’ along with their insurance company lobbyists.”

Just when you thought you’d heard it all. Blame it on us!

In Mr. Zeigler’s alternate reality, Obamacare is somehow the fault of the Tea Party.

Zeigler does acknowledge that the Affordable Health Care Act is anything but “affordable,” lamenting rising health insurance costs to the detriment of those it was supposed to help.

One wonders, though, where this man and others who think like him have been for the last 3-4 years? Living under a rock completely unexposed to the Obamacare banter?

I find that hard to believe. Even “low information voters” understand that the Pelosi-Reid-Obama troika was 100% responsible for Obamacare.

On March 9, 2010, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi said of the Affordable Care Act:

“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of controversy.”

That infamous quote along with all the political jockying in 2010 went viral. Mr. Zeigler must have had his head in the sand during Obama’s first two years in office not to notice.

He might find it enlightening to know that 219 Democrats voted “Yes” for Obamacare whereas ZERO Republicans (null, zip, nada, zilch) voted “Yes.” Ouch!

In fact, all Republicans—including the handful who, at that time, associated with the Tea Party movement—voted AGAINST Obamacare along with 34 Democrats.

It strains credulity to believe anyone could be that oblivious but then again — in man-on-the-street interviews, people actually thought that Sarah Palin was Obama’s running mate.

No, I don’t imagine he was unexposed or even ignorant of the process. It’s more likely that he was just another “useful idiot” blindly trusting his union leaders, dutifully attending rallies and town halls with his union’s imprimatur and fully equipped with pre-made, pro-Obamacare signs supplied by his union.

He was probably misled into believing that his people would be taken care of if there were any messy glitches with Obamacare.

Remember all of the waivers granted to big unions and companies that supported Obama?

Now that “working families” and the middle class are feeling the pinch, they have to blame someone and they cannot point fingers at the very man they re-elected. That might suggest that they were, um, wrong.

So, they might as well do what they always do when backed into a political corner and change the narrative. This time, in addition to casting tea partiers as racist, sexist, homophobic, radicals, they have planted the seed that we are “birthers”—having given
“birth” to Obamacare.

But here’s the truth:  The Tea Party movement was a direct, grassroots response to the mammoth, out-of-control spending of the Obama Administration and the 111th Democrat –controlled congress in the months after they first took power. The Tea Party coalesced around Obamacare in the summer and fall of 2009 trying to prevent it, read it, defeat it, and expose it.

It was the passage of Obamacare on March 21, 2010 (much to the chagrin of over 60% of the country that opposed it) that ushered in a wave during the 2010 mid-term elections of the first “official” Tea Party candidates. No one—not even Democrats and their cronies in the press—denies that this was a clear referendum on Obamacare by Democrat and Republican voters who had it with government spending and overreach.

Tea Party activists who got elected couldn’t have hatched Obamacare prior to the 2010 mid-term elections, because they weren’t in office at that time.

The handful of Republicans in the 111th Congress who sympathized with the neophyte movement could not have hatched Obamacare because the entire concept of it—the expense, the regulations, the taxes and the government overreach—go against everything any tea partier ever stood for.

And, even if it were a Tea Party “baby”, conservatives didn’t have any voice in Nancy Pelosi’s Congress.

In any case, Pelosi and Obama have consistently and proudly touted Obamacare as his singular achievement in the first term. There is nothing in the record to suggest we owned this one. Quite the contrary.

As further evidence that Tea Party activists did not hatch Obamacare, Mr. Zeigler might take note that the 2010 and 2012 Republican Congresses have actually voted to repeal ObamaCare 33 times—yes, 33 times!

So, they had to pass the bill in order to kill the bill? That makes sense.

So, Mr. Zeigler and members of the Roofers and Waterproofers Local 81, you have been either been duped or have allowed yourselves to be used.

Your union and Democrat leaders did not enact Obamacare because it is what’s best for youand your family. They did it because it was what’s best for them. They did it for your vote.

For unsuspecting union activists like Mr. Zeigler, Pelosi was correct: you had to pass the bill, to see what’s in it.

Tea Partiers were reviled for being outraged at rallies and town halls because they were paying attention. It seems Mr. Zeigler is outraged because he wasn’t paying attention.

Photo Credit: Sally Zelikovsky addresses Bay Area patriots in San Francisco.

 

Visit ThoughtfulWomen.org for more stories like this one.

Don’t Know What Chained CPI Is?

Dollar Bills SC Don’t know what Chained CPI is?

If you’re not sure what “chained CPI” is, you’re not alone. That’s a feature, not a bug. In fact, its wonky and innocuous-sounding name might just be the reason chained CPI could be included if some sort of grand bargain to reduce the deficit ever materializes.

A quick explainer: Right now, Social Security and other benefits are adjusted annually in order to keep pace with inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Index). Switching to chained CPI would mean using a different (probably more accurate) formula, which assumes lower cost of living increases. The obvious result of switching would be that the government would have to pay out less in benefits.

The reason this idea is so appealing to green eyeshade numbers-crunchers and political strategists, alike, is simple: Most people don’t like to have their benefits cut, but since so few Americans understand what “chained CPI” is, it’s more politically feasible than other options.

Democrats who might take heat for raising the retirement age, would probably elicit a collective yawn from their constituents if they voted to change how government calculates inflation.

As TPM’s Brien Beutler reported, Nancy Pelosi has even voiced support. “No, I don’t,” consider it a benefit cut, she said. “I consider it a strengthening of Social Security.” And the Wall Street Journal has also noted that, “President Barack Obama has expressed interest in the chained-CPI idea in the past.”

Read More at dailycaller.com . Matt K. Lewis.

MSNBC: We’ll Beat Fox By 2014

MSNBC SC MSNBC: Well Beat Fox By 2014

In a profile piece written by veteran journalist Rebecca Dana in The New Republic, MSNBC President Phil Griffin said he believes that the liberal network can beat Fox News by 2014.

Dana writes that even though Griffin and new CNN president Jeff Zucker are close personal friends, Griffin plans to “kick his ass,” and that beating Fox News is his “life’s ambition.”

And MSNBC is more successful now than it has ever been. At the end of this presidential election, it drew an average of 1.5 million viewers to its weekday prime time lineup. (The numbers have fallen since.) Fox still gets more than two million a night, but Griffin, optimistically, believes he can beat Fox by 2014. It’s a cockiness that has funneled down. In a recent staff meeting, one of Griffin’s producers coined a new term for Fox News: ‘Loserville.’

Griffin and his producer sound more like Nancy Pelosi every time she predicts that the Democrats will retake control of Congress in the next election. It isn’t based on reality and isn’t going to happen any time soon, considering how much MSNBC trails Fox News in the ratings.

While Griffin keeps setting his sights on Roger Ailes and Fox, he should keep his eyes on his rear view mirror, where onetime cable news leader CNN is receiving a makeover under new president Jeff Zucker.

MSNBC’s new 8 p.m. anchor told Dana that he wasn’t sure what Griffin’s political leanings were, though he thought he was a Democrat, and that Griffin’s politics aren’t woven into the DNA of the network as they are with Roger Ailes and Fox.

That may explain Griffin’s desire to build “the MSNBC Lifestyle,” in an attempt to broaden the network’s reach beyond liberal politics. That includes giving Chris Matthews a digital channel to talk about movies and good television shows.

What’s next? Decorating tips from Rachel Maddow?

Griffin has succeeded in improving the ratings and profits at MSNBC, but the lifestyle effort shows that he isn’t really confident that his brand of liberal talk will be able to overtake Fox News, and he is hedging his bets for the day viewers tire of the left-wing banter.

 

Please visit AIM.org for more articles like this one.

 

Photo credit: methodshop.com (Creative Commons)