ObamaCare Ruins Medicare Deliberately — But Why?

Dr. Milton Wolf, The Washington Times

“We don’t want to take away people’s health insurance,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius so graciously declared earlier this year. But then she quickly qualified that with these ominous words: “before they have some realistic other choices.”

Americans have overwhelmingly, consistently and wisely been opposed to a European-style, single-payer, government-run, socialized health care system. So how might the big- government types who are hell-bent on forcing their will upon us attempt to implement this oppressive system in America? Simple. By creating medical refugees desperate for any port in a storm. That storm is coming and, unlike global warming, it’s actually man-made.

America somehow managed to survive for 189 years without Medicare or Medicaid and, in fact, became the greatest nation in the history of humankind. Established in 1965 – a mere 46 years ago – too many politicians today lack the perspective to understand this health care altar at which they worship. Instead of reforming the system to align it with American values, they abuse it as an eternal source of giveaways to buy votes. As for the politicians of the 1960s, except for the mop tops and go-go boots, they were very much like the politicians of today: They made a lot of empty promises.

President Lyndon B. Johnson promised that Medicare would cost about $500 million a year – yes, million. He even said that if costs went higher, then he was going to look like the “worst kind of damn fool.” Just a year later, in 1966, the House Ways and Means Committee estimated thatMedicare would cost about $12 billion a year by 1990. The actual 1990 cost was $107 billion – off by an order of magnitude but close enough for government work. And that’s when costs really took off. By 2008, annual costs hit $599 billion and the program for the first time went into deficit-spending mode.

For all the Democrats’ dishonesty and reckless spending, Republicans weren’t exactly blameless either. In 2003, President George W. Bush and a Republican Congress doubled down and ushered in the largest expansion in Medicare history with their senior citizen prescription drug entitlement program. They claimed the price tag would be $400 billion for the first decade but quietly adjusted that estimate upward to $534 billion just one month after passage.

Parenthetically, just three years later, in 2006, the free market roared as a private company in Bentonville, Ark. – without a single dime of taxpayer money or the compulsion from know-it-all government bureaucrats – lowered prices of the top 331 prescription medications to just $4 per month (and later to $10 per three months), not just for seniors but for all Americans. And equally importantly, Wal-Mart did not send the bill to our children.

Today we know that LBJ and a lot of other politicians indeed are the worst kind of damn fools.

Read more.

Obama to Tout Amnesty in Speech Near Mexican City That Had More Casualties Than Afghanistan

Fred Lucas, CNSNews.com

President Barack Obama’s commitment to providing legal status for illegal aliens is reflected in the time he has spent focusing on the country’s immigration laws in recent weeks, the White House said on Monday, one day before the president is set to deliver a national address on immigration in El Paso, Texas.

El Paso is across the border from Juarez, Mexico, a city where 3,111 civilians were murdered last year–more than in all of Afghanistan.

In recent weeks, Obama has met with current and former elected officials, business leaders and Hollywood celebrities – all of whom agree with his position on the matter – to promote comprehensive immigration reform.

Proponents call the proposal a “pathway to citizenship” for the roughly 12 million illegal aliens in the country, but critics call it “amnesty.”

“It will reflect his commitment to comprehensive immigration reform,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday. “We weren’t able to achieve it in the first part of the president’s term but it remains a priority of the president, even though it’s hard. He takes on hard things because he believes they’re important to get done. Hard things often need bipartisan support.”

“One thing I would note,” Carney continued, “is there was bipartisan support at the highest levels of the Republican Party – including the president, George W. Bush, including Sen. John McCain, the Republican Party’s nominee in 2008.”

The proposal has even less support today, however, with McCain and other Republicans having largely reversed themselves on the issue.

Obama is likely less concerned about pushing the proposal than about appealing to a political base in the lead up to his 2012 reelection campaign, says Bob Dane, spokesman for the Federation of Americans for Immigration Reform, a pro-border enforcement group.

“If Bush couldn’t get an amnesty bill passed, any bipartisan consensus for an amnesty bill now is not possible,” Dane told CNSNews.com.

Dane wondered why the president has only talked about the matter with people who already agree with him.

Read more.

Justice Served, “At an Hour of our Choosing”

Dr. Paul G. Kengor

“In Bin Laden Announcement, Echoes of 2007 Obama Speech,” declared the headline in the New York Times. It’s difficult to find a newspaper that has demonstrated a worse pro-Obama and anti-Bush bias than the New York Times, especially when dealing with the War on Terror. And so, I expected a headline like this in the Times. When I searched Google this morning, looking for a text of President Obama’s statement on the death of Osama bin Laden, the Times headline was the first thing that popped up.

That’s too bad. A better banner would have been, “In Bin Laden Announcement, Echoes of 2001 Bush Speech.” That’s what I immediately thought when I heard the stunning statement by President Obama announcing the killing of Osama bin Laden. To wit, President Obama stated….

Read more.

Obama Stands on Bush’s Shoulders

Susan Stamper Brown, FloydReports.com

“If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants.” – Isaac Newton.

It seems like only yesterday when crowds filled streets across America waiving hand-scripted signs vowing they would “Never Forget” the atrocities perpetrated against America by al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001.

With American flags flying everywhere, it seemed the patriotism of yesteryear had been revived from an extraordinarily long sleep and the deep partisan divide resulting from the 2000 presidential election was temporarily patched by a bond of brotherhood.

Many forget the gruesome scenes witnessed that day – when some Americans made an unimagined choice as to how they would die that morning. Some chose skull-splitting skyscraper-to-sidewalk jumps, while others chose to stay in the towers only to be charred alive in a steel-melting inferno. Some chose to sit and silently pray while others chose to say “Let’s roll!” and fight the Islamic extremists on a plane destined to crash and burn.

While the stench and smoke rose from the human infirmaries, the skies were painted a charcoal gray as a black cloud of grief settled within most American’s hearts.

Our enemy celebrated.

As we bandaged our wounds, time seemed to stand still in many ways. The sun continued to rise and fall, the seasons changed, and we were forced to move forward – although it seemed inappropriate. It takes God-given grace to make it to the other side of grief, and those who survive it are permanently changed. An acquaintance of mine once said, “Broken hearts never heal; they just stop bleeding.”

Almost ten years has passed since that tragic day and most Americans have fallen into a routine of normalcy, having become accustomed to new things like bellicose airport security checks, the Patriot Act and a Homeland Security Department.

Once again, history has done what she seems to do best by repeating herself, but this time with a twist of poetic justice – as Americans line the streets to celebrate justice rightly served to bin Laden at the hands of our brave military and the intelligence community who have given themselves sacrificially day-in and day-out since September 11….

Read more

Bin Laden Proves: Terrorists Will Rot in Hell

Michael Reagan, FloydReports.com

They got him. Put a couple of slugs in his face. Then they dumped his body in the sea — something for the fish, which don’t much care what they eat, to feed on.

No matter how you look at it, this was a masterful stroke by a group of Navy SEALs who went about their business with great skill and steely nerves. Naturally, great credit went to the president who stuck with an operation that was set in motion by his predecessor, George W. Bush.

We’re told that President Obama not only approved the strike, but actually watched it unfold. As one of his predecessors would have said, “Bully for him.”

One hopes that the al-Qaeda thugs have learned an important lesson from the death of their leader….

Read more.