False Prophets And Fake Presidents

Obama Prophet SC False prophets and fake presidents

“I hear all the time the expression ‘the good old days.’ Well, the good old days, we forget they have been good for some, but they weren’t good for everybody. It drives me crazy when the captains of the religious right are always calling people back … for blacks to be back in the back of the bus, for women to be back in the kitchen, for gays to be in the closet, and for immigrants to be on their side of the border.”

So says Rev. Luis León, Rector of St. John’s Episcopal Church, situated not far from the White House.  León’s remarks were part of his Easter message March 31, with the First Family in attendance.  His church and his ministry endorse homosexuality, homosexual marriage, and practicing homosexuals in ‘ministry.’  Obviously, the ‘good’ pastor denies Scripture is inerrant, Christ’s clear assurance. Thus León, completely contradicts the Lord he claims to serve, which is, quite frankly, insane.

“It drives me crazy . . . “

Yes, one would have to be crazy to point the finger of accusation at fellow pastors and other Christian believers, accusing them of ridiculous things, on Easter Sunday no less.  León did not name the “captains of the religious right” who drive him crazy.  In the present day, such captains might include Tony Perkins, Mat Staver, Gary Bauer, Sarah Palin, Cal Thomas, Jay Sekulow, Billy Graham, or James Dobson, all good people holding to traditional values for legitimate reasons, none of which have anything to do with discrimination or persecution.

Not one of these good people has ever suggested blacks return to the back of the bus.  Blacks have not been forced to the back of the bus for more than 50 years.  Just as a reminder, it was the Christian Right in the 19th century that freed the slaves, helped slaves escape the South, died for justice in the Civil War, and ministered to the suffering of all colors during and after the war. Without the religious right, the civil rights movement would not have gained altitude.  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Christian Republican, just for the record. Without Republican votes, the Civil Rights Act would never have passed.

No one has called women back to the kitchen.  Women, like Sarah Palin and millions of others, can freely choose home life, or a professional life, or both; and this has been true in growing measure since Christ liberated women, most especially in America.

Not one of these respectable Americans has insisted homosexuals stay in the closet.  Christians of all political affiliations have been the most loving toward homosexuals, demonstrating that love by providing far and away the most support when the AIDS epidemic struck.  Homosexuals enjoy the greatest freedom and prosperity here in America thanks to the traditions of tolerance and acceptance cultivated by centuries of Judeo-Christian tradition.

And no one from the religious right has ever denied anyone the right to immigrate.  Indeed, Christians have been the most supportive of new citizens.  Christians from the right and the left have shown the most grace in discussions about the vexing problems associated with illegal immigration.

It is beyond disturbing listening to León’s condemning remarks and hate-filled raving, especially in view of the fact he is in this country thanks to the benevolence of Americans and our Christian traditions.

At age 12, León came to America from Cuba as part of the CIA’s Operation Pedro Pan.  The American government and the church helped 14,000 children get out of Cuba before Castro could steal them from their parents to indoctrinate them as communists.   León owes his life to the religious right, for no other force on earth has been as effective in confronting communist thugs and murderers.  Still, showing his gratitude, the only thing León left out of his Easter ‘sermon’ was “G**damn America: it’s in the Bible!”

Ordinarily, Easter Sunday is revered in Christian tradition, honored as our most holy day, the day we celebrate the Resurrection and the day we celebrate the new life graciously given by a loving God willing to die in our place to set us free from sin and death.  The fact that sin is causing millions of homosexual deaths is apparently lost on León and his smiling messiah, Barack Obama.  They promote a lifestyle that is killing people and separating them from God, yet they call it love.

Until last Sunday, Easter was a day presidents attended services at St. John’s to hear about grace, mercy, and righteousness, about the virtue necessary for the sustenance of the Republic, and about the love of God that encourages the rest of us to love.  They gathered to hear about the blessings of liberty and freedom brought by the Spirit as well as the commandments to love and forgive and encourage and reconcile.

They did not gather in the ‘good old days’ to hear a so-called pastor demonize others, engage in satanic condemnation, slander good people with lies, promote ill-will and divisiveness, or witness an ego-tripping abomination in the pulpit.

Easter is about God reconciling all things to Himself.  León works against reconciliation.  He scatters the flock.  What a shepherd!  In the ‘good old days,’ such a man would never have graduated seminary.  In the present day, he is celebrated and honored by a president.

 

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is also the author of “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Can GOP Win Without Hispanics? Look At Arizona

arizona map SC Can GOP win without Hispanics? Look at Arizona

PHOENIX — Arizona stands out in the Southwest.

Most of its neighbors are independent-minded states that once leaned Republican but are trending Democratic, partly because of increasing numbers of Hispanic voters alienated from the GOP by its tough stance on illegal immigration.

But not Arizona.

Read More at OfficialWire . By Nicholas Riccardi.

“Rainbow Journalism” Is The New Enemy Of Children

220px Dan Savage Provided 218x300 “Rainbow Journalism” is the New Enemy of Children

Dan Savage writer of sex column perverting young minds

In this column we coin the term “rainbow journalism.”

If you’re young, trendy and hip, and are strolling through downtown Minneapolis, you might grasp a copy of City Pages from the newstand. Its stories, appealing graphics, attractive restaurant ads and reviews of the local night club scene would seem to set you up for an upbeat weekend.

But look a little further, and you’ll uncover a fanatically-driven editorial policy that promotes sleeze and liberal causes. For example, “Savage Love” is a weekly sex advice column by the notorious sex activist Dan Savage. His recent advice includes using online resources to find a worker in the sex industry for a reader’s 22-year old mentally-ill brother. Ugh. The column is filled with trashy advice and crude language.

City Pages is part of a chain of 16 “alternative” free weekly papers around the country with a hefty combined circulation of 1.8 million. You wonder, an alternative to what? It’s an alternative to what is wholesome and true; City Pages promotes strip clubs, homosexuality, and condemns any moral message of Christianity. It scorns patriotism as well. One front-page display contained a mock-up photo of the Statue of Liberty with the words, “One nation under tacos.”

Screamed at readers

Around 1900, yellow journalism screamed at its readers with sensational headlines, weakly-supported facts, with a show of being legitimate by claiming to champion the underdog. Today’s yellow journalism jabs at morality, criticizes Christian organizations, all with name-calling and mockery. The only underdog it champions is the radical homosexual who demands that all of his sexual practices become codified in law, while crushing those with contrary beliefs.

It’s a kind of news adolescence that never grows up. Let’s call it “rainbow journalism.”

More than one hundred years ago, newspapers of integrity separated themselves from yellow journalism, and medical professionals likewise distanced themselves from snake-oil salesmen and abortionists. It was a time for the growing professions of the day to disavow themselves from shady and base practices.

But some news outlets never grow up. Like the crowd that shouted for Christ’s condemnation on Good Friday, City Pages relies on a lot of emotion, few facts, and is quick to slam anyone who stands for morality.

Hate-mongering

It’s no wonder then, that every few weeks New City trots out hate-mongering articles against Christian rock musician and preacher Bradlee Dean and his ministry, You Can Run International, based in Annandale, just outside of Minneapolis. (Disclosure: You Can Run International is a client of our PR firm.) New City has covered Dean’s defamation lawsuit against MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in snarling tones. They accuse his ministry of not only gay-bashing, but now have made dangerous accusations about his family.

I don’t care what your politics are, but going after your enemy’s family is just plain evil. What could be done against the paper if it were not protected by a too-broadly defined First Amendment interpretation today that allows the big media to destroy someone’s reputation?

What enraged City Pages: You Can Run International’s school presentation in Dunkerton Iowa, above, which quoted Elton John and Lady Gaga in their support of homosexuality.

Dean’s presentations in more than three hundred schools around the country warn about bullying, drug use, and yes, the very real dangers of abortion and the homosexual lifestyle. The talks also emphasize the Biblical basis of our country’s Constitution. Having grown up in a broken family himself, Dean knows what it’s like to struggle through the teen years. Now he is driven by a passion for helping youth not make the same mistakes, to turn to wholesomeness and integrity of character. What’s wrong with that?

Building an enemies list

All of this is threatening stuff for City Pages. As a matter of fact, the newspaper has teamed up with its Phoenix look-alike New Times (both are owned by Voice Media Group) to slander Dean’s attorney Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch, a non-profit law firm which attained notoriety through 18 civil lawsuits against the Clinton Administration. New Times, which had never heard of Klayman until he represented Dean in his lawsuit against MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, now puts Klayman in its sights. The paper has in fact dragged Klayman’s family into the battle, making up stories about his failed marriage.

Voice Media Group has thus added Dean and Klaymen to its enemies list, which also include Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the popular elected sheriff of Arizona’s Maricopa County, who has taken an outspoken stance against illegal immigration. Klayman has represented Arpaio, fighting his recall effort.

So the new enemy of youth and children is “rainbow journlism.” And it’s no surprise, since sex to them is something enshrined unto itself, something only for pleasure, practiced to the exclusion of the possibility of children. Maybe the patrons of these papers’ many advertisers should stay away from them like the plague.

For Dean’s syndicated columns, read the Bradlee Dean Blog.

Obama Abusing The Declaration

“We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but the men who pervert the Constitution.” – Abraham Lincoln

In response to being called out on the carpet for his tyrannical methods, Obama stated publicly, “I am not a dictator.”

Whatever Obama says, you can rest assured he is doing the exact opposite, calling “evil good and good evil” and putting “darkness for light, and light for darkness” (Isaiah 5:20).

To add to Obama’s list of abuses, his administration attempted to justify drone strikes on his own people. The American people are now beginning to realize we are no longer speaking of what happens in Third World countries; it is happening in our own backyard.

What is it that defines a dictator?

Parallel the abuses of tyrant King George III in 1776 to what is happening to the American people under Obama’s administration, and you will see the same tyrannical measures stemming from the same tyrannical ideology.

Replacing King George with Obama, the Declaration of Independence states:

The history of the present [president of the United States] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted. …

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

Operation Fast and Furious: Obama, as an accessory to criminal activity, including murder, asserted executive privilege where law as well as court precedent clearly shows it unlawful.

Obama has used criminal measures to attack American immigration law and illegally usurped constitutional laws by unashamedly announcing he will issue work permits to illegal aliens.

As the chief law-enforcement agent, Obama has refused to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act as well as the Voting Rights Act against a domestic terrorist group, the New Black Panthers.

Obama has been held in contempt of court for refusing to lift the Gulf of Mexico oil-drilling ban.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained;

With no constitutional jurisdiction in the area of states laws regarding illegal immigration, Barack Hussein Obama sued states such as Arizona and Alabama for their laws preventing and prosecuting illegal immigration.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

Czars, anyone? He has sent his EPA, IRS, DOJ, and other gangsters to sue private American businesses and citizens, steal private lands, and assault churches as well as private groups that oppose him.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

Obama set criminal precedents as he moved the United States military from the congressional chain of command and used them in Libya with no regard to the violation of the War Powers Act. Obama’s secretary of defense has advised Congress that the military will go to war upon the authorization of the U.N., NATO, or other global entity, excluding any mention of congressional approval.

These are just a few examples of Obama’s “King George” abuses on the American people.

Now the question lies at the feet of America: How are we going to respond?

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is the their right, it is their DUTY, to throw off such Government. …

It is time for the Declaration of Independence to be resurrected in the same spirit as our forefathers.

Who is Bradlee Dean?

Immigration: So What Exactly Is It Again That We Are Trying To Fix? (Part 2)

Obama Immigration Policy SC Immigration: So what exactly is it again that we are trying to fix?  (Part 2)

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Did I do something wrong again? I thought this article was insightful and interesting, and all under 1,000 words.

If we want to fix immigration, we first have to know and agree on what is wrong with it.

There are different views on what is wrong. The most obvious problem is that we have maybe 11 million people who are not supposed to be here. And our country has lost the will to remove them. Many of them, of course, were brought here as children, so they personally bear no culpability.

The second problem that we hear about is that it is taking too long for the families of immigrants still in their home countries to be able to come here.

However, there are two other problems not being discussed that need to be addressed. The first I mentioned in part 1, that we are rewarding bad behavior by giving free citizenship to children born here of illegal immigrants. As long as we do this, we will always have an abundance of illegal immigrants. And I noted also how the 14th Amendment is being misunderstood and abused to apply here.

The other problem will be seen more clearly after we ask the bigger question: Why do we want immigration in the first place?

The main reason we allow and encourage immigration, so we are told, is for what they bring to our country in terms of hard work and their entrepreneurial spirit. Yes, our country was built on immigrants, but it was not the first come first served totally open immigration that we have today. We chose the countries of origin, and we put a priority on what they could contribute to our country.

The more important reason, however, though not mentioned in public, is that the people already living here are not reproducing in sufficient numbers to replace the population. So our populace is aging with fewer younger people to support the elderly and the ever growing federal government. So the idea is to bring working people into the States so we can have a larger tax base to support an aging population.

However, since 1965, our government’s priority in immigration has been to reunite families. Noble, compassionate intent, but it defeats the whole purpose of immigration. This means that we are not only getting the taxpayers but the entire family, which essentially resembles the demographics we already have here.

For example, I have two siblings who are not working, one due to age and another due to health. My extended family includes more of the same. So if I were the immigrant and my entire extended family were to come here, all the supposed advantages of immigration would be nullified, taxpayers offset by non-taxpayers.

So, as our current immigration system is set up, there is no real advantage to bringing in these 700,000 new people every year. Except one. The Democrats believe they will have a lock on their votes.

The only real advantage of immigration would be if we pursued and prioritized the best and the brightest. Of course, their immediate family would be allowed, but to concentrate on reuniting the entire family essentially nullifies any perceived benefits to immigration.

So what exactly would or should immigration reform look like?

1) We must first stop rewarding unlawful behavior by giving instant citizenship to the children of those who are in this country illegally. What do people risk by entering our country illegally? A return trip home? And what are the rewards? For many, it is the citizenship of their children. Yes, of course, there is also the free medical care (if you go to the county hospitals) and a better life in so many other ways.
2) We must secure our borders, so we can control the flow of people into our country. And we must fix our visa system, so that visitors who extend their stays cannot disappear off the radar.
3) We need to implement the E-Verify system immediately. This is the best way we have now to ensure that companies do not hire people who are not here legally.

If we don’t do these first three things, we will have this same problem again and again and again.
If we are not serious about enforcing the laws we already have, any new laws would simply be a joke. We have three states now that offer driver’s licenses to illegals. And these are the people who make our laws? If they have no respect for the laws we already have, why are they in office?

4) After we deal with essentially ending the flow and incentives for illegal immigration, those who were brought here as children could be given legal status with a path to citizenship. However, those who are still children living with their parents, if the parents are no longer able to find employment, they may find themselves returning with their parents to their country of origin. Those who were already deemed US citizens can come back when they are able to live on their own.
5) We have far more people wanting to come here than we can assimilate. So why are we showing no apparent regard for what they can contribute to our country? Political and religious refugees should always be welcomed here, though there have been cases where entire ethnic or religious groups have been targeted for extinction, but that’s for another article.

So we can and should show preference to those who can be of most benefit to us and who are most common to our culture. There is no reason or justification for bringing 700,000 new people into our country every year without looking for what value they can bring to our country.

If we don’t do everything here, our immigration system will still be broken. And there is still the issue of the melting pot. For another time.