WHO Told These Republican “experts” They Know What They Are Talking About?

Republican Elephant 2 SC WHO told these Republican “experts” they know what they are talking about?

Who pats these fools on the head and anoints them as “experts?”

Politico finds it significant that “the usually gregarious consultant to Sen. Marco Rubio uncharacteristically resisted eight days of calls and emails seeking his thoughts for this column [on the Immigration bill].”

Presumably with their eyes toward the heavens, the authors of this article called Rubio’s push for amnesty a liability “at least for now.”

Using quotation marks around the word, Politico dismisses the notion that Rubio was “played” by Uncle Democrat (aka Chuck Schumer and other Senate Democrats.)

Sen. Lindsey Graham, who is very likely to face a primary for his part in granting  amnesty to millions of illegal aliens,  gave Rubio some advice: “If he’s got some influence in the House, now is a good time to use it.”

Politico praised Rubio for  “masterfully” winning over “important talkers like Bill O’Reilly on Fox” without realizing that O’Reilly couldn’t get himself arrested at a genuine TEA party rally and holds no sway whatsoever with actual conservatives. The authors’ claim that Rubio “neutralized” many radio talk show hosts best exemplifies how far from reality they are as well.

A Republican “expert” who mused about the “benefits” Rubio will enjoy because everyone will love him for giving us amnesty said “he might be threading the perfect political needle, getting credit for winning Senate passage without owning the responsibility for the complexities of implementation….”

Mike Murphy, a “noted” Republican strategist advises Rubio to keep pushing for final passage of an amnesty bill. Despite his plunging popularity, this idiot told Rubio to “Dance with the one that brung you. You get points for courage on a very tricky issue. And years from now, he’ll be able to say he was on the right side of it.”

All of this begs the question: Who told these people they know what they are talking about?

Are Rubio’s close advisors and this “genius” Murphy even able to read simple data? Can’t they look at the numbers and see that amnesty will destroy the Republican Party?

The guys at Politico, I can understand. They are liberal Democrats and would love to see a socialist America. But WHO told the Republican “experts” they know what they are talking about?

Photo Credit: Donkey Hotey (Creative Commons)

Rubio Didn’t Know His Own Bill Allows Someone To Forge 2 Passports Before It’s A Crime

Marco Rubio SC Rubio Didnt Know His Own Bill Allows Someone to Forge 2 Passports Before Its a Crime

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)–a Republican member of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” who co-sponsored the Senate immigration bill and was one of 14 Republicans who ultimately voted for it–was unaware that his own bill allows a person to forge up to two passports without penalty.

“Under the Senate immigration bill, how many passports can someone forge before it becomes a crime?” CNSNews.com asked Rubio Thursday on Capitol Hill.

“How many–you can’t forge any passports,” Rubio replied. ”That’s a federal crime now.”

CNSNews.com: “It’s actually a part of the bill that it’s up, that you can do two, and three and on it’s a crime. Why would that be a part of it?”

Rubio: “Well, first of all, I think what you’re talking about is the way the law is described vis-a-vis, umm, waivers that people can get. And as I said, I mean, there are elements of that bill that continue to be, need to be improved, and I myself have disagreements about the way the waiver structure was put in the bill, and my hope is that it can be improved through the House process when they do their own bill.”

Read More at CNS News . By Alissa Tabirian.

A Warning To My Congressman: No Amnesty!!

Amnesty 1987 Ill Be Back SC A Warning To My Congressman: No Amnesty!!

Dear Congressman Michael Grimm (R-NY),

I speak for myself and a sizable bloc of like-minded people who are furious with your apparent intention to vote to erase our borders and destroy our economy by the importation of tens of millions of new uneducated and unskilled people into our midst.

These people will overwhelmingly vote Democrat so they can squeeze every last drop of blood out of the body of our beloved country. We’ve tried to talk to you about your legally mandated responsibilities to uphold the Constitution and protect our interests, but you seem to be ignoring what we have to say. Instead, you are listening to people like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, who tell you that unless you vote to provide (fill in your name for amnesty), Hispanics will never support you, and Republicans will never hold the White House again. Why you would believe this is a mystery. Such an assertion is bizarre and absolutely unsupportable on its face. Neither you nor anyone else can make the case that Hispanics will ever vote for Republicans under any circumstances.

Take a look at what the 1986 Amnesty bill did to California. Your implied parroting of the Democrat Party line on the urgent need for “comprehensive immigration reform” without the slightest hint of self-consciousness speaks volumes about where your true loyalties are. You seem to believe that those of us who can see what is really happening should be addressed with this child-like foolishness about “comprehensive immigration reform”; but believe me, you are making a serious mistake.

I remind you that we are not a mindless mob as you and your Republican colleagues choose to believe. We are the very people who worked 8 and 10 hours a day every day for months to get you elected. We can and most certainly will work just as hard to defeat you if you support any form of amnesty. We understand the issues. We understand that you are contemplating actually putting the future of our nation, and more to the point the future of our families, in the hands of Barack Obama, a narcissist who thinks he is a king one day and a dictator the next.

Mister Grimm, what makes you believe that the so-called triggers for this or triggers for that will force King Barack to implement anything he doesn’t like? Don’t you see how naïve you sound with all of this high sounding talk and apparent trust in Barack Obama? The King didn’t like parts of his own Obamacare bill, so he merely declines to enforce what he doesn’t like. The king won’t like anything in your naïve “comprehensive immigration reform bill” that closes the borders, so he WON’T enforce what you vote for. He wants only one thing from this bill: Tens of millions of new Democrat voters.

Perhaps the most insulting aspect of this issue is the used car salesman talk you and your colleagues use when talking up this amnesty bill. You babble about tough border security; they will have to get a job and learn English; they will go to the ‘end of the line.’ Let’s talk about these things. There already is a federal law in place requiring 700 miles of new fencing to be built on the southern border.

Yet, contrary to the nonsense from Marco Rubio and his sidekick Paul Ryan, a future Congress cannot refuse to build THEIR new fence. Where is the fence Mr. Grimm? This kind of breathtaking arrogance is why your Party is losing members, and you are in danger of losing your seat next year. The Democrats don’t want the fence, so it will never be built; but they will lie and say they do to get their steady stream of new voters. Why would you want to help them?

Get a job or be deported? Do you mean steal a job from the pitiful 47% of American adults who are still working? Is that what you want, Mr. Grimm? Learn English or by deported? Who will decide the English proficiency of uneducated illegal aliens – LaRaza? “Go to the end of the line or be deported?” What line – at McDonalds? Do you r-e-a-l-l-y believe this stuff, Mr. Grimm?

Your choice is simple. You can either help save America, or you can help destroy it. If you vote for amnesty (and please don’t try to fool us with ‘I’ll never vote for blanket amnesty’ as that’s insulting), within two cycles, there will be 375 Democrats in Congress and at least 65 in the Senate. When that happens, all of your attempts at high-sounding rhetoric aimed at fooling people will mean nothing (and by the way, you will be unemployed.)

I know that everyone who gets elected to anything instantly believes himself to be an expert in EVERYTHING, and you are apparently no exception. That said, let me say you are no political sage. Your willingness to force a loser like Mitt Romney on us to make it seem like you know about politics made you look foolish and ill-advised. You got 26,000 more votes than Romney last November. Doesn’t that tell you something? Don’t you see those 26,000 voters as already angry with the Republican Party and at least somewhat ready to be angry with you?

Under no circumstances will you ever get the Hispanic vote. You are a Republican, and that disqualifies you in their eyes. If you vote for amnesty, LaRaza will give you a plaque called Miguel and vote Democrat anyway – it’s really as simple as that.

Chuck Schumer is not your friend. Paul Ryan doesn’t know what he is talking about, and neither does Marco Rubio. If they did, they would debate the issue; but of course they won’t because they know they can’t defend their position.

Because of my oath as a brother Marine and member of the Marine Corps League, I feel honor bound to tell you my plans in advance. If you do this, Mister Grimm, if you vote to destroy my family’s future and finish off what is left of America, I will consider it a direct attack on my family and my nation.

That attack will be met with an all-out 24×7 effort to defeat you. Replacing you with a Democrat will mean nothing to me because in the overwhelmingly Democrat Congress to come ,the only way Staten Island would get anything is with a Democrat Representative. This is not a threat but an explanation of my position and what I see as my only possible response to your callous disregard for the future of my family.

Since I believe you will betray America for a picture with Chuck Schumer and/or John Boehner, I’ll see you on New Dorp Lane in front of your office. I’ll be the guy wearing a sandwich board telling people what you have done and asking them to join me in re-registering as an Independent working against you and voting against you. I will fight you with every ounce of strength I have as any Marine who perceives a threat to America and his family would. I won’t be alone, so look for a tall man wearing a USMC cap.

Smart Money Still On Govs For GOP Nod In 2016

Bobby Jindal SC Smart Money Still on Govs for GOP Nod in 2016

There’s been much hype lately surrounding three enterprising young Republicans in the Senate, and rightfully so. Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz are dynamic personalities who’ve thrust their way into the public debate in recent months on issues ranging from drones to gun control to immigration.

All three appear to harbor aspirations for higher office, and are already in the conversation as potential presidential contenders in 2016. It would be foolish to count them out.

By historical standards, they lack the requisite experience to sit in the Oval Office. But so did another freshman senator, Barack Obama. Moreover, Americans’ attentions spans are so short these days that candidates who burst on the scene only a short time ago — Sarah Palin being the outstanding example — are already old stories.

And though Paul, Rubio, and Cruz hail from a political party that traditionally awards its presidential nomination to the next guy in line, no obvious person fits that description today. The 2016 field truly is an open one.

Yet, history says they’re all underdogs to win the GOP nomination and face even longer odds of winning back the White House for Republicans.

Read More at Real Clear Politics . By Tom Bevan.

Marco Rubio’s Big Immigration Mistake

Marco Rubio SC Marco Rubios Big Immigration Mistake

What a sad transformation it’s been to see Senator Marco Rubio go from being a Tea Party hero to an apologist for the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill.

Back in 2010, Rubio was a handsome and articulate State Senator in Florida when he decided to run for the U.S. Senate. Doing so meant defying the Republican establishment’s hand-picked selection, then-Governor Charlie Crist.

There were two make-or-break issues in the Republican primary that year. The first was Barack Obama’s massively expensive stimulus program. Crist was so enamored of it that he actually agreed to have a photograph taken of him publicly embracing the President. We’ll never know how many votes that hug cost him, but it was a bunch.

Rubio said that counting on federal handouts to create jobs was a huge mistake. He called instead for letting the free enterprise system work, by lowering taxes and reducing regulation. The voters made it clear which message they preferred.

The other issue that marked a sharp disagreement between the two candidates was immigration reform and, in particular, amnesty for the millions of people who were in this country illegally. Crist endorsed amnesty; Rubio, the son of immigrants from Cuba, said he was unalterably opposed to it. In speech after speech, Rubio repeated this warning in some form: If you grant amnesty in any form, you will destroy any chance we ever have of having a legal immigration system that works here in America.

Read more at The New American. By Chip Wood.