Wow: Hillary Just Suffered A Huge Unexpected Campaign Blow, And Trump Could Get A Big Win From It

In a stunning move, the Teamsters Union wants to meet with Donald Trump before endorsing Hillary Clinton for president. The move is uncharacteristic of the Teamsters Union, which has historically endorsed Democrat Party nominees.

The union backs up their endorsements with millions of dollars of contributions to Democrats each year. In 2014, their budget for Democrats, Democrat Pacs, and Democrat candidates exceeded 3.6 million dollars.

The largest recipient of their political contributions is the Senate Majority PAC, whose purpose statement reads “Senate Majority PAC is fighting to take back the Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate.” That’s what makes the union’s desire to meet with Trump perplexing.

Trump is running for the Republican Party nomination for president, so the decision of the executive board of the Teamsters Union to reach out to Trump before endorsing Clinton has many questioning their motives.

Trump has declared that he will unite the American people and “make America great again.” While the Teamsters Union is still deciding who they will endorse for president, from all appearances, and from their own statements, they’re considering Trump.

FOX News has learned exclusively the 26 member board decided unanimously to withhold a presidential endorsement… Union executives told me they want to sit down with Republican candidates, most notably, front-runner Donald Trump who has collaborated with unionized work forces across his real estate career.”

Recently, Rand Paul called Trump a “clown.” Apparently, the Teamsters Union does not see Trump as such; and if officially endorsed by the union, Trump will undoubtedly receive a boost from union voters.

With the potential for an endorsement from the Teamsters Union, Trump stands to gain more credibility with critics who may see him as divisive.

What do you think? Should the Teamsters Union endorse Donald Trump?

Exposed: The Establishment’s 2016 Election Strategy

The main objective of the political-media establishment and, in particular, Barack Obama is to prevent any post-election investigation of the rampant corruption in Washington DC.

Both the Democrats and the Republicans want to maintain their standing as permanent political elites, whereby they may continue to treat ordinary Americans as indentured servants and broker the tax revenues for the benefit of themselves and their wealthy donors.

It is clear that the Obamas and Valerie “Rasputin” Jarrett hate the Clintons and do not want to risk “payback time” from a vindictive and ruthless President Hillary.

The Obama strategy is to stretch out the homebrew server scandal to undermine Hillary’s campaign through a death by a thousand cuts. It has to be delicate surgery, something short of indictment and trial–which would likely implicate him–and something that would prevent retaliation from the Clinton camp, perhaps leaks of the Muslim or birther variety that we witnessed from them during the 2008 primary season.

Barack Obama has been secretly searching for a challenger to replace Hillary and is ready to endorse Vice President Joe Biden. But that backing comes with a price – Obama would select his running mate. The Obamas want a high-powered African American who can carry on the Obama legacy, and that choice is likely to be former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick. In such a scenario, Biden would agree to not run for re-election, paving the way for a Patrick presidency.

Equally eager to avoid any corruption investigations, the Republican establishment has selected Jeb Bush, the candidate most likely to continue business as usual and not raise any embarrassing questions.

Jeb’s poll numbers are so anemic, however–an anticipated maximum of 15-20%–that the Republican establishment had to devise a plan that would keep Jeb afloat and gain enough primary victories in the key states to ensure his nomination. By splitting the vote amongst a number of other establishment candidates, the “Jebettes,” enough votes would be drawn away from any significant challenger. Ballooning the field with a large number of candidates has been a deliberate strategy, whereby Jeb could win–not by gaining support, but by fracturing his opponents’ support. The original cast of “Jebettes” was Graham (South Carolina), Kasich (Ohio), Perry (Texas) and Rubio (Florida), with further insurance policies in Virginia (Gilmore) and New York (Pataki).

Unfortunately for the Republican establishment, Donald Trump transformed their grand strategy into a bridge to nowhere. And that is why they are so aggressively trying to get him out of the race, lately by leveraging the fluctuating popularity of Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina as a counterforce to Trump.

The Republican establishment is composed of financiers, like Wall Street, banking interests, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and K-Street Lobbyists, who pay the Republican National Committee (RNC) and derive benefit from the policies created in Washington DC.  It is all part of a machine that tells Republican politicians what to do; the RNC is the Board of Directors, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell are the managers, and the politicians are the employees.

The possibility of a President Trump upsets that cozy financial arrangement, where, like the Democrats, they would like to continue plundering the economy and bleeding white the American Middle Class.

The Republican establishment knows that it cannot control Trump, who may decide that investigations and prosecutions are in order, a possibility that strikes fear in the hearts of all the current holders of government-supplied and guaranteed “Get Out of Jail Free” cards.

The financiers, who every four years hire a President, are generally ambivalent about party affiliation and would be equally pleased from a cost-effectiveness standpoint with either a Hillary or Jeb presidency because they are really only distinguishable by a Y chromosome, whichever one of them has it.

Post-election, the Democrats will continue the relentless movement to the left; highlighted by their tribal politics, profligate spending and political correctness, all practiced until our economy matches that of Venezuela, the southwest is returned to Mexico, beheadings are declared a legitimate Muslim response to any perceived grievance, abortion is made mandatory, and a pedophile is appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The Democrat dream is not a country, but a collection of simultaneous arguments, where all we have in common as Americans are our differences.

Regardless of who wins, the Republicans will simply follow the Democrats leftward, attempting to match their racial, ethnic, gender and Muslim pandering in the desperate hope that they can scrape together enough votes to maintain their position as the junior partner in a corrupt status quo.

Then again, a courageous outsider may win and expose the whole stinking mess.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Clinton Campaign Caught In Either Massive Coincidence Or Blatant Breaking Of Law

From all appearances, senior staff members from the Clinton campaign and from a super PAC supporting her candidacy worked together in their messaging regarding the candidate’s ongoing email controversy. The only problem is that federal election laws forbid candidate campaigns and PACs from “coordinating.”

During Hillary Clinton’s appearance on Meet the Press on Sunday, campaign senior adviser and spokeswoman Karen Finney tweeted at 10:16 a.m.:

Less than 20 minutes later, Brad Woodhouse, the head of the pro-Clinton super PAC Correct the Record, tweeted the exact same thing:

The identical messaging did not stop with those two. Democrat strategist Hilary Rosen chimed in…

…as did Former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm:

Breitbart reports:

The Clinton campaign recently claimed that it can coordinate somewhat, within the law, with Correct the Record when it comes to Internet postings. The Clinton camp thinks that it can comment on Correct the Record’s online content, such as its videos, without being guilty of illegal coordination. But the FEC has still yet to confirm that. And can the campaign and the super PAC literally use the same exact talking point, seemingly copied and pasted from one Twitter account to another?

During the course of the interview, Clinton seemed to contradict the messaging by agreeing with host Chuck Todd that the story is ongoing. “It is like a drip, drip, drip,” she said, adding, “I want these questions to be answered.”

By federal court order, the State Department is required to review and release emails monthly that are responsive to multiple FOIA lawsuits by Judicial Watch. The next batch is due to be released this Wednesday.

Clinton also told Todd, despite previous assurances to the contrary, that she cannot personally guarantee all of her work-related emails have been turned over to the State Department.

“I’m very sure that my attorneys did the most meticulous job that could have been done,” she said.

When the host questioned her about the recently released emails between herself and Gen. David Petraeus that were not previously turned over to the State Department, she admitted: “There was a transition period. I wasn’t that focused on my email account.”

She also could not guarantee that the FBI would not recover emails from her server that might raise more questions.


CNN Just Made A Giant Announcement About The Next Debate That Could Have Big Implications

Even as the cable network’s criteria threatened to exclude a Republican candidate with proven nationwide support, CNN is prepared to invite a Democrat to join in that party’s first debate despite the fact that he is not yet a candidate.

Joe Biden, who has attracted recent attention as a potential replacement for scandal-plagued front-runner Hillary Clinton, is polling well enough to earn him a spot on the stage Oct. 13 – assuming he actually decides to run for president.

CNN released its criteria, which stipulates that Biden would qualify for the debate as long as he formally announces his candidacy by the date of the Las Vegas debate. Beyond that, any candidate with a polling average of at least one percent may participate.

Biden, who came in third place in a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, is scoring much better than a number of announced Democrat candidates. Despite their relatively modest support, Lincoln Chafee and Jim Webb have been invited to join top-tier candidates Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Reports indicate Martin O’Malley did not score high enough to qualify for a spot in the first debate.

While CNN earned some praise from Biden supporters for its debate criteria, some critics speculated that the network’s motives were likely ledger-related …

… or an effort to push its partisan agenda.

h/t: CNN

Do you think Joe Biden will enter the Democrat primary race? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

After Pope’s Speech To Congress, A Dem Approached The Podium And Did Something Bizarre

A Democrat Congressman who has a long history of voting against the sanctity of human life did a very bizarre thing after Pope Francis left the podium once his address to a joint meeting of Congress ended. He stole the pope’s water glass in order to sprinkle the “holy” water on his grandchildren.

After the pope left the podium, Representative Bob Brady, D-Pa., snuck up and grabbed the water glass from which the Pontiff was sipping during his speech. Brady carefully took the “holy” water back to his office and began a bizarre ritual of feeding sips of the water to his wife and others as if he himself was some sort of priest officiating at a holy ceremony. And he posted the images to social media to prove it.

The congressman began his bizarre ritual by sipping some of the water himself.

After he took a sip, Brady is seen in several photos officiously holding the glass and pouring sips of the water into the gaping mouth of his wife.

The representative also doled some out to his staffers and a few others in his office.

Brady also told constituents that he intended to save some of the water to sprinkle on his grandchildren.

The Pennsylvanian claims to be a devout Catholic, but he has a long, long history of voting for even the most extreme pro-abortion bills, something that puts him decidedly at odds with the Catholic Church.

Back in the year 2000, Brady even voted in favor of the barbaric practice of partial birth abortion, a procedure where an abortionist kills a live baby as it is on the way out of the birth canal.

One of the most liberal members of Congress on abortion, Brady has been awarded a 100% approval rating from the infanticide-pushing National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL), and a dismal 9% from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

This isn’t the only time Brady has pulled this bizarre water glass trick. The Rep. also stole Obama’s water glass from his second inaugural. Brady had both glasses dusted for fingerprints, claiming that it would somehow prove that he had taken the president’s and pope’s water glasses.