The Sequester As Seen From Capitol Hill

Obama Shaves Uncle Sam Sequester SC The Sequester As Seen From Capitol Hill

If I’ve learned anything after 30 years on Capitol Hill, it’s this: you can never trust what politicians say. We all know that actions speak louder than words, and nowhere is that more true than in government.

The same applies to the budget battle going on in Congress. Everybody on the left and the right has been posturing for months now, spewing rhetoric that they think voters want to hear.

But once the rubber finally meets the road, all of that posturing means nothing. Let me tell a little story to explain…

Last night, at about 9:30pm, my phone rang.

Mary Beth, my wife of 30 years and veteran of countless campaigns, picked up; but then she handed me the phone.

I was surprised to hear a congressman on the other end. It was late, and his call was unexpected. I won’t divulge my friend’s name (we’ll call him “Bill”) because he’s a great source of inside information. If I shared his name, he’d likely deny what I’m about to tell you because he dropped a bomb.

First, Bill tried to tell me that the drop in Obama’s poll numbers would surely make him compromise on the budget.

I couldn’t help but laugh. I said, “If you think a temporary drop in poll numbers will send the White House into retreat, you don’t understand Obama and the people around him.”

See, in my opinion, the Obama administration has only begun to fight for their budget. And I also reminded Bill that all of the House members are up for re-election next year, whereas Obama never has to run for office again.

He then agreed to share his secret with me. He said that the Republican caucus is preparing to compromise with Harry Reid and the Senate on the budget.

After all of the congressional cat fighting, all the rhetoric, and all the posturing, the House Republicans are ready to throw in the towel.

And the worst part is the reason they’re caving. You see, Republicans believe that compromise will cause the least disruption before the 2014 election.

You read that right. They’re only thinking about the election. John Boehner knows that most of the Republican caucus won’t support the compromise. Instead, Boehner is counting on Democrat votes to get a budget deal done.

If Bill hadn’t said it so clearly, even I, as cynical as I am, wouldn’t have believed that our representatives could be this crass. But there it is, straight from the mouth of a congressman. Proof that the reason a budget deal will get done has nothing to do with the country or governing America properly.

Instead, the Republican leadership will compromise with Obama so that Democrats can’t hammer them on the budget in the next election.

Now we know that all the promises to balance the budget, keep down taxes, and repeal the Affordable Care Act are just rhetoric to get our votes and secure their jobs. But, on a positive note, at least my friend said he’d vote against the budget compromise.

 

This article originally appeared at CapitolHillDaily.com and is reprinted here with permission. 

Video: Harry Reid Attacks Ted Cruz As “School Bully”

Not bad for a new Senator…

Obama’s “Fairness” Economy Has Backfired

Barack Obama speech 7 SC Obamas Fairness Economy Has Backfired

One of the most seductive parts of President Barack Obama’s political message (and the message of progressive Democrats in general) is sympathy for the poor and a willingness to talk about the disparities of capitalism — about the rich being too rich and the poor being screwed. In some ways, it’s the predominant message of the Obama era.

And though it’s reasonable to contend that Republicans need to display more compassion — if for nothing else than their own political survival — isn’t it also reasonable to take stock of how things have gone for the poor under four-plus years of progressive rule?

Now, if you’re heavily invested in the market, life is peachy. A confounding fact, no doubt, when one considers that nearly every economic indicator known to mankind has been pretty abysmal of late. We are experiencing high unemployment, a shrinking labor force, stagnant gross domestic product growth and rickety consumer confidence. A disconnected market, though, has been on a historic boom. So if we need any more proof that life really isn’t fair, think about this: The rich have the Federal Reserve, and you have Harry Reid.

What does it mean in substance? According to a new Pew Research Center analysis of Census Bureau data, thanks to a robust stock and bond market, coupled with a lousy housing market, the recovery has meant that households with a net worth in the upper 7 percent have seen their net worth rise, on average, by nearly 30 percent in the years after the recession and that everyone else’s net worth has dropped by an average of 4 percent.

The economic gap between whites and minorities is even worse. According to the Urban Institute, whites, on average, have two times the income of blacks and Hispanics and six times the wealth, and that gap is accelerating.

Read More at Reason . By David Harsanyi.

Video: Harry Reid Calls Tea Partiers “Anarchists”

If only this man knew what he was talking about…

How About An Assault Pressure Cooker Ban?

Dianne Feinstein SC How About An Assault Pressure Cooker Ban?

Here’s an idea.

How about an assault pressure cooker ban?

In view of last week’s events in Boston, it makes more sense than an assault rifle ban. (Keep in mind that Obamacare probably will not pay for the surgical removal of my tongue from my cheek.)

It’s now well known that a cheap pressure cooker (Wal Mart has them as low as $42.87 for a T-Fal model) can be turned into an IED, which can kill or maim a lot faster than a Bushmaster 223 with a 30 round magazine.  Ask the folks who were gathered near the finish line of the Boston Marathon last week.

Where are the “if we can just save one life” folks on this one?

I’m pretty sure that the Second Amendment does not cover pressure cookers, so why not ban them in addition to ball bearings and printed circuit boards that can receive radio signals and switch something on?

A more reasonable question to ask, of course, would be if those folks in the Boston area, who were ordered back into their houses during the manhunt for the two Chechnyan punks who apparently set off the IEDs at the Boston Marathon, would have felt more comfortable with a handgun or an assault rifle to protect themselves and their families?

I know that if this had happened in Northern Nevada, there would have been a whole lot of weapons being loaded and cocked and kept handy until the manhunt was over.

At the risk of being accused of politicizing a tragedy, this is the exact reason we do not and should not ban guns in this country.  You have a guaranteed constitutional right to defend yourself from nutjobs like these clowns and, for that matter, anybody else who would do your family and yourself any harm.

Understand that you are not required to do so.  But you have the right to do so.  And, should you wish to be pro-active in a situation such as this, the nanny staters should not be standing in your way.

One such nanny stater is our own Harry Reid (D-Washington DC Ritz Carleton), who has now completed his transition from a one-time blue dog Democrat who understood exactly the nature of the state he represented to a Barney Frank limousine liberal who could care less about who actually sent him to Washington because he’s above all that.

In last week’s Senate votes on the President’s gun control bill, Reid actually voted FOR an assault weapons ban.

That’s right, Dirty Harry voted to stop me from owning my M1 Carbine, the assault rifle that won World War Two.  The rifle we made six and a half million of and sold surplus to citizens’ marksmanship groups in the 50s and 60s for around $21.

He lost by a good 20 votes because even in a Senate run by Harry Reid, there’s enough good sense to realize such a bill was going nowhere.

California Senator Dianne Feinstein poo pooed the need for “assault weapons” in Boston on Fox News Sunday:

CHRIS WALLACE: Senator, reaction to the Boston bombings has spilled into other issues, including gun control. There are some conservatives who say — some conservatives who say that, when a million people in Boston were forced to stay in their homes, that a lot of those people — particularly in Watertown where they were going door to door and there was a real concern that this fellow might be on the loose, might break into their house, might take hostages — would people like to have guns?

SENATOR FEINSTEIN: Oh, some may have, yes. But if where you’re going is do they need an assault weapon? I don’t think so. As the vice president said — 

WALLACE: Shouldn’t they have the right to decide whatever weapon they feel they need to protect themselves?

FEINSTEIN: Well, how about a machine gun then? We did away with machine guns because of how they’re used. I think we should do away with assault weapons because of how they’re used.

WALLACE: Semiautomatics, that’s the most popular rifle in America.

FEINSTEIN: And you could use a 12-gauge shotgun and have a good defensive effect. And there’s the element of surprise. Now, you’ve got police all over the place in Watertown, so I don’t really think that this is applicable. I think there are people that want to make this argument, but 12-gauge shotgun, there are many weapons, 2,000-plus weapons that are available to people for choice without an assault weapon.

Please.

This is a woman who simply cannot see reality.

As a neighbor of mine succinctly put it, “I have great respect for the police, but they’re reacting.  I want to be pro-active.”

That is exactly what people like Feinstein fear.

Pro-active citizens?  We can’t have that.  They might hurt someone.

Fortunately, our founding fathers already thought about it way back in 1789; and they added it to the Constitution right after Freedom of Speech and Religion.

So, it would seem that no matter what Feinstein and Reid do, they cannot win.

As long as we don’t back down, that is.  And if there was ever a reason not to back down, it’s the fact that Reid could betray the state that sent him to Washington.