Ben Johnson, The White House Watch
Although he has grown Washington more than any president in a generation, Barack Obama is talking like a Jeffersonian states rights champion — in the one night, in the one state, on the one issue that would promote his top-down rejection of traditional morality. As Barack Obama prepares to attend a sold out, $1,250-per-plate campaign fundraiser before a large homosexual group in New York (the “Gala with the Gay Community”), the state legislature in Albany seems poised to pass a bill approving same-sex marriage. Some speculate this evening Obama will endorse marriage destruction. But Obama’s handlers are rolling out a new and, for him, novel tactic: wrap himself in states rights. An unnamed White House official told The Huffington Post, “Although the president believes that this is an issue best addressed by the states, he also firmly believes that committed gay and lesbian couples should receive equal protection under the law.” (Emphasis added.)
(Update: Here’s video of the speech. Obama has done precisely as I reported. Story continues following the video.)
At last, Barack Obama has discovered states rights, which constitutes a significant act of rhetorical hypocrisy even by his standards. Obama’s left-wing allies have equated a belief in the Founders’ view of government with “racism” and derided those who believe in states’ rights as “Tenthers.”
The Obama administration is suing Indiana on behalf of Planned Parenthood, since that state prohibited tax dollars from funding abortion providers. The showdown could cost the state $4.3 billion. Obama not only sued but hauled the state of Arizona before the UN Human Rights Council over its immigration law. He sent 400 federal agents to harass poll watchers enforcing state election laws during the 2010 midterms. (It didn’t help, much.) His National Labor Relations Board is suing (see a trend?) Boeing, because it planned to build one plant in South Carolina, a state that has chosen to adopt “Right to Work” laws. ObamaCare marks his largest legislative trampling of states rights. Now that Republicans control the House, Obama is increasingly ruling by executive fiat.
But allow a blue state to consider redefining the fundamental building block of society, and suddenly Barack Obama is the Lester Maddox of gay marriage. (Both constituencies have significant experience bicycling backwards.)
The move is a down payment on the debt Obama owes this voting bloc. The LGBT lobby has been a pillar of his re-election fundraising. As 2012 draws closer, Obama has hinted his views on same-sex marriage will “evolve.” White House spokesman Jay Carney followed this line when pressed for clarification on Monday. Obama “was very clear in the campaign,” when he claimed to oppose it, Carney said. “He’s very clear about the fact that his position is evolving.”
For those who are confused, Obama’s position on same-sex marriage is simple….
Elise Foley, The Huffington Post
Rep. Lamar Smith is working to gather support for a bill that would block the Obama administration’s ability to take executive action on deportations…
Smith is attempting to draw support for the Hinder the Administration’s Legalization Temptation Act — more commonly referred to as the HALT Act — to stop the Obama administration from blocking deportation for families of U.S. citizens who are being sent to dangerous countries.
The bill is a political attempt to push back on Democrats, who are advocating for the president to end some deportations since major immigration reform remains nearly impossible. Although the HALT Act is unlikely to make it out of the House — and would almost certainly be vetoed if it passed the Senate — Smith is highlighting a controversial presidential power at the same time that Democrats urge Obama to use it, which may lead him to not assert his authority at all.
Democratic lawmakers have asked the president to use his executive power to stop certain people from being deported, such as families of U.S. service members and citizens, or young men and women attending college in the United States. Some have argued the government should redefine “extreme hardship,” a classification used when determining whether a family member or spouse of an American citizen can remain in the United States, to allow families to remain together.
But Smith claims in a “Dear Colleague” letter that the White House is already using its discretion to avoid enforcing immigration law.
“[T]he Obama Administration has made clear that it plans not to use but to abuse these powers,” the letter reads. “Because of the Obama Administration’s record, it cannot be trusted with these powers.”
Smith’s bill would prevent administrative officials from granting work authorization on a discretionary basis or granting parole or issuing deferred action, except under narrow circumstances. It would also prevent Obama from canceling orders of deportation entirely and from waiving the three- and 10-year barriers to entry for men and women who have been caught illegally present in the United States.
E.W. Jackson Sr. is a Marine Corps veteran, lawyer, and preacher who is running for the U.S. Senate from Virginia. His recent speech to Tea Party gathering is generating buzz. This segment on what Jackson calls Obama’s “Constitutional crisis” makes us wonder if he isn’t reading this website. Jackson is the founder of Staying True to America’s National Destiny (STAND), an organization dedicated to preserving America’s Christian history, faith and values. You can visit his website here.