Video: ACLU Lawyer Calls Obama “Judge, Jury, Executioner” Over Drone Attacks

A recently leaked Department of Justice “White Paper” gives the President of the United States and those he designates – “high government officials” – the authority to take the life of any American citizen, even if there is no proof that the citizen in question is involved in nefarious activities.

John Brennan, the Obama administration’s pick to replace Leon Panetta as the next CIA Director, has found his nomination put on hold by Senator Rand Paul after refusing to answer Paul’s question in front of the Senate sub-committee regarding the use of drones to attack American citizens domestically, again without ever having been charged with a crime in a court of law. Senator Paul calls the idea “appalling.”

In this episode of “The Truth Is Viral”, Nate Wessler, a lawyer with the ACLU’s National Security Project, echoes Senator Paul’s sentiments in this exclusive interview in which he calls Obama and the members of his administration “Judge, jury, and executioner.” That is a strong statement of condemnation coming from the historically ultra-liberal ACLU.

****CALL TO ACTION INFO****
WBKB PHONE: (989) 356-3434
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/WBKBTV
TWITTER: @WBKB11
YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/user/wbkbtv
(Please remember to call only once as they are logging all numbers with CallerID)

****READ DEATH/RAPE THREATS  BELOW****

TTiV Forum thread: Twitter Followers Of Rapper “The Game” Threaten TTiV Host And His Wife With Murder And Rape

 

SOURCE: Bob Powell/The Truth Is Viral

Video: Limbaugh Scorches ‘Sick And Depraved’ MSNBC

Rush Limbaugh rightfully characterizes MSNBC’s singular focus as racism.

Related posts:

  1. Rush Limbaugh Challenges MSNBC: Don’t Mention Me   By ANDY BARR, Politico   Conservative radio host Rush…
  2. Limbaugh Rebuffs Attempt By Sleep Train To Get Him Back The rift between Sleep Train Mattress Centers and Rush Limbaugh…

The Colorado Shooting And The Crowdsourced Future Of News

Liberal Media SC The Colorado shooting and the crowdsourced future of news

Only a few days ago, we were writing about how users of Twitter and Reddit used those networks to tell a compelling story about a mass shooting in Toronto, and now the same phenomenon is playing out in real-time during another horrific incident: a shooting at a movie theater in Colorado that has killed at least a dozen people and wounded more than 50. Although local TV news channels and CNN have been all over the story since it broke late Thursday night, some of the best fact-based information gathering has been taking place on Reddit and via curation tools like Storify. In each of these events, we can see how a new form of journalism — one that blends traditional reporting and crowdsourced reports — is taking shape.

As media writer Andrew Beaujon at the Poynter Institute notes, Reddit quickly became the go-to spot for comprehensive information about the shooting and its aftermath. Although other sites put up Storify collections of tweets from individuals who were at the scene — including one of the victims — as a way of tracking how the news spread, the community of users at Reddit went a step further: they collaborated in real time to produce a continuously updated timeline of the event, complete with links to where they obtained the information. That kind of collaboration is something many cash-strapped newsrooms simply no longer have the resources to produce (Buzzfeed has an interview with the 18-year-old Reddit userwho created most of the timeline).

Eyewitness reports, crowdsourced timelines, Q&As

But Reddit hosted more than just the timeline: while other mainstream media outlets spoke to people who were near the incident (many of whom added little in the way of useful detail) Reddit had several submissions from members of the community who were actually in the theater when the shooting started — and because of the way Reddit functions, commenters were able to interact with those eyewitnesses in a way that wouldn’t have been possible in any other format except a staged conversation on a TV talk show. Not only that, but one person involved in the incident actually posted photos of their wounds to the site. As one commenter noted:

“How cool is it we can ask a guy a question over the internet about an event that happened less than 8 hours ago firsthand? Reporters couldn’t get on a plane and find someone that quickly. The future is now.”

Read more at Gigaom.com. Matthew Ingram.

Photo credit: wstera2 (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. NBC Probe Centers On Staffer In Shooting Story Error April 5 (Reuters) – An internal NBC News probe has…
  2. The Future Of News Jeremiah Dobruck, Daily Titan  Taxpayers are already shouldering the burden…

What We’ve Come To Expect: Media Bias In Alaska

Alaska Map SC 300x242 What we’ve come to expect: media bias in Alaska

In what conservative Alaskans have come to expect from our state’s LSM, these outlets failed to report the most salient point of the “Offer to Enter Judgment” requested by the borough and its former Mayor Jim Whitaker, which is that it is a judgment in Miller’s favor. This is the exact final judgment that Miller would have received if he had won a jury verdict in this case, plus whatever dollar amount the jury would have awarded.

Some Alaska media outlets have published variations of the theme that Joe Miller and the Fairbanks North Star Borough and its former mayor Jim Whitaker entered into a settlement agreement, or “offer of compromise” that allowed the borough to simply pay $5,000 and avoid any statement of liability. The Anchorage Daily News entitled its story, “Joe Miller Accepts Offer of Lawsuit Compromise,” the Alaska Dispatch, “Joe Miller settles lawsuit with Fairbanks borough,” and the Fairbanks Daily News Miner, “Joe Miller, who claimed damages of more than $160000, settles for $5000 and declares victory.”

Read More at joemiller.us.

Related posts:

  1. Racial Media Bias Meets Liberal Media Bias With the inauguration of America’s first black president less than…
  2. Big Media Shows Bias Against ‘don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ By Chad Groening, One News Now The Media Research Center…

Drugs, The Media, And Barry Obama

King Obama SC Drugs, the Media, and Barry Obama

It was big news when President Clinton said he “never inhaled.” People laughed at the absurdity of the statement. Everybody knew he inhaled. His denial was done with a wink and a nod. I suspect that a lot of you who are reading this article also inhaled.

A younger Barack Obama wrote a good deal about his drug experimentation in his 1995 book Dreams From My Father. As you read the excerpt below, ask yourself this question: If this had been written by a Republican presidential candidate, what do you think the liberal media reaction would have been? There’s a further question: Why wasn’t the story part of the vetting process when Barack Obama was running for President? The media knew like they knew about JFK’s sexual exploits and Martin Luther King’s plagiarism. Why is Mitt Romney’s one-time hair-cutting story of 50 years ago so important and not Obama’s cocaine use?

“I blew a few smoke rings, remembering those years. Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow [cocaine] when you could afford it. Not smack [heroin], though — Mickey, my potential initiator, had been just a little too eager for me to go through with that. Said he could do it blindfolded, but he was shaking like a faulty engine when he said it…

“Junkie. Pothead. That’s where I’d been headed; the final fatal role of the would-be black man. Except the highs hadn’t been about that, me trying to prove what a down brother I was. Not by then, anyway. I got high for just the opposite effect, something that could push questions of who I was out of my mind. Something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory.

“I had discovered that it didn’t make any difference whether you smoked reefer in a white classmate’s sparkling new van, or in the dorm room of some brother you’d met down at the gym, or on the beach with a couple of Hawaiian kids… You just might be bored or alone. Everybody was welcome into the club of disaffection.

“And if the high didn’t solve whatever it was that was getting you down, it could at least help you laugh at the world’s ongoing folly and see through all the hypocrisy and bullshit and cheap moralism. That’s how it seemed to me then, anyway.”

Read more at Godfather Politics. By Gary De Mar.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Related posts:

  1. LETTERMAN AWKWARDLY MOCKS BOEHNER TO NBC’S WILLIAMS: HE CRIES ‘LIKE HE’S ON DRUGS’ … Continue to Post…
  2. Should Christians Support The War On Drugs?   Televangelist and founder of the Christian Coalition Pat Robertson,…