Watch: Obama Mentor Bill Ayers Just Proposed We Build A Monument To Bowe Bergdahl (But Only If He Was A Deserter)


For a radical domestic terrorist who to this day refuses to apologize for numerous bombings he took part in during the 1970s, Bill Ayers is no stranger to outrageous behavior. Nevertheless, the man who helped launch Barack Obama’s political career managed to once again offend much of America with his take on accused Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl.

Since Obama pushed through a deal with the Taliban that would secure the American hostage’s release in exchange for the release of five dangerous terrorists, Bergdahl has faced significant criticism from his fellow soldiers. Numerous sources confirm he left his platoon willingly and made it clear he did not wish to return or be in any way associated with the military.

In a recent Fox News interview, Ayers weighed in on the controversy, suggesting host Megyn Kelly should shift the focus away from the suspected deserter.

“It would be fair and balanced to also look at the violence that was and is going on,” he said, “perpetrated by the government, by the official agencies and organs of the government.”

Kelly shot back, pointing out the perceived anti-American tone of his stated position.

“You sound like – with respect – Osama bin Laden,” she responded.

Ayers continued in the same vein, concluding that the U.S. should actually honor those who desert their fellow soldiers during a time of war. “I think Bowe Bergdahl, if he deserted, that was an heroic thing to do,” he said. “No one knows if he did or if he didn’t.” Finally, he expanded his support to include those who showed similar disloyalty throughout the nation’s past. “I think throughout history we should build monuments to the unknown deserters,” he concluded, “the people who look at the craziness they’re asked to participate in and say ‘I’m not part of this.’”

Decades after co-founding the notorious Weather Underground, it appears rooting against America has become second nature for Ayers.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

Nine Ways Obama Makes Hitler Look Like An Angel

We are living in perilous times; our nation is being fundamentally transformed into something our founding father’s tried to prevent, an oligarchy.

Oligarchy (from Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía); from ὀλίγος (olígos), meaning “few”, and ἄρχω (arkho), meaning “to rule or to command”) is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, or military control. 

Barack Obama has, through the creation of his many executive czars, established his own set of laws (or rather rules, regulations, and executive “fiats” or Orders) that allow him to usurp Congress’s legislative authority to pass those very laws that govern our lives.

Click here to see the regulations enacted by Obama’s unelected Czars Versus the laws written by Congress in 2013.

This is not the first time a republic has been destroyed this way.

Herr Hitler wasn’t even the president when he had the “Enabling Act of 1933” passed giving him, the Chancellor of the cabinet of the Weimar Republic, the authority to enact legislation without passing it in the “Reichstag,” or the Weimar Republic’s version of our Congress.

We all know how well that turned out.

Obama told us he would do it; remember this?

He promised to “fundamentally change The United States of America”.

What he has done so far:

  • He has created positions in his executive branch for czars that are beyond the approval of Congress.
  • Each of these positions carry the power and authority of a cabinet position, without being responsible to anyone but Obama himself (like Himmler, Goebbels, and the rest of Herr Hitler’s crew.)
  • Each of these positions are empowered by Obama to create any rules and regulations they decide are necessary without going through Congress; in other words, Congress has no say whether these rules are legal under our Constitution.
  • He has created the largest governmental  bureaucracy ever in our country’s history through auspices of Obamacare. (Click here to study the Monster for yourself)  
  • He has been given the power to kill  or imprison anyone, anywhere on the face of this planet without a trial, simply if he decides that person is a threat to this country (or rather his vision of what this country is threatened by.) (NDAA act of 2012)
  • He has created the most intense surveillance of our own citizens ever conceived by man. He has even been spying on Congress.
  • He is providing police departments with military surplus mine-proof vehicles and  weaponry for civil unrest, or “Rescues”.
  • He is well on his way to creating a national security force just like he said he would.
  • Obama has used the IRS to attack his political enemies and their families, particularly the Tea party (and even Sarah Palin’s father.)

Herr Hitler was a rank amatuer compaired to Obama; but then again, Hitler was never a student of Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky, who wanted to eliminate millions of American citizens just for their political views.

But wait, there’s more….Click here to read Bill Ayers’ own communist manifesto calling for race wars and revolution in this country

Obama is an Alinsky radical to the very core, being molded by Frank Marshall Davis and Bill Ayers and funded by George Soros.

The Alinsky radical has a single principle – to take power from the Haves and give it to the Have-nots. What this amounts to in practice is a political nihilism – a destructive assault on the established order in the name of the
“people” (who, in the fashion common to dictators, are designated as such by the revolutionary elite)

Who is Frank Marshall Davis? He was Obama’s mentor in Hawaii, introduced to him in 1970 by his grandfather. Davis took young Obama into his tutelage and turned him into a man.

 “I admire Russia for wiping out an economic system which permitted a handful of rich to exploit and beat gold from the millions of plain people. . . . As one who believes in freedom and democracy for all, I honor the Red nation.” —FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS, 1947 

Some even believe Davis is actually Obama’s real father, who conceived him with an underaged Ann Dunham during the writing of “Sex Rebel: Black” in which he describes having sex with “Anne,” a common enough name. Except for the nude photographs of Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, taken by Davis (and the almost eerie resemblance Obama has in common with Davis, especially when compared to Barack Obama Senior.)

The Man who promised to fundamentally change this nation has started doing so with executive orders and rules and regulations from his own personal cadre of the liberal and often communist elites he has installed into positions that cannot be removed from our government by either Congress or the Judiciary.

Change is not always a good thing.

Hitler promised change to the people of Germany. He promised them free health care, the envy of the world; he promised to destroy the rich and raise the poor out of poverty; and he promised to build schools and roads that would change Germany into  the greatest nation on earth.

He did so by surrounding himself with his own Cadre of like-minded people and was given the legislative power to do whatever was necessary to implement what he promised to do for Germany.

There is an axiom of the internet called “Godwin’s law,”  which states:

 “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches”.

It isn’t always a bad thing to compare some politician’s actions to Herr Hitler; sometimes it is a fair warning of what can and WILL happen next if such abuses of power go unchecked…       

I like to call that “Suhor’s Corollary to Godwin’s law,” Internet patent pending of course…


Video: The Terrorists, Socialists, and Con Men Behind ObamaCare

“If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it…”

This refrain was repeated by Obama literally hundreds of times despite the fact that he knew it was a lie.

But this Big Lie wasn’t some off-the-cuff remark; it was the brainchild of a slick, socialist public relations firm called the Herndon Alliance—whose ultimate goal is a socialist utopia where the State is God.

Gone are the days of blowing up the Pentagon to usher in a socialist utopia—á la Bill Ayers, head of the Weather Underground. Now everything is done in secret—stealth socialists they’re called. So former domestic terrorist Weather Underground architect and Bill Ayers buddy Jeff Jones is pushing ObamaCare over at the George Soros-funded Apollo Alliance. And socialist-connected American Environics is doing all the polling for the stealth operation. And another socialist front group, Families USA, is concocting phony ObamaCare “success stories.”  Enroll America, the so-called “non-partisan” federally-funded group, outed by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas as full of liars and conmen, is tasked with signing up dupes for Obama’s overpriced healthcare.

Domestic terrorists, socialists, and con men, all working with Obama to push socialized medicine…and no one is surprised.

America’s Inner Struggle: Freedom Under Fire

Photo credit: Roger Smith (Creative Commons)

Ever since the founding of the United States of America, the idea that all men were created equal and free has faced scrutiny from those who prefer to live under cradle-to-grave government control.

In the 1700′s, our founders were considered to be rabble rousers and homeland terrorists by the Tories and other factions who were sworn to the king of England. Our founders realized that the unique concept of establishing freedom and liberty for all would take a lot of work and self sacrifice. Thank God they were willing to do it as they were able to establish the longest standing free Republic that the world has ever known. The only tools that they were able to employ at the time were the power of the pen, the pulpit, and, the printing press. Still, with only three percent of the nation’s population supporting them, and by the grace of God, they were able to win our freedom and independence from the king.

In the 1800′s, our country was literally torn in half due to the issue of slavery. Once the fire of freedom caught on to the slaves who were controlled from cradle to grave, they wanted it too. Unfortunately, a group of southern, slave owning Democrats decided that this concept was unacceptable since it threatened the survival of their plantations; and hence, the Ku Klux Klan was born, further launching us into civil war.

In the 1900′s, we witnessed the most fundamental changes in American society as we faced new threats from fascism and communism, again with the goal of controlling the masses from cradle to grave. Sen. Joe Mc Carthy warned us back in the fifties that Hollywood and institutions of higher learning were being infiltrated with communists; but no one headed his warnings, and they ran him out in disgrace. The sixties were wrought with the assassinations of President Kennedy and Martin Luther King; while at the same time, the race war was being waged in Congress by Democrats to once again limit the rights of the newly freed black man. The sixties communists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn, with their Weather Underground group, thought it best to just blow things up and overthrow the government; but a better way was found, without the violence. The communists divided; and hence, the Progressive party was re-born. It was an off-shoot of Teddy Roosevelt’s strategy, this time inspired by the Cloward-Piven strategy of forcing so many people onto a government welfare system that it would become unsustainable and eventually collapse. Their plan was to collapse the economy and then take over the government without even firing a shot. In order to protect this strategy, Saul Alinsky published a book titled “Rules for Radicals” as a guide to destroy any detractors of their plans. On a side note, Bill and Hillary Clinton are members of this New Progressive party.

As we move on to the 2000′s, it would appear that the Cloward-Piven strategy is working perfectly, as well as Alinsky’s tactics. The US economy is on the verge of collapse; welfare recipients now outnumber those who are working; our children are being indoctrinated every day in school by communist-leaning teachers and professors; and anyone who stands up for the US Constitution is being labeled as crazy, out of touch, and a homeland terrorist. Our media is now mostly government-controlled, our churches are preaching social justice, and our children barely even know how to write.

The battle for freedom continues just as it did back in the 1700′s. The ideology has remained the same; it is just that the players have changed. This all boils down to a choice: cradle to grave government enslavement, or the absolute Freedom that our founders envisioned. The tools haven’t even changed all that much either. Those who control the power of the pen, the pulpit, and the printing press will control the masses. As always, my fellow Patriots, may God bless you, stay safe, and be aware of your surroundings.


Photo credit: Roger Smith (Creative Commons)

“Revolution Beyond Borders” Comes To America

Marxist SC “Revolution Beyond Borders” Comes to America

The famous GOP strategist Karl Rove, who lost $300 million betting on a Mitt Romney victory in 2012, says it appears that President Obama is on an “ideological crusade” against the Republican Party. Congratulations to Rove for recognizing the obvious. But where does Obama’s ideology come from? This is where Karl Rove, most Republicans, and even many in the conservative media fear to tread.

Professor Paul Kengor has the question: Has Obama ever been influenced by Marxist ideology? The answer in the affirmative helps explain why Obama is so determined to crush the political opposition and take complete control over the budget process in Washington, D.C.

Obama claims that the Republicans, who have the power of the purse in the House of Representatives, are the ones pursuing an “ideological crusade.” But Rove, who has a basic understanding of the ideological struggle, comments that Obama “wants to dramatically increase the size of the federal government,” and that his party’s control over matters such as raising the debt ceiling without spending cuts is crucial to that effort. Blaming the government “shutdown” on the Republicans and getting the GOP to back down is what this is all about.

But what explains this determination on Obama’s part and his refusal to compromise? Paul Kengor wrote a recent column on the far-left campaign for New York City mayor being waged by “progressive” Bill de Blasio, whose support for communism in Central America was recently exposed by the liberal New York Times. Kengor noted that the Times ran a follow-up story which said that de Blasio was asked whether he had ever agreed with Marxist ideology and that he replied, “It’s 2013. I’d like to note, I’m not going to stoop to Joe Lhota’s [the Republican mayoral nominee] level here.”

Kengor commented, “All of which leads to a more intriguing question that should be directed not at de Blasio, but at Obama, namely: Has Barack Obama ever agreed with Marxist ideology?”

The professor noted that “conservatives like myself have been pushing this question for a long time, but never with access to Barack Obama. We can’t get this question asked, and thus it has never been answered.”

Kengor wrote a 400-page book on Obama and his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, a literal card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA. He also interviewed Dr. John Drew, who knew Obama at Occidental College in the early 1980s. Drew was a Marxist at the time, and he says that Obama was as well.

Kengor wonders why journalists never posed to Obama the question that was asked to Bill de Blasio. He adds, “We’re waiting less on Barack Obama than we’re waiting on just one honest mainstream journalist with access to the President. If the inquiry is okay for the potential mayor of New York, then why not for the leader of the free world?”

Of course, de Blasio tried to deflect the question by insisting that things have changed and that it’s somehow dirty campaign tactics today to ask about such matters. Because registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by six to one in New York City, de Blasio seems poised to win that election with the support of what Sol Stern calls the “old Popular Front” of liberals, Marxists, and others.

The city thus faces not only higher taxes and spending, but major new restrictions on a police force on the front lines of safeguarding citizens from criminals and jihadists.

However, former pro-communist activist Tom Hayden expressed concern in a Huffington Post column titled “Defend de Blasio Now” that de Blasio’s past could come back to haunt him, saying that there is a fear that Marxism could taint their “progressive” candidate and that his election is not a sure thing.

But Hayden, who achieved notoriety as Jane Fonda’s husband and eventually became a politician, also has a lot to answer for. Like Communist terrorist Bill Ayers, Hayden was a key member of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), the violence-prone group that laid siege to college campuses in the 1960s. One of their main goals was making sure that the communists conquered South Vietnam.

On June 4, 1968, Hayden wrote a “Dear Col. Lao” letter to a North Vietnamese official that ended, “Good fortune! Victory!” So Hayden was someone who was cheering for the communist enemy killing Americans. The communists won.

De Blasio also worked on behalf of the communists, namely the Sandinistas in Central America, who took power in Nicaragua in 1979.

At that time, top Sandinista Tomas Borge said, “This revolution goes beyond our borders.” Another top Sandinista, Comandante Bayardo Arce, said, “We cannot cease being internationalists unless we cease being revolutionaries.” By 1986, the Sandinistas were closing down independent newspapers such as La Prensa, leaving only pro-Sandinista papers in circulation such as Barricada, the Sandinista party paper, and the regime-subsidized el Nuevo Diario.

According to The New York Times, de Blasio subscribed to Barricada, even after the Sandinistas lost power in a free election. As Paul Berman notes at the New Republic, this “was the most hardline of the Sandinista publications.” Today, de Blasio still describes aspects of the Sandinista Marxist program as “inspirational.”

Although Obama hasn’t been asked about his communist mentor Frank Marhall Davis and how Davis’s Marxist ideology influenced the future President, we can anticipate that he would adopt the de Blasio technique of blaming his political opponents for bringing the subject up.

The current budget impasse provides an opportunity to educate the American people about the “Revolution Beyond Borders” that has come to America. The evidence cannot be denied, despite the media’s failure to ask the President about his background in Marxism. We are faced with a Marxist in the White House who is determined to crush the opposition. Can the Republican Party hold up under the pressure?


This commentary originally appeared at and is reprinted here with permission. 


Photo credit: SS&SS (Creative Commons)