Debbie Wasserman Schultz Still Cannot Answer The Question Of When Life Begins

Senator Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz are in a fierce debate of sorts about late-term abortions; Schultz refuses to specify when she and her party believe life begins, and Paul refuses to answer if he is okay with exceptions to abortions such as rape or incest.

The two are at a standstill, with each party seemingly refusing to answer until the other does.

Schultz joined CNN host Wolf Blitzer and then Fox News’ Megyn Kelly and still refused to answer Paul’s question on both shows–and added that Paul is the one who is deflecting.

Schultz believes she answered Paul’s question by claiming that she and her party are “pro-choice.” She held fast to the notion that if the mother and her doctor are okay with an abortion, then that is okay.

Twitter is not reacting positively to Schultz’s latest comments:

Twitter Abortion

Twitter/ Progressives Today

Twitter Abortion

Twitter/ Charlie Kirk

h/t: TheBlaze

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth

Democrats’ Policies Are Literally Killing Us

Photo credit: NCinDC (Creative Commons)

Some might wonder how Democrats can be so proud of their extreme position on abortion; but Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz just doubled-down, insisting there be no limits on when a mother can end the life of her unborn baby. We can thank Rand Paul for challenging her to justify “killing a seven-pound baby that is not born yet.”

Few remember when Planned Parenthood President Cecil Richards said her kids’ lives “began when I delivered them.” On Wednesday, Paul stated, “Ask her when life begins, and you ask Debbie when it’s okay to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, get back to me.”

Abortion being a sacrament to the left, as well as big business leading to millions of dollars in donations, Schultz reiterated the Democrat Party demands no limits on abortion, adding, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”

Most of us believe God creates every life in His image. This is not merely a social, financial, or political issue. It is a moral issue. Our tax dollars should not help fund something we know is sin and that we strongly oppose. The abortion business seems to help doctors and the Democratic Party leaving millions of women in anguish. They’ve done some excellent (read: evil) marketing through the years.

In other disappointing but not surprising news, the New York State Assembly just approved a bill allowing for abortion up to the moment of birth. Many “anti-lifers” refuse to defend their reasoning because they attempt to make a distinction between just inside and outside the birth canal. I would like them to logically explain how an unborn child who is one day away from his due date can be dismembered or shot in the heart with poison, but a newborn baby can’t? Theirs is an indefensible position; and yet, government, Hollywood, and the media generally defend the so-called right to choose.

Tragically, more black babies are aborted than born in the Democrat stronghold of New York City. Hispanics are not far behind, as they account for 31% of all abortions in New York. Don’t you find it strange that, in a liberal media claiming to support minorities, rarely does anyone address the truth? Roughly 78% of Planned Parenthood clinics are located in minority neighborhoods and inner cities. Does anyone sees any connection between the eugenics, population control, and racism endorsed by Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and abortion policy today?

If you support abortion, but claim to follow Jesus Christ and identify as a Christian, please examine your worldview on the subject of life. Search your heart, particularly if you are a dedicated Democrat. You may find you have bought into progressive propaganda and have an inner contradiction needing to be dealt with. How can you defend the moral relativism in society today and yet profess faith in a holy God and trust in the Bible which promotes absolute truth?

Thankfully, more young people today lean pro-life, and over 80% of American citizens favor abortion restrictions; but who seems to be winning this cultural battle? The extremists with the loudest voices have made progress and have the advantage, but they are not winning public opinion. Their agenda, however, will continue to be forced on all Americans until more of us unashamedly preach the gospel and protect all life, including the elderly.

When people sincerely return to faith in God or become genuine Christians for the first time, their worldview must necessarily change, which affects their behavior and politics. Sure, we may win a few surface battles and pass more pro-life legislation, which is good; but until we commit to praying and seeing hearts changed for Christ, the debate will continue to go back and forth.

Do you have a biblical Christian worldview, and are you willing to speak and stand up for the most vulnerable among us? If your answer is yes, then your actions, politics, and words should line up with your faith; and you will make the only logical choice: life.

David Fiorazo is the author of the brand new book, The Cost of Our Silence.

Photo credit: NCinDC (Creative Commons)

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

DWS Says Government Should Make No Restrictions On Abortion. ‘Period.’

Flickr/Fortune Live Media

Determined not to let the media stick him with the hard questions while lobbing softballs at his liberal opponents, Rand Paul threw a question back to one reporter Wednesday who was pressing him on the issue of abortion.

“Why don’t we ask the DNC: Is it OK to kill a 7-pound baby in the uterus?” Paul responded. “You go back and go ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby that’s just not born yet. Ask her when life begins, and ask Debbie when she’s willing to protect life. When you get an answer from Debbie, come back to me.”

The Democratic National Committee chairwoman fired back in a press release that made her position on the matter very clear:

Here’s an answer. I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.

In an interview with Wolf Blitzer, Paul commented that “it sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s okay with killing a seven-pound baby.”

In 2012, under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications. In his interview with Blitzer, Paul noted that Wasserman Schultz’s position, assumedly the position of the Democrat Party, is that abortion up until the day of birth is fine — a position he believes “most pro-choice people would be really uncomfortable with.”

According to the most recent Gallup poll, only 28 percent of Americans believe that abortion should be legal under any circumstance, making Wasserman Schultz and the Democratic Party’s stance rather extreme on the political spectrum.

Many took to Twitter after Wasserman Schultz’s press release to express their disgust with her statement and point out the hypocrisy of her stance.

DWSabortionafterbirthDWSabortiongosnellDWSabortionsubsidiesDWSabortiontweet

h/t: The Daily Caller

Share this article on Facebook if you support a child’s right to life, in or out of the womb.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Just Proved How Anti-Science Liberals Are…

Deb2 Link

Courtesy of LouderWithCrowder.com 

When Debbie Wasserman Schultz says that abortion at any point for any reason should be legal, it shines a light on the fact that liberals are anti-science. No scientist or doctor denies that these babies are viable, that they are lives, and that they can feel pain. Nobody. Not one single doctor. Yet liberals want the right to murder them anyway. Merely because it’s an inconvenient life.

“Abortion is the sacrifice at altar of self.”

So if you haven’t been following this back and forth, you may live under a rock. No offense to people who live under rocks. I’ve heard good things. We’ve got the latest interview from Rand Paul last night; and trust us, it’s worth watching. A little back-story first. Rand Paul originally said:

“You go back and go ask [DNC chair] Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby that’s just not born yet…When you get an answer from Debbie, come back to me.”

Lil Debbie responded.

“Here’s an answer,” Schultz said. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul….And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me,”

Ah, the shushing. Because, you know, sexism. Well, looks like Rand Paul wasn’t scared off by Lil’ Debbie, as he answered her challenge on CNN last night. It’s very much worth a listen.

I’m glad to see someone addressing this. Because what Debbie Wasserman Schultz is saying is that she supports actions that are directly comparable to Kermit Gosnell… so long as they happen within the womb.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Top Liberal Meltdowns Of 2014

bestofrants

Whether made by politicians, cable news commentators, or civil rights activists, there was no shortage of controversial remarks and full-blown rants captured on video this year. Western Journalism compiled some of the more memorable moments of leftist punditry from 2014.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom