Florida Judge Quotes Christmas Movie In Ruling Obama Eligible

Barack Obama 10 SC Florida Judge Quotes Christmas Movie In Ruling Obama Eligible

Florida Democrat Michael Voeltz had filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States and claimed that he was a threat to the safety and security of the United States. Larry Klayman, founder of Freedom WatchUSA served as Voeltz’s attorney on the case.

On Dec. 13, Florida Circuit Court of Leon County Judge Kevin Carroll gave the plaintiffs until Dec. 23 to respond to Obama’s attorneys’ motion to dismiss the case. However, Judge Carroll went against his own order and dismissed the case on the 21st. In his dismissal, Carroll wrote:

“This court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses and meets with congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world.”
“As this matter has come before the court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film ‘Miracle on 34th St.’ ‘Since the United States Government declares this man to be president, this court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.’”

Carroll’s dismissal was immediately challenged by Klayman claiming that the judge prematurely dismissed the case without a proper hearing as described by state law. Klayman explained:

“This act also flies in the face of this court’s own order of Dec. 13, 2012, which was law of the case.”

“This court had a statutory duty under the Florida Election laws, the Florida and U.S. Constitutions, and 3 U.S.C. Section 5, to adjudicate defendant Obama’s eligibility and his alleged fraudulent acts expeditiously, timely, and before the electors met on Dec. 17, 2012, and before the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2013. Thus, this court also violated these law is dismissing the complaint summarily.”

“This court seems to want to sidestep having to reach these serious and important matters before it.”

Klayman also noted that Judge Carroll made an inappropriate remark concerning a friend of his who had been appointed to a federal post by Obama and indicated that it may demonstrate bias on the part of the judge.

Read More at politicaloutcast.com . By Dave Jolly.

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. Kansas voters chose to ban Obama from November’s General Election ballot. They may or may not have considered courts role in this issue, but the point was made. Courts do have limitations as well as obligations in every state. Homesteading in elected office, as Floria’s judge suggests, is not a comforting precedent.

    When elected office, especially at a federal level, starts resembling practices found in real estate businesses, Americans had better defend their 2nd Ammendment right to bear arms in defense of privacy, property and personhood. Presumed privilege of office isn’t the same as legitimacy in office for citizens or political party members. It may be that both Republicans and Democrats have for years chosen to formally and through accepted institutional form claim rights to sovereignty in professional practice from certain elected heads of state or legislation.

  2. Governor Abercrombie of Hawaii understands what political midgetry is, not because he is short in physical stature, but because his public statement about having seen Obama’s birth certificate did not address whether or not it was counterfeit. A copy is posted on the internet for free. It looks like a fake.

    At this point, it may not matter if Congress had already determined how to deal with this strange issue of Obama not having his own birth certificate in possession since his first run for President. It’s even stranger how Arizona officials filed a lawsuit about needing to obtain a copy last year then said nothing about it to the rest of America. Now, it’s seen for free along with two big tits on news internet site from Maui.

    I reported it to Donald Rumsfeld and my other formal contacts. This is a factual statement. I even called two not for profit organizations on the island to report this incident. News wire incitement is a problem. As Obama. Vacations in Kailua Oahu this weekend, inquiring minds want to know if he has seen this Obama birth certificate on the internet site blaming NRA for murder of children.

  3. VirgoVince says:

    The judge took the easy way out, he did what he was told to do, NOT what was RIGHT!!
    Get your hipboots and ladders ready folks, the bullshit is going to start flowing like a river and will soon bury us!! WE'RE already knee-deep!!

    • Edwardkoziol says:

      Vince all judges will take the easy way out because none them want to be called racist.Every liberal coon will be up in arms if this actually goes to court,hell Vince you can't find a senator or congressperson with balls to relly try to find out if Sambo is legal or not even those Tea Party politicians.

      • And isn't it pathetic that the very reasons you gave should keep ANYONE from doing the RIGHT thing?? House and Senate ALL know the truth and the facts, they just can't figure what's RIGHT!!
        WHY should anyone in their RIGHT mind give a damn about the 'coons' or 'sambo' or being 'racist' and WHY not do what's RIGHT for OUR country????
        How much has any of them even tried????

  4. I KNOW ONE THING WE ARE NOT–NOT–NOT GOING TO GET OUR COUNTRY BACK BY THE JUDGES, THEY ARE COMMUNIST OR COWARDS & work for this communist party IN D.C. I THINK THERE MAY ONLY BE ONE WAY TO GET THIS COUNTRY BACK ( THE HARD WAY ) .

  5. Another idiot judge who thinks more of his career than what's best for America and Americans,

    Thanks judge, you stayed true to your colors!!

  6. They got to this Judge!!!

  7. Excuses, excuses, excuses. That seems to be the grounds of dismissal for a majority of these cases. They're not real legitimate reasons for dismissal. They're excuses and petty ones at that. "Oh, we can't make a ruling because it will interfere with the president's schedule.", "Oh, we can't make a ruling because it is election time.", "Oh, we can't make a ruling because it could offend people.", "Oh, we can't make a ruling because he's not an official candidate.", "Oh, we can't make a ruling because this is the wrong time." or the most outrageous one of all, "Oh, we can't make a ruling because you lack standing." Gee, I didn't realize being fluent in bull$#*t was required before becoming a judge. This is how the judge decided to base his dismissal? By quoting a movie? Talk about missing the point. Was he asleep during the proceedings? Either he was afraid of what might happen, was threatened, or he was paid off.

  8. Folks, there is NO way to remove this imposter from office legally. He has his thieving tentacles in every branch of gov't and courts. There is NO fighting him on legal grounds, we can't win. We have a substantial amount of proof the sky is blue, but a judge says it's plaid. Doesn't matter what we all see, the judge says it's plaid. Now go back to work so some illegal alien or drug-head can have a free phone, food and Lexus.

    There is no way to fight him fairly because he and his minions are not fighting fairly. So, what then, you ask? Exactly.

Speak Your Mind

*