Obama’s Speech May Have Undercut Prosecution for Judge’s Murder

Josh Gerstein, Politico

It may have been inadvertent, but a passage in President Barack Obama’s speech to a memorial service it Tucson Wednesday night could undercut a criminal charge federal prosecutors have leveled at suspect Jared Loughner for the death of U.S. District Court Judge John Roll in a shooting rampage Saturday.

“Judge Roll was recommended for the federal bench by John McCain 20 years ago, appointed by President George H.W. Bush, and rose to become Arizona’s chief federal judge,” Obama told the crowd at the University of Arizona. Roll’s “colleagues described him as the hardest-working judge within the Ninth Circuit. He was on his way back from attending mass, as he did every day, when he decided to stop by and say, ‘Hi,’ to his representative”…

Prosecutors and the FBI insist that Roll “was engaged in official duties” because he wanted to talk to Giffords and her staffers about problems with a surging caseload in federal courts in Arizona, particularly along the Mexican border.

Loughner’s alleged killing of Roll may only be a crime under federal law if Roll was on business and not merely stopping by to say hi to a friend

As a legal matter, Obama’s view (which tracks with the public narrative offered by Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik) may be irrelevant, but it probably doesn’t help to have the President of the United States emphasizing the social aspect of Roll’s stop to see Giffords on Saturday, rather than the reason prosecutors claim drew him there.

Read more.

A Christian Response to the Arizona Shooting

Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com

This may not be my most popular column, and if that is the case, I can live with it.

I never thought I’d get to write these words, so I had to take the opportunity while I could still do so: Barack Obama Did Something Right. This “Man Bites Dog” phrase refers to the fact that the president took exactly the right tone in his speech addressing the Tuscon shootings last night. Unlike rabid left-wingers who have tried to pin blame on his political opponents, Obama gave an apolitical speech that quoted Scripture, memorialized the dead, comforted the grieving, and called on the nation to celebrate the best aspects of America. He was right to keep the tone and the content within appropriate boundaries. When someone does something right, I believe in acknowledging it, and he did something right.

As usual, it was purely rhetorical. We can count on seeing the same Chicagoland culture and tactics in the White House for as long as he is president. But his speech deserves careful reading.

Of course, he set a low bar by his past performance. At least he did not begin by giving a “shout out” to anyone.

How then should Christians react to the tragedy and Obama’s speech?

The most striking part of the speech recounted the lives of those lost. Among them were three people over the age of 70.

Dorwan and Mavy Stoddard spent their retirement visiting family and donating their time to the Mountain Avenue Church of Christ. Their pursuits are the two most important in our lives: God and family. Too often we do not realize this until we are retired, but they alone make every age of life worth living, infusing purpose and fulfillment into our every action and rescuing us from the loneliness of self-seeking.

Dorwan covered his wife’s body, trading his life for hers.

George and Dorothy Morris were also parted by Jared Lee Loughner’s bullets. Obama noted, “When gunfire rang out, George, a former Marine, instinctively tried to shield his wife. Both were shot. Dot passed away.” George embodied the spirit of martyrdom, of laying down one’s life for others. His example should remind us of the spirit of service to our fellow man. It should be an exhortation to fulfill the eternal devotion of a husband for a wife, to “love your wives as Christ loved the Church and gave Himself for it” (Ephesians 5:25). George’s example should remind us of those who serve in the armed forces, who are prepared to lay down their lives everyday to protect us, encouraging our thanks and forcing us to make sure those who serve never lack for physical needs or health care (physical or otherwise).

Gabe Zimmerman, an aide to Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, devoted himself to work in the government. Government, too, can be a means of service, if it is limited to its proper function, scope, and role. Government keeps foreign enemies from invading and prosecutes grave breaches of our liberties such as this shooting.

Judge John Roll, Obama said, “embodied America’s fidelity to the law.” We must abide by this commitment, remembering we are a nation of laws, not of men. Selective enforcement of the law is unacceptable. The supreme law of the land is the U.S. Constitution. Those laws which violate its terms must be struck down, and those who refuse to abide by its terms while in office should be defeated, recalled from office, or impeached. And those responsible for enforcing our laws, like Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, must….

Read more.

The Tuscon Shooting: Round Up the Usual Hypocrites

Don Feder, GrassTopsUSA.com

It’s difficult to say which is more absurd, in a loathsome sort of way: Iran blaming Zionists for the Christmas Day massacre of 21 Egyptian Christians, or the Left blaming the Tucson shootings on Sarah Palin, Glenn Back, the Tea Party movement, and everyone who watches FOX News.

The smoke had hardly cleared from the shootings at a constituent meeting that left six people dead and U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords critically wounded, before the liberal smear-machine went into overdrive.

“These sorts of things (Palin putting Giffords’ district in crosshairs on her website during the last election) I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response,” intoned Senator Dick Durbin. Speaking of toxic rhetoric, in 2005, Durbin compared the treatment of terrorist detainees at Guantanamo to the Holocaust, Soviet gulags and Pol Pot.

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann blamed the “ever-escalating, borderline ecstatic invocation of violence in fact or in fantasy” to everyone Keith Olbermann has ever disagreed with. Apparently, he was not thinking of President Obama telling his supporters at a 2008 fundraiser that if Republicans “bring a knife (to the presidential campaign)…We bring a gun.” The New York Times’ Julie Bosman found this an adorable example of the messiah “showing a more pugnacious side” rather than language that condones violence.

The National Jewish Democratic Council – which exists to attack anything to the right of Nancy Pelosi and whitewash anti-Semitism in the party of Jimmy (Israel is an apartheid state) Carter – nattered: “It is fair to say – in today’s political climate, and given today’s political rhetoric – that many have contributed to the building levels of vitriol in our political discourse that have surely contributed to the atmosphere in which this event transpired.”

If I can attempt to parse this mishmash, the NJDC is saying: In today’s political climate, and given today’s political rhetoric, levels of vitriol (which assuredly are building), have contributed to an atmosphere in which an event transpired. As for the author of the foregoing, surely there’s a place at the New York Times for someone this logical and coherent.

The mainstream media’s newest hero, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, is more direct. Calling his state the capital of “the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on this country,” Dupnik indicts what the Times describes as “anti-immigrant sentiment” for building levels of vitriol.

Well, there it is: Arizonans who object to the illegal alien inundation (reputed to include many violent criminals) helped to generate the atmosphere of anger, hatred, and bigotry which contribute to building levels of vitriol, etc.

For the record, and not that it matters, there’s no evidence that the man arrested for the shootings had any views on illegal immigration – or that he ever attended a Tea Party rally, visited Sarah Palin’s website, or watched Glenn Beck.

Read more.

Media Knew Killer Probably Wasn’t Politically Motivated

Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com

The Left has gone out of its way to blame Saturday’s tragic shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords on anyone to the Right of the Mensheviks. Among the first to pile on the blood libel was New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, who pinned the shooting on an alleged conservative “climate of hate.” Most of us countered that the murderer, Jared Lee Loughner, clearly seemed mentally ill, addicted to mind-altering drugs, or perhaps the victim of an LSD-induced psychosis. Krugman should read his own newspaper — and I rarely make that suggestion. The NYT reported yesterday that most assassins are unhinged, not politically motivated, and any intelligent American should have known that was the likely motive. That means those accusing Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, and the Tea Party of facilitating this crime are either unintelligent or transparently politically motivated (or both).

The New York Times reported yesterday, “A 1999 study of assassins and attackers found few common threads. Many had delusional ideas, but few heard voices; still fewer abused drugs or belonged to militant groups.” (Emphasis added.)

To make matters clearer, many of those who appear to kill for a political cause are merely demonstrating symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Forensic psychologist Dr. Michael Stone told the Times the paranoid mind…

Read more.

Will AZ Shooter Kill the First Amendment?

Joe Guzzardi, FloydReports.com

Immediately after crazed gunman Jared Lee Loughner gravely wounded Arizona U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords, killed U.S. Judge John M. Roll, and six other people while wounding 12 innocent bystanders, the immigration rhetoric subtly ratcheted up.

Denouncing Gifford’s shooting, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik and others made it clear that what they referred to as “inflammatory speech” had made the political atmosphere in Arizona so toxic that acts of violence were inevitable.

Referring to talk radio hosts, Dupnik charged them with “inflaming the American public by those who get paid to do that. It might be free speech but it does not come without consequences.”

Ironically, Dupnik is the most skilled flamethrower of all.

Last year, at the height of the S.B. 1070 controversy, Dupnik called it “racist” and “disgusting” while claiming that Arizona is “the mecca of prejudice and bigotry.” Furthermore, Dupnik went on record that he would not enforce the measure if it became law, a blatant violation of his oath of office.

Dupnik never directly claimed that S.B. 1070 and Giffords’ support of it were linked to the shootings. But a close read between the lines strongly suggests that Dupnik blames Loughner’s multiple murders on “the haters,” a label that many automatically apply to Americans who favor enforcing federal immigration law.

Even though only a few hours had passed after the massacre before Dupnik pointed his finger and no evidence has yet surfaced that Loughner is anything other than deranged, more “hate” charges flew.

Read more.