Lawmakers “Accidentally” Legalize Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners’ Homes

Guns SC Lawmakers “Accidentally” legalize warrantless invasion of gun owners homes

UPDATE 2/23/13: the assault weapons bill that was proposed in the Washington State Legislature has died.

Lawmakers in Washington State have accidentally written a bill permitting police to invade private homes for the purpose of confiscating “illegal” guns and accessories, such as magazines that hold over 10 rounds.

According to Senate Bill 5737, introduced on February 13th by Democrat State Senators Murray, Kohl-Welles, and Kline, no one may possess an “assault weapon” or the combination of a semi-automatic pistol or rifle capable of using a detachable magazine AND any magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammo.

Happily, however, you ARE allowed to possess an UNLOADED assault weapon “…for the purpose of permanently relinquishing it to a law enforcement agency of the state.”  (Pg. 6)

Naturally, the statute would NOT apply to police, members of law enforcement in the state, or to federal authorities; in short, the oft-referred to “only ones.” That is, the only ones, the political ruling class tells us, who can be trusted with firearms.

However, if one happens to own an “assault weapon” prior to the effective date of the legislation, he may keep it IF he agrees to “safely and securely store the assault weapon.” And by the way, “THE SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY MAY, NO MORE THAN ONCE PER YEAR, CONDUCT AN INSPECTION TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE…” Not surprisingly, safe and secure storage is not defined in the bill. (Pg. 7)

Also not surprisingly, this language was quickly deleted from the bill immediately upon lawmakers learning of the public outrage their little foray into dictatorship had spawned.

Yet, in order to provide cover for the bill’s sponsors and fellow liberals, duplicitous “journalist” Danny Westneat is hoping to sell Washington gun owners on the laughable story that the whole thing was just an unfortunate mistake! According to Westneat, one of the bill’s sponsors, Democrat Adam Kline “…did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.” Naturally, ALL prospective laws should be written without paying much attention to what’s in them!

And the PRIME sponsor, Democrat Ed Murray, admitted that the language was “probably unconstitutional.” “I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” allowed the munificent liberal.

PROBABLY unconstitutional?  Here is the 4th Amendment to the Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

And by the way, MR. Murray, how were your “only ones” to know which homes to enter and search? Could it be that mandatory, statewide gun registration was to become the next in your series of “common sense” gun laws?

But even with the Orwellian language now removed, SB 5737 is an affront to the God-given rights of the American people. After all, the bill still states that, should one inherit an “assault weapon,” he must either dispose of it by allowing law enforcement to confiscate it or permanently disable it. It is government literally authorizing the theft or destruction of personal property. Anyone who objects will be subject to one year in prison.

As for the claim by the bill’s authors that it was a mistake, a misstep? “It’s a “misstep” because they said what they want to do.  They gave away what their plan is.” The truth is, “it’s not a misstep, it’s the next step.”

Freedom-loving Americans must understand that the left will never stop their assault on our liberty until WE FINALLY STOP THEM.

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >


  1. These ledislators in Wa. should lose their positions now and don't wait for their term to end. Oust them now!!

    • Tricia Anthone says:

      Totally agree! This is evidently how ObamaCare passed. ONLY ONE lawmaker was said to have "had it read" (by hiring a team of people to read some of it each) before it was called to a vote and narrowly passed. ONLY ONE – and that lawmaker himself did not (could not have due to the volume of pages and the time alloted) READ THE WHOLE THING before signing it to LAW. This is irresponsible in the EXTREME. Those who sign a bill of LAW without reading it should loose their job, be forever ineligible to hold office and be charged with a crime. To foist the ham-fisted power of the Federal Government upon citizens without consideration for the contents of a law nor it's unintended consequences is a reckless act, and those lawmakers found guilty of it should pay a very steep price.

  2. The Law makers in Wasington did not know that this inspection clause was in the bill and it was a mistake is, as everyone with any brains knows, a bunch of B.S. Nice try!!!!

  3. Idiots! Who are the ones voting these people in office?!

  4. lets pass a bill then read it we have more time then ??

Speak Your Mind