Obama Adviser: House GOP Resemble Arsonists, Terrorists

white house5738 300x224 Obama Adviser: House GOP Resemble Arsonists, Terrorists

Viciously attacking anyone who disagrees with Obama has been a common theme of this administration. Senior White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer built on that despicable record during a recent CNN interview by lobbing a number of incendiary accusations in the direction of House Republicans.

Just hours after GOP leaders compiled a prospective list of requirements the House would include in a vote to raise the debt ceiling, Pfeiffer appeared with host Jake Tapper to engage in the type of name-calling for which his party has become known.

He indicated the White House has no interest in negotiating with Republicans, who he described as “people with a bomb strapped to their chest.”

In addition to a suicide bomber, Pfeiffer later said the controlling party in the House also resembles a group of arsonists.

“It’s a negotiation if I’m trying to sell you my house and we are debating the price of it,” he said. “It’s not a negotiation if I show up at your house and say, ‘Give me everything inside or I’m going to burn it down.’”

For good measure, he chose a third inflammatory attack in the mix, contending the GOP’s attempt at compromise amounts to “essentially ransom demands.”

The House, which seeks an ObamaCare delay, progress on the Keystone XL pipeline, and cuts in entitlement spending, is just doing its job by embracing some level of fiscal responsibility. The Obama administration, on the other hand, just wants unfettered access to even more capital after completely wasting trillions of dollars.

Instead of throwing good money after bad, the House is trying to enact responsible measures that might one day put America back on the path to economic solvency. Whether those efforts will ultimately be successful or not remains to be seen.

One thing, however, is clear: anything short of issuing a blank check to this president will be met with derision and vilification by administration thugs like Pfeiffer.

Learn more about the author of this article here.


"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. Linda From NY says:

    Obama, Holder, Pelosi, Reid, Hilary and Dan Pfeiffer, Jarrett and more to this list, they all are thugs, they want more money to continued doing the same old thing which is wasting trillions of dollars, while every day more Americans are hurting by their losing jobs, and their homes.

    On Nov 6 it will be a year of Forward, where is the Forward? Forward to more poverty?

  2. MuslimLuvChrist says:

    10/1 optout.org: You are not required to purchase health insurance through an Obamacare exchange! There are cheaper, better options. REASONS OBAMACARELESSJOBKILLER OCLJK IS BAD FOR YOU:
    INEQUALITY: Signing up for OCLJK will force Millennials to pay more to cover costs for the wealthier. Rates will increase by an average of 169% for the young while older people will pay about 22% less.
    INCONSISTENCY: OCLJK is full of exceptions for those connected enough to get special favors, mostly corporate cronies, congress and their special friends. These inconsistencies contribute to businesses avoiding OCLJK by shifting to more part-time positions-hurting those looking for jobs after graduation.
    1 Don’t I have to buy into OCLJK? Isn’t it illegal to not buy OCLJK insurance? No. There is a relatively small tax (ITS NOT A TAX) associated with not buying government-approved health insurance, but you can pay that small penalty and buy a health insurance plan that meets your individual needs.
    2 Why would I turn down government assistance to buy health care? It’ll be cheaper (or free) if I get it from the government, right? No. It will be more expensive and it will certainly not be free.
    3 Isn’t healthier people covering costs for the sick how insurance works? No. Insurance is about protecting individuals against unexpected and costly events.
    4 Even if OCLJK is a generational transfer of wealth, won’t young people benefit from it in the long-run? Unfortunately, no. The Millennial generation (those of us that are currently 18-29) will not benefit from OCLJK the same way current older Americans will.
    5 I don’t like OCLJK, but I support a single payer system. What’s your position on that? We do not think that more government is the solution. But we’re glad to work with you on opposing OCLJK. This entire scheme is a huge handout to corporate interests — massive insurance companies, hospitals and drug companies. Big government propping up big business isn’t OK. Hopefully, we can convince you that a health care system based on freedom and competition will lead to more health care coverage and better quality care than a single-payer system. But let’s have that debate without lining the pockets of big business at young Americans’ expense. WORK OUT YOUR BEST HEALTH CARE SOLUTION AT OPTOUT.ORG

  3. MuslimLuvChrist says:

    If Congress does not strike a deal to raise the debt limit and avoid a default, AND the U.S. defaulted on some of its obligations, the S&P rater would automatically place the U.S. under the 'SD' or selective default rating. Once the nation caught up with its bills (US CAN NOT PAY ALL ITS BILLS), the U.S. would get a new rating, which based on previous defaults would sink somewhere between 'CCC+' and 'B.' But even in previous events, S&P noted that no nation had thus far willingly defaulted (IF OBAMA WILLINGLY DEFAULTS THEN FINALLY USE THE I-WORD IN CONGRESS) on their obligations, as would be the case if lawmakers failed to strike a deal to boost the borrowing cap.

Speak Your Mind