Watch: What Michelle Obama Just Said Could Prove She’s As Racist As Barack In Only 39 Seconds


Popular actor and author Ben Stein stirred it up on Monday when he declared that Barack Obama is “the most most racist president there has ever been in America” because he has tried to racialize virtually every aspect of politics.

Now, as we learn from a post on, the First Lady has said something that certifies her racist credentials by telling a national TV audience that, no matter what, African Americans should vote Democrat.

In a revealing interview on TV One — a U.S. television network that targets black adults — Michelle Obama said that black voters don’t need to know what a candidate stands for, or how a candidate views the nation’s challenges, or what principles inform a candidate’s thinking.

In other words, Michelle Obama — just like her husband according to commentator Ben Stein — clearly believes politics should be racialized. Essentially, she tells show host Roland Martin, blacks shouldn’t, or can’t, think for themselves and make up their own minds — they should just cast their ballots blindly for the “D” in the race.

To Ms. Obama, it’s all about labels and race-think.

You can watch the segment on TV One by clicking on the video above.



The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Food Dictator Michelle Obama Gives Black People Permission To Eat Fried Chicken After Voting Democrat


Michelle Obama, like her husband, has been losing popularity for her school food regiments that are depriving students of food, as well as her recent gaffes on the campaign front.

Her most recent glaring statement came when she said that it doesn’t matter who is on the ballot; “our community,” or the black community, should always vote Democratic. No matter who it is, what they stand for, or what they’ve said or done, they need to vote Democrat. She added that black youth need to be taught to always vote Democratic.

Things somehow just got worse during her interview with Roland Martin on TV One, a station that caters to black viewers. She said something so racially charged that had it appeared anywhere else, there would be demands for apologies and for people to lose their jobs.

“So can we, if we go out to the polls, can we say, we have ‘souls to the polls’ on Sunday, can we do soul food after we vote?” Martin asked.

“Absolutely, I give everyone full permission to eat some fried chicken after they vote, only after…” the First Lady snickered.

“Just Checking!” Martin exclaimed.

“You make a good point because I am, I do talk about health,” she added. “But I think that a good victory for Democrats on Tuesday, you know, should be rewarded with some fried chicken.”

If Obama was just called “the most racist president ever,” what does this make his wife?


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Huge Michelle Obama Rumor That Could Mean America Is In Big Trouble (Video)


Responding to a report from last week, Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-California) said she would be “flattered” if First Lady Michelle Obama decides to run for her seat when her term is up in 2018, but admitted she has “no idea” what she’ll be doing at that time. It has been suggested that Feinstein, 81, won’t seek re-election at the end of her term.

Feinstein responded to Candy Crowley’s question on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday about a report published in Orb Magazine Thursday suggesting that First Lady Michelle Obama would move to California with her husband after his final term as president and pursue Feinstein’s seat in the U.S. Senate.

Crowley: I cannot let you go, Senator, without asking about an article I read that posited that Michelle Obama would like to run for the Senate in California, and that she has her eye on your seat in 2018 because the feeling is that you may retire at that point. And so I thought I’d get your reaction to that story.

Feinstein: Oh, did you? Well, I have no idea what I’m going to be doing in 2018. That’s four years from now, and that’s one of the nice things of a six-year term. I’ve served two years of my term and you know, I’ll make a decision in due time. I’m flattered, if that should be true. Somehow I do not believe it is true, but I would be flattered if it were.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported last month that, because of her age and the fact that Republicans have a good chance of reclaiming the majority in the upper chamber next week, Feinstein would not want to seek another term. Stanford University political scientist Bruce Cain was quoted as saying,

“It’s hard to believe at the end of your career you want to go back into opposition again, especially for someone like Dianne Feinstein, who has such a critical role in security matters and has been at center of debates about national security and surveillance.”

Orb Magazine outlines why California is the best place for the Obamas, as supposed to New York, Illinois, or Hawaii.

“Hawaii is too remote. Illinois is a cesspool of political corruption which they prefer to avoid, and New York, which they love, is too dense with Clintons and Clinton acolytes. They have many friends in Los Angeles, dating back to Barack’s student days at Occidental College, when he first left Hawaii.

An insider tells the publication why Los Angeles is specifically the leading contender for the Obamas.

“Barack could golf year-round and Michelle could emerge from his shadow after 20 years and retake control of her own life… Remember, Michelle is a Harvard educated lawyer whose career was more robust than Barack’s when they met.”


h/t Truth Revolt

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Watch: This Photo Of A Gross Michelle Obama School Lunch Has Sparked Widespread Outrage


An Oklahoma family is outraged over the portions their 17-year-old daughter is being served at lunchtime.

Kaytlin Shelton took a photo at her high school in Chickasha, Oklahoma, Monday showing a lunch with meat, two sets of crackers, a slice of cheese, and two pieces of cauliflower. The school serves this every other week, Fox 25 reported.

There is another wrinkle to this story: Shelton is eight months pregnant.

“It makes me want to take that and take it to the superintendent and tell him to eat it for lunch.”

Vince Holton said the meal, worth $3, is not good enough for any student, pregnant or not pregnant.

“I can go pay a dollar for a lunchable and get more food in it.”

School Superintendent David Cash told Fox 25 the small portions are due to federal regulations to fight childhood obesity, and knows that some kids are going hungry in his schools.

“You’ve got in some cases little kids that their only two meals are breakfast and lunch at school, and they’re getting… a grand total of 1100 calories. That’s not enough.

“My own kid comes home and the first thing he does is raid the refrigerator.”

Assistant State Superintendent for Child Nutrition Joanie Hildenbrand defended the photo to a certain extent, saying, “We have a meat-alternate, we have a bread grain, we have vegetable…It’s the student’s choice of what they want to take,” while acknowledging the hardships of the new regulations.

“These regulations were put into effect two years ago and we’re still struggling with them.”



This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

With Just 7 Revealing Words, Michelle Obama Lowers Herself To Slick Willy Status


Twenty years ago, when Bill Clinton was trying to distinguish himself as the “cool” candidate for president, he told an MTV audience about his intimate undergarments. You may remember the moment when a teenage girl asked, “Is it boxers or briefs?”

Here was a chance for real, meaningful insight into the lifestyle of America’s first-ever presidential contender to admit to smoking marijuana. Clinton’s answer, “Usually briefs.”

Now, two decades later, We the People are enlightened once again about the intimate fashion/comfort habits of an occupant of the White House. And for many, it may fall into the category of TMI — Too Much Information.

For others, what Michelle Obama revealed this week could qualify as a questionable disclosure for the First Lady of the United States. (It’s certainly hard, if not impossible, to imagine that Laura Bush would say such a thing.)

As we learn from

Speaking at the White House Fashion Education Workshop Wednesday, Michelle Obama may have revealed a little more about her choice of undergarments than most would like to know.

The event was geared toward young people interested in the fashion industry, so the first lady used Sara Blakely, founder of Spanx, as an example of how perseverance pays off.

Ms. Obama proceeded to tell the youthful gathering how Sara Blakely never gave up on her dream of producing form-fitting women’s undergarments intended to make the wearer look more slim and shapely. That dream became a very successful reality, said Michelle Obama, when Blakely founded what is now a multi-billion dollar company, Spanx.

Then, the First Lady let all the world know with a joyful 7-word exclamation, “And we all wear them – with pride!”

As a post on wryly observes:

How fitting that Obama should lift up a company whose product is designed for one thing and one thing only — to hide the truth.


Photo Credit: The White House    H/T:

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom