Police Shoot Two Innocent Female Pedestrians, Blame Unarmed Man


This one is a gem.

Two of the NYPD’s finest decided to open fire on an unarmed, mentally disturbed man outside New York’s Port Authority Bus Terminal. His capital offense–wandering through traffic.

Though these defenders of the realm missed their target, they did manage to shoot two women who had the impudence to be on the scene.

And now for the MOST unbelievable part of the story–New York’s DA has charged the mentally disturbed man with ASSAULTING the women! As Assistant DA Shannon Lucey puts it, “The defendant is the one that created the situation that injured innocent bystanders.”

So New York City apparently now has a “Situation Statute!” Create a situation that prompts certain NY police officers to reveal their mind-numbing stupidity, and the powers that be will put you in the slam.

According to National Review contributor Mark Steyn, “The defendant is looking at 25 years in jail for the crime of provoking law enforcement into shooting random citizens. If this flies in New York, then there is no law.”

For years, Nanny State, anti-gun liberals have argued that only police officers and government officials should be permitted to carry firearms. You know…they’re just more competent, more experienced, better trained, and clearly more concerned with the welfare of the Serf class than are members of the Serf class themselves! Indeed, right now, New York Governor Cuomo is busily confiscating firearms from New York residents because it’s just too dangerous for extraneous little civilians to own weapons!

Anyone want to give odds on New York City’s new Communist Mayor, or the state’s Marxist governor demanding that these trigger happy imbeciles be thrown off the police force?

Yeah, me neither.


Photo credit: coleyboley (Creative Commons)

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. Larry Cates says:

    I hope these women sue the pants right off the Keystone cops and the NYPD.

  2. Does anyone want to create a situation in NY where an armed citizen shoots cops, just like the cops shot those 2 women? That way, under NY's way of thinking, the cops can be arrested for some BS too….

  3. Seeks_the_truth says:

    One point for all to remember: Law Enforcement only carry a firearm for THEIR defense, NOT for the protection of citizens.
    Law Enforcement also has NO Constitutional duty to PROTECT a citizen EVEN when they have an order of protection (Castle Rock vs. Gonzales).

    Welcome to The Machine.

    • Edwardkoziol says:

      Seeks are you saying that if 2 policemen come upon a say bank robbery they shouldn't do anything unless they are fired upon by the crooks.Wow I didn't know this and as you know I trust what you say because you put a lot of research in your answers.

      • Seeks_the_truth says:

        Law Enforcement has the right to fire on ANYONE that they feel threatened by. That's the 'self defense' part. Remember the cop that fired on the minivan with a woman who had fled arrest 3 times and her kid got out and attacked the original officer? The cop felt 'threatened'.

        In fact, even RETIRED law enforcement can carry concealed even if state law states NO citizen can concealed carry. http://www.fop.net/legislative/issues/hr218/hr218

        Read the decision on the Castle Rock vs. Gonzales verdict. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_04_

        Everyone needs to remember who the REAL enemy is.

  4. Edwardkoziol says:

    My opinion is we better have a better way of selecting who should be a police person.I'm amazed that there was shooting when the mental patient didn't have a gun.

Speak Your Mind