Is Unity With Romney Possible?

Mitt Romney with supporters 2 SC Is Unity With Romney Possible?

Sitting on the floor of the Arizona Republican convention, we have a sick feeling in our stomachs. Everyone in this room wants to defeat Barack Obama, but divisions are deep, and much work needs to be done to heal the wounds.

Early in the day, we heard a series of speeches from Arizona and GOP luminaries. Despite being united in purpose, the catcalls, boos, and jeers are easily heard over the tepid applause.

Mitt Romney’s third son, Josh, took the podium and offered inevitability. He said, “my Dad realized he would be the next president the Rick Santorum called him to say he was suspending his campaign.” He acknowledged the other candidates, and when he offered kind words about Ron Paul, the room erupted in cheers.

Next up, the Ron Paul campaign appointed a local GOP leader named Sydney Hay to speak. She talked about the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. She seemed to understand Paul’s underdog status, but the Paul supporters cheered her wildly.

The Romney supporters were much more polite; they didn’t jeer the way the Paul crowd jeered Romney supporters.

Listening to the cheers and jeers, the energy in this hall is with Paul, but the majority of delegates are clearly with Romney.

So why is there less energy for the front-runner and presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney?

We decided to ask some of the delegates why. Here is what we heard from the respective campaigns’ delegates:

“Ron Paul wants to follow the US Constitution; Mitt Romney supports the unconstitutional bailouts of the banks.”

“Mitt Romney is the most qualified, he has run businesses, he has run the the Olympics, and he can run the government.”

“Ron Paul is against NDAA, the bill which allows for the arrest and imprisonment of Americans without trial, and Mitt Romney supports the NDAA.”

“Mitt Romney will enforce our immigration laws; Ron Paul will let people cross the border.”

“Ron Paul is a Christian, and Mitt Romney isn’t.”

“Mitt Romney can win, and we will appoint conservatives to the Supreme Court.”

Romney garnered 47 percent of the votes in Arizona’s primary, and Ron Paul only received 8 percent, but because of this enthusiasm gap, the Paul supporters are making the delegate campaigns a close race.

Our own belief is that if Romney wants to run away with this race, he should not be moving to the middle so quickly.

When Barack Obama endorsed homosexual marriage this week, Romney responded by affirming traditional marriage, but then he undercut his own message by endorsing homosexual adoption. This type of “splitting the baby” approach to issues is alienating the conservative GOP base he needs to work hard for his campaign.

Romney will never get the homosexual vote, so why try to placate them by endorsing adoption into untraditional families?

Mitt Romney needs to sound a clear message and not fear the media. He needs to stand on conservative principle.

In this regard, he could learn much from Ron Paul. He would do well to choose Senator Rand Paul, Ron’s son, as his running mate this fall. It would show that he hears the voices of those yearning for a candidate that stands firmly by the US Constitution, and it just might bring some enthusiasm to his campaign.

Photo Credit : Gage Skidmore Creative Commons

 

Related posts:

  1. Can Romney Beat Obama? Mitt Romney faces a daunting task. In the best of…
  2. Talk Of A Paul-Romney Alliance Won’t Go Away Mitt Romney and Ron Paul – friends, and a political odd couple. But…

5 Ways Obama Is A Dictator

Obama Presidential Seal Podium Speech SC 780x1024 5 Ways Obama Is A Dictator

When power is placed in the hands of a usurper like Barack Obama, all thought of accepting authority from the other branches of government as delegated by the Constitution is rejected. Three years in office, we have seen Obama use the various agencies of the executive branch to break countless federal statutes, rob states of their legislative prerogatives, and flout the authority of Congress and the courts.

Obama’s Department of Justice has actively prevented South Carolina, Arizona, Texas, and other states from implementing voter ID laws designed to prevent the widespread incidents of fraud so instrumental to the success of the Democrat Party in elections for the past 50 years. The Department has filed suit in federal court to prevent implementation of those state laws in spite of a 2008 Supreme Court ruling which found Constitutional an Indiana voter ID law whose various requirements were mirrored in the Texas and Arizona legislation.

The EPA imposed water quality rules in Florida which would have led to “…billions of dollars in compliance costs, significant spikes in utility bills and the loss of thousands of jobs.” In February, the Florida Attorney General prevailed in a lawsuit against the EPA in which the presiding judge found “…the EPA’s rules were not based on sound science…”  Moreover, the judge declared the EPA had even failed to prove its scheme would prevent any harm to the environment.

Obama’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) threatened suit against South Carolina “for guaranteeing a secret ballot in union elections.” The NLRB eventually backed down, but then turned its attention to the Boeing Company, telling Boeing it could not relocate its plants. Once again, the Board backed down “but only after the company and the union worked through an agreement.”

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) demanded that the Hosanna Tabor Lutheran School rehire a minister discharged for her disagreement with the religious doctrines of the church. So outragious was EEOC involvement in this case that the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY found in favor of the School in a January 2012 ruling.

Health and Human Services mandated Jewish, Catholic, and Baptists schools and churches provide abortion services to their employees. Seven state Attorneys General have filed suit after Barack Obama made an “accommodation in name only that required insurance companies…provide the services for free…”

In the Constitution, the Founders created an overlap of authority, based on the view that “…liberty can only be effectively preserved by having not only separate branches…but also by mixing in each branch aspects of all the forms of power—legislative, executive and judicial…” The argument as to which branch—the executive or the legislative– has the final authority to declare and engage in war, for example, has especially raged in recent years.

But Barack Obama and his thuggish Regime desire the exercise of absolute control over all aspects of existence in the United States. It is anathema to this would-be dictator that authority even be shared with the people he was elected to govern, much less that all authority to govern be DERIVED of their consent.  The system of federalism upon which this nation and its Constitution are based is systematically being destroyed by a Manchurian Candidate bent on absolute rule over a free people.

Related posts:

  1. 100 Ways Obama Is Wasting Your Money Conservatives often see the government as an Orwellian apparatus hungrily…
  2. FCC Looks At Ways To Assert Authority Over Web Access The Federal Communications Commission is considering aggressive moves to stake…

“Here’s The Plan…” A Letter From Obama To Supporters

Obama+golfs Heres The Plan... A Letter From Obama To Supporters

From the desk of The Fearless Golfer

Washington, D. C., U. S. A.
Nairobi, Kenya
Cartagena, Colombia
Various Golf Courses

Eyes only Destroy after reading.

My plan is to get re-elected and continue the work that I have started. I am making great inroads in fundamentally changing America! I have given the president (that’s me!) the power to detain any American that I want on suspicion of something. Just imagine what I can accomplish with that power! I also now have the power to limit the speech of Americans. Even the Republicans know how important that is! Even Newt agrees with me! People can no longer say bad things about me on government property. And I will extend that power as soon as I get re-elected.

I showed you how to win an election in 2008. I want you to use the same tactics this time to get me re-elected. Get illegal aliens to register to vote using phony addresses. I have the cooperation of many of the Registrars of Voters, and the plan I gave good old George to get the Secretaries of State to pass laws without the State legislators is working, of course. In Nevada, I can get people registered to vote online! This photo ID stuff has to go. I told everyone it was a bad idea. The Democrats are listening to me, but some of the Republicans are insisting on this foolishness. However, I do have some of them on our side now. All but three voted to limit free speech in my hearing. I have told my Secret Service to enforce that law. I have Newt’s agreement that we should limit free speech.

So far I have just about destroyed the First, Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Amendments to that great impediment to government the Constitution. I have Reid and Pelosi, along with the Brady Bunch and a multitude of the members of Congress working to destroy the Second Amendment. I will have more power and flexibility to join up with Venezuela, Russia, and China to bring about the changes that I promised in 2008.

I don’t have to worry about Romney in the campaign, if he wins. I have instructed the fools on all of the major television networks to keep on ignoring that champion of Liberty and low taxes, Ron Paul, so I don’t think he will be a problem, unless he wins the nomination. If he wins, then I may be in trouble. But then I have the computer programmers working for me, and that Spanish company that will be counting the votes is in my pocket. But still, Paul could be a problem. The internet is being used by his supporters to great success. My followers in Congress just passed CISPA, so I have that going for me, but Paul worries me.

My TSA is keeping the public in a turmoil just because they grope little boys and girls and old women. I told them to leave the Muslims alone.

I have a pedophile as the safe schools czar and a tax cheat as the Treasury Secretary, so I’m okay in those two areas. My military is ready to act even though the Constitution has limited their power to act within the country.

I want you to keep on registering illegal aliens and fighting to prevent the requirement of photo ID’s.

I have Boehner and Lindsay Graham seeking more power, and I will let them think that they have it. I will have Van Jones back after the election. He is a good little order-taker, if I can just get him to shut up once in a while. He always talked too much.

I have the Departments of Education and Transportation following my orders as well. And now that my TSA is being deployed on the highways, bus terminals, and rest areas, travel will become an unpleasant trial. My air will no longer be fouled by emissions from cars.

Soon, Solyndra will rise from the ashes like a Phoenix, not the one in Arizona, and with a billion or so, we will be selling Sunlight to the Americans.

You’re happy to hear from me.

The Fearless Golfer

(Editor’s Note: Now who could he possibly be referring to?)

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s Great New Plan: Algae For Our Energy Needs! President Obama has recently offered the American people a truly…
  2. Video: McConnell’s Plan Would Give Obama Dictatorial Powers Mitch McConnell explains his “Plan B” on the debt ceiling.Barack…

Justice Dept. Plans To Sue Arizona Sheriff Arpaio

Joe Arpaio speech 3 SC 256x300 Justice Dept. Plans To Sue Arizona Sheriff Arpaio

Federal authorities have said they plan to sue Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Latinos.

The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement requiring Arpaio’s office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Latinos to assure them that the department is there to also protect them.

Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.

DOJ officials told a lawyer for Arpaio on April 3 that the lawman’s refusal of a court-appointed monitor was a deal-breaker that would end settlement negotiations and result in a federal lawsuit.

The “notice of intent to file civil action” came Wednesday from Assistant U.S. Attorney General Thomas Perez in a letter to an Arpaio lawyer.

Read More at OfficialWire. By Walter Berry.

Related posts:

  1. Arizona Senate Joins Sheriff Joe Arpaio To Combat Ineligibility Of Presidents Editors Note: This story is from a third party and…
  2. Possible DOJ Perjurer Says Sheriff Joe Arpaio Racially Profiles Mexican Illegals? A new report from the Justice Department accuses America’s toughest…

Exclusive Investigatory Report: The Enigma That Is Barack Hussein Obama, Pre-Election To 2009

obama speech 7 SC Exclusive Investigatory Report: The Enigma That is Barack Hussein Obama, Pre Election To 2009

I was sitting in my study on a quiet Sunday afternoon pondering how is it that we have come to this point in our evolution as a nation of like minds where we are on the brink of financial, political, moral and spiritual collapse.  This question led me to create a list of the most controversial deeds, actions, and statements from our President, the Democrats, and their patrons and supporters.

When finished with this task, fifty separate questions that could be an essay or article each lay before me; my intention is to research several of these questions in turn and try to make some sense of it all.

To put this in perspective, we need to take a “birds eye” view, or a thirty thousand foot perspective of all these anomalies and see if we can create a tapestry or mosaic that is Barry Soetoro, our President and resident Nobel Laureate that lays about the White House these days.  Not to be outdone with this accomplishment, he flits across the nation on the taxpayers’ dime as he seeks another wealth- and economy-destroying term in office sowing class warfare and discontent wherever he can; currently, it is reserved exclusively for battleground and swing states.

The logical place to start is with Barry as a young man in college. I will do this without digging too deeply into this matter and all that this entails as many others have chronicled this before me. Why rehash stale controversies or attempt to cover new ground?

Many stories have been reported of Barry going to Pakistan to visit a college friend; to add mystery to this story, he is purported to have stayed in the Lahore Hilton International Hotel, swanky and expensive digs indeed for a starving college student.  This description of himself is paraphrased from “Dreams of my Father”, his 1st book as a “threadbare college student” during his time at Columbia University.

Some of the accounts have him visiting and going hunting with a future Prime Minister of Pakistan.  The credibility of these events are questionable at best as Obama fails to mentions this escapade in either of his books, though he makes mention of them in a press conference in August of 2008 in passing to Jake Tapper of CBS.  He makes this out to be cutting his teeth on foreign policy as he is eager to show what little experience he has had in this area.  The back-story was filled in, after the fact of his disclosure at the press conference, by several authors that wrote about Barry and his time in Pakistan.

As we move further through time, I purposely gloss over his time in Chicago for the sake of brevity and the fact that he is not on the national stage at this time.

The next conundrum was not mentioned in any news sources of note in our nation: Obama as a freshman Senator from Illinois went on a congressional fact finding tour to Perm Siberia in Russia with Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) in 2005 to verify the destruction of mobile missiles and their launchers under the Cooperative Threat Reduction program (CTR).

The trip was uneventful, that is, until it was time to depart the Russian military base where these inspections took place. All of a sudden, Barry and Senator Lugar were confronted and held by Russian authorities for three hours while the Russians sought permission to search the aircraft they were traveling in.

Senator Lugar does not make any mention of this incident in his after-action trip report; the Chicago Tribune has a small blurb in passing on August 29, 2005.  Numerous foreign news sources in Italy and other nations reveal that Barry was being held and questioned for espionage as being a spy for Britain. This is curious behavior from the Russians because the Cold War ended in 1991, and our nations have more to gain with mutual cooperation than hostility towards each other.  This type of behavior was the custom during earlier times of detente between our nations, though not in 2005.

Moving on to October of 2007, we have Hillary Clinton and Barry on a stage with two others. They have announced or soon will announce their intention to run for the Presidency.  Barry is shown with his hands clasped and not placing his hand across his heart as the National Anthem is played nor when the Pledge of Allegiance is recited.  He does not mouth the words to our Pledge either.  This is self-explanatory and requires no additional explanation as it shows a complete and utter disrespect to all that have fallen in the defense of this Nation and his lack of loyalty to the United States of America and it’s fifty Sovereign States.

Next up, we have Barry running for President, and the Birth Certificate issue surfaces, forcing Barry to post his alleged short form, or “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB), on his election website under “Fight the Smears” to quell claims that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii.  This document is declared a forgery by several sources.  The allegations still have merit (thanks to Donald Trump & Jerome Corsi) as the long-form version that was released in April 2011 has been deemed a forgery by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s investigators.  What the long-form does show is that he is ineligible to be President as he is not a natural born citizen and holds dual citizenship with Britain if he so chose to claim it.

(Note: a link to an 11 part series on how Obama released his forged long-form birth certificate may be of interest to the reader)

However, the definition by SCOTUS in Minor v. Happersett in 1875 precludes Barry from the Office of President, as he is not a “natural born citizen.” This Supreme Court decision is central to the question of eligibility as we step through the conundrum that is Barry Soetoro.

As we move down the list, we come to a bizarre occurrence that assisted Barry and has only come to light in July 2011 with the changing of references, citations, and text of Supreme Court Case documents at Justia.com during the run-up to the election in 2008.  This directly applies to the natural born citizenship or “birther” question for Barry.  Justia is an internet website that provides legal documents and case files for anyone that wishes to research federal, state, and Supreme Court decisions and case files as well as many other documents for the legal community.

Accusations of citation and textual changes were made to approximately 25 SCOTUS cases.  Leo Donofrio Esq. informed us about this discrepancy last July as he researched Boyd v. Nebraska and noticed anomalies with the returned data from Justia.  These cases define the body of law and precedence for the definition of a natural born citizen with Minor v. Happersett being front and center during the run-up to the election in 2008.

This is the only ruling SCOTUS has ever made in a unanimous decision by all nine Justices defining all the requirements of a natural born citizen.  Barry does not meet these requirements because his father was a British subject and was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his birth.

This deeply troubling issue can be found by using the query of “Justiagate” in your browser search window; it is an eye-opening read in its scope and it’s legally surgical precision of it‘s execution being a fait-accompli.  Not to be undone by such a turn of events, Barry had the Federal Election Commission declare naturalized citizens and others born under his circumstances eligible to hold the office of president, Minor v. Happersett be damned!  This is extraordinary when the scope and magnitude is considered and needs to be investigated; I won‘t hold my breath for any investigation from the Justice Department or the FBI from this regime.  Congress appears impotent and MIA on this matter as well and is baffling since they are a separate but equal branch of our government and should be actively pursuing this matter.

(Note: this is actually a hollow gesture by Obama as the election for the office president is in the hands of the 50 separate State Governments that comprise the United States of America; the only ones that are probably affected by this decision are the Territories of our Nation.)

Combine this issue with the “birth certificate(s)”, Obama’s “dual citizenship,” and being questioned by “Russian authorities,” and it is beginning to smell like a conspiracy or smelly rancid cheese; take your pick at the behest of some covert shadowy cabal that crosses international borders.

Then we have this from Mondo Frazier in his American Thinker article “Who is Barack Obama?” I attempted to verify this source; however, it appears to have been scrubbed by Obama’s internet crew:

One other oddity: in the fall of 2008, Obama admitted on his Fightthesmears.com site that he had held dual citizenship with both the United States and Great Britain (the site explained that this was due to Barack Obama, Sr. being a foreign national) until 1982.  Did the Russians know something about Obama’s citizenship in 2005 that ordinary Americans don’t know in 2011?

This first part has discussed who Barry was before he came onto the national stage with his early years and the mysterious trip to Pakistan, living a lifestyle he could ill afford given his threadbare description of his early years in his two autobiographies, which are now being considered works of fiction.  We were introduced to his bizarre trip to Russia after becoming a U.S. Senator and the reaction of the Russian Security service with claims of Obama being a British spy.  This is the introduction to what will dog our president with a four year saga with Obama’s “birth certificate,” with many of his other bona-fides being declared forgeries by law enforcement officials of the State of Arizona.

It culminates in the almost surreal exposure of Justiagate with the deliberate tampering of SCOTUS documents at Justia dot com.  The surgical precision indicates a skilful lawyer assisted with the tampering of these documents and the all-too-familiar fact that fortuitous circumstances have favored Obama being the recipient of all of these random acts of fate by unknown benefactors is a bridge too far for believability.

Part Two has Barry being elected and some of the more controversial actions he takes during the first few months of 2009 after being elected.

Related posts:

  1. Blindly Following Barack Hussein Obama: A Theory Ever since the high profile emergance of Barack Hussein Obama…
  2. Imagine Being A Member Of The United States Military With Barack Hussein Obama As Your Commander-in-Chief There is a new Obama fan and that would be…