The Media’s Vile Attacks On Conservative Assimilationists

I have had enough of smug liberal elites wrapped in their “Celebrate Diversity” banners tearing down minority conservatives.

Look in the mirror, media and academia bigots. Your own reflexive racism and divisive rhetoric are poisoning public discourse. There’s nothing “progressive” about attacking the children and grandchildren of immigrants who proudly embrace an American identity.

We are not “self-hating.” You just hate what we believe.

The most recent grenade tossed by the jack-booted Enforcers of Ethnic Authenticity came from The Washington Post this week. The Beltway fish-wrapper hyped a 2,100-word investigation of GOP Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal with a condescending quote from Professor G. Pearson Cross, who sneered: “There’s not much Indian left in Bobby Jindal.”

Has pallid Professor Cross invented an ambient diagnostic test to measure sufficiently acceptable levels of ethnicity?

The Post quoted a grand total of one disgruntled Democratic donor who railed against Jindal for “forgetting” his “heritage” and his “roots.” But that was more than enough for the apartheid-lite adherents to heed the dog whistle immediately. The Post’s splashy attack on Jindal’s assimilationist ethic spawned a vile Twitter hashtag game: #BobbyJindalIsSoWhite.

Left-wing racists mocked his skin color, his kids, and his decision to change his name from “Piyush” to “Bobby.” A New York Times digital editor, Shreeya Sinha, gleefully linked to a BBC compilation of “The best of #BobbyJindalisSoWhite.” NBC News gloated over tweets from liberal Indian-Americans who mocked the accomplished governor, Rhodes scholar, and father of three as a “Jindian.”

It’s the same old, same old from radical academics and reporters who spurned assimilation as a common goal long ago. As I’ve long observed, the media-ivory tower complex’s fidelity lies with bilingualism (a euphemism for native language maintenance over English-first instruction), ethnic militancy, extreme multiculturalism, and a borderless continent.

If we conservatives “of color” refuse to promote the welfare state, unfettered abortion, affirmative action, and massive immigration, we are guilty of “selling out.”

Conversely, if I point out that my skin is far darker than that of the TV progressives of pallor who presume to know more than me about what it’s like to experience prejudice, I’m accused of exploiting my ethnicity.

We’re coconuts, bananas, and Oreos (brown, yellow, or black on the outside and “white” on the inside).

We’re accused of “thinking” and “acting” white if we quote the Constitution, shoot, hunt, oppose high taxes, homeschool, take personal responsibility, or demand that government leave us alone.

You can’t win with these insane identity-mongers who preach compassion and peace while practicing vicious demagoguery. Black conservatives are “Uncle Toms.” Jindal is an “Uncle Bobby.” And GOP Gov. Nikki Haley, born to Indian Sikh parents, has been derided as a “female Uncle Tom.” Jindal is “trying to be white” even though his parents are Indian and his wife’s parents are both from India. Meanwhile, haters have accused me of being an “Auntie Tomasina” for marrying outside my race and taking my husband’s name.

Marriage choice and marriage equality are sacred rights for everyone except minority conservatives.

Jindal and Haley are just the latest targets. Last month, it was son of Cuban immigrants Ted Cruz. White liberal journalist Mark Halperin took it upon himself to drill Texas GOP Sen. Cruz on his “favorite Cuban food” and demanded that he welcome socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders to the presidential race “en Espanol.”

Que estupido.

The civility police and tolerance mob find nothing wrong with their ad hominem assaults and vulgar litmus tests. They’re just trying to make the world safe from the liberated minds of minority conservatives. Those of us who dare to succeed in America without relying on tribalist entitlements must be dragged back and down by the resentful, seething crabs in the collectivist bucket.

We are scorned for abandoning the militant hyphenated fetishism of the left.

We are punished for rejecting rigid boxes and boundaries and one-drop blood rules and permanent castes.

Assimilation is a Class A felony in the liberal rulebook and a threat to the Democratic grievance racket. Tell me who the real racists and bigots are again.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

The New York Times’ Reckless Report

“It seemed pretty glaringly obvious to me that the ‘news fit to print’ was pretty much the news that’s fit to serve the powerful… The way that the paper’s senior staff think is exactly like those in power — in fact, it’s their job to become their friends.” – former NYT correspondent Daniel Simpson

We see right through the propaganda. As one possibly left-leaning commentator astutely noted in response to a stereotypical hit piece against those who lean politically right:

No doubt there are people infuriated with the government but to suggest that these Faux News watchers are going to take up arms against the government is not supported by the facts. Moreover, those few examples cited appear to be unstable individuals, not politically motivated but listening to audio hallucinations found in young male schizophrenics. Better research and an editor with a sharp pencil might are needed here.

Words matter and loose labels are highly irresponsible. Too much mainstream reporting is perpetuating a hidden agenda in their political projections and culture war aggression. Maybe if all crimes were reported equally – black on black, black on white, and everything in between – rather than fanning the flames in a unilateral direction, the right wing news outlets would not feel the need to overcompensate.

If you only followed mainstream media, you would think Obama was the second coming of Jesus. Well, Jesus does not play favorites and neither should we. We are either for Him or against Him. Faithful believers of every color, race, background, gender, and ethnicity are fit for the Kingdom. He is an equal opportunity redeemer. Look in the mirror, see past your complexion, and decide where you stand!

“If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.” – James 1:5

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Major Media Fail: The Catastrophic Climate Change This Network Predicted For…TODAY!

Here’s a little lesson in how the mainstream media can try to scare the daylights out of people with dire warnings about catastrophic climate change…only to be proven utterly wrong and exposed as, what one might reasonably term, hysterical hucksters.

In June 2008, ABC News announced with great fanfare an “exciting and important” program the network claimed would be an “unprecedented” news event — an exploration of a bleak and frightening future for the United States — a future bedeviled by the “perfect storm” of shrinking resources, population growth, and climate change…emphasis on climate change. ABC News correspondent Bob Woodruff was embarking on his newly adopted reportorial mission of warning people about a potentially apocalyptic scenario of distress, deprivation, and death.

As NewsBusters reminds us of the 2008 broadcast on Good Morning America that introduced the project called Earth 2100:

Then-GMA co-anchor Chris Cuomo appeared frightened by this future world.

On June 13, 2008, ABCNews.com promoted the special by hyperventilating, “Are we living in the last century of our civilization?”

Woodruff and Cuomo did their best to build up the “news event” into must-see TV, trying to hype the hysteria to the point that viewers would have to watch…like people have to look at a horrible wreck along the roadway where mangled cars are bathed in the eerie flashes of red and blue light from emergency vehicles.

The pair breathlessly promoted a special website to go along with the program — Earth2100.tv — which, curiously, is now a site that promotes advances in cosmetic surgery. Apparently, the fear of a frightful future because of man-caused climate change wasn’t enough to keep viewers engaged for the ABC News crew.

But the network has maintained a presence for the Earth 2100 project on its own website, where hysteria and hyperbole still rule the day with incredibly dramatic declarations.

It’s an idea that most of us would rather not face — that within the next century, life as we know it could come to an end. Our civilization could crumble, leaving only traces of modern human existence behind.

It seems outlandish, extreme — even impossible. But according to cutting edge scientific research, it is a very real possibility. And unless we make drastic changes now, it could very well happen.

The NewsBusters article on the Bob Woodruff climate change project notes how very wrong many of the so-called “predictions” offered by participants in the introductory story for the Earth 2100 project were. Some of those forward-looking warnings of doom and gloom were aimed at the very month and year in which we’re now living — June 2015.

“New York City underwater? Gas over $9 a gallon? A carton of milk costs almost $13? Welcome to June 12, 2015. Or at least that was the wildly-inaccurate version of 2015 predicted by ABC News exactly seven years ago. Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic 2015.”

Ironically, one could say that the special website then associated with the ABC News “sky is falling unless we change our evil environmental ways” project has more appeal in its current incarnation — sharing “wonderful guidelines” for people who want to mold their faces to better suit the personal vision they have for themselves.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

WATCH: Of All The ‘Caitlyn’ Talk This Could Be The Most Bizarre Gibberish On TV

The segment on the MSNBC program All In with Chris Hayes was called “The Jenner Effect.” And if this video clip from the show is any indication, the “effect” is to cause supposedly capable commentators to devolve into what one might call blubbering boobs as they try to conjure up some sort of intelligent, enlightened observations about the transgendered celebrity formerly known as Bruce.

Of course, this was on MSNBC, where — in the name of progressivism — what many would consider pure gibberish is passed off as pure genius.

The woman featured in this clip from the show is Michelle Goldberg, senior contributing writer for The Nation, the self-described “flagship of the left” that’s devoted to politics and culture.

Somehow, Goldberg’s observations about Caitlyn Jenner turned to why “second-wave feminists” want to remove the use of the word “women” when it comes to discussing abortion. The rest of Goldberg’s comments are, well, so convoluted and contorted that even the fellow next to her — New York Times sports columnist William Rhoden — couldn’t help but look politely puzzled by what was said.

By clicking on the video above, you can see for yourself what might just be the most bizarre gibberish yet on TV about Jenner’s adventure into transgenderism that’s become a liberal cause célèbre.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Watch: Duggar Sisters Just Told Megyn Kelly About Being ‘Victims’…But Not Of Their Brother

In a previous post, Western Journalism shared a portion of Megyn Kelly’s exclusive sit-down interview with members of the embattled Duggar family. We heard from Michelle and Jim Bob Duggar, explaining how their discovery of the sexual misbehavior of their son Josh when he was a teenager caused them such heartache.

“I think, as parents, you feel like a failure when one of your kids does something wrong,” Jim Bob said. “You feel like if I had done more training or maybe something else that this wouldn’t have happened.”

On her Fox News show Wednesday night, Kelly presented quite a lengthy interview with the Duggar parents — their first such in-depth discussion of the events surrounding the scandal that has engulfed their family and jeopardized the future of their popular TLC TV show 19 Kids and Counting.

Kelly’s interview with the Duggars will continue to be shown on Friday, as the Fox News anchor talks with Jessa and Jill, two of Josh’s sisters whom he allegedly molested years ago. In a preview of that highly emotional conversation, the two young women reveal the pain of being “victims” in this whole messy episode — victims not of their brother’s admitted “misbehaviors,” but of the controversial disclosure of their involvement in the scandal.

The legal fallout of the release by authorities in Arkansas of secret juvenile records involving the Duggar children is still being felt. As Fox News has reported, a police chief in Springdale, Ark., Kathy O’Kelley, okayed the release of those sealed records, even though state law appears to order that they be kept under wraps:

…the Freedom of Information (FOI) law in Arkansas states that the records of the arrest of a juvenile ‘shall remain confidential’ and ‘shall not be subject to disclosure under the FOI.’

By clicking on the video above, you can see a short preview of Megyn Kelly’s Friday interview with Jessa and Jill Duggar, who speak of the pain of being victimized by the disclosures that have been splashed all over the tabloids and made them targets of vicious attacks by liberals.

Do you think the Duggar girls are being unfairly victimized by the liberal media? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth