Did Obama Stage Benghazi Attack?

Obama Car Libya Flag SC Flicker.com CC 5914760451 0281079446 z Did Obama Stage Benghazi Attack?

I received a phone call from an old friend that has been in Washington D.C. for years and is fairly well-connected politically. What she told me was ugly and sinister, yet very compelling. She said she had received information from someone high up in White House circles, and wanted my thoughts. No, there is no leaked email, no concrete proof, and this article is based on “hearsay.” I’m not one that usually engages in or repeats hearsay, but if this is true, it could be the biggest story in 50 years.

According to her, Barack Obama, wanting an “October Surprise,” had secretly arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood for a kidnapping of our ambassador. Then sometime in October before the election Obama was to orchestrate some great military action to rescue Ambassador Stevens, causing all of America to cheer Obama’s strong foreign policy and bravery and making him look like a hero. After all, his supposed killing of Osama Bin Laden bounce had long since faded. Thus, sweeping him to victory in November. Imagine the headlines and talking points. The election would be a lock. The Muslim Brotherhood has every reason to want Obama re-elected in November and have an American President sympathetic to their causes. Not to mention an administration filled with Muslim appeasers. Therefore, they agreed to aid in these theatrics. Unfortunately for Ambassador Stevens and three others, the Brotherhood could not control the hired thugs that were to perform the kidnapping and things escalated and four American lives were lost. Panic set in at the White House and with little time to place blame as far away from Obama as they could, they settled on a ridiculous fairy tale about an irrelevant video posted four months prior on YouTube and ran with it. Barack Obama even ran with it after evidence showed he knew better and ran with it all the way to his speech at the U.N.

So now, they are admitting it was a terrorist attack. They are admitting that the State Department had denied requests for more security from Washington, but nobody told them. Blame anyone but Barack Obama. I’m betting the White House is smirking and perfectly happy to be accused of having a breakdown in communication as opposed to the alternative. This scenario, if true, more than satisfies my common sense gland.

Photo Credit: osipovva

Related posts:

  1. New Ad Asks Why Obama Won’t Call Benghazi A Terrorist Attack This is a serious problem. America will not be safe…
  2. Romney: We Sure Didn’t Get Transparency From Obama On Benghazi Attack Mitt Romney talks to Sean Hannity regarding Obama’s response to…
"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. reportanddeport says:

    This is very good and very intriguing, that Barack Ovomit staged the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya.
    Now, though I can't bring myself to actually believe he did it, I do think it merits investigation. As we know, Ovomit has ZERO loyalty to the United States of America, and we also know that he puts his own personal power above our country, our Constitution and the American people. So yes, he would have no moral qualms about doing it.
    BUT, for him to arrange a scheme to make himself look like an actual rescuer of the American Ambassador, seems a bit too ambitious for such a lazy person to take on. And though Ovomit and his zombielike supporters consider him to be a genius, I think that even he would have to secretly admit to himself that he lacks the mental agility to successfully pull off such a complex scam.
    But yes, I think he would do it, if he thought he could get away with it.

    • jan dinkins says:

      It is no surprise at all that Obama and gang would devise a plan such as the one theorized. He planned and orchestrated the Arab Spring up-risings all the while knowing that a more radical Islamic group such as the Muslim Brotherhood would take control of regions such as Yeman, Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. But he adamantly ignored and refused to help the Iranian youth revolt in Iran in 09. He knew that Iran was a king pin in extreme Islamists.

  2. Shawn Fahrer says:

    I think Amb. Stevens was set up– like Pat Tillman– because he thought he was somehow "better" than anyone else. The giveaway was the reaction stating how "great" a man he was, how he'll be missed, etc. BULL! Tillman thought that because he was a "Football star" he could make like he was high and mighty, and it got him death from "friendly fire". Stevens got the same kind of death (under the guise of 'terrorism')…. I don't buy a "rescue" idea at all– he was murdered, plain and simple. And how ironic it is that Hillary Clinton (she of Vince Foster infamy– remember HIS suspicious death which probably has HER fingers on the murder weapon) is now "taking the blame" for Stevens's death. WHAT ABOUT VINCE"S DEATH, HILLARY????? Some of us haven't forgotten– we NEVER forget! We can't afford to forget!

    • From what I have read, to include excerpts for Stevens diary. was hat he was being targeted and that was the reason he refused to come out of the burning building. I have said from the beginning that Stevens was to be kidnapped and that this would be a hostage situation. I just didn't think that BO as despicable as he is would stupe to a stunt such as this, but I could be wrong. But I do believe that Stevens was targeted to be kidnaped.

  3. If confirmed would you be surprised?

  4. Another false flag attack like 9/11. This is what those in power do. It's heartening to see the scales falling from some eyes.

  5. Nam Marine says:

    PROBABLY !

  6. While my gut told me something smelled wrong in this attack, we may never know what really happened. I would never think Obama was NOT capable of something like this, it's just that we may never know because they know how to cover their tracks so well. The thing about these islamic animals is that it's like the story of the frog giving a scorpion a ride across the river. The scorpion bites the frog, the frog asks why because they're both going to die now and the scorp says "I'm a scorpion, what did you expect?" The Muslim Brotherhood is the scorpion, if you play with fire you're gonna get burned. This administration is playing with fire and the Ameican people are going to gt severely burned when they bring their islamic war against the West to our shores. We will only have Obama and his cronies like Hillary Clinton to thank. Remember her top aid belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, along with her family members? These people have either got to be stone cold stupid or in cahoots with these animals. My money is on being in cahoots with them.

  7. BiBiJon says: April 5, 2011 at 5:04 pmOne of the games of the Americans is to sell geopolitical prcoeotitn.For that game to make sense, they need to either create a crisis or maintain it.They are masters of this game as the history of the Cold War demonstrates.To wit; in the Levant, they maintained the Arab-Israeli crisis until they lost control of it.In Iraq, their control was being lost through the erosion of sanctions against the Ba’athist state and therefore they were left with no good choices except the revolutionary course that they took. Which only hastened then loss of their control. Now, in the Persian Gulf, they need to maintain the sense of crisis against Iran. They need to frighten the Arab leaders of the Southern Persian Gulf (as well as the Azeris of the so-called Azerbaijan Republic) to extract prcoeotitn money. One form of this extraction is the purchase of US weapons that these states do not need, cannot use, and cannot maintain. But it is necessary for the US arms industry to remain viable.The United States has no incentive at this time to normalize relations with Iran; then she will have no leverage with the Arabs and others. And I think that US leaders think that they can indefinitely maintain their current posture in that part of the world; eing subsidized in a manner of speaking by the Arab (oil) states of the Persian Gulf.And this is not even taking into account the US grand strategy that calls for the destruction of local states that aspire to more power in certain critical (to US planners) regions of the world.From a non-Iranian/non-American point of view, all of these is quite insane; playing with fire in a region on which the world is critically dependent on meeting her energy needs. But the rest of the world, outside of the Middle East and outside of the Axis Powers, is powerless to stop this dynamics.

Speak Your Mind

*