Exclusive Investigatory Report: The Enigma That Is Barack Hussein Obama, Pre-Election To 2009

May 9, 2012 By 13 Comments

obama speech 7 SC Exclusive Investigatory Report: The Enigma That is Barack Hussein Obama, Pre Election To 2009

I was sitting in my study on a quiet Sunday afternoon pondering how is it that we have come to this point in our evolution as a nation of like minds where we are on the brink of financial, political, moral and spiritual collapse.  This question led me to create a list of the most controversial deeds, actions, and statements from our President, the Democrats, and their patrons and supporters.

When finished with this task, fifty separate questions that could be an essay or article each lay before me; my intention is to research several of these questions in turn and try to make some sense of it all.

To put this in perspective, we need to take a “birds eye” view, or a thirty thousand foot perspective of all these anomalies and see if we can create a tapestry or mosaic that is Barry Soetoro, our President and resident Nobel Laureate that lays about the White House these days.  Not to be outdone with this accomplishment, he flits across the nation on the taxpayers’ dime as he seeks another wealth- and economy-destroying term in office sowing class warfare and discontent wherever he can; currently, it is reserved exclusively for battleground and swing states.

The logical place to start is with Barry as a young man in college. I will do this without digging too deeply into this matter and all that this entails as many others have chronicled this before me. Why rehash stale controversies or attempt to cover new ground?

Many stories have been reported of Barry going to Pakistan to visit a college friend; to add mystery to this story, he is purported to have stayed in the Lahore Hilton International Hotel, swanky and expensive digs indeed for a starving college student.  This description of himself is paraphrased from “Dreams of my Father”, his 1st book as a “threadbare college student” during his time at Columbia University.

Some of the accounts have him visiting and going hunting with a future Prime Minister of Pakistan.  The credibility of these events are questionable at best as Obama fails to mentions this escapade in either of his books, though he makes mention of them in a press conference in August of 2008 in passing to Jake Tapper of CBS.  He makes this out to be cutting his teeth on foreign policy as he is eager to show what little experience he has had in this area.  The back-story was filled in, after the fact of his disclosure at the press conference, by several authors that wrote about Barry and his time in Pakistan.

As we move further through time, I purposely gloss over his time in Chicago for the sake of brevity and the fact that he is not on the national stage at this time.

The next conundrum was not mentioned in any news sources of note in our nation: Obama as a freshman Senator from Illinois went on a congressional fact finding tour to Perm Siberia in Russia with Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) in 2005 to verify the destruction of mobile missiles and their launchers under the Cooperative Threat Reduction program (CTR).

The trip was uneventful, that is, until it was time to depart the Russian military base where these inspections took place. All of a sudden, Barry and Senator Lugar were confronted and held by Russian authorities for three hours while the Russians sought permission to search the aircraft they were traveling in.

Senator Lugar does not make any mention of this incident in his after-action trip report; the Chicago Tribune has a small blurb in passing on August 29, 2005.  Numerous foreign news sources in Italy and other nations reveal that Barry was being held and questioned for espionage as being a spy for Britain. This is curious behavior from the Russians because the Cold War ended in 1991, and our nations have more to gain with mutual cooperation than hostility towards each other.  This type of behavior was the custom during earlier times of detente between our nations, though not in 2005.

Moving on to October of 2007, we have Hillary Clinton and Barry on a stage with two others. They have announced or soon will announce their intention to run for the Presidency.  Barry is shown with his hands clasped and not placing his hand across his heart as the National Anthem is played nor when the Pledge of Allegiance is recited.  He does not mouth the words to our Pledge either.  This is self-explanatory and requires no additional explanation as it shows a complete and utter disrespect to all that have fallen in the defense of this Nation and his lack of loyalty to the United States of America and it’s fifty Sovereign States.

Next up, we have Barry running for President, and the Birth Certificate issue surfaces, forcing Barry to post his alleged short form, or “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), on his election website under “Fight the Smears” to quell claims that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii.  This document is declared a forgery by several sources.  The allegations still have merit (thanks to Donald Trump & Jerome Corsi) as the long-form version that was released in April 2011 has been deemed a forgery by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s investigators.  What the long-form does show is that he is ineligible to be President as he is not a natural born citizen and holds dual citizenship with Britain if he so chose to claim it.

(Note: a link to an 11 part series on how Obama released his forged long-form birth certificate may be of interest to the reader)

However, the definition by SCOTUS in Minor v. Happersett in 1875 precludes Barry from the Office of President, as he is not a “natural born citizen.” This Supreme Court decision is central to the question of eligibility as we step through the conundrum that is Barry Soetoro.

As we move down the list, we come to a bizarre occurrence that assisted Barry and has only come to light in July 2011 with the changing of references, citations, and text of Supreme Court Case documents at Justia.com during the run-up to the election in 2008.  This directly applies to the natural born citizenship or “birther” question for Barry.  Justia is an internet website that provides legal documents and case files for anyone that wishes to research federal, state, and Supreme Court decisions and case files as well as many other documents for the legal community.

Accusations of citation and textual changes were made to approximately 25 SCOTUS cases.  Leo Donofrio Esq. informed us about this discrepancy last July as he researched Boyd v. Nebraska and noticed anomalies with the returned data from Justia.  These cases define the body of law and precedence for the definition of a natural born citizen with Minor v. Happersett being front and center during the run-up to the election in 2008.

This is the only ruling SCOTUS has ever made in a unanimous decision by all nine Justices defining all the requirements of a natural born citizen.  Barry does not meet these requirements because his father was a British subject and was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth.

This deeply troubling issue can be found by using the query of “Justiagate” in your browser search window; it is an eye-opening read in its scope and it’s legally surgical precision of it‘s execution being a fait-accompli.  Not to be undone by such a turn of events, Barry had the Federal Election Commission declare naturalized citizens and others born under his circumstances eligible to hold the office of president, Minor v. Happersett be damned!  This is extraordinary when the scope and magnitude is considered and needs to be investigated; I won‘t hold my breath for any investigation from the Justice Department or the FBI from this regime.  Congress appears impotent and MIA on this matter as well and is baffling since they are a separate but equal branch of our government and should be actively pursuing this matter.

(Note: this is actually a hollow gesture by Obama as the election for the office president is in the hands of the 50 separate State Governments that comprise the United States of America; the only ones that are probably affected by this decision are the Territories of our Nation.)

Combine this issue with the “birth certificate(s)”, Obama’s “dual citizenship,” and being questioned by “Russian authorities,” and it is beginning to smell like a conspiracy or smelly rancid cheese; take your pick at the behest of some covert shadowy cabal that crosses international borders.

Then we have this from Mondo Frazier in his American Thinker article “Who is Barack Obama?” I attempted to verify this source; however, it appears to have been scrubbed by Obama’s internet crew:

One other oddity: in the fall of 2008, Obama admitted on his Fightthesmears.com site that he had held dual citizenship with both the United States and Great Britain (the site explained that this was due to Barack Obama, Sr. being a foreign national) until 1982.  Did the Russians know something about Obama’s citizenship in 2005 that ordinary Americans don’t know in 2011?

This first part has discussed who Barry was before he came onto the national stage with his early years and the mysterious trip to Pakistan, living a lifestyle he could ill afford given his threadbare description of his early years in his two autobiographies, which are now being considered works of fiction.  We were introduced to his bizarre trip to Russia after becoming a U.S. Senator and the reaction of the Russian Security service with claims of Obama being a British spy.  This is the introduction to what will dog our president with a four year saga with Obama’s “birth certificate,” with many of his other bona-fides being declared forgeries by law enforcement officials of the State of Arizona.

It culminates in the almost surreal exposure of Justiagate with the deliberate tampering of SCOTUS documents at Justia dot com.  The surgical precision indicates a skilful lawyer assisted with the tampering of these documents and the all-too-familiar fact that fortuitous circumstances have favored Obama being the recipient of all of these random acts of fate by unknown benefactors is a bridge too far for believability.

Part Two has Barry being elected and some of the more controversial actions he takes during the first few months of 2009 after being elected.

Related posts:

  1. Blindly Following Barack Hussein Obama: A Theory Ever since the high profile emergance of Barack Hussein Obama…
  2. Imagine Being A Member Of The United States Military With Barack Hussein Obama As Your Commander-in-Chief There is a new Obama fan and that would be…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , , , , , ,

Forgerygate, Or How The US Was Tricked: The Conclusion Of Operation Sideshow

April 30, 2012 By 3 Comments

obama speech 7 SC Forgerygate, or How The US Was Tricked: The Conclusion of Operation Sideshow

Part 11: Conclusion

Facts and nothing but the facts with documents that have been deemed forgeries by a credible Law Enforcement Agency of the State of Arizona

A press gaggle had been hastily called on the afternoon of April 26, 2011 to debut Obama’s newly found long-form birth certificate for the next morning, the 27th.  This briefing was done “old school” with the press corps being barred from using any audio or video recording of the event forcing them to use only pen and paper for any notes.  This practice was extremely rare within the James S. Brady press briefing room and was usually only followed when they were on Air Force One or Two or other secure locations for security purposes.  We do not have to guess the motives of the president’s agents at this gaggle, they were being deceptive.

The complicity of the State of Hawaii and several officials in their guarded and misleading statements from the Health Department and the Attorney Generals office had started in 2008 one week before the general election.  The changing of the name of birth certificates or certifications (COLB) sometime in 2009 is another reason to doubt their veracity.  Their duplicitous statements regarding the ability to receive a true and certified copy of an original document and impeached by the requirements of the State of Hawaii Homelands Heritage Agency itself, to require only the long-form birth certificate prior to sometime in 2009.  Hawaiian Statute §338-18 refutes all the hyperbole of the officials in this matter as it was only “departmental policy” of the Health Department and not “law” as these officials continually stated.  This corroborates the statements of Mile Zullo from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office about Hawaiian officials being complicit at least at some level; by their own deceptive statements, they have in essence self-impugned their own credibility.

We have the contradictory comments and actions of Neil Abercrombie the Governor of Hawaii who vowed to release Obama’s birth records in December of 2010 and by late January 2011 had retreated from all of his previous statements.  However, on Tuesday January 18, 2011 he stated to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Obama did not have a hospital-generated long form birth certificate and the official record only consisted of a “unspecified notation or listing“.  Four short months later on April 27, 2011 the Governor makes a press release of his own in conjunction with Obama’s “sideshow” message and tacitly intimates that Obama has a hospital generated long-form birth certificate.  It is signed by Dr. David A. Sinclair who had conveniently died in 2003 as evidenced by the now fraudulent and discredited document posted on whitehouse.gov.  This  forgery had been substituted for the official “certified certificates of live birth” he received on the 25th through his personal attorney.

The long-form birth certificate is so poorly forged that it claims Obama’s Father’s race classification as “African” when the National Center for Health Statistics of the Public Health Service used the official term “Negro” to denote a person of color in 1961.  All States and Territories were required to use the National Center for Health Statistics race classifications by federal law in the collection and reporting of vital statistics.  Pencil mark notations are seen on his long-form certificate, and was a national reporting requirement from the National Vital Statistics Division which required data be taken from certain birth certificates for statistical analysis.  The oddity about Obama’s certificate is that is was only required on “even” numbered documents, his forged document is numbered “61 10641″ an “odd” numbered document so it would not have had these penciled-in notations for data collection.  On it’s face it is a fraudulent document without any type of analysis needing to be performed.

Officials of a credible law enforcement agency of the State of Arizona has leveled charges of forgery and fraud and that “probable cause” of a federal crime exists over Obama’s latest “Certificate of Live Birth” and his Selective Service Registration card.  Without having one, he could not have been elected to federal office.  Investigators also found that Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) microfiche records for the week of Aug. 1st thru 7th of 1961 from Hawaii were missing at the National Archives in Washington.

Selective Service Administration officials have refused as of March 28, 2012  to permit examination of Obama’s original  Select Service Registration card to court approved forensic examiners of Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office investigators.

Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of his long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order dismissing the petition.  This statement lends credence that Obama’s fraudulent birth documents would have significant evidentiary value of forgery and fraud in the proper forum though was made in a failed ballot challenge from Alabama.  Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office in his concurrence.

We have so many questions and odd facts surrounding our president they are worth noting and discussing here:

His adoption records by Lolo Soetoro is another unanswered question which would sully the nativity narrative from his book Dreams from my Father and destroy his claim to citizenship.

It is also the little things: not showing any reverence for the National Anthem, when the flag is raised, every child is taught this from an early age, much less the exclusive education Obama received.

The ability to recite with almost perfect intonation the Muslim call to prayer after being absent from Indonesia a Muslim Nation for 36 years is baffling and astounding since he was only 10 years old when he left.  However, the reporter may not know how it should sound, given this then Obama is definitely a Manchurian candidate and belies a deeper story about his past that is unknown.

Obama tells a journalist about his Muslim faith, then is quickly corrected by the journalist as being a Christian, this is definitely something one does not make a mistake about, which is it?  Believing that there are 57 States in our Nation, he lived in the 50th State, why does he not know this.

The little details seem so difficult for him.

Canadian Talk Show Host, Ezra Levant, characterized the servile bow to the Saudi Prince in April 2009 as he commented:

“Americans Bow to No One, they are not of a Monarchy, much less a deep servile bow to the Saudi King.”

(Note: you should listen in its entirety to this commentary)

Our State Department throughout the years has created unique diplomatic protocols to recognize our distinction as a “Constitutional Republic” and not a Monarchy.  We take fealty to the Constitution not a Man or Woman of Royal Heritage as a Nation that believes in self-rule and the Rule of Law, we bow to no one.  Powerful people with ties to a Saudi Prince purportedly paid for his Harvard education and put his “deep servile bow” in perspective.

An employee of the TAC Corporation was cooperating with the FBI in 2008 over a passport data breach of Obama’s records which was managed by John Brennan, he was an advisor to Obama‘s campaign at the time.  Mr. Brennan then became a National Security advisor to Obama effectively ending any inquiry into his part in the matter.  The poor employee was murdered in cold blood under mysterious though fortuitous circumstance for Obama and Mr. Brennan.

Summation and Conclusion

I have given an honest due diligent effort to research this issue and have used the words, deeds and actions of the players in this matter to impeach their statements and call into question their motives for their behavior.   The only record of the release of the forged “certificates of live birth” on April 27, 2011 is the transcript produced by the White House.

It appears a bait and switch of the forged document was substituted for the real certificates Obama physically received in fact on April 26, 2011, as this is only statement regarding it’s authenticity made by him “no matter what we put up.”  We are also lacking any statements from Ms. Corley; the president’s personal counsel on what it is that actually resides on whitehouse.gov.

The very real possibility that he does have a long-form birth certificate by affidavit and is now more than likely the reason to continue to secret all his records in the State of Hawaii and elsewhere is more than plausible; it is most likely as PROVEN by Governor Abercrombie.

We have been shown a simple method for anyone to ascertain that the president’s long-form birth certificate is a forgery by simply printing two copies from whitehouse.gov and matching the type between two lines of text.  Nick Chase developed this method, I encourage everyone to use his method and prove it to yourself.

Obama’s aides, officers and agents created a false narrative and media style negative hype campaign with “Operation Sideshow” with the sole objective and purpose to place a forged document on a federal government website.   The news media agencies in this nation should be investigating these grave matters to find out who has perpetrated any possible wrongdoing, by and against the individuals named in this investigation.

The unwillingness of Congress and the Courts to investigate and prosecute this matter is baffling and disturbing as the Constitution appears to be a dead document to all our branches of Government, except of course to the people, as in “We the People.”  To do otherwise only mocks the rule of law and openness in government and calls into question our natural and unalienable right to a free and open press and our many Constitutional guarantees and treats our citizens as subjects and not free Men and Women to determine our own destiny.

We are a free and able people that deserve Obama’s respect and admiration as he works for us, as we certainly do not work for him.  Furthermore, this travesty of credibility of our president robs the American people of the dignity of our heritage as a Nation founded on self-rule and the rule of law with no one being above the law, not even our President!

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

 

Related posts:

  1. ForgeryGate: Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 5   Hawaiian Officials have been duplicitous and need examination before…
  2. ForgeryGate: Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 4   A name not mentioned enough in the ForgeryGate controversy…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , , , ,

Today Is The One Year Anniversary Of The Release Of Obama’s Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate! Operation Sideshow Part 9

April 27, 2012 By 18 Comments

Obama birth certificate SC Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Release of Obamas Forged Long Form Birth Certificate! Operation Sideshow Part 9

(Part 9 of an exclusive Western Journalism investigative report)

Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Placement of Obama’s Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate on the White House Website, a Red-Letter Day to be Sure

Forensic Hurdles and the Obvious Choice, a Digital Forgery

Just this past month, Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order:

Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.

His statement resulted from a failed ballot challenge from Alabama, although Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office.

I believe we are at a point to make some reasonable conjecture.

A forgery for a “certificate of live birth” must be created to give the appearance of propriety to Obama’s claims of citizenship. Otherwise, he is simply a usurper; the cries for verification have become too loud to ignore. Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s best selling book “Wheres the Birth Certificate?”, which was released in May 2011, turned the tide and forced Obama to make an about face on this issue.  Obama could not release his actual and genuine “certified” copy as it would show him to be ineligible to hold the Office of President as it is most likely a birth certificate by affidavit.

Given this set of circumstances, several technical difficulties come into play that limit his choices to accomplish the goal of creating a forgery for his birth documents; these hurdles are discussed below.

1.) It cannot be easily placed into the bound volume residing in the records of the State of Hawaii; the reason for this is that it is forensically impossible to do so for the following reasons:

1a.) this would require removing the entire record from the vault for an extended period; this is practically impossible.

1b.) the entire bound volume would be nearly impossible to duplicate as it would require a volume of materials that are no longer available (age appropriate).  This would mean paper, spine,  cover, inside flap materials, adhesives, ink, and the duplication of every record in the current bound volume, a monumental task.

1c.) to replace just his record is again difficult as it actually requires taking the bound volume apart separating the page that contains his record.  A single page in a bound book is actually only one of four pages.  It is a single piece of paper that is folded in half and placed with others nested to make a booklet; these booklets are then brought together and bound then placed into the spine of a single volume.  It is printed on each side as well, further complicating matters.

(Note: if it is a 3 post binder book this matter would be easier to accomplish; however, any single page would either be two or four pages front to back.)

2d.) it would be next to impossible to cut and replace a page; this would then be two pages (front & back), and it would be grossly evident given close examination.

1e.) forensic and chemical tests on the paper and materials would again preclude the substitution or replacement scenario, as aging leaves it‘s own evidence that is difficult to duplicate and in some cases geographic dependent on how it effects a record.

1f.) a bound volume that has records added as is it made (being added through time) brings a matter of complexity to any attempt to enter a forged record of this type.  This book then would capture certain biological material (spores and pollen) and information of the seasons as flora blooms and blossoms along with fungi and humans that handled this volume.

(Note: examination of this type of evidence would be another method to ascertain that the book or records contained forgeries.)

2.)  Microfiche records may or not exist for his record; if so, a forged microfiche record may be able to be made. However, it would require remaking the entire reel or sheet, then substituting the forged record during the exposure and creation process.  This is probably a more feasible process; however, it would need materials that would pass forensic examination.  Original materials that date to the time the reel or sheet was last created is probably next to impossible to obtain to complete this type of forgery.

Any forgery for a bound volume breaks down rather quickly as being insurmountable when the technical hurdles are considered.  The only reasonable alternative is to create a digital image and substitute it for any “claimed” certificates Obama received from the Hawaii Department of Health, a bait and switch scenario.  An honorable mention needs to be made to Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health for Hawaii; Neil Abercrombie, Governor; and David Louie, Attorney General, who played their parts extremely well to aid Obama in this masquerade over his birth certificates.  One can only hope that the legal and political consequences prove disastrous for them in the future as they assisted in the deception of the American people.

The actual forger was so incompetent that whoever made this forgery did not know that all they had to do was print the document on a safety paper background, then scan that and post it on whitehouse.gov, making detection more difficult. Obama is strictly second rate as he cannot even get a world class forger to create his false and fraudulent documents; they are on par with his Cabinet and Czars, all second and third string players.  Was the actual perpetrator of this crime an unwilling participant to this cabal and left tell-tale evidence for others to find? We can only hope so.

(Note: I personally believe it was incompetence born of arrogance as the press corps would give cover to any actions Obama and his agents cared to implement so he could be careless.)

All the subterfuge of the press gaggle and Obama’s own statements of April 27, 2011 were obfuscation for the placement of a false and forged document on the web.  Officials of the State of Hawaii have facilitated this.  Operation Sideshow is looking like an actual operation and cabal conceived, planned, and executed with a host of accomplices. Some were active and others were passive as a fawning and pliant press; without their capable or incompetent services, this could never have been possible.

Obama needs to end this matter by releasing his birth certificate documents for examination from Hawaii’s vital statistics vault.  Forensic analysis of the original record(s) is necessary to clear this matter up.  This can be done by Obama waiving any confidentiality requirements as he did in his letter of April 22, 2011 per Hawaii Statute §338-18 and allow his records to be examined.

His refusal to release his documents is ominous and mystifying if in fact his records are as he claims them to be.  Ms. Corley needs to state that the “Certificate(s) of Live Birth” she received from Ms. Fuddy is the same as the one posted on whitehouse.gov.  I personally think she would decline such a claim now that it has been declared a forgery. Who knows what she will do?

She was probably only sent to fetch the certificates and instructed not to view the documents so that she could not be compelled to testify on the contents of the sealed envelope at a later date if it all blew up in their faces.  This way, she could use plausible denial as a defense; all she would have done was turn over a sealed envelope to Bob Bauer (the White House counsel) who would have a certain amount of executive privilege from congressional oversight and possibly the courts as well.  It was probably cheap insurance for them, though only a well-reasoned guess on my part.

Part Ten is a simple method to determine for yourself that Obama‘s long-form birth certificate is a forgery; this method was developed by Nick Chase, a retired expert in typewriters and type set machines for the printing of technical documents and newspapers.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Operation Sideshow the Hawaii Five-O Pineapple Express (the Hawaiian Officials Connection)
Part Five
Part Six
Part Seven
Part Eight

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the Evidence & Conclusions)
Part Nine
Part Ten

Part Eleven

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. Does Hawaii Ever Release Long-form Birth Certificates? A former official with the Hawaii Department of Health says…
  2. Arpaio News Conference Video 2 On Obama Long Form Birth Certificate To see more videos and the entire conference, use the…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , , ,

ForgeryGate: Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 5

April 19, 2012 By 5 Comments

 

Obama birth certificate SC ForgeryGate: Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 5

Hawaiian Officials have been duplicitous and need examination before a full accounting of “Operation Sideshow” is completely exposed

Hawaiian officials have never stated that the documents posted on the White House website are the true, genuine, and certified copies of what they have in their document vault.  All they have stated is that they have seen or released to Obama what they have of record without saying what that record consists of.

Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii’s Department of Health made this statement to Michael Isikoff of NBC News on April 11, 2011 in a rare telephone interview.

Before she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document’s validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time.

This is troubling because her most recent statement is embellished from what she stated on October 31st 2008.

There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.  

Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

Dr. Fukino makes another statement on July 27, 2009.

I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.

In October of 2008 a week prior to the general election, she personally inspected Senator Obama’s records and made a statement regarding his his records that were on file with Hawaii’s vital statistics agency.  Why she did this is not revealed since his “certification of live birth”, COLB had been released in June of 2008.  She uses couched and non-committal phrasing on what is in the record since she only states that she has seen and verified a “record” in possession of the vital statistics archive leaving out the all important details about what is in the record.  Then in July of 2009 she reiterates essentially the same statement she made in In October 2008.  However, her declaration adds a new twist contradicting her statement that she did not have anything “new” to add to this issue when she states emphatically that Obama is a natural born citizen, her quote is shown below:

and is a natural-born American citizen

Her title is Director of Health for the State of Hawaii – how is it that she is now a constitutional lawyer, attorney general, or judge that is qualified to make such a distinction?  The reason for this statement is also curious, why would she even make it since it is immaterial and incompetent and has no bearing on her current or previous statement(s)?  Another question that needs to be examined was why was she making this statement at this time?   And the addition of the “natural born citizen” status of her statement is curious, was she directed or coached to do this, if so by whom?

We are now faced with an intriguing problem in 2008 and 2009 she states essentially nothing, then 2 ½ year later when this issue is heating up with the focus Donald Trump brought to this tawdry affair she has a completely different story, which is it?

Dr. Fukino still has a duty of non-disclosure after leaving service as the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, so her statement of Aril 11, 2011 is a violation of this duty.  We also have the law itself, so she violated confidentially requirements under Hawaii Statute §338-18 as well and are clear on this matter.

There does not appear to be an exception in this statute for former Directors of the Department of Health for the State of Hawaii, this leaves her statements in serious doubt as to their veracity since her departure as director in December of 2010.  The timing of her statement is suspicious, it appears timed to coincide with the planned execution of Operation Sideshow, which will launch in sixteen days, it is either fortuitous or complicit?

Obama is never going to press the issue on this breach of his vital records, as it is an implied declaration of corroboration on what will be posted on whitehouse.gov before the fact; we also have Neil Abercrombie as the current Governor of Hawaii a Democrat so I doubt he will prosecute her for any violation of Hawaiian law either.

Prior to Dr. Fukino making her statement of October 31, 2008 Governor Lingle seals Obama’s records on the 26th, five before days before her carefully crafted statement of the 31st.  This was the response from the Governor on a request made by Dr. Jerome Corsi a correspondent on behalf of WND to receive a copy of Obama’s birth certificate:

It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he seeks,

Her statement is a direct citing of Hawaii Statute §338-18 and appropriate, given current law, though seems misguided as Hawaiian law directs how vital statistics data is released not administrative or executive directives from the governor.

In this same WND article, an unnamed source makes the following statements:

Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama.  The source also refused to answer WND’s question whether the original document on file with the Department of Health was a hospital-generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may have been filed subsequent to the birth.

The anonymous source made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release Obama’s original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.

These statements on the handling of vital statistics data by Hawaii state employees and officials of the Department of Health is verbatim per Hawaii’s statutes for vital statistics data and is procedurally correct.  However, it is clear that the only one stopping release of this information is Obama himself.

It is disturbing that references to withholding the information was “political” in nature and portends that this matter is far from being fully vetted and disclosed, by Obama.  Now that Maricopa County Sheriff’s investigators have declared his long-form birth certificate, a forgery provides tacit foundation to these statements.  Dr. Fukino now stands as a full participant in Operation Sideshow as an active member along with White House personnel to facilitate the acceptance of the forged document posted on the White House website.  As stated previously it is either fortuitous or complicit.

Part Six looks at the Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, and his conflicting statements about what Obama actually has in the vital statistics vault.  Other officials of the State of Hawaii make misleading statements as well.

Operation Sideshow is Mission Accomplished (the White House and Press Connection)

Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

Photo credit: aaron_anderer (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. ForgeryGate: Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 4   A name not mentioned enough in the ForgeryGate controversy…
  2. Obama’s Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 3 A concerted effort was used to convince the press corps…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , ,

Obama Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 2

April 16, 2012 By 10 Comments

obama birth certificate 300x229 Obama Operation Sideshow Is A Mission Accomplished, Part 2
Just Google “Obama Sideshow” this simple phrase “sideshow” gave cover to what has become the single greatest HOAX ever perpetrated on the American people by a sitting president with the sole purpose to place a forged birth certificate on the White House website.  I have dubbed it “Operation Sideshow.”  My browser showed 5,380,000 hits for this search string, you are welcome to try to ascertain this for yourself.

This is my favorite from the Huffington Post “Carnival Barkers Slam Obama’s ‘Sideshow’ Remark“; posted on April 28, 2011, the day after the release of Obama’s latest birth certificate.

Couched Phrasing & Misdirection Accompanied the Discussion During the Press Gaggle on Why Obama was Releasing his Long-Form Birth Certificate

A careful reading of the transcript is lacking some important details about why they were actually dealing with the issue of president Obama‘s long-form birth certificate at this time.  Jay Carney passes out their press packets moments before the briefing starts:

“You can read the paperwork we just handed out in a minute.”

Dan Pfeiffer let’s them know what is in the “press packet” that was given to them moments before and gives a 30,000 foot perspective to bring them quickly up to speed on what they wanted them to know in paragraph 2:

“Thanks, Jay. What you have in front of you now is a packet of papers that includes the President’s long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the original birth certificate that the President requested and we posted online in 2008, and then the correspondence between the President’s counsel and the Hawaii State Department of Health that led to the release of those documents.”

A reporter asks on page 4 paragraph 16:

“Did the President change his own mind about this? In other words, was he advocating during the campaign let’s just put it out there and get it over with, or was this an internal shift in thinking based — in other words, was it the President who steadfastly during the campaign said this is ridiculous, I don’t want to give this any more ground, and has now changed his mind? Or is this the –”

Dan Pfeiffer answers in the next paragraph:

“Let’s be very clear. You were there for the campaign. There was never a question about the original birth certificate during the campaign. It was a settled issue. I was there for the original decision to release the birth certificate. I was there when we posted it online. I’m not sure I even knew there was an original one that was different than the one we posted online because it wasn’t an issue. So it wasn’t like — let’s be very clear. We were asked for the President’s birth certificate in 2008; we released the President’s birth certificate; and it was done. That was it.”

Dan Pfeiffer is again “messaging” using experiences of the campaign trail, reminding them of their shared uncertainties harking back as comrades from 2008, he was sharing “war stories” with them.  Several of the reporters were wondering what is prompting this sudden turn of events out of the white house and ….

Another reporter asks the $64 dollar question at page 3 paragraph 10:

“Bob, can you explain why President Obama let this drag on for four years? Was it Donald Trump that prompted you to issue this?”

Dan Pfeiffer answers it on page 3 paragraph 13:

“MR. PFEIFFER: He even said you would be the one who would ask it. (Laughter.)

I don’t think this dragged on for four years because this was a resolved — for those of you who remember the campaign, this issue was resolved in 2008. And it has not been an issue, none of you have asked about it, called about it, reported on it until the last few weeks.

And as I said earlier, it probably would have been — a lot of the pundits out there have talked about the fact that this whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party and would probably be good for the President politically.   But despite that, the President, as I said, was struck by how this was crowding out the debate, particularly around the budget, on important issues, and was an example of the sort of sideshows that our politics focuses on instead of the real challenges that we have to confront as a country.

And so that’s why he made this decision now, because it became an issue that transcended sort of this — it essentially was something that was talked about, as I said, from the nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream network newscasts. In fact, Jay has been asked about this just yesterday in this room.”

When does any story from the “nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream network newscasts” actually happen?  Dan Pfeiffer tars the Republicans with the “birther” brush and attempts to convince the press corps that somehow keeping this issue alive is good for Obama who is only thinking what is best for the country to finally resolve this issue.  It is disingenuous at best and pandering to their prejudices at worst, again they are messaging and manipulating the media.

This stinks of nothing but a cheap attempt to wrap Obama in the flag as the din is now a loud roar on this issue thanks to Donald Trump, by the way, “the Donald” is completely ignored in his response, typical.

Note:
Just to bring some truth to this process, the Republican House had passed a budget two weeks previously to this press gaggle.  Democrats, thanks to Harry Reid have not even brought one to the floor for and up or down vote, in over 700 days by 2011 much less passed one, it is now over 1079 days, so Dan is deliberately lying.

A reporter asks this question and makes a crucial point that at least one reporter got a “whiff” that something was up on page 7 paragraph 2 :

“When was this gaggle put on — when was this planned?”

With the answer from Dan Pfeiffer on page 7 paragraph 3, just before the conclusion of the briefing:

“Whatever time you received your guidance suggesting that it would be “this time tomorrow
Morning.”

By this time, the hook had been set and the “sideshow” message firmly ensconced into the minds of the assembled press corps however, someone is suspicious?

The confusion of the press corps is evident as they know the white house had been content to sit back and let anyone that questions Obama fall on their own sword as “fringe” elements and “birthers,“ both pejorative terms they used early on.  Since the assembled media was not aware of any real debate about this issue, other than Donald Trump making some noise about this, much less any stories from the “nether regions of the internet.”

The biggest reason for this is the media itself, as they squelch almost any story before it rises to anything the White House would have to deal with.  Some of the press corps were wondering why this about face was coming from the White House at this time?  However, they failed to connect the dots on this U-turn by Obama in regard to Donald Trump and Jerome Corsi’s newest book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate” which had become a No.1 best seller on Amazon in pre-release sales from the week before on April 21st.

This is further evidence that a pliant press corps and media had accepted their “sideshow” message and would prime the pump for the media cycle to follow.  Since they had given up their objectivity long ago when is comes to Obama and are simply acting as cheerleaders for Team Obama.  Dan Pfieffer, Bob Bauer and Jay Carney could now be assured that they would assist the White House to squelch any noise about this issue in the future.

Part Three delves into the fantasy about the extraordinary means that was needed to acquire Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii.

Correction:
The Law Firm Perkins Coie, was mistakenly noted as being misspelled as “Perkins Cole“, an error in Part One and is correctly spelled in the transcript of the Press Gaggle of April 27, 2011.

Mission Accomplished, Obama; Operation Sideshow is a Success, Part One

 

 

Related posts:

  1. Mission Accomplished, Obama; Operation Sideshow Is A Success, Part One Just Google “Obama Sideshow”; this simple phrase “sideshow” gave cover…
  2. Politico: Birthers Are Nothing But Obama Haters Those who have read  Politico in the past know that…

Filed Under: Featured Stories, Floyd Reports Tagged With: , , ,
« Older Posts