The Left is uncomfortable about “keeping score” of racial attacks by black males on (especially) defenseless whites. The favorite targets of these cowards are fragile elderly whites and white women; although when they are assembled in sufficiently lopsided numbers, these predators will attack young healthy white men.
The numbers of stories about these savage attacks are growing faster than the Democrat-controlled media can smother them. Last week, we heard about two black males attacking and killing a World War II hero in Spokane – a place that prides itself on its liberality. They beat this fine American veteran with heavy metal flashlights. Of course, the authorities are not calling this a hate crime; in Liberal-think, hate crimes can only be committed by whites against blacks. That’s just another lie the Left tells about race in America.
Today brings another classic example of an impotent black male making himself feel powerful by beating up an old white man.
Last Sunday, after a rally in a New Haven, Connecticut park (in support of a black woman who is running for mayor), a 35 year old black Hispanic male – not to be confused with a George Zimmerman Hispanic male – savagely attacked a solitary 71 year old white man.
The thug, Jorge DelaPaz, apparently a self-appointed warrior fighting to protect black children from having to be subjected to the sight of an old white man, said white men shouldn’t be, “.. in his park where young black kids are playing.” Then he attacked the elderly white man who was peacefully eating a sandwich.
True to the creed of the cowardly “warrior,” after punching his helpless victim in the face several times, DelaPaz ran away.
DelaPaz, a felon, was captured by the police a short time later. He was carrying “…a Sig Sauger P239 handgun, a set of brass knuckles, and a voter registration card.” Let’s take a wild guess and say he’s a registered Democrat.
How a felon could have a gun in the State of Connecticut or why they let felons vote is a mystery. All we “know for sure” is this it wasn’t a hate crime because the Connecticut authorities say it wasn’t. Anyone disagree?
Photo credit: uconnlibrariesmagic (Creative Commons)