Financial Ruin: What do you call a budget that boosts spending $227 billion, adds $329 billion to an already huge deficit, and does nothing to fix the entitlement crisis? If you’re President Obama, it’s called “fiscal responsibility.”
In the message Obama attached to his 2013 budget, he claimed that he’s “taken many steps to reestablish fiscal responsibility.”
But his budget is a colossal monument to irresponsibility, continuing a deficit-fueled spending spree that will take the country ever closer to fiscal ruin.
Just how big is this budget’s spending splurge? Among other things:
• It increases projected federal spending for this year and next by a total of $227 billion, and adds $329 billion to projected deficits for those years.
Related posts:
- Budget Blowout! Deficit 4X Higher Than Last Year The United States posted an $82.69 billion deficit in April,…
- Is This A Joke Headline? ‘Obama To Order $100 Million In Budget Cuts’ By Tim Graham What happens when the White House publicity…
Get Informed! Read More About this topic::
- Obama Admin Projects $1.2T 2012 Budget Deficit WASHINGTON (Official Wire) — White House predicts this year’s federal...
IMPEACH OBAMA
As a fellow Republican who is vitally interested in this country's health and overall relevant happiness, I would like to comment on the current situation with respect to the current candidates running for the position of being the nominee who will run against Obama. I have spent a lot of time analyzing and assessing these candidates and their road ahead in this campaign. I think that in order to arrive at the ideal Republican candidate, it is absolutely necessary to analyze Obama. As we all know, Obama's philosophies concerning dealing with the 'organizing" of the neighborhood, which in this case is America, is rooted in his following the messages in his comrade Saul Alinsky's little red book. This is a clue. However, to such a devout follower of Marxist ideologies, Obama's narcissism has broadened his scope of a neighborhood to include all of America, if not the world eventually. In his narcissistic and arrogant mind-set, he believes he is incapable of doing anything wrong or making a wrong decision. As such a person, he is also an illusionist and a weaver of smoke and mirrors who will always make promises that will always be misunderstood by the voter. Obama is a master of debating as McCain and Hillary found out. In the nationally televised debates before the American public he wiped the floor with all contestants. He is capable of such a high level of persuading public involvement with his smoke and mirrors illusions that very few candidates can overcome him.
The main Republican candidates, Romney, Santorum and Gingrich fall into only 2 categories…those who can out-debate Obama and those who cannot. The public continues to search for God's name on the list of candidates. They want a Mr. Nice Guy, one who is the most religious, most family oriented, the kindest and most considerate and the most respectable and the nicest. They want a candidate who is totally without baggage of any kind. They have not thought about who can beat Obama. They have not thought that far ahead and that is EXACTLY where their focus should be. It should not be focused on the past or even the present platforms of each…but on the future. For all practical purposes, McCain and Hillary had virtually no baggage, were religious to a certain extent, were family oriented and nice and considerate. We saw what Obama did to them. He wiped the floor with them and American believed his illusions. Look what it has cost us. We need a candidate who is capable of debating Obama at least on the level of the notorious, late William F. Buckley Jr., the ultimate master of the art of debating. It is an absolute certain 100% guarantee that neither Romney nor Santorum are debaters and that has been shown in the states' debates seen thus far. There were misspeaks, flounders, pauses of uncertainty everywhere. Just one single one of those when debating Obama and he will return for another term. I stongly believe that the only candidate capable of debating Obama is Gingrich. He alone has the mastery of the art of debating to the level of Buckley. That and his inordinate level of government and total recall of history puts him a rung up on even Buckley. Gingrich may very well not be MY candidate of choice when it comes to Mr. Wonderful but he is the only one who can expose and defeat Obama by publically showing the televised audience what a liar and narcissist Obama actually is. If ANYONE other than Gingrich is nominated, the Republican party will suffer the defeat of their lifetime. If the voters of this nation continue to dwell on the silly expectations of a candidate with no baggage and religion and family-oriented and who made the most money in business, if the voter is willing to do those things, then that voter is more than willing to return Obama for another term as president.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Dr. Anthony Thannisch
What you say makes total sense, but something that I read called Gingrich a progressive. Do you have any opinion about how Gingrich would be as President?
Ha ha ha That is an EXTREMELY good question. As most Americans I would hope for Mr. Perfect. Who wouldn't? After all, I too am interested in having a president that has ALL people in mind and doing what is best for the PEOPLE, not a bunch of over-inflated idiots in Wash. D.C. Guess I am just too much of an idealist. However, given the choices we DO have as candidates and who we DO have for a president…..no matter who IS elected would be infinitely better than Obama. The problem is….electing someone who can defeat the idiot. The states are all holding their conventions and debates and hoopla things and we are finding out who will do what to whom and who is the best at this and that. It is a given that all these guys are pretty much just about the same. Another thing that is just about the same is that they will all say one thing and do another when/if elected to the presidency. People do not realize though that none of our candidates are narcissists. Only a total narcissistic egomaniac would make promises of change and, all the while, the in-the-dark voters have no idea what that means. Too late. Now we know. And, because the presidency is under the nuclear powered national microscope of public scrutiny by ever living soul, it is impossible that Gingrich or anyone else could sneeze without it being televised, scrutinized an publicized on the second. Actually, I am also a VERY big proponent of Women's rights and my favorite candidates are Palin and Bachmann. If I had my very best choice of people I would select for the presidency and v.p would be those two. But, they are not there unfortunately. I absolutely must overlook baggage as far as marital problems and political baggage. One thing that I thought of was the fact that when Gingrich did what he is supposed to have done, that microscope was not on him. It was on the presidents whom he served with. As a president, the microscope will be on him. One of this country's favorite presidents was the Democrat John F. Kennedy. Now there is some heavy duty marital baggage. I absolutely must focus on one single thing….who can out-debate Obama during the national debates and that is all. Gingrich is the only person who can do that and expose Obama for what he is….a liar and a thief of dreams. And it is without a single shred of remorse. He has destroyed this nation for generations and generations to come. It is well known that ALL of his programs, for the most part, have been financed and implemented for the "entitlement" segment of society, those who are the recipients of "sharing the wealth". Those are the ones on massive welfare and food stamps. It was only Gingrich who had the nerve to point out that this president is known as the Food Stamp president. None of the other candidates had the nerve to point this out. Gingrich did. And, it is that very level of TRUTH that will evict Obama.
A good debater does not make a good president and the proof of that is Obuma.The lies flow like sweet music out of the evil one throat and that poor sap Senor McCain couldn't hold a candle to him.Any republican should be able to beat him as long as they run a smart campaign.Last do you really think Obuma would give Newt more then 3 debates and the press would not cover Newt in a fair way.
While you are correct in Obuma's debate abilities and annihilation of McCain and Hillary, it showed me one important thing…he is a master at debating and it is done with his unspoken and hidden meanings. I believe that because he was black and the media was so terrible soft on him out of fear of appearing to be politically correct, that they gave him an unbelievable pass with virtually no investigating of his background. I, and millions of voters have watched the debates b/t Santorum and the others and we have seen them falter, flounder and make near-fatal debate mistakes to the point that they lost points. None of them demonstrated the nerve nor the cajones Gingrich had. He is the one candidate who could care less and is absolutely unwilling to sacrifice his beliefs for the sake of "appearing" politically correct. He is not one to prostitute his beliefs for the mere sake of appearances and appealing to anyone…esp. the "entitlement" segment of society. No, I believe you are wrong. Not just ANY Republican can beat Obama. I still say that whoever is thrown in the debate arena with Obama had most assuredly better be a quintessential debater. Romney and Santorum, while they have their very good and very positive points, are not debaters at all and I believe Obama would slaughter them outright. I am sure you have heard of William F. Buckley Jr. and know of his reputation. That is the level of debating art the Republicans need, a Vlad the Impaler so to speak. Tied with Gingrich's ability, he has had years of govt. service and has shown many of the old establishment that he will not be pushed around. That is why they fear him. They know that there is much of what they will not be able to get away with once he enters. No, I do not think Obama will want to give Gingrich even one debate but may be forced to for fear of being beaten. The other candidates….he is more than willing to give them as many as they can stand but not Gingrich. If Obama will not give Gingrich the debates he wants, believe me, Gingrich will humiliate him so badly publically that Obama will be exposed to the ultimate humiliation nationally. His sterling reputation will melt away even in the eyes of those who support him.
the devil{ovomit}has taken steps to try to destroy this country,we the people will not allow this illegal upsurp musmutt. to continue to do so.lucifer and his band of treasonous traders.holdup,kagan,pelosi,reid,napalitano,doj,doh,epa,federal reserve,un people.have all been exposed and noted for there treasonous deeds and will be held accountably for there treasonous deeds.and to all politicians for doing nothing to stop these these traders from destroying the constitution.and for aiding and abetting these traders.you will be held accountably for your in actions of said deeds.good bless all american veterans and all american citizens
Barack's delusional, if he thinks he'll get reelected in November!
Don't be so sure, with his Chicago-style politics and actions. Get out the vote!
Let me say this this clown knew his budget stunk and that his own party tells him it sucks.The welfare people who wouldn't know what a budget is because Obummer gives them everything while he wantsto get his black paws into the so called riches pockets.Everyone blames congress for not passing bills but I never hear the press blaming that slimmy Harry Reed for tableing ever bill congress sends the little dwarf.
You have a point here.