The Nightmare ObamaCare Wants to Unleash Here

Susan Stamper Brown, FloydReports.com

Another dreamer quietly joined the Obama administration last summer without Congressional approval. Despite resolute promises that Obamacare would not include rationing or result in a single-payer system, please give a hearty and belated welcome to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services director, Dr. Donald Berwick.

Berwick’s unobtrusive entrance could not muffle his history of being a very loud proponent of the troubled British National Healthcare System (NHS). During the NHS’s 60th anniversary meeting in 2008, Berwick scorned America’s ho-hum, less superior, lower quality, fragmented, capitalistic, supply-driven medical system – and praised NHS’s socialized system saying, “Excellent health care is by definition [wealth] redistribution,” and told NHS leaders that “Britain chose well.”

An increasing number of NHS patients may not concur with Dr. Berwick’s assessment. According to the UK Guardian, not long after Berwick’s appointment last year, written complaints ranging from “neglect and misdiagnosis” to a “distinct lack of care and compassion” from caregivers rose 13.4 percent.

Patient complaints along with various audits expose insufficiencies within the NHS. On January 17, 2011, the UK Daily Mail told of an investigation into 15 UK West Midlands hospitals that used “substandard” maternity care including delivery delays, inadequate resuscitation attempts, and failure to properly monitor patients that may have resulted in the unexplained deaths of 21 babies.

A striking 2009 audit found many NHS health care managers prioritized cost cutting over patient care and cited that “appalling standards of care” may have attributed to the deaths of up to 1200 people at one hospital in Mid-Staffordshire where poorly trained and overworked nurses turned off equipment they didn’t know how to work and inexperienced doctors were left alone with post-surgery patients while receptionists were tasked with triage assessment.

In order to meet an NHS-imposed four-hour waiting room limit, doctors left blood-covered, seriously ill patients without pain medication to treat….

Read more.

Death Panels Re-Defeated? Officials Say Obama Will Reverse Himself

Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com

When ObamaCare goes into effect, the president may want to get checked for schizophrenia. Just weeks ago, the Obama administration bypassed Congress to add a “death panels” provision to the new health care law by regulation. Today, a number of “administration officials” have told the New York Times the president will withdraw the federal rule.

Of course, this reversal in no way signals that Barack Obama has changed his goals. This was a defeat forced by an indignant public. This is a defeat for Obama’s administrative lawmaking and a major victory for the Tea Party movement.

In fact, this is the second time the same time they have defeated the creeping threat of euthanasia. Democrats added a provision….

Read more.

“Death Panels” Regulation Begins Obama’s Rule by Fiat

Ben Johnson, FloydReports.com

In a foretaste of outrages to come, the Obama administration managed to sneak out a federal regulation paying doctors to provide “end of life counseling” to those covered by ObamaCare. The Medicare rule, which Congress never voted on, may encourage thousands to forego lifesaving treatment. This move is a voluntary precursor to the inevitable rationing engendered by socialized medicine. Many conservative media outlets have objected to the pro-death aspects of this decision. However, they have ignored a vital aspect of this story: the way he implemented the policy. This federal regulation inaugurates Obama’s two-year strategy to rule by executive order. The New York Times reports….

Read more.

Death Panels Are Back, Says Pro-Life Group

Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com

A pro-life organization that monitors end-of-life issues is worried the infamous “death panels” have been added back into the implication of the controversial ObamaCare health care law.

The so-called “death panels” came under fire when former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin used the phrase to describe the advance care planning consultations found in Section 1233 of the bill before the final version received Congressional approval. The infamous Section 1233 of HR 3200 would have federalized “voluntary” end-of-life “consultations,” and, in three states, had patients advised they could seek a legal assisted suicide.

The section was eventually dropped but the pro-life group LifeTree says the concerns are back again.

Last Monday, The Federal Register (page 73406) published a new funding rule for “voluntary” advance care planning consultations that changes Department of Health and Human Services regulation pertaining to Medicare and Medicaid patients, the group explains….

Voluntary advance planning is defined as:

Verbal or written information regarding the following areas: (1) An individual’s ability to prepare an advance directive in the case where an injury or illness causes the individual to be unable to make health care decisions[; and] (2) Whether or not the physician is willing to follow the individual’s wishes as expressed in an advance directive.

“The new regulation states that advanced care planning consultations will now be offered (and funded) as part of the initial wellness visit for medicare patients and during all subsequent annual visits,” LifeTree says.

Read more.

The Declaration of Independence is the Key to Impeachment

Ben Barrack, FloydReports.com

When it comes to the impeachment and subsequent removal from office of a sitting president, the ‘how’ is found in the Constitution; much of the ‘why’ is found in the Declaration of Independence. The former was an extension of the latter.

As a Constitutional law professor, Barack Obama is extremely familiar with our founding documents but – quite ironically in light of his nearly palpable contempt for Great Britain – he seems to be channeling the individual most responsible for the Declaration’s authorship – King George.

For example:

He (King George) has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

Two states have passed laws recently that have, in effect, been “suspended.” In the case of Arizona’s SB 1070, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton blocked the most key parts of the law one day prior to its scheduled implementation. This never would have been done had Obama’s Department of Justice not filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona. As for the neglecting-to-attend-to-them part, the law has virtually faded from public view since the ruling.

The other state to have an activist judge rule in favor of the Obama administration – inferred based on the president’s ideology and past statements – is Oklahoma. After 70 percent of that state’s voters decided they wanted to preemptively eliminate the possibility of Shari’a law factoring in to any court rulings there, an activist judge “suspended” the results of the ballot measure.

How courts rule on the multiple lawsuits already filed in different states challenging the legal standing of Obamacare will further demonstrate the degree to which this administration’s luck may not be luck at all.

He (King George) has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

Speaking of Obamacare, isn’t this precisely what happened?….

Read more.