John Boehner Did Not Gain Any New Conservative Fans After Calling This Couple ‘Good People’

House Speaker John Boehner sat down for an interview with Bloomberg Politics recently to discuss the scandal regarding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server to send and receive official emails during her time as secretary of state.

“She violated the law,” Boehner insisted, “and the idea that she was going to use her own server and do official business on it goes against every transparency issue that the president likes to tout.”

When asked what policy she violated, he responded that she would have had to “sign a sheet when she got there that she was going to preserve all of these records. At some point, they just can’t ignore the fact that there are a lot of public documents on this server that the American people have a right to see; and we believe it is time for Mrs. Clinton to turn that server and all its documents over to the IG – the inspector general – at the State Department.”

He confirmed that, if Clinton refuses to cooperate, “all options are on the table” – including a House subpoena.

“It’s important for the American people to know the truth about what happened in Benghazi,” he said, “and it’s important to know what was going on at the State Department before, during, and after the events that occurred in Libya.”

Boehner’s palpable irritation dissipated somewhat, however, when he was asked whether Bill and Hillary Clinton are “ethically and morally fit to return to the White House.”

He replied that the Clintons are “good public servants” and “good people,” acknowledging that “there are questions that have to be answered.”

Do you think Hillary Clinton should release the contents of her server? Let us know in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

MSNBC Hosts Skewer Howard Dean For His Defense Of Clintons

Amid a growing scandal suggesting the Clinton Foundation improperly accepted donations in exchange for political favors, 2016 presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton and her husband, Bill, can at least count on Howard Dean for support. The former Democrat National Committee chairman and one-time presidential candidate appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe this week to criticize the author of a new book that promises to expose the Clintons’ actions.

Dean suggested author Peter Schweizer could not be trusted because he “is getting money from donors – big donors who support Ted Cruz.”

“You’re going after the author?” host Joe Scarborough asked.

He continued, noting that plenty of other news outlets are following up on the issues presented in the book, asserting that Dean must similarly criticize these sources – specifically the New York Times, which published an article that promoted the story to nationwide prominence.

“You’re actually going to have to condemn the New York Times, Joe Becker and Mike McIntyre,” Scarborough insisted. “They’re the ones that wrote the story.”

Dean accepted the challenge and went on to rip the Times as an outlet with numerous “incredibly sloppy” journalists on its staff.

“I have been threatened by reporters,” he asserted. “They were going to run a story that they knew wasn’t true and I knew wasn’t true unless I produced evidence to prove it wasn’t true.”

Scarborough cut Dean off, comparing him to previous guest James Carville, who consistently attempted to change the focus of the conversation.

“It’s always ‘look at something else,’” he lamented.

The host also coaxed Dean into admitting that he has no criticism of the authors behind the Times article being discussed.

Do you think the accusations against the Clintons are credible? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

‘It Looks Like Bribery’: Mitt Romney Breaks Down Hillary’s Uranium Scandal

Appearing on radio host Hugh Hewitt’s program Thursday, 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney responded to growing criticism of Hillary Clinton and the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

Romney cut to the chase, explaining that he was “stunned” by the accusations, adding that “it looks like bribery.”

He went on to highlight the most egregious examples of alleged wrongdoing, stating that “there is every appearance that Hillary Clinton was bribed to grease the sale of, what, 20 percent of America’s uranium production to Russia? And then it was covered up by lying about a meeting at her home with the principals – and by erasing emails.”

Such evasive action on her part, Romney explained, will make finding the truth all the more difficult.

“And you know,” he said, “I presume we might know for sure whether there was or was not bribery if she hadn’t wiped out thousands of emails.”

Furthermore, Romney countered the Clinton campaign’s assessment of mounting accusations as unsubstantiated.

“The story that came from the New York Times is pretty straightforward,” he said, “which is that millions upon millions of dollars were given to the Clinton Foundation at the same time by a group of people who had uranium assets; and shortly thereafter, these people came to the State Department for approval to be able to sell these assets to Russia for a huge price tag.”

If the donations and subsequent approval are determined to be connected, Romney assessed, “it’s a form of bribery.”

The scandal extends beyond a presidential campaign, he concluded.

“I mean this is a question about whether or not the United States secretary of state was bribed to grease the sale of strategic assets to Russia.”

Do you think Hillary Clinton is guilty of accepting bribes? Sound off in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

‘Unbelievable Arrogance’: Charles Krauthammer Dismantles Clintons’ Alleged Quid Pro Quo Scheme

In response to the growing scandal surrounding the Clinton Foundation and its links to shady foreign entities, Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer offered a pointed monologue during a recent appearance on Special Report.

“It’s hard to know where to start with this,” he began, opting to break down the intricacies of the latest scandal to rock Hillary Clinton’s fledgling presidential campaign.

He continued:

They go unreported, and then you hear the principal who donates the money saying that he really was interested in the charitable objectives of the Clinton Foundation, when it is obvious to anybody who is over nine years old that you take the president of the United States, ex-president, on a plane, you go to Kazakhstan, he praises one of the more infamous dictators in the region at a time when he needs that kind of validation. A few days later this small company which is sort of unknown, a shell company, gets a huge concession and then there is a donation, and then there’s a speech that he can pocket. Whereas the donations, you know — what did you report the other day, something like $70 million the foundation has spent on transportation? I mean, what does it take? I mean, that’s really flying pretty high. So in a sense it’s a piggy bank for the Clintons under the guise of a charity.

The brazenness with which the Clintons engage in such activity, however, was where Krauthammer showed the most indignation.

“But what strikes me about all this is the unbelievable arrogance of the Clintons,” he said, “who do this in full expectation that they’re going to get away with it.”

He acknowledged that enough evidence to prove a quid pro quo existed between the foundation and its donors was lacking; however, he said there is plenty of proof that the Clintons attempted to cover their tracks.

“They burn the tapes, they eliminate the emails,” he said, adding that it is obvious the influential couple comes “really close” to the threshold of criminality.

Do the Clintons think they are above the law? Let us know in the comments section below.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Jeb And Hillary: The Worst Of Evils

Does anyone in the country want to see another Bush vs. Clinton presidential race? If they do, they have a death wish for America.

It is not uncommon these days to hear people refer to Jeb and Hillary as the “royals.” And, while I’m glad that a lot of people seem to have a natural revulsion to having another Bush or Clinton in the White House, the fact is, the Bushes and Clintons are not two “royals.” They are one CRIME FAMILY.

One of the greatest hoaxes of modern times was the façade that the Bush and Clinton families were political adversaries, when the truth is, they have all been “best buds” for most (if not all) of their political careers. For anyone who wants to research the veracity of what I am saying (with an honest and open mind), it will take almost no time to be convinced. The recent reports about foreign influence and money that have poured into the Clinton coffers are nothing new and are just the tip of the iceberg.

While there is no way that we can know the totality of all that this international Crime Family is guilty of, there is enough evidence and eyewitness testimony out there to convince even the most stubborn skeptic that these people are among the most despicable trolls in the world. If we had a semblance of a free and independent national news media, the Bushes and Clintons would have already been exposed as the miscreants they are and would be serving life sentences in prison–which is where they all belong. (Of course, that could be said for a bunch of those criminals in Washington, D.C.)

We hear much talk about the “lesser of two evils.” Well, folks, I’m here to tell you that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are the worst of evils. Both of these people are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the international elite who are hellbent on destroying capitalism, free enterprise, constitutional government, and yes, the sovereignty and independence of the United States. There is no substantial difference between them. They may have two different last names and claim to represent two different political parties and ideologies; but, again, they are members of the same cabal of international gangsters. And between the two, Jeb is probably more dangerous.

Despite the best attempts by the propaganda press to keep Hillary’s crimes under wraps, the skeletons are starting to fall out of the closet. It will be virtually impossible to keep them from developing into full-fledged scandals in forthcoming months. Hillary is damaged goods. In fact, Hillary is NOT even electable. I repeat: Hillary is NOT electable. The only way that Hillary will even obtain the Democratic nomination is if the power elite want to offer her up as a political sacrifice so Jeb (or another controlled Republican) can be the next President. The fact that New York newspapers are already breaking the foreign-cash scandal against Hillary is illustrative of what I’m saying. But if it looks like they cannot cram Jeb Bush down the throat of the Republican Party, and there is too much popular resistance to Bush, they might decide to let so many skeletons out of the closet that Hillary would not be able to even win the nomination.

As for Jeb Bush, he is the quintessential neocon: he loves Big Business, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and, especially, Big Banks and the Federal Reserve. He loves perpetual war; he loves the military-industrial complex; he loves open borders; he loves the DHS, the Patriot Act, and a domestic Police State. And Jeb Bush knows where the bodies are buried. He knows virtually every skeleton in every closet in Washington, D.C.–and in foreign capitals.

Jeb and his fellow globalist robot, Benjamin Netanyahu, are international gangsters of the highest (or lowest, depending on how one looks at it) order. With the two of them in power at the same time, WATCH OUT! The Warfare State and Police State would grow exponentially. War in the Middle East would become as hot as hot can be. Jeb and Bibi would take the world to the precipice of, or into, World War III.

Skull & Bones, the Rothschilds, Bohemian Grove, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergs: Jeb is in the shadow of all of it. Jeb Bush is the Darth Vader of 2016. And with virtually unlimited money and a questionable voting system–not to mention the support of virtually the entire international banking system, military-industrial system, and corrupt foreign leaders in his pocket–he is going to be a most formidable candidate. The media is already skewing poll numbers to make it appear that Jeb Bush is popular with grassroots Republicans. Media manipulation of opinion in favor of Bush has only begun. It will proliferate tremendously in the months to come.

If Jeb Bush is elected President of the United States, he will make Barack Obama’s terms in office look downright benign by comparison.

However, the global elite do not always get their way. Jeb’s nomination is far from locked up. He is almost universally despised among grassroots conservatives. They know he is a Big Government neocon. His support for Obama’s executive amnesty for illegals, his support for Common Core, his support for Loretta Lynch, his infatuation with Lyndon Johnson, etc., have raised major red flags with genuine conservatives. It is yet to be seen if GOP grassroots conservatives can rise up against Bush in sufficient numbers to derail his candidacy–but they might.

Of course, the second scenario is that the power elite might use Bush as a smokescreen to pave the way for someone equally controlled. The field of GOP contenders is littered with neocons: Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, John Kasich, Bobby Jindal, Bob Sasse, etc. (Forget about Mike Pence; he killed any presidential aspirations he may have had with his embarrassing flip flop over the religious freedom issue in his home State of Indiana.) If conservatives derail Jeb Bush in the primaries–and if the media keeps Hillary Clinton in the race–you can know that this second scenario is the one the elites are using.

Again, if the elites plan on a Democrat taking the White House next year, they will remove Hillary from the race. Otherwise, they plan to play the same old “throw-the-bums-out” game and replace a controlled establishment Democrat with a controlled establishment Republican in 2016. In like manner, they replaced a controlled establishment Republican with a controlled establishment Democrat in 2008. In that race, John McCain was the sacrificial lamb. If this is the same game plan for 2016, Hillary Clinton will be the sacrificial lamb. This two-party charade has been going on forever. One would think that, sooner or later, the American people would catch on; but they seem to never do.

Thus far, the only two Republican candidates who are outside the blessing of the global elite are Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. So, you can mark this down and take it to the bank: the Republican establishment and propaganda media will do everything in their power (which is substantial) to make sure that neither of these men obtain the nomination.

I have written preliminary reviews of both Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.

My review of Ted Cruz is here:

Ted Cruz: Pros And Cons

My review of Rand Paul is here:

Rand Paul: Pros And Cons

Without a doubt, New World Order globalists have been active in many presidential administrations, beginning with the man who started it all: Abraham Lincoln. Of course, some administrations have been worse than others: Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, for example. But in the modern era, George H.W. Bush introduced America to the neocon agenda–complete with perpetual war and a burgeoning Police State. And every single presidential administration since Bush I (Clinton, Bush II, and Obama) has merely continued and escalated this agenda. For all intents and purposes, America has had only one continuous presidential administration since Bush I. And the globalists will do their very best to ensure that this agenda continues unabated into the next presidential administration, be it Republican or Democrat.

But Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton represent the very pinnacle of the ideal globalist-controlled candidate. If you value your liberties at all, you better pray to God that neither of these people is elected President next year. As I said, anyone who would want to see a Jeb Bush vs. Hillary Clinton presidential race in 2016 has a death wish for America.

© Chuck Baldwin

If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth