Liberal Judge Strikes Down OK’s New Anti-Sharia Law

Sharia SC Liberal Judge Strikes Down OKs New Anti Sharia Law

Of course, she’s a liberal. They’re the only kind of people that would do this out of “Political Correctness”. Recently, Oklahoma (one of the reddest states in the country) passed a new amendment to its Constitution stating that Sharia law (Islamic Law) cannot be used in any way in their courts. Sounds good to me. Only American laws should be applied in American courts.

Now, this judge,Vicki Miles-LaGrange, takes it upon herself to toss this into the trash. According to the Tulsa World:

An Oklahoma constitutional amendment that would bar the state’s courts from considering or using Sharia law was ruled unconstitutional Thursday by a federal judge in Oklahoma City.

In finding the law in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause, U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the certification of the results of the state question that put the Sharia law ban into the state constitution.

“While the public has an interest in the will of the voters being carried out, the Court finds that the public has a more profound and long-term interest in upholding an individual’s constitutional rights,” the judge wrote.

Now, nit-picking this isn’t even necessary. The judge ultimately gives herself the mindset of a person who knows what’s best for everyone. The judge thinks this is violating someone’s rights; but in reality (and not her liberal, nannyist fantasy land), this was meant to protect people’s rights.

Sharia law should not and cannot be used in this land. Our laws are so much different from Sharia. Accepting Sharia law in our courts, US courts, just to please a few Muslims so they can manipulate America into what they envision, is a dangerous thing. Judges are idiots when they consider someone else’s law, especially when it’s not the law of this land.

You can call me a bigot and an islamophobic idiot all you want; but when you start seeing Sharia Law used in our courts more and more often (as if the courts weren’t abused enough), you’ll start whining about the unfairness of it. They won’t care by then. Their transformation of America will be too far along to easily stop it. And they won’t care about it’s “unfairness.”

Just look at all the Islamic countries in the Middle East. Do they care about minority rights? Do they care about what they do to people of another religion? NO! That’s why you see Muslims burning churches in other Islamic countries. That’s why you see Muslims angry when people don’t abide by Sharia Law. That’s why gays are lynched in many of those countries, too. If you’re a pro-homosexuality kind of person, go to Iran or Saudi Arabia and see how long you last. I doubt it’ll be long when you start talking.

I don’t know what this judge was thinking; but in doing this, she opened the door for more court abuse the state of Oklahoma doesn’t need. Oklahoma is still trying to recover from that devastating tornado months ago. They don’t need someone to come to their state and force laws from another country onto them. That’s not what they need. I read this judge’s wiki page, and there was a state senator calling for her impeachment. I fully support you in your endeavors, you brave Senator; and I wish you good luck.

Photo credit: AsianMedia (Creative Commons)

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. If the law had stated that ANY LAW FROM ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY (not just Sharia Law, but FRENCH LAW, CANADIAN LAW, etc.) can not be used in Oklahoma's courts, it might have passed Constitutional muster. The law is wrong solely because it singles out ONLY ONE TYPE OF LAW while not banning ALL FOREIGN LAW. Why should a non-American law be usable solely because it is not Sharia Law? The answer is simple: it should NOT. If the legislature reworks this law as I have stated, it would seem to be Constitutional on the grounds that America (the USA) should be governed by American laws (and no other such laws).

  2. Linda From NY says:

    This political correctness by Liberal Fools is what is destroying this Country, this judge needs to be removed, she has lost her mind. We do not need foreign laws, in our Country, if these muslims want sharia law then they need to go back to their country. We have our American laws not this crap of sharia law.

  3. MuslimLuvChrist says:

    This she judge should adhere to Sharia right now by wearing a burka, giving up her judgeship, being bitch slapped when speaking in front of men, and being chained between the kitchen and bed. Does she know how women are treated under Sharia. She should live in hell for a couple of weeks before making a ruling like this!

  4. I think all these whacko liberals should have an awakening themselves. Make them go to Pakistan and cite Bible verses on the street corner, then they will see Sharia law for exactly what it is. I doubt the real American people want to have our women subjugated and forced to wear a burka, not be able to drive etc. Careful what you wish for liberals, you may not like the turd that comes out the other end.

  5. It is unconstitutional to create laws that specifically single out one religion.

    • Seeks_the_truth says:

      But it's not singling out a 'religion'. It is singling out a system of laws and rules that are BASED on a 'religion'. Big difference there.
      Sharia law is a system of governce and rule that would superceed our Constitution. This makes it unconstitutional.
      While as a muslim, you may have certain rights by your system, doesn't mean you are entitled to these same laws in America.
      America says we have the right to free speech and freedom of religion. In the muslim 'faith', only islamic law is allowed. Our laws trump any other for all American citizens.
      If a Christian and a muslim face each other in a court of law, American law will rule.
      Therefore you must be very clear. Is it a religion or is it a type of rule? If it is a type of rule, it is unconstitutional and can not be enforced.
      After all, sharia law is just a codification of the koran.

  6. Seeks_the_truth says:

    The muslims are starting to be exposed. This is not against a religion but against a type of rule BASED on a religion.
    After all, sharia law is just a codification of their koran.
    It can not be used in American courts. We have freedom of speech and freedom of religion, but sharia law has nothing to do with either.
    It is unconstitutional for someone to attempt to use a foreign judicial system in America. Two muslims might be allowed to use this rule between themselves but if it's tried to use with anyone else, it will fail.
    Our Constitution trumps all foreign laws.

  7. What ever kind of law is chosen, it must do complete justification to all people with equal rights that's what every one are expecting to happen. My pal suggested Criminal Defence Lawyer Vaughan for the best legal services which they are offering. As they are justifying the clients.

  8. This blog providing so many interesting content services. But here we seen the content is very helpful to all the law students and liberal judge strikes and more informational services are providing to everyone.

Speak Your Mind