Much ink has flowed over the recent apologies from President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and General John Allen, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, following the burning of copies of the Koran and their careless disposal. An apology may have been justified. A national mea culpa was not.
When the president of the United States speaks for the nation, a national apology for the misguided acts of soldiers on the other side of the world has little meaning other than to feed the suspicions and hatreds of an enemy who hates the United States anyway. Implying that “we the people” are somehow to blame only legitimizes retribution on a potentially greater scale. Follow-on apologies by the secretaries of defense and state potentially extends that culpability to U.S. service personnel and members of the State Department. This compounds the threat to Americans posed by religious fanatics in this global war against al Qaeda and its confederates.
What is in order is an examination of the purpose and results of our strategy in the War on Terror generally and Operation Enduring Freedom more specifically. These apologies weaken the United States in the eyes of the Taliban, further jeopardizing our troops, who are already facing the daunting task of withdrawing to meet a temporal deadline driven by domestic political considerations rather than strategic reality. An army in retreat faces the twin threat of an emboldened enemy anxious to exploit perceived weaknesses and a force whose mindset is on disengaging and going home and not on fighting to win. No one wants to be killed on the day we turned out the lights at Bagram Air Base.
While controversy rages over the apologies, questions concerning this sorry mess remain unanswered. Who was responsible for disposing the Korans? When it was discovered that prisoners were communicating through messages written in the Korans made available by the prison library, who made the decision to burn the books? Did anyone think that these messages might hold intelligence value? What might have been learned had the messages been copied and analyzed? Did anyone think to slap a security classification on those Korans and then send them in secure pouches to CIA headquarters for exploitation? Had this been done under proper security, not only might we have gained valuable knowledge about the Taliban and al Qaeda, it would have been far less likely this sorry mess would have ever arisen.
On the other hand, if the decision was to dispose the Korans, why wasn’t that done in a proper manner consistent with Islamic laws and traditions? In this kind of war, it is imperative that our warfighters understand the culture within which they are operating, especially concerning religious matters. Our enemies unabashedly acknowledge the nature of this conflict as a religious struggle—a jihad. When we deny that fact, we give the enemy a strategic advantage. Additionally, the otherwise “politically-correct” and “culturally-sensitive” U.S. armed forces seem to have their quota of chaplains for every possible religious faith, even wiccans. It is hard to believe there is not a Muslim chaplain assigned to NATO headquarters in Afghanistan. If so, was he consulted on the proper way to dispose Korans? Did that occur to anyone?
These oversights and mistakes, as consequential as they have become, do not rise to the level of an apology required by the president of the United States. Due to a needless knee-jerk reaction in Washington, a level of culpability probably not exceeding a letter of reprimand in a junior-level officer’s file has escalated into a sorry mess with enormous political and military implications. Several Americans were needlessly killed. High-ranking officers may suffer career-ending consequences.
In March 1968, a handful of American GIs commanded by Lt. William Calley murdered 501 South Vietnamese women, children, and old men. Calley eventually stood trial, was convicted of several counts of murder, and sentenced to life in prison at hard labor. He served one night in the post jail before receiving a presidential pardon. No one apologized to the Viet Cong—certainly not the president nor secretary of defense, neither of whom were in office when the incident occurred.
This My Lai massacre occurred at the start of the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam. Troop morale was plummeting. Military leadership, from the top down, was out of touch with the true nature of the war.
History should not be ignored. Apologizing to the enemy reflects a gross misunderstanding of the purpose and realities to which “we the people” commit our armed forces in our national interest. We go to war with regret, but without debasing ourselves in what are, essentially, meaningless expressions of hand wringing. The real sorry mess is in our strategic assumptions and those who are responsible for articulating them.
Related posts:
- O’Reilly: Obama Will Face Impeachment If He Pardons Illegals Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly is warning that if President Barack…
- The Growing IRS Mess Boy, is our tax system in a mess. The mess…
No related posts.
Blue lips is always apologizing to the muslims but he sure as hell don't mind screwing catholics and other christians.The whole socialist democrat party feels that way.Who really in America that are real Americans give a damn if they torch the koran,ragheads torch the bible but in the Obuma administration that's exceptable
Right on Edward, my thoughts as well. Blue lips goes out of his way to apologize to Muslims, never are their apologies for burning the Bible or the American flag or Manicans of US Presidents. Furthermore, Never does blue lips apologize to this Country for far greater atrocities than a burning of a book, such as all the deaths that have occurred from his and Holders "fast and Furious" folly, Or apologies for a nearly 16 trillion dollar debt.
in 2007 he called Bush irresponsible and unpatriotic for raising the debt 5 trillion dollars to 9 trillion in a 8 yr period.
Obama has nearly doubled our nation debt in 4 yrs, so does that make him irresponsible and unpatriotic also? Of course not, Its Bushs fault, Clintons fault, Reagons Fault, Republicans fault, Tea Parties Fault and the Easter bunnies fault even though We have a Democratic Controlled Senate by which has failed repeatedly to do anything to hear and vote on any bills from the house.
Let me guess, its Christians fault and Bush's fault that the Democratic Controlled Senate does nothing.
You will never hear an apology from Obama or Holder or anyone else from this Administration unless it deals with insulting Muslims or Blacks.
Even though he stated in 2009, he will be "accountable" for this nation. He has yet to take responsibility for any of the mess he has created, but quick to try to take credit for others success.
For you libtards with short memory of all the lies Obama says, here is a refresher of what he said in 2009.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCN5-ovvFL0
Obama has proven himself the most anti-America occupant of the White House in history, bar none.