During a recent Congressional Hearing on Executive Authority, Congress provides clear evidence that Barack Hussein Obama has assumed the role of a Dictator…
Congressman Steve King (R) – Iowa – explores Obama’s impeachment with Constitution experts during judiciary hearing. If the president is willfully and repeatedly violating the Constitution, this is a clear case for impeachment. If the People come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws, then they will conclude that neither are they.
Do you support Congressman King? Let us know in the comments below.
After three long years of cautious resistance to comprehensive replacement of ObamaCare, the House Republican Leadership seems ready to approve of legislative hearings and eventual House action on major proposals to that effect – namely, to proactively support the Republican Study Committee’s HR 3121 (with well over 100 GOP co-sponsors) and Rep./Dr. Tom Price’s overlapping HR 2300 (with over 40 co-sponsors).
These two proposals — like Rep. Price’s HR 3400 in 2011 and HR 3000 in 2012 — can all be traced back to the March 2010 House debates and razor-thin 219-212 House passage of ObamaCare. It was then that GOP leaders (then in the Minority) proposed a comprehensive “Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute” – that would almost surely have passed and would have “partial-birth aborted” Obamacare, but which was quickly “tabled” on Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s party-line procedural vote instead.
Since then, the GOP Leadership, believing that a) free-standing repeal without replacement, or b) repeal via defunding, or c) the Supreme Court might solve the problem, and fearing also that deeply divided Republicans would fall into self-destructive warfare over what total replacement should involve, opted to avoid such intra-party conflict.
But now that that hoped-for rescue by the Supreme Court, bare-bones repeal, and bare-bones defunding have all failed, the House GOP is finally – some say very belatedly – returning to the “regular order” legislative process of crafting what will become the “De facto ‘Repeal’ of ObamaCare via Comprehensive Replacement.”
Predating all of this by almost three years was a widely distributed (but unheeded) op-ed essay by this writer in AmericanThinker.com, here, in February 2011 entitled “Still Time for a Simultaneous Repeal and Replacement” – whose recommendations back then have evolved into the following six “regular order” legislative steps today:
1. Using the new HR 3121 and HR 2300 bills as major building blocks, begin several weeks of hearings in the various House “committees of jurisdiction” to design measures containing new versions of the very few sensible elements of ObamaCare – along with those many private- sector and non-bureaucratic reforms most Republicans have always favored.
2. Combine these Committee-approved bills (including tort reform, pre-existing conditions, personal healthcare accounts, insurance across state lines, children’s coverage, various pooling options, etc.) into either one ”omnibus” bill or into a multi-part “replacement package” for each and every element of the fatally flawed ObamaCare law – and repealing thereby the concomitant parts of its 15,000-page regulatory and IRS-dominated enforcement machinery, as well.
3. Following several weeks of House hearings and bill-crafting during the rest of this year and early next year, schedule House Floor action for February or early March of next year when “regular order” debate, voting, and final passage would occur — with bipartisan support by all Republicans and by some 50-70 terrified Democrats, thanks to ObamaCare’s ever increasing unpopularity.
4. Send this truly bipartisan bill to the Senate and insist on “regular order” (no dilatory filibusters and no perverse Motions to Table) debate and record votes throughout — which radical-Left Senators Reid, Schumer, Durbin, and others have repeatedly promised in recent Senate debates to do, as long as that is not “with a gun pointed at our heads” on threat of a government shutdown.
5. Reconcile in Conference Committee whatever differences might exist between House and Senate versions — and send this de facto repeal-by-replacement legislation (which should enjoy substantial bipartisan public support by then) to our hopelessly narcissistic President for his likely veto.
6. Prepare in both Houses to make an all-out effort to override any such ill-advised veto – whose election-year outcome at a time when ObamaCare has fallen ever deeper into its death spiral will impact heavily which party eventually wins control of both the House and Senate during Obama’s last two “lame duck” years in office.
In this context, all serious planning for the eventual demise and burial of ObamaCare must now be focused on how the legislative design, perfection, and passage of a fair and balanced replacement measure by the House – which is sufficiently bipartisan to force the Senate to debate and vote on the merits of all major elements, rather than turn to a series of cowardly Harry Reid-style “Motions to Table.”
Can We “Trust, but Verify” These Honorable Senators?
While there is no absolute guaranty that these Democrat assurances of item # 4 above will be honored in full, we seem to have no real options other than to “Trust, but Verify.” Knowing how absolutely true to their solemn word these “Honorable Senators” are supposed to be, the Senate would then proceed without fear of dilatory filibusters, or of “votes to table,” or of blocking all or most amendments of either side. And at long last, we would be able to witness – win or lose — an open-minded, fair and balanced return to a “regular order” consideration of what will have become a truly bipartisan House-passed bill of total replacement.
In the days and weeks ahead – assuming that the still-conflicted House GOP Leadership finally rises to the occasion – and with this legislative replacement effort being the only realistic game in town,
a) most Tea Party types will come around and begin focusing on thoughtful testimony to the hearings;
b) the healthcare industry, doctors, hospitals, and think tanks will offer their much needed advice;
c) most Progressive-Socialist (ProgSoc) Democrats will loudly oppose and continue to demonize; and
d) at least 60-70 worried House Democrats will eventually vote yea — because for the first time, they will have something sensible to vote FOR, which just happens to remove the rotting ObamaCare albatrosses from their necks.
Finally, proponents of this “regular order” approach should remain mindful that almost any piecemeal amendment that might tend to improve the law at its edges (a) would leave the intrusive, Big Brother, jobs-killing, hugely complex core of this ruinous law intact, and (b) would also make it all the more difficult to justify total replacement of that deadly bureaucratic core.
Any such well-intended changes (e.g., the House and Senate votes in 2011 to eliminate the ruinous “IRS 1099″ reporting mandate on small businesses) must either be made part of the House bill or be added as an integral part by the Senate, rather than be enacted separately and possibly helping to “save” the Gordian Knot – or is it the Hangman’s Noose? — of ObamaCare itself.
Assuming that this promising movement toward repeal via replacement actually succeeds during 2014 or early 2015, its timeframe for completion is largely unpredictable – except to say that it will probably take about as long as the four years the ObamaCare fiasco has taken to achieve its ongoing collapse.
JIM GUIRARD — TrueSpeak.org 703-768-0957 Justcauses@aol.com
A DC-area attorney, writer, and national security strategist, Jim Guirard was longtime Chief of Staff to former US Senators Allen Ellender and Russell Long. His TrueSpeak.org Web site is devoted to truth in language and truth in history in public discourse.
Susan Rice, who falsely told the nation that the terrorist attacks in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012 had developed out of a spontaneous demonstration against a YouTube video, will mark the one year anniversary of those attacks by briefing Congress to make the administration’s case for authorizing President Barack Obama to use military force in Syria.
Speaking on CBS’s “Face the Nation” today, House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R.-Mich.) pointed to the administration’s decision to have Rice brief members of Congress about this issue on the anniversary of the Benghazi attacks as emblematic of the administration’s bumbling approach to making its case for intervening in Syria.
On Monday, Rice will give a speech about Syria to the New America Foundation, then speak to the Congressional Black Caucus and participate in a classified briefing that the administration will provide to members of Congress, the Associated Press has reported. She will then participate in another classified briefing for Congress on Wednesday–which will be the twelfth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S. homeland and the one year anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the State Department and CIA facilities in Benghazi, Libya.
House Intelligence Chairman Rogers, who supports taking military action against the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad to punish that regime for using chemical weapons, said he does not believe Obama has effectively made the case for doing so.
“The president hasn’t made the case,” said Rogers on CBS’s Face the Nation. “Again, it’s confounding. They’re going to send up this week–think about this, this tells you the relationship with Congress, and it’s not great: They’re sending up Susan Rice to brief Congress on the year anniversary of Benghazi. And they’re trying to win votes. I mean the credibility gap there is huge.”
Read More at CNS News . By Terrence P. Jeffrey.