The Multi-Front Assault On Our Liberty

Statue of Liberty The Multi Front Assault On Our Liberty

9/11, much like December 7th, is a day that will live in infamy. It is not only a day that brought foreign-born terror to our shores, but it also led to the direct erosion of our very freedoms so near and dear to our hearts. The Patriot Act is what I speak of. It was one of those things done by our elected officials in response to what happened that awful day. It was swift, it was sure, it was seemingly that one correct thing to do. Nothing could be further from the truth.

That single enactment of law took our freedom from us. It made us suspect. It made us slaves. It allowed the terrorists to win a battle they had not anticipated winning at all. To compound the problem, another cabinet-level department was created, along with several new agencies and administrations. Not only did we lose freedom, but we inflated our government at a time when it was expedient to reduce government spending and waste. Knee-jerk reactions rarely provide equitable solutions.

Now we find ourselves in a time of deep financial crisis. A crisis long in the making it has been. From a government telling mortgage companies they must provide loans to people who have no visible means of ever paying to Freddie-Mac and Fannie-Mae that would underwrite a corpse and probably did on several occasions. The ever-present availability of easy-credit terms and credit cards. Americans these days have forgotten the lessons learned by the previous two generations. The lessons of the Great Depression can teach a lot of things; one of them was how to save and be less wasteful. But what is history? Apparently, it is something in a book on a shelf for almost all Americans that must be dusted occasionally.

We are a nation that is some $15 trillion in debt. We have elected a most curious President (about whom we know very little) who is running up more and more debt each day. We have a Democrat- controlled Senate and Republican-controlled Congress that cannot present a debt-reduction plan with a balanced budget. It seems that senility runs rampant in the halls of the US Congress and Senate; yet we keep electing these lethargic and pathetic fools. So what does that make us, the electorate? I do not think I need to answer that.

Tax increases are looming. I, like anyone else in their right mind, hate taxes and the thought of paying them. But they are needed. They are absolutely necessary. The question is how we go about the whole process, as well as how much enough is. The last time I checked, I am paying out about 1/3 of my income in taxes, Medicaid, Social Security, etc. I think I am being robbed blind. What entitles the government to 1/3 of my income? The new healthcare law we all have come to love and know so well is a joke. The so-called preexisting condition clause whereby you cannot be denied? Guess what? It doesn’t apply to private insurance companies. So what was Princess Pelosi so proud of? Proud of screwing Americans once again with her fantasy world. (I wonder if her plastic surgery counts as a preexisting condition.)

The ship is sinking; I do not have the bilge pump to help keep it afloat, just my simple leaky bucket. Please go out and vote. Vote them all out.

Related posts:

  1. Conservatives Unite In Opposing Obama’s Assault On Religious Liberty (CNSNews.com) – A sweeping alliance of fiscal, social and national…
  2. A Report From The Front Lines In The War Between Catholics And Obama A CINO (Catholic In Name Only) Democrat Ohio State Senator…

Why Have We Surrendered To Big Brother?

Obama Big Brother SC Why Have We Surrendered To Big Brother?

What makes us Americans unique in the world is that we question everything. This is how we are able to keep our freedoms, by questioning the people representing us in our government.

However, we have stopped questioning; we let them get away with too much, and they walked all over us. Now, we pay the price. Our freedom is at stake.

Where we once could be free people, we have been regulated and controlled. We no longer can have lemonade stands; kids can’t just go outside and play. They have rules about riding bikes, playing in the street on a Saturday, and what games can be played at school (oh yeah, and there are no winners and no losers growing up.) Groups of people have words they can use but others cannot, we have “free speech zones”, reporters for our Representatives have to use government computers so they can be monitored, and we have cameras on corners to watch us. In short, we have BIG BROTHER.

Yes, everyone needs rules, but common sense should also be there. Don’t ride a bike in the middle of the street. Don’t just go up and hit someone because they are different; there are ways of speaking without causing a fight. Unfortunately this is all some people can understand.

Where is our common sense? It’s been legislated to death.

We have given away too much power to our Representatives. We need to take it back.

Our Representatives are trying to put everyone in a bubble, for our own good. They want to control us for our safety.

We have given up our freedoms because we kept quiet too long. Our Representatives do not hear us anymore, no matter how loudly we yell or scream at them.

If we want OUR White House back and our House and Senate back, we are going to have to make them listen. We are going to have to find a way to get their attention.

Too many times, we have heard this is so-and-so’s Senate seat or House seat. It is NOT their seat; it is the people’s seat.

The White House is the House of the People. It does not belong to the current President, whoever he (or she) may be.

We MUST remember the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. They are not just old pieces of paper or rags.These are our Rights. Our founding fathers even said that they could not list all of our Rights in the Constitution as there are too many.

Do we really want to keep giving away everything? Or do we want safety so badly that we’re willing to give up ALL our Freedoms to Big Brother?

Do we want Big Brother speaking to us from a box on the street telling us to pick up trash and to not do this or that? Do you really want to get fined for anything and everything that they think we should or shouldn’t do?

I do not want to live like that. I want to take personal responsibility for myself and my actions from when I get up in the morning, deciding for myself what I eat, whether or not I exercise, and what choices I make during the day. What my kids eat during the day is MY responsibility. If I decide to drink soda 6 times a day or more or get a hangover, this is my responsibility. Taking responsibility also means accepting the consequences when you do something wrong, intentionally or not.

Photo credit: waif69 (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s Red Tape Strangled The American Dream — And My Brother’s Business   I guess we were supposed to be encouraged last…
  2. Brother: Medical Records Will Prove George Zimmerman’s Story Despite what Obama may want, facts are stubborn things, and…

House Moves Ahead With CISPA, Despite Criticism Of The “Cybersecurity” Bill

us capitol building SC 300x199 House Moves Ahead With CISPA, Despite Criticism Of The Cybersecurity Bill

House Republicans are pushing ahead with legislation to protect the nation’s critical infrastructure and corporations from electronic attacks despite Obama administration objections that the legislation fails to protect Americans’ civil liberties.

The House begins work Thursday on the bill designed to address the cybersecurity threat by getting the private sector and government to share information to thwart attacks from foreign governments, terrorists and cybercriminals. Although the information sharing is voluntary, civil liberty groups fear the measure could lead to government spying on Americans.

The administration objections run deeper.

“The sharing of information must be conducted in a manner that preserves Americans’ privacy, data confidentiality and civil liberties and recognizes the civilian nature of cyberspace,” the administration said in a statement Wednesday. “Cybersecurity and privacy are not mutually exclusive.”

The administration also complained that the bill’s liability protection for companies that share information is too broad and argued that the Homeland Security Department should have a primary role in domestic cybersecurity. In its current form, the administration said, the president’s advisers would recommend a veto.

Read More at OfficialWire. By Donna Cassata.

Related posts:

  1. House Cybersecurity Bill Would Establish Federal Overseer Members of the House Homeland Security Committee introduced a cybersecurity…
  2. CISPA: Stop The Cybersecurity-Industrial Complex Should Congress commission private companies to spy on you? As…

Obama’s NSA Close To Knowing All About Us?

NSA logo SC Obamas NSA Close to Knowing All About Us?

Not long before Dick Armey – a conservative Republican constitutionalist – retired as House majority leader, he gave a speech expressing his worry about the government’s increasing blanket surveillance over We the People. He practically begged President George W. Bush to “use these tools we have given you to make us safe in such a manner that’ll preserve our freedom” (my book, “The War on the Bill of Rights and the Gathering Resistance,” Seven Stories Press, 2003).

Bush’s response, alas, was to listen more and more to Vice President Dick Cheney.

And now for the first time in American history, according to the Government Accountability Project’s Jesselyn Radack, Attorney General Eric Holder has officially and publicly declared “new guidelines that permit the federal counterterrorism investigators to collect, search and store data about Americans who are not suspected of terrorism, or anything …

“According to the Justice Department, law enforcement and other national security agencies can copy entire databases and sift through the data for suspicious patterns to stop potential terrorist threats” (“Govt. Keeping Data on Americans With No Connection to Terrorism,” whistleblower.org, March 23).

Where in the Constitution do “suspicious patterns” – otherwise undefined and outside the jurisdiction of our courts – allow the government to put large and growing numbers of us into databases for future tracking?

Read More at WND.

Related posts:

  1. FirstEnergy To Close Six Coal-Fired Plants Due To EPA Regulations “Closed” signs are a symbol of Lisa Jackson’s success in…
  2. Reagan’s Attorney General On Impeaching Obama, “Close To A Constitutional Crisis” President Ronald Reagan’s Attorney General, Ed Meese, has said Barack…

The NSA’s New Capabilities Are A Threat To Our Freedoms

nsa aerial SC 300x240 The NSA’s new capabilities are a threat to our freedoms

James Bamford, whose track record on all things associated with the National Security Council (NSA) is excellent, has a chilling article in Wired about the NSA’s newest facilities and capabilities. They are jaw-dropping. In effect, he is telling us that once the new Utah facility is operational, everything that an American citizen does that involves electronic communication will be captured by NSA—emails, purchases, cell phone calls, text messages. Everything. Bamford doesn’t say it, but I assume that NSA can also do what hackers can do: Get access to the entire contents of disk drives.

Contemplating this capability, we are beyond having to ask whether NSA will watch over the most private affairs of American citizens. That’s already happening, under guidelines that the government assures us limits surveillance to those citizens who pose a threat. The only question is how fast the definition of “threat” will expand from people who pose a clear and present danger of mounting a terrorist attack to people who pose whatever kind of threat is dear to the heart of the administration in power.

Read More at The American. By Charles Murray.

No related posts.