Dems Warned Against Certifying Obama Eligible For White House

Barack Obama between flags SC Dems warned against certifying Obama eligible for White House

Attorney Larry Klayman has warned Robert Bauer, the General Council to the Democrat National Committee, that members of the “Democrat Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could become the targets of election-fraud charges.”

Klayman–the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch–bases his warning on the fact that Hawaii State Registrar Alvin Onaka refused to verify to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett “the birth facts for Barack Hussein Obama that are claimed on the birth certificate posted on the White House website…”  In addition, Onaka “undeniably failed to verify that the [birth certificate] image posted at whitehouse.gov ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files.’”

On March 30th, Secretary Bennett filled out a standard request form, asking that Onaka “verify as true” that Barack Hussein Obama was born on August 4th, 1961; that he was born in Honolulu, Oahu; that his mother was Stanley Ann Dunham and his father Barack Hussein Obama. Two months later, Onaka wrote back that “a birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.” But the Secretary refused to verify the date of birth, the name of the mother or father, or even the gender of the baby!

Why would Onaka admit that a birth certificate is indeed on file, yet refuse to verify much of the information that certificate ostensibly contains? According to Klayman, “…the only legal reason for Onaka to not verify those facts is if he can’t legally do so.” That is, “… the record itself must not have ‘probative value.’”

And as for the long-form posted on the White House website, Klayman says, “…the only legal reason for not verifying that the posted long-form ‘is a true and accurate representation of the original record in [the DOH] files’ is if it is not.” “There is no other plausible explanation.”

What does all of this mean? Klayman explains that “the only Hawaii statute rendering completed (and therefore numbered) birth certificates to be non-legally binding…applies to ALTERED or LATE birth certificates.” According to Onaka’s written response to Bennett, Obama’s birth certificate is indeed numbered. Therefore, as Onaka refused to legally verify the “facts” contained in the certificate or verify that the long-form “is a true and accurate representation of the original record,” it can only mean the Obama birth certificate is either altered or late, as defined by Hawaii statute.

Altered or late birth certificates cannot “stand on their own” as evidence of anything! They have no legally probative value and can therefore not be used as proof even of an individual’s age, never mind the natural born citizen status of a candidate for the nation’s highest office!  Moreover, altered and late Hawaii birth certificates and copies have the word ALTERED or LATE prominently stamped on them. It’s altogether possible that Obama “created” his birth certificate online in order to hide such an obvious and troublesome imprint from the American public.

According to Hawaii statue, Obama could only correct the situation by presenting the totality of his birth records along with all existing corroboration to a proper judicial or administrative body. Such a body would then weigh all existing evidence according to “legal evidentiary standards.” Needless to say, Obama has no intention of following such a procedure.

Four years ago, the Democrat National Committee refused to certify that Barack Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” This year, Larry Klayman is strongly advising Democrat attorneys to disavow Obama altogether! It will be interesting to see what Robert Bauer and Co decide.

Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach

Related posts:

  1. Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their…
  2. Something Is Rotten In The Obama White House If you walk up to a barn, you might say,…

"Loophole" from Obama's IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver... click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Comments

  1. yourmomscalling says:

    HE IS A FRAUD AND THIS ISN'T GOING AWAY !!!

  2. there’s no entity called the “Democrat National Committee,” so I’m not sure what this is even about.

    • Then what's it called?

    • stan....s.c. says:

      If you educate yourself you might find out that there's Nothing, until the Process takes shape when the individual States start accepting the democrat nominee as Their acceptance for POTUS. If you read? this article you will understand this is what it's about. And there is Consequences from these states and people that sign off as Representatives of the People, to which charges against the Constitution will be forth-coming. UNDERSTAND ? And you Vote , too???

    • So your saying there is no DNC…?

    • Seeks_the_truth says:

      If there is no entity called the Democratic National Committee, how is Debbie Wasserman Schultz the Chairwoman and Patrick Gaspard the Executive Director?

    • http://www.democrats.org/
      at the bottom of the page they are the ones paying for the propganda

  3. stan....s.c. says:

    I also wrote my State Senator to engage State AG and the Secretary of State of this event, if they sign off as this Usurper POTUS is Qualified and Eligible for placing his name on the Nov. 6 2012 ballot. I believe if more eligible Voters and Citizens do this, the message will sound Loud and clear that we're NOW fed up with this CRAP, and measures must be taken for Who and What the Hell this POTUS Nominee is, and Where the Hell does HE come from !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Semper Fidelis

  4. I truly hope all this information is coordinated with Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona. Let's get it all together and throw all the communists out.

  5. Pondering Granny says:

    The Democrats are not fearful of exposure by the Republicans because they know; enough of the republicans are new world order puppets and just as guilty of fraud, high treason and all the criminal activities of the new world order that has made them successful in destroying us from within. The new world order could not have so totally infiltrated our government without the help of both the DNC and the RNC. What we are seeing in Washington, DC are only the "post turtles" that the new world order elites have placed there to do their bidding. This does not make them any less criminals – just not the masterminds
    behind the heinous crimes they have committed.

    Read #4. Leak at Department of Justice Pulls White House Deeper Into Fast and Furious.

    Obama, Eric Holder and all the other "post turtles" placed there by the one world global government, aka
    the new world order, are just the amoral hirelings trained to do their bidding as ordered.

  6. Seeks_the_truth says:

    Even when confronted with the facts Democrats still deny.

    This is why the Democrats will lose in November. They have become the party of deceit, division and despair.

    "When you can't run on your record, you paint your opponent as someone to run from" ~ Obama 2008

    "The only people who don't want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide" ~ Obama 2008

    "The private sector is doing fine" ~ Obama 2012

  7. Evermyrtle says:

    There is so much lying, betrayal of America, hatred to CHRIST and Christian America, anti-GOD laws passed, and all the HE promoted made illegal, I do not know where to start.

  8. More evidence that Zero is Pretender in Chief. I would challenge my Sec of State, but he is the guy who fraudulently certified Freaking Franken as winning the Senate seat. No way would he ever challenge Zero's position on the ballot.
    I just hope that at least one State will prohibit Obama from appearing on their ballot.

    • Minnesota's Sec of State was put there by George Soros' Secretary of State program which he has now disbanded, perhaps because he has a better way…namely to own the software that will be counting ballots in Spain…so, you're right…no point in asking him!

  9. Obama is president because several people failed to do their job and those lawyes are already guiltyof fraud._Obama is not an American, was never born here and has no "right" to be president. Why there isnt more legal filing to disqualify him from yet another run at taking this country dowm is beyond common sense. When do politicians do their job?

    • Politicians are never going to do their job unless we make them,

      Nothing will be done about this because of race and fear of what will happen and the politicians have no clue as what to do or handle it. Nothing like this has ever happened before. The work involved and years to take it through a court would be fiasco. They would prefer to leave the mess than clean it up.

  10. Danney Ball says:

    … even if he should win the election … it will be challenged on this basis … and decided in the supreme court … and if he loses … it still must be proved for him to obtain any retirement benefits …

  11. Anybody who would have so many allegations, suspicions and unsatisfactory job performance hanging over their head and still seek to be re-elected to the office again has the biggest brass ball super ego in History. Plus, a touch of mental malfunction, illusions of grandeur and the confidence of protection by friends in high places.

  12. AS OUR WONDERFUL FRIEND , AND MY HERO MENTIONED , OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST HOAX EVER

    PULLED IN THIS COUNTRY. THE PROBLEM, A LOT OF OUR ELECTED OFFICIAL KNEW IT AND THEY

    ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS COVER UP,AS SUPREME COURT JUTICE MENTIONED "WE ARE

    EVADING THIS SIBJECT FOR NOW" THAT IS A CRIME AND THIS GUY HAS TO BE TAKEN OUT IN A

    HAND CUFF, FORGET ABOUT 2ND TERM AND EVERYTHING HE HAS SIGNED, WHOULD BE INVALID.

    HAME ON EVERYBODY.

  13. I heard a couple of months ago that the electronic counting of the votes would be done in Spain or another country by a company owned by one of Obamma’s biggest donators. Now, tell me how, that voting count could be secure or unbiased??? I have not heard anything more about that on the news. Why are the republicans not concerned about Obamma’s people counting the votes. Anyone else hear anything about this???

Speak Your Mind

*