Video: Boston Bombing May Be Tied To Reservoir Poisoning Plot

As the country was preparing to mark the one-month anniversary of the Boston terrorist attack, in the middle of the night, on May 14, seven self-identified Muslims broke into the Quabbin reservoir. The Quabbin reservoir in Belchertown, Massachusetts covers thirty-nine square miles, holds an astounding 400 billion gallons of water, and supplies the majority of the water supply to the Greater Boston area. A Massachusetts State Trooper happened upon the scene a few minutes after midnight as the five men and two women were climbing into their vehicles to leave. They were immediately arrested for trespassing.  They all denied any wrongdoing, stating they were all recent chemical engineering graduates and were simply on a field trip to marvel at the largest inland body of water in the state of Massachusetts. Why they chose to go on their “field trip” in the middle of the night when nothing could be seen was not explained.

The Feds quickly took over the investigation. Given that they all had a background in chemical engineering, the reservoir was tested for contamination. An odd secrecy surrounded the incident almost immediately, as any information, besides the nationality of the trespassers—Saudi Arabian, Pakistani, and Chinese—leaked in the initial police investigation—was kept secret.

Alternative media outlets filed Freedom Of Information Act requests for names, addresses, and court dates of those arrested. The request was denied last week, citing an obscure Massachusetts state law.

Oddly, no charges were filed, with the Massachusetts State Police immediately filing an appeal to this decision. The whole matter was then pushed down the memory hole, now only being covered by alternative media.

Coming so close to the Boston terrorist attack, the question must be asked—Are the two events related? Was there an alternative reason that martial law was all but declared in the Watertown area in the days following the Boston bombing? Was suspicion that a plot was afoot to poison the water supply of millions of people the real reason for instituting martial law in the greater Boston area?

America was stunned not only because of the Boston terrorist attack, but the de facto martial law that was declared, looking for the unarmed teenager Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, allegedly the second Boston bomber.

In the ensuing martial law, citizens were confined to their homes. Light-armored tanks roamed the streets. Hundreds of militarized police conducted illegal house-to-house searches.  Citizens were taken into custody without being charged with a crime.

Given that America was lied to about the Benghazi consulate attack, were we also lied to about the Boston terrorist bombing?

There are some serious questions. Besides the fact that a possible terrorist attack against the Quabbin reservoir may have been suppressed, America wants to know the following:

Why did the FBI beg the public to help identify the Tsarnaev brothers, even though they had had both of them under surveillance for several years?

Why the veil of secrecy involving evidence implicating the Tsarnaev brothers? The Feds have released a videotape of the Tsarnaev brothers walking around minutes before the bombing, yet refuse to release the video of them placing the bombs—or any other evidence for that matter—implicating them with the bombing.

And what about the Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, in the U.S. under a student visa? He was caught running from the scene of the Boston bombing, hospitalized for burns, and held under armed guard by the FBI. His apartment was searched extensively in the hours after the Boston bombing, and the Feds carried out a truck-load of evidence. It was reported on April 18 that Alharbi had been charged under  section 212 3B,  “Terrorist activities,” and was being secretly deported at the request of the Saudi government. Just as quickly as details of the Alharbi investigation began, like the Quabbin reservoir case, the mainstream media quickly buried the story. In Congressional testimony, then-Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano stated that all of the information about Alharbi was based on false reporting and then refused to answer any further questions.

As reported by al-Qaeda researcher Walid Shoebat, whether Alharbi was connected to the Boston terrorist attack or not, his extensive al-Qaeda connections should have precluded him from even entering the country, let alone attending college under a student visa. Alharbi has at least a dozen members of his clan connected to al-Qaeda, including members currently behind held at Gitmo!

Adding to the mystery, Obama secretly met with the Saudi Foreign Minister on the day after Alharbi was arrested, after which Alharbi was quickly released. Then the odd photos of Michelle Obama visiting Alharbi in the hospital surfaced. This is eerily similar to the Osama Bin Laden family connections with the Bush administration that surfaced and were quickly buried after 9/11.

What exactly is the Obama administration hiding? If information about the Benghazi consulate attack was false, is information about the Boston terrorist attack also false? And in light of the impending war with Syria, is information about the chemical weapons attack by Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad also false? Given that if we went to war with Syria, we would essentially be fighting on the side of al-Qaeda, where is the Pied Piper, Barack Obama, trying to lead us?

Who exactly is our enemy, the “terrorist” Bashar al-Assad—or is it in fact Barack Hussein Obama?

Congressman Reveals Obama Policy That Opened Asylum Floodgates

Barack Obama 4 SC1 Congressman Reveals Obama Policy That Opened Asylum Floodgates

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) has sent a letter to Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano that reveals the Obama administration policy of asylum overwhelms the ability to enforce laws. This comes in the wake of a Breitbart News story about the sudden surge of “credible fear” requests at Mexico/U.S. border crossings.

The letter begins by referencing the story that Breitbart News brought to national prominence:

Dear Secretary Napolitano,

I write regarding the recent surge in foreign nationals, largely from Mexico, claiming asylum at U.S. ports of entry. This surge has been overwhelming Border Patrol agents in San Diego, California. Border Patrol agents reported that in one day 200 aliens came through the Otay Mesa, San Diego port of entry while as many as 550 overflowed the processing center there and in nearby San Ysidro claiming a “credible fear” of the drug cartels in Mexico.

Rep. Goodlatte then lays out the concern that another Breitbart News story pointed out—that the asylum process is being exploited by Mexican nationals—and highlights the surge in such claims since 2009:

Such claims have increased from 5,222 in 2009 to 23,408 in just the first three quarters of 2013. According to the most recent data available, DHS is permitting 92% of these claimants to move forward to further proceedings, despite the fact that press reports indicate that up to 91% of these claimants from Mexico are ultimately denied. In addition, most are likely being released into the U.S. pending further proceedings before Immigration Judges as opposed to being detained as required by law.

Read More at Breitbart.com . By Lee Stranahan.

Obama Nominee For Homeland Security Under Investigation

Homeland Security logo SC Obama nominee for Homeland Security under Investigation

WASHINGTON — Alejandro Mayorkas, who is the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services director, is accused of misusing his position to help a company have access to a visa loophole.

Reuters reports that he is under investigation for misusing his position to benefit the brother of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Anthony Rodham. Mayorkas was nominated by Barack Obama to act as the deputy secretary for Homeland Security.

With Janet Napolitano, the last DHS secretary, gone to work in the University of California system, Mayorkas will be running the show if nominated. But this investigation raises red flags.

Mayorkas, who was born in Cuba, has ties to the Clintons going back to their days in the White House. He had gotten in trouble in the past for petitioning the Clintons to pardon a drug dealer, whose father was a Democratic Party donor.

This time, Mayorkas supposedly secured an investor visa for Anthony Rodham’s company Gulf Coast Funds Management after being denied twice.

 

This article originally appeared at AIM.org and is reprinted here with permission. 

Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano Resigning

Janet Napolitano SC Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano resigning

WASHINGTON — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, who led the burgeoning Department of Homeland Security through a host of policy changes in the post 9/11 era, is resigning to head the University of California system.

Napolitano, just the third person to lead the 10-year-old department, told her senior staff Friday she would be leaving for California. She will become the president of the University of California system, which includes UCLA and the University of California, Berkeley, among other campuses. The University of California also announced Napolitano’s nomination to be the 20th president of the statewide system.

“The opportunity to work with the dedicated men and women of the Department of Homeland Security, who serve on the front lines of our nation’s efforts to protect our communities and families from harm, has been the highlight of my professional career,” she said in a statement. “After four plus years of focusing on these challenges, I will be nominated as the next president of the University of California to play a role in educating our nation’s next generation of leaders.”

“I thank President Obama for the chance to serve our nation during this important chapter in our history,” Napolitano said, “and I know the Department of Homeland Security will continue to perform its important duties with the honor and focus that the American public expects.”

Obama issued a statement commending Napolitano for “her outstanding work on behalf of the American people over the last four years.”

Read more at CNS News. By Alicia A. Caldwell and Eileen Sullivan.

Liberal Word Manipulation And Mind Control

Gun Control SC Liberal Word Manipulation and Mind Control

The political and social strategy of the radicals in Washington is clear:

* Control the narrative
* Control public opinion
* Control the culture
* Control the vote

* Repeat the pattern until such time that the Country implodes (and/or is severely weakened socially, morally, economically, emotionally, physically, and spiritually).

The easiest way to control the narrative is through the utilization and manipulation of a complicit media to define the issues ‘that matter’ and promote the political ‘solution.’ Achieving such ends is made easier (and more convenient) by creating little slogans or labels and basically beating the community-at-large (consisting of friend, foe, and everyone in between) over the head with it…..repeatedly…..time and time again……at nauseum.

Throw in today’s divided and demoralized social-political climate, a little bit of apathy, and some low voter IQ – and watch a considerable majority of the population blindly respond to the promise (no matter how empty) of a greater future or even a greater present! We are currently witnessing an impenetrable monopoly on the nation as applied by a strongly unified, radically-progressive elite.

Let’s consider the trendy ‘catchphrases’ used to advance the talking points of the liberal-left. After all, both the agendas and the hypocrisies are easily identified upon close examination – it all depends on your degree of impartiality. Anybody with a shred of decency and common sense will observe a comprehensive unwillingness on the part of the radical left to advance any kind of practical, ethical, or moral decisions/policies for the good of the people.

‘War On Women’ – A label used, most often in relation to mandated healthcare coverage, to disparage conservative efforts to protect employers’ “rights of conscience”, restrict taxpayer- funded abortions, and require women to pay for their own sexual contraception.

The Hypocrisy – Many liberal progressives, including the POTUS, endorse (or remain silent) as women and young girls are repressed, silenced, breaten, raped, murdered, discriminated, insulted, and humiliated in the name of Allah! Which party is really the one complicit in a ‘War on Women’?

‘Marriage Equality’ – A term used to neuter and neutralize efforts to uphold traditional marriage.

The Hypocrisy – So marriage is what based on what???

What we really have here is a purposefully arbitrary failure to actually redefine marriage in any meaningful or consistent way, leaving the door wide open for endless consequence and confusion.

‘Voters Rights’ – The idea that implementing safeguards, in the form of requiring proper ID at election polls, is somehow a racist proposition.

The Hypocrisy – I never understood how the Dems try to connect voter ID to racism – if I was African-American, I would be offended by such perspectives. Are they actually insinuating that African-Americans, and minorities in general, cannot obtain valid ID? That’s a backwards generalization if I ever heard one! Shouldn’t we look to protect one of our most sacred privileges from fraud and corruption?

‘Anti-Immigration’ – A term used to vilify those who seek to uphold current immigration laws against violators and/or those who attempt to do so.

The Hypocrisy – Reckless executive orders rewarding incarcerated illegals. These recent ‘random pardons’ fly in the face of sound national security policy and protections that seek to minimize opportunity to those who look to abuse our systems (or even worse, engage in terrorist activities on our soil.) Rather, let’s support those who proudly await ‘legal’ entrance/naturalization – that we may once again be a land of opportunity!

‘Islamaphobia’ (Related: ‘Man-CAUSED Disaster) – A term used to condemn those who seek to remain vigilant against Jihadists.

DHS head Janet Napolitano prefers a different descriptor when addressing acts of terror -

“I presume there is always a threat from terrorism…I referred to “man-caused” disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.” This is why the massacre committed by the radical Fort Hood ‘terrorist’ was swiftly deemed an act of “workplace violence.”

The Hypocrisy: I guess a tendency to facilitate these “man-caused disasters” are being projected upon angry, God-fearing patriots. You know, those freedom-loving Constitutionalists who seem to be at the top of our government’s hit-list these days. They continue to be unreasonably and unjustifiably identified as having major insurrection potential.

‘Gun control’ – The term used to condemn those who oppose excessive gun restrictions/regulations (regardless of the 2nd Amendment Right to Bear Arms.)

The Hypocrisy – Most high-profile gun-control advocates (NY Mayor Bloomberg immediately comes to mind) are well protected by a plethora of armed guards. Even worse is how this administration continues to heavily arm those whose job it is to identify and control terror threats – you know, those tea-party activists. DHS is rapidly shifting their focus away from foreign infiltrations toward home-grown domestic agitators of the God fearing, patriotic sort. Again, remember who’s at the top of that list! Who needs protection from who in this scenario?

‘Domestic Security Surveillance’ – National security can essentially be claimed to justify even the most intrusive violation of personal dignity. But the Constitution and the majority of Americans resist these extensive intrusions without just cause.

“In the wake of 9/11, mass surveillance has become one of the U.S. government’s principal strategies for protecting national security. Over the past decade, the government has asserted sweeping power to conduct dragnet collection and analysis of innocent Americans’ telephone calls and e-mails, web browsing records, financial records, credit reports, and library records. The government has also asserted expansive authority to monitor Americans’ peaceful political and religious activities.” – ACLU

The Hypocrisy – The POTUS has yet to release his college transcript or a legitimate birth certificate/social security card (and has spent reportedly $5 million in legal fees to keep his records hidden). So far, the unprecedented and extensive information gathering has not been as successful in stopping acts of terror as it has in punishing, blackmailing, and threatening political enemies, impartial journalists, and those who oppose government’s agenda-based legislation!

Again, beware of government propaganda; and whenever a statement comes out of the White House, be sure to always read between the lines. Be cognizant of the hidden meanings, indoctrination efforts, and the overall agenda. Don’t let the government tell you how to think! Do your own research so you can consider all the long-term ramification/consequences and ultimately decide for yourself what is most important!

God Bless!

Photo credit: krazydad / jbum (Creative Commons)