King Obama Tramples the Law, Continues Libyan War by Decree

Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com

In his official notice to Congress that he had unilaterally sent American soldiers into the Libyan war kinetic action, Barack Obama wrote, “I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution.” Today, he decided the War Powers Resolution is also disposable. In a letter to Congress today Obama declared America’s role in the Libyan civil war is so “limited” that he does not need Congressional authorization, as that law requires. He then asked their support for a measure John Boehner had not even seen. The move is the most recent of a string of Obama actions that bypass Congress to implement his agenda.

The War Powers Resolution allows the president to introduce troops into war for 60 days before either seeking Congressional approval or beginning a 30-day withdrawal.

Those 60 days ended today. However, Congress adjourned this afternoon without providing authorization.

Obama has made clear our troops are staying in the middle of a losing civil war no matter what the members of Congress – or the people who elected them – think.

Only as Congress was ready to adjourn did Obama send a letter to the leaders of both houses supporting a resolution in favor of the war. The measure drafted by Sens. John Kerry, John McCain, Carl Levin, Dianne Feinstein, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman.

Obama wrote passing the resolution would “underline the U.S. commitment” to this “remarkable” action. As an afterthought, he added it would be “important in the context of our constitutional framework” – not because it is a legal requisite imposed by constitution and statute – but because “it would demonstrate a unity of purpose among the political branches.” If there is a division, the implication is that Obama would continue without such “unity.”

At least one Congressional leader said he had not yet seen the resolution, much less had it been approved. A spokesman for Speaker of the House John Boehner, Michael Steel, told the L.A. Times, “We received the president’s letter but have yet to see the draft resolution it mentions.”

The president concluded the letter with his traditional audacious lie….

Read more.

If Obama Treated Koran Burning like the Ground Zero Mosque

Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports

Although he would not say a word about Iran’s human rights violations after Mahmoud Ahmadinejiad tortured protesters of the stolen presidential election last summer, Barack Obama brought the full weight of the presidential bully pulpit down against 50 people planning to burn the Koran this Saturday. Obama told George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America this morning the would-be Koran-burners’ “stunt” is “completely contrary to our values of Americans…this country has been built on the notions of religious freedom and religious tolerance.”

That is an interesting about-face on the right of religious people to exercise the First Amendment. Less than a month ago, he declared his support for the Ground Zero Mosque, telling Muslims at an Iftar dinner:

Let me be clear: As a citizen and as president I believe that Muslims have the right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.

He later said he was only reiterating their constitutional rights and “will not comment on the wisdom” of planting a victory mosque atop the graves of 3,000 jihad victims. But he felt no constraint commenting on the “wisdom” of a tiny Christian church burning the Muslims’ “holy” book. Although he showed enthusiasm for the First Amendment rights of Muslims, he tried to sic the local police on Pastor Jones, stating that he found the Dove World Outreach Center’s rights “frustrating”….

Read more.

Obama: Leaked Afghanistan Military Papers “No Big Deal”

Ben Chapman, Floyd Reports Staff Writer

The news of the leak of over 75,000 secret military documents seems to be no big deal to Obama. After all, it’s only the largest leak since the Pentagon Papers about Vietnam and is likely to greatly endanger our Afghan allies’ lives.

I know I’d like to think our leaders in the White House are kidding, and the joke is going to get funny soon. Try again, because no one is laughing.

According to Colonial David Lapan, “the documents are at the ‘secret’ level; that’s not a very high level of classification.” If something isn’t confidential to begin with, how can it be “leaked”? Thank you Col. Lapan for your idiotic comments.

Also quick to the defense of our bumbling administration was Senator John Kerry, who wanted to quell our fears and make sure we don’t “overhype or get excessively excited about the meaning of these documents.”

What does the military, or voice of reason, say about all this? Admiral Mike Mullen, the top ranking U.S. military officer, said he was “appalled” by the leak of information.

The liberal democrats say it’s no big deal that these secret (apparently un-important) documents were leaked, yet the highest ranking U.S. military officer is “appalled.” I think it wise to side with the one who has a clue about military matters!

This latest gaff by the Obamites is another great example of their ineptness.

How does an administration that cannot keep secret documents under wraps expect to do a good job controlling and distributing healthcare to 300 million people?

There are only 500,000 people on the TSA’s “no-fly list,” yet Abdul Farouk Abdul-Mutallab (the December Detroit bomber) waltzed on the plane like the list was there just for fun.

Obama and your fellow idiots: get a grip on reality and the state of this country, before we have another terrorist attack, more important leaked military documents, or your impeachment!

Come to think of it, that last option sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?

Prez slinging mud to stoke his base

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN, New York Post

He said he had the audacity to hope that America could rise above the politics of partisan polarization and embrace the sunlight paths of compromise and cooperation. But that was then and this is now.

Faced with falling polls and the chance of wholesale obliteration of his majorities in Congress, President Obama has plainly decided to pursue the very politics of division and partisan animus he once claimed to eschew.

To grasp the reasons behind Obama’s descent into the mud, start with some basic facts. In 2008, he won almost exactly the same percentage of the white vote that John Kerry won in 2004. The reasons he won and Kerry lost were all demographic:

* Obama generated an African-American turnout three points higher than Kerry, and almost all of those new voters supported him.
* Latino-American voters gave Obama a margin of 45 points while they supported Kerry by only 10 — and they constituted 1 percent more of the vote in ’08 than in ’04.
* Obama offset his losses among older white voters by increasing the turnout and the Democratic margin among whites under age 30.

Read More