Soros-Funded Website Attacks Christians


George Soros SC Soros Funded Website Attacks Christians

Throwing logic aside, a left-wing petition on the popular website has taken aim at popular preacher and radio personality Bradlee Dean and his participation in the Minnesota state fair recently.

The petition, started by St. Paul resident Michael Chergosky, claims that You Can Run But You Cannot Hide, Dean’s youth ministry, is “divisive” and should not be invited to the state fair. However, it ignored a multitude of praise from young people and school administrators over the years of YCR’s ministry. Chergosky merely made the oft-heard charge of being a “hate group” simply because Dean promotes a message that sex should be limited to within marriage between one man and one woman.

“It’s all a matter of viewpoint discrimination,” Dean said in reply. “When you uphold the truth of the Bible, you have enemies – Christ himself told us this.”

Dean said that they met scores of young people and others at the Labor Day fair with their positive message, as they have there for eight years. “We met lots of young people who truly appreciated our message of promoting the Constitutional and Biblical values that are at the very root of our country,” Dean said, adding that his rock group Junkyard Prophet is very popular in bringing YCR’s message to schools and public venues around the country.

Indeed, YCR organizers are noting that their ministry has reached out to more than 300 high schools in 36 states. Opposition to it, Dean said, seems to center on a few opponents from either the militant gay community or the left-leaning media.

Unnamed critics

The Minnesota CBS TV affiliate also took up the claims, citing unnamed critics of YCR’s booth at the fair.

In response to the news report, Dean said, “Are we to believe that it is ‘hate’ to stand up for God’s Word, the laws of our Constitutional republic, for marriage, and for the protection of our children? When does hate ever tell the truth? Love does that.”

“The petition quoted as our critics the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. Quoting these as authorities is nothing but laughable,” Dean said.

The SPLC has long been a critic of conservative causes and persons, including some of the most popular ministers in the country. And yet the SPLC is unabashed about its attack on these people, Dean said. Mark Potoc of the SPLC said that “Sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring hate crimes and so on… I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely destroy them.”

“It’s true that conservative Americans who really believe in the Constitution and the Bible are being found guilty of ‘thought crimes,’ and their detractors won’t stop until they are completely silenced,” Dean said in reply. “But we won’t stop, because we must preach the truth without compromise.”

SPLC’s tarnished beginnings

The Southern Poverty Law Center has as its mission making money while working hand in glove with the mainstream media to attack America’s foundation using a Communist/Marxist agenda.

The SPLC’s history is tarnished from its beginning. Its founder, lawyer Morris Dees, earned money in 1961 by doing legal work for the Ku Klux Klan. That information alone brings enough red flags to expose SPLC as an illegitimate and anti-American organization.

Dees founded the SPLC in 1971, after the civil rights battle had been won and there was no money left in representing KKK-like groups. He then jumped to the other side of the fence, masquerading as a “civil rights organization dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, and seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of society.”

In 1986, the SPLC’s entire staff quit in protest of Dees’ refusal to “address issues such as homelessness, voter registration and affirmative action – that they considered far more pertinent to poor minorities ….” (Harper’s Magazine). dominated by liberals, which was started in 2007 as an advocacy group and has been funded by liberal activist George Soros, has 20 million subscribers and has long been pushing liberal causes. Although it changed its policy to allow conservative advertising a year ago, it is still largely filled with liberal-leaning causes.

Chergosky, who says on his Facebook page that he was born in 1953, got only a few comments when he said that he started the petition.

Dean started his full-time ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide, after his conversion to Christianity in 1995. He has since dedicated himself to reaching the young to help them find a purpose in life, and to educate them in the Constitution and America’s biblically-based foundation.

Get in the fight today

Help in battling the enemies of our Constitution and Biblically-based values. Like Bradlee Dean on Facebook, sign up for the You Can Run But You Cannot Hide and Sons of Liberty newsletter, or donate to receive a free gift: Join the fight and Donate HERE!


Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)

War On Syria Means Victory For Al Qaeda

McCain Wacko Birds Roost SC War on Syria Means Victory for Al Qaeda

President Obama’s proposed military strike means, practically speaking, that the U.S. will intervene on behalf of al Qaeda in Syria. Why is this dangerous proposal being taken seriously by Congress?

If the proposal were somehow designed to save the Christians and other minorities in Syria, that would be one thing. But there has been no announced intention to do that. In fact, as we have argued, the proposed strike on the Syrian regime puts Christians at more risk of genocide. Obama’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt demonstrates that he has no regard for the rights of Christians in the Middle East.

But the proposal goes forward in Congress because very few Republicans are willing to stand up to media-hungry politicians such as Senator John McCain (R-AZ), a war hero from Vietnam who assumes the high ground in any military crisis or conflict.

McCain, however, said something the other day on Fox News that, in the words of “Jihad Watch” director Robert Spencer, demonstrates his “appalling ignorance” on Middle East matters. This wasn’t just a gaffe but a deliberate comment. More than that, it demonstrates how the media shower McCain with praise and respect when none is deserved.

Spencer notes that Brian Kilmeade on Fox News had objected to Syrian rebels yelling “Allahu akbar! Allahu akbar!” McCain shot back: “Would you have a problem with an American or Christians saying ‘Thank God, Thank God?’ That’s what they’re saying. Come on! Of course they’re Muslims, but they’re moderates and I guarantee you they are moderates.”

Spencer says that “Allahu akbar” does not mean “Thank God.” It is a war cry that means “Allah is greater” and “is essentially a proclamation of superiority.” Spencer notes it is the same cry that Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood members were shouting as they destroyed a Christian church and tore off its cross.

The exchange between Kilmeade and McCain has received more than 240,000 views on YouTube.

What is intriguing is how the rest of the media covered this. Many different publications, including Politico, The Huffington Post, Business Insider, and Mediaite, ran stories about the exchange which claimed that McCain had somehow “shamed” Brian Kilmeade and Fox News, as if McCain knew what he was talking about and that Kilmeade had been exposed as an ignoramus.

This, then, is why McCain succeeds with his policy of going to war on behalf of the mysterious “moderates” in Syria. We have a media that are afraid of telling the truth about the senator when he makes bone-headed comments that have no relation to reality.

McCain’s preference for “moderates” in Syria would be laughable, were it not so serious and coming at a time when America is on the verge of going to war.

Spencer writes, “McCain’s appalling ignorance and Obama’s ongoing enthusiasm for all things Muslim Brotherhood, including the Syrian opposition, are leading the U.S. into disaster.”

This is not necessarily news to those who have been following our reports about McCain’s praise of the Al Jazeera terror television network and his appearances on that channel. This is the same channel that has just been closed down in Egypt for inspiring violence and terrorism. But the media persist in conveying the impression that McCain knows what he is talking about and has some mastery over Middle East events.

In a commentary for the London Center for Policy Research, Jed Babbin says Obama may get a war resolution from Congress because “the Republican ‘leadership’ of national security affairs—at least the only ones who get media attention—is comprised of Obama’s most dedicated allies in Congress, Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham.”

The key phrase is “the only ones who get media attention.” This is why Obama invited these two to the White House after he announced plans to go to Congress. It was a careful strategy designed to create the impression of Republican support for Obama. McCain and Graham (R-SC) are assigned the roles of providing Republican cover for Obama’s policy. They have performed the same function in regard to his support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

In the case of Syria, however, Graham seems to have competition for the role of second fiddle, as Fox News Republican commentator William Kristol has been appearing all over the media (including NBC’s “Meet the Press” and CNN) to argue on Obama’s behalf. It was Kristol’s group, the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), that released a letter arguing for a strike on Syria without congressional approval. Fox News commentator Karl Rove signed the letter, as did Randy Scheunemann, a former foreign policy adviser to McCain who lobbied for the Open Society Institute, founded by billionaire financier George Soros.

Kristol’s group has also been critical of Russia for passing legislation to protect children from homosexual propaganda. An FPI scholar, James Kirchick, went on Russia Today television, wearing rainbow suspenders, to argue for gay rights in Russia and complained when his audio was cut off. Perhaps war with Russia is next on the agenda. Obama might agree with that, if the war was based on protecting gay rights.

But remember that the push for intervention in Syria is based on the assumption that Syrian leader Bashar Assad has used chemical weapons. Kristol, who founded The Weekly Standard, has decided not to ask for proof and simply takes Obama’s word on this. This is not journalism, but advocacy and recklessness.

With House Republican leaders endorsing Obama’s policy, it was left to conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh to weigh in on Tuesday, citing a detailed report by terrorism analyst Yossef Bodansky that the August 21, 2013 chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was actually “a pre-meditated provocation by the Syrian opposition.”

Limbaugh, who clearly has no regard for McCain’s presumed stature in this debate, said the evidence shows that the rebels have access to chemical weapons and may have used them.

Limbaugh is not the best opponent of Obama’s policy that conservatives can offer. So it has to be noted that former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy points out that U.S. Government officials have always known that al Qaeda has been pursuing chemical weapons. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that the rebels did indeed get access to and use them in Syria.

But whether Assad used the chemical weapons or not, McCarthy argued, “It diverts attention from the issue the interventionists do not want to discuss: the fact that al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood would be the chief beneficiaries of U.S. attacks against Assad’s regime, the fact that the toppling of Assad could very well be even worse for American national security than Assad himself has been.”

Limbaugh made the same point, emphasizing what will happen if Obama’s policy goes forward and the Syrian regime is toppled: “If they get rid of Bashar in Syria, it will be Al-Qaeda.”

To remind McCain and the media, al Qaeda is not a group of “moderates.”


This commentary originally appeared at and is reprinted here with permission. 

ObamaCare II: Catholic Bishops Pushing The Poison Pill Of Immigration Reform

Catholic Church interior ObamaCare II: Catholic Bishops pushing the poison pill of Immigration reform

Dear Excellencies, Reverends, Deacons, and fellow Catholics -

This morning, I read in my Bakersfield paper that a group of Catholic Bishops and priests are planning to push the current immigration bill on 60 targeted Republican lawmakers, including my Congressman Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy has been trying to hold the fort against the complete collapse of the nation’s borders and taking flak for it from people who ought to know better.

If “Obamacare II” – the draconian, poison-pilled immigration bill–is passed, all 1200 pages of it, kiss what’s left of the Republic good bye. Is Nancy Pelosi going to be here leading the “real Catholics” who seem to have no idea how a representative Constitutional Republic was designed to work? Do they understand we are in all out spiritual warfare? Ask your local jihadist!

This is a repeat of the way the Church was sucked into the Delano Grape Boycott when clergy were happily marching under the banners of Our Lady of Guadalupe and mass murderer communist Che Guevara. Only one woman saw the contrast and stood against the surge of communist chicanery. She paid the price by being kept out of discussion meetings even at Catholic churches. Her major sponsor’s Learjet crashed not long after. Has it ever been investigated?

Don’t these bishops and priests know they are playing into the hands of George Soros, who through has been sponsoring UFW and anti-fracking protests and attacks against the Church from all sides? Very strange bedfellows indeed.

Don’t they read papal encyclicals like Caritas in veritate? (#58 for starters)?

The bishops have been urging the faithful to participate in the body politic. All they can come up with is more Marxist social justice and don’t yet understand the Republicans are not the enemy. The Democrat Party left the Catholic Church in the dust way before Ronald Reagan realized the party left him. Under a totalitarian President and corrupt Democrat Congressmen, the pace has hit warp speed.

Please, for the love of God and Country, pay attention to who you’re getting in cahoots with. Why not challenge Congress to come up with a comprehensive and fair bill under 100 pages long?

Not one of us knows the full context of the current legislation – or who actually wrote it!

FYI, Muslim Brotherhood supporter Neera Tanden recently bragged that she helped write the “Affordable Care Act” while on George Soros’ payroll. Ever notice Muslims are exempt per Dhimmitude on page 107 (or that in Denmark ,they constitute 4% of the population, yet draw down 40% of the welfare budget)? Thank God they hold the Blessed Virgin as “the most important woman in Islam!” Maybe she’ll come to our rescue as she did for the human-sacrificed Aztecs! Is there another Juan Diego out there?

I was almost convinced that things would change with the elevation of really great and brave new Archbishops and Cardinals. I trust they’re not behind this upcoming September 2nd protest!

“Brother Roger” And The Racial Agitators

Roger Ailes Fox News “Brother Roger” and the Racial Agitators

When conservatives complain about Al Sharpton, they usually note his relationship to NBC news or his hosting a show on MSNBC. But a new book says the racial agitator and Democratic Party politician has considerable clout with Fox News, and in fact played a role in getting conservative Glenn Beck fired from the channel.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson says “people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do not deserve to be called civil rights leaders. They are not. They are hustlers and pimps who make a living off inflaming racial tensions.”

However, The Zev Chafets book, Roger Ailes: Off Camera, has some revealing passages about the clout that Sharpton and Jackson have with the chairman and CEO of Fox News. It says Ailes took a phone call from Sharpton after Beck, then a Fox News host, staged a rally at the Lincoln Memorial 47 years to the day after Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his “I have a dream” speech at the same location. Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally, designed to pay tribute to America’s military personnel and restore traditional values, was strongly attacked by figures such as Sharpton and George Soros-funded groups like Media Matters, then campaigning to have Beck fired from Fox News.

Chafets says Reverend Alveda King, a national pro-life leader, delivered a conservative “I have a dream” message of her own at the Beck-sponsored rally that was “infuriating to many viewers” and Ailes as well. “Ailes didn’t like it much, either,” he reports. However, the book doesn’t explain why Ailes took issue with the rally or the speech.

The book adds, “When Al Sharpton called him [Ailes] to complain, Sharpton was surprised to hear Ailes say he would ‘take care’ of it.” The passage is included in the context of Ailes making a decision that “he would have to get rid of Glenn Beck” and telling Howard Kurtz, then a media reporter with The Daily Beast, that “he was turning down the partisan heat at the network” and was pursuing “a more moderate tone” in programming.

Kurtz, who was recently hired by Fox News, is described by Michael Clemente, Fox’s executive vice president of news, as “the most accomplished media reporter in the country,” despite a series of embarrassments over erroneous and controversial columns and media appearances that resulted in his firing from The Daily Beast.

While the Chafets book is considered sympathetic to the chief of the Fox News Channel, it notes that Beck’s firing followed his strong criticism of billionaire George Soros and a vigorous campaign by various left-wing groups against him.

Chafets also points out that then-Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), another liberal recently hired as a Fox News commentator, is a member of the “roster of Friends of Roger” and an old “buddy” of Ailes.

Accuracy in Media chairman Don Irvine noted that Kucinich was “one of the most liberal members of Congress until he lost his seat after redistricting in 2012,” and that he was “the latest in a string of liberals at Fox, including former Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Bob Beckel, Sally Kohn, Jehmu Greene and Santita Jackson who have joined the network in recent years.”

Ailes declared, “I’ve always been impressed with Rep. Kucinich’s fearlessness and thoughtfulness about important issues. His willingness to take a stand from his point of view makes him a valuable voice in our country’s debate.”

Chafets notes that Ailes is also personal friends with Jehmu Greene and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, for whom he wrote an endorsement for her book critical of the use of U.S. military power.

However, the pandering to Sharpton is not new on the part of Fox News. Back in 2007, as AIM reported at the time, popular Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly paid homage to Sharpton at the civil rights agitator’s national convention. Indeed, O’Reilly himself was an honored guest at the event.

But Sharpton isn’t alone among civil rights agitators in having clout at Fox News. The Chafets book has a photo of Ailes posing with Jesse Jackson after Jackson delivered a keynote address at a 2012 graduation ceremony of the Ailes Apprentice Program, a venture designed to support and promote “diversity in broadcast & cable journalism.” It is open to “top diversity candidates,” presumably meaning non-whites, and sends young people to events featuring such groups as the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association.

“Few people realized that Jesse Jackson, of all people, is a friend of ‘Brother Roger,’” says Chafets. “Fewer know that Santita Jackson [another liberal hired by Ailes as a Fox commentator] is one of Michelle Obama’s closest friends: Jackson is a godmother to Malia Obama.”

The book says Jesse Jackson “happened to mention” to Ailes that his daughter Santita had lost her job as a Chicago radio talk-show host and was “looking for a new gig” when Ailes decided to hire her.

We noted at the time that Santita Jackson listed the notorious Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Jr. as being among her personal “activities and interests” on her Facebook page. She was also a supporter of New York University law professor Derrick Bell, who supports race-based hiring policies.

Such liberal hires, the book notes, “makes Fox more difficult to assault as a bastion of racism.” Chafets adds, “It means that one of the nation’s premier civil rights leaders owes him [Ailes]. And, as an extra bonus, it is sure to cause a little heartburn for Jackson’s chief rival, Al Sharpton. After all, Sharpton has daughters, too.”

The implication is that Sharpton might hold back on his criticism of Fox because of favors Ailes could do for him.

Nevertheless, some Fox News personalities continue speaking the truth. “They don’t represent anybody, they’re not elected to anything, they don’t have constituencies,” Tucker Carlson said of Sharpton and Jackson. “The only reason they’re allowed to do this is because we in the press enable them by calling them civil rights leaders. Why do we do that?”

Perhaps it’s because the head of Fox News fears and respects their political power.


This article originally appeared at and is reprinted here with permission. 

Anti-Obama “Witch Hunts?”… Or “WHICH Hunts?”

Valerie Jarrettjpg Anti Obama “Witch Hunts?”… or “WHICH Hunts?”

Surprise, surprise!!  Left-wing Congressman Elijah Cummings, senior Democrat on the House Investigations Subcommittee, is trying to end the ever-expanding House investigation of the Internal Revenue Service’s illegal “political targeting” of conservative applicants for 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status, by loudly insisting that “This witch hunt needs to end.”

This nonsense repeats the demands of a major May 15 article from Media Matters (an integral part of socialist George Soros’ blindly pro-Obama Center for American Progress) — to the effect that “New Talking Points Revelations Should End Benghazi Witch Hunt.” 

How outrageous that there should be not only one but two dastardly Republican-led “witch hunts” atop each other in Barack Obama’s two supposed scandals and subsequent cover-upsHow dare the GOP go digging around for witches and warlocks in the President’s inner circle.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Avoiding the Dreaded “Cover-up” Label

Of course, this is only one of many misleading, blame-game mantras by which today’s Obama partisans attempt to avoid the dreaded “Cover-Up” label for the President’s culpability in a long list of scandals involving the huge Benghazi fiasco, the plainly illegal IRS discriminations, the Associated Press and Fox News incursions, and multiple other scandals big and small.

Other such labels of derision and misdirection from Obama’s “Age of Scamalot” crowd over the last several months have included a “partisan sideshow,” a concocted “Fox News story,” a mere “political carnival,” a matter of “there’s no there there,” a “right-wing distraction,” a display of “radical extremism,” a transparent “GOP tool for fundraising,” ad infinitum..

But the false label that is most repeated – but which, ironically, offers the best opening for effective counter-attack — is the spurious charge that this is nothing but a partisan “Witch Hunt,” to which we should respond that this is actually a multi-layered “WHICH Hunt,” instead.

The deadly serious goal should now be to discover exactly which guilty government officials – including the President himself — have been lying, covering up, and even committing perjury in the scandal at hand …

o  which White House, IRS, and Treasury officials?

o  which State, DHS, INS, and DOD officials?

o  which DOJ, FBI, CIA, and NSA officials?

o  which “Soroctopus” (Soros-funded) operatives?

o  which “ProgSoc” Congressmen and Senators?

o  which lockstep-Left members of the Media, etc.?

Looking first at the uniquely complex “Benghazi Affair” – the congressional inquiries of which do not currently include the names of either Valerie Jarrett (Obama’s “brain”) or Huma Abedin (Hillary’s former “brain”) — this search should clearly not be abandoned, as Cummings demands, but should be expanded, instead, into a Watergate-style “Select Committee” whose authority should extend at least

a)  until all brave “whistleblowers” (especially among the 30-plus rescued personnel who have been so effectively “disappeared” by the endless Benghazi Cover-up) have told their truthful versions of this monumental story; and

b) until several major reluctant and even hostile witnesses from all across Barack Obama’s Administration have been subpoenaed, questioned under oath, and made subject to charges of perjury and Contempt of Congress if they dare to lie.

Is Valerie Jarrett Our Prime Suspect?

Looking next at the IRS “Targeting of Conservatives” infractions, we notice again the absence of Obama’s closest and most senior political advisor, policy strategist, and de facto “Producer” in TV-programming terminology for over two decades – one Valerie Jarrett. As this lady’s last quarter-century record reveals, it was she

o  who recruited young Michelle Robinson in 1988 and the young Barack Obama in 1990 into the highly “political” and left-leaning law firm of Sidley Austin;

o  who appears to have been the “cupid” of their relationship  and 1992 marriage in the Marxist-inspired Black Liberation Theology church of the (former Muslim) Rev. Jeremiah Wright;

o  who apparently steered Barack into socialist “Progressive Chicago” in 1993 and the Chicago New Party in early 1996 – under whose banner he was elected to the state Senate in late 1996;

o  who has continued in both “Mother Hen” and “Chicago Politics” fashion to promote both his and Michelle’s legal and political careers into his successful races for the US Senate in 2004 and for the US Presidency in 2008 and 2012; and

o  who has been his principle liason to the entire inner circle, and especially to the President’s off-campus “Soroctopus” think tank and revolving-door employer of first resort, the George Soros-funded Center For American Progress – from which many Obama political appointees and regulatory “czars” have come and by which many former White House socialists (e.g., Van Jones, Carol Browner, Anita Dunn, and Cass Sunstein, just to name a few) are now employed.

If It Wasn’t For Valerie …

As the outspoken political biographer Ed Klein has stated with emphasis in his best-selling book, The Amateur: “If it wasn’t for Valerie Jarrett, there’d be no Barack Obama to complain about. … She knows the buttons, the soft spots, the history, the context.”

And as yet another careful student of the Jarrett-Obama relationship, Karin McQuillan, observes in a recent posting on

Obama relies on Valerie Jarrett to create the White House bubble he likes to live in, where his narcissism is stroked and his desire to do the big, left-wing thing is encouraged.  Jarrett is the doorman. She runs access to the president. As Klein puts it, she guards him from meeting with ‘critics and complainers who might deflate his ego.’ No one gets past Jarrett who has an incompatible point of view.

Still, other observers anoint her as Barack Obama’s “alter ego,” as “the other side of Obama’s brain,” as “Barack and Michelle’s consigliere” and as the President’s “ultimate gatekeeper.” The emphatic confirmations of her White House prowess go endlessly on. And in explanation of what this woman thinks about the power she wields, here is what she told a group of rabid supporters on the eve of last year’s presidential election.

After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time! Everyone not with us is against us and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded; the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over, and we have two judges ready to go.

And did not the President himself embrace this “punish the enemy” attitude when he stated in an October 2012 campaign speech that “voting is the best revenge”? Partisan revenge from Obama and hell to pay from his ‘round-the-clock enforcer.  As the French would say about the Obama Inner Circle (OIC), “The more things change, the more they remain the same, n’est-ce pas?”

Uncovering “Who Knew What and When”

All of which means that within this tight-knit group, the only one who truly “speaks for Obama” and who decides what he should know and when he should know it is this mysterious woman whose name seldom comes up when the Congress, the media, and the American people quite properly continue their search for who, indeed, knew what and when – and who is, therefore, so shamefully responsible for the multiple scandals now crippling the nation.

Yet, when Congressman Cummings angrily alleges a partisan “witch hunt,” he argues that even if senior IRS officials knew all about and directed the illegal “targeting” of conservative groups, “These facts are a far cry from accusations of a conspiracy orchestrated by the White House to target the President’s political enemies.”

But in so contending, Cummings conveniently ignores the fact that the President’s own political orchestrator, and Obama himself, have recently threatened just such a profiling of enemies and a “hell-to-pay” punishment of them — as was also being recommended in formal letters to the IRS by left-wing Senators (Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, Sheldon Whitehouse et al) and by certain highly ProgSoc congressmen, as well.

So, as the several well-founded investigations go forward on Capitol Hill, we should finally begin asking about the vital roles almost surely played before, during, and after both the Benghazi and IRS scandals by presidential confidante Valerie Jarrett – as suggested in Cover-up # 35 of an earlier essay entitled “Hillary’s – And Now Obama’s – Vast Left-Wing Cover-up.”

Although her culpability is not yet proven, there is every reason in the world for the Congress to ask these three proverbial “$64,000 Questions”:

First, was it not this Obama alter ego (and thus Obama himself) who knew all about the IRS misdeeds from their start in early 2010 (apparently on April 1, the next day after a March 31 visit to the White House by the highly partisan National Treasury Employees Union president, Colleen Kelly) — and about their conduct, 100% success, and cover-up to this day?

Second, was it not she who almost surely delivered the President’s infamous Benghazi Cover-up marching orders to then-UN Ambassador, and now National Security Advisor, Susan Rice – and who constantly keeps both the President and the First Lady fully informed about all such matters of  monumental importance?

Third, although both Valerie Jarrett and Susan Rice are now protected by “Executive Privilege” from being subpoenaed by Congress, might they – in a heroic fit of transparency, accountability, progress, and balance – simply volunteer to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to the Congress about which of them (and thus the President himself) knew what and when?


JIM GUIRARD —      703-768-0957

A DC-area attorney, writer and national security strategist, Jim Guirard was longtime Chief of Staff to former US Senators Allen Ellender and Russell Long. His Web site is devoted to truth in language and truth in history in public discourse.