Are The Clintons In Trouble Again?

Photo credit: InSapphoWeTrust (Creative Commons)

Conflicts of interest seem to follow the Clintons with total impunity. While Hillary (and the frothing liberal media) are gearing up for her probable run in 2016, they appear to ignore all conflicts of interest (and even, reportedly, a possible 47 mysterious murders or deaths surrounding acquaintances or business associates of those two.)

There was some deal struck between Obama and the Clintons before he appointed her to be Sec. of State. In Nov 2007, he invited her to be with him on his plane.  No one seems to know what transpired there. He didn’t want her too close to him as V.P, but he owed her something.

The alarm bells began ringing, not only because of the Clintons’ long history of corruption– the long list of women abused and smeared, but also their propensity to peddle influence to the highest bidder. How could this compromise or influence U.S. Diplomatic policy? The possibilities for high stakes dealing were endless.

In 2011, Judicial Watch, a government watchdog, began asking questions and seeking information, only to be stonewalled by Obama and his administration. Now, they are forced to go to the court to get this needed information.  On May 28, 2013, a FOIA lawsuit was filed by JW against the Dept. of State to obtain documents of possible conflicts of interest between the actions taken by Hillary Clinton as Sec. of State and Bill’s activities with his Global Initiative. The following records are sought with any and all certifications or divestiture for Mrs. Clinton:

  • Any waivers issued to or for Mrs. Clinton, or anything applicable (ethics stature, regulation, or agreements.)
  • Any and all records of communication, including phone logs related to Mr. Clinton’s speech schedule.
  • Any and all communications including but not limited to e-mail, fax reports, and phone logs related to Mr. Clinton’s personal or charitable financial relationship with foreign leaders and governments. The State has failed to produce any record to these requests.

In the meantime, the former President released a list of 200,000 donors to his library and foundation with what he termed a deal between Obama and Hillary.This deal reportedly included nine conditions  to which Bill agreed, including a ban on foreign government contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative. According to an AP story, Saudi Arabia gave $25 million to the foundation. Other government donors include Norway, Kuwait, Qator, Brunei, Onan, and more.

This is about the potential undermining of our national interest in exchange for contributions to the Clinton’s coffers (for Hillary to build up for her 2016 run?)

The ethics division of the State Dept. appointed Cheryl Mills (Clinton’s former deputy counsel) to review these conditions. Ms. Mills tried to silence Gary Hicks in the Benghazi hearings. She was also named Sec. of State’s Hillary’s chief of staff.

But, as Hillary said, “What Difference Does it Make?”


Photo credit: InSapphoWeTrust (Creative Commons)



Moral Collapse After Decades Of Leftist Policies

Moral Collapse Moral Collapse After Decades of Leftist Policies

“Leftist policies harm society’s moral character,” says Dennis Prager, syndicated radio host and author of,  “Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph.”

America’s largest cities and many states have been run for decades by liberal mayors and administrations and now we are seeing them sinking towards bankruptcy, such as the decay called Detroit. Michigan governor, Rick Snyder, has decreed a takeover of this city government and hired an outside emergency manager with sweeping powers similar to that of a bankruptcy judge to try to salvage this city. Such powers include the ability to toss out unaffordable contracts with public employees unions and vendors, put city assets up for sale, consolidate or eliminate government departments and make further service cuts. Needless to say this is met with much opposition from the public employees and unions.

While the liberals are so certain about the moral superiority of liberal policies, those policies actually diminish a society’s moral character. This tends to make a people worse.

The bigger the government, the less citizens do for each other. Europeans give far less to charity and volunteer less than do Americans. Tocqueville, in the early 19th Century, admired how much Americans–through myriad associations–took care of each other.

Then in the 30s, Franklin Roosevelt began the movement of America toward a European welfare state–vastly expanded by Democrat Presidents since. Churches, Rotary clubs, other free loan societies and other voluntary associations took care of most. But as the state grew, all associations declined. Also, citizens of liberal welfare states become increasingly narcissistic. People’s disdain of work, erodes character, then they develop an entitlement mentality–always a “right” which reinforces this sense of entitlement. “The welfare state is a Ponzi scheme,” says Prager. “The bigger the government, the greater corruption.” ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.’

Big businesses can be corrupt, but eventually they are caught or go out of business. Government cannot go out of business. Corrupt businesses cannot print money and they cannot arrest you.

Liberals, in spite of all other evidence, will not respond to arguments to refute the consequences of the welfare state– but cite things like “social justice” and they are so “compassionate” (as long as it is with government money or other people’s money). They label their opponents as “selfish” or “greedy” or they plain “don’t care.” It’s a ‘feel good’ mentality.

According to Dr. Lyle H G. Rossiter, Jr. M.D., and a psychiatrist, in his book, The Liberal Mind, says “modern liberalism irrationality can only be understood as the product of psychopathy.” “He calls it a massive transference neurosis and projection of mostly perceived wrongs when young, so they are therefore victims and so must be others–all this acted out in the world’s political arenas, with devastating effects on the institutions of liberty.” They are going to save, through the government, all the victims they perceive around them. It is infantile, Rossiter claims.

And they don’t have a clue as to how stupid they really are, how misinformed, whether is is over global warming, type of light bulbs we must use, extreme environmentalism, or abortion, liberal education, women’s rights, racism, but just regurgitate what they read or hear from the liberal media or professors in the universities  They speak in mantras.

Is it all like a river with God at the bottom, with the devil working the currents, with the seeds and crumbs floating on the top of the river, and with the liberals regurgitating the crumbs and the conservatives being torn along by the currents, –now trying to swim upstream to try to save the river and the country.



Games People Play–Obama’s The #1 Game Player

Obama Social Security Chess Game SC Games People play  Obamas the #1 Game Player

Life is all a game to Obama. Like playing chess. The game is politics–above all else–at any cost.

Too often, he checkmates his opponents–the Republican leaders. He appears to have about all the cards–so far. But how much longer before his “House of Cards” falls? There are already cracks in his armor, just into his second term–the ones where he could ace out all the Republicans and be in complete control again as he was in the first two years of his first term. He bet on the Republicans folding over the sequestration, but they did not.

He bet that Benghazi’s mistakes would take little notice, as the Republicans would not pursue that, especially after he reportedly “stole” the 2012 election (by only 2.8%–large margin).

He bet they wouldn’t pursue the IRS scandal and the Dept. of Justice AP scandal. After all, he knew nothing about any of these scandals.  But now the liberal reporters are bristling. They are even asking questions (finally) about Benghazi, as it appears it will not go away. He loses the liberal media on his side, and he loses all.

He has bet that winding the war down in Afghanistan and bringing all the troops home at once in 2014 will ignite his base and be a part of his legacy–that he won the war (but with no forethought of how they will get jobs or even medical care, let alone the mess this leaves Afghanistan in.)

He’s bet  that the economy will turn around to make him look good, if they just tax the rich some more–yet we are facing even higher oil prices and possibly high inflation (and still high unemployment.)

He’s bet on amnesty for illegal aliens–11 million of them, and more and more will come then–buying votes in his bid to remake America (so he will have millions more indebted to him and to the liberals.)  He’s stopped deporting aliens and stopped the border fence.  However, Sen. Marco Rubio is working on a path to citizenship for these illegals.  Maybe someday, Hispanics and other illegals will realize that it is not the land of the free and that the Republicans represent their family values (and the liberals don’t really care for them, just for their votes.)

He’s bet that the liberal media will continue to cover up his scandals, his birthplace, and past. But the ‘chickens may come home to roost’ as the media are catching on now and may turn on him so that he could end up his second term either early–after impeachment– or be booted out at the end of his failed Presidency, going down as one of the worst and least experienced Presidents who tried to bring down America (the greatest nation there ever has been.)

All bets are off, Obama! We’ve come back from worse than what we’ve been experiencing today. It’s karma, and right will prevail!

The American Eagle will soar again!

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Does Obamacare Have Hidden Dangers?

Obamacare SC 300x232 Does Obamacare Have Hidden Dangers?

Photo Credit: Fresh Conservative (Creative Commons)

“One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine.”–Ronald Reagan

The full implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act  (ObamaCare) coming soon body slams the health care industry, the American economy and our liberties.

“We need to know what’s ahead and more importantly what we can do to survive ObamaCare,” according to Grassfire Nation with their very informative booklet “Hidden Dangers of ObamaCare.”  What you know about ObamaCare is bad. What you don’t know is far worse. Families are already paying 14% more or $2,000 more a year. That is just for starters, and it does not begin until 2014.

The words of Frederick Douglass, (a slave, who was taught to read, that ran away up north and became an aide to Pres. Lincoln) spoken to inspire resistance to slavery in the mid-19th century, apply equally well to us today: “power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what many people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong, which will be imposed upon them and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”

As we know from the Supreme Court ruling it means a massive tax increase with 21 new taxes. The “death panels” will be stripping you of control over your own health care decisions. Massive job losses estimated at 80,000 over 10 years, are predicted. Doctors will leave their practices and retire early. There will be a massive shortage of doctors, and of ones who will accept Medicare or Medicaid.

This is the largest tax increase ever imposed on a society. It will be a real disaster for America’s health care system for the nation’s fiscal future and for a limited government. Every American–young and old–will be severely impacted.

It means ObamaCare, the most destructive piece of legislation ever passed by the Democrat Congress–yet most of the dangers are unknown. In reality it could well shorten your very life.  Believe it or not we have enjoyed the most envious health care system with the best doctors, hospitals, researchers and care ever seen in the world. Repealing and removing this behemoth will require one of the hugest political fights in the history of our country.

Soon people will wake up when they can’t get the care they need or are used to. And where does it all lead?  Liberals plan on it leading to National Health Care, controlled completely by the government.  Not only your health, but your very life will be at stake.  It will become a quagmire and there may be no return.

We have to know what’s in store, not only on the 2,700 initial pages that nobody who voted for it had ever read, but now the hundreds of thousands of new pages of quasi-government regulations written by mainly the Secretary  of Health and Welfare and her staff. It will create billions for Unions who voted for Obama and liberals. Many unions and others who voted for Obama have already received special exemptions.  It will hike all premiums, politicize medicine so you and your Dr. will no longer make decisions. There will be real “death panels” for the elderly and affirmed, assaulting our life and liberty, –a financial boondoggle mess.

Obama promised this new health care plan would lower costs and improve access–but no fluke that it will fail to achieve that as this was Obama’s and the liberals plan all along.  By making insurance unaffordable for everyone–it will become unavailable to most all. All that will be left is government centered–government run single payer Health Care, which is the plan all along. Then comes the control over everyone.  All dictator controlled, socialist, fascist, communist countries have taken over the health care first.  It must be repealed.  What can do that?  A Republican controlled House and Senate in 2014 is the only way, with millions of phone calls, letters, tweets, faxes, from their constituents, telling them to repeal it at once.  Before it is too late!

Ideas On Where We Go From Here

Tea Party SC Ideas on Where We Go From Here

Yogi Berra once observed: ‘When you come to a fork in the road–take it.”

I am reminded of a story about a pony. Two boys were assigned to shovel a stable full of horse manure. One of the boys was depressed. The other enthusiastically shoveled with glee.  “Why are you so happy?” asked the depressed lad.  His happy associate responded, “with all of this manure, must be a pony in here.”

I must now trust and believe that God has a pony in there by allowing Obama to be re-elected. Therefore, I will not join those who think we have lost the battle for America–even though I have gone through the gauntlet of depression, denial, and fear. Nor do I ascribe to the nonsense that our Tea party and our values for over 200 years are too extreme. Our values are aligned to the human spirit. They are right and just.

Obama appealed to three general groups: the clueless entitlement addicts, racists and yuppies from the 60s, and liberal Hollywood–all aided and abetted by the liberal media, who actually determines who will win elections nowadays by their biased reporting and their late night shows and by keeping the masses clueless or misinformed.

So where do we go from here?

First of all, contact the electors of the red states (17 of them) and tell them to not vote in the electoral college on Dec. 17. That would throw it to the House (with a majority of Republicans) to vote for the President.  All that is needed is for 1/3 not to vote.

Why don’t the multimillionaires who throw vast amounts of money into the election buy up some of the news media and turn them into fair and balanced and investigative news sources (as they used to be)? Why don’t other billionaires start journalism schools where they are taught something besides socialism and biased reporting and teach them to do investigative reporting? Offer scholarships.

Develop a greater ground game–outfox the foxes. Start right now and set up office, especially in the swing states for the 2016 election.

Forget expensive TV ads as most get their news on Ipods and the net now. We should have learned by now that being nice like McCain and Romney does not work with these socialist democrats.  For goodness sakes, find a younger conservative to run, preferably a minority.  It is apparent that white men in their 60s will not always win with the demographics of the country now. One suggestion: Marco Rubio.

May God continue to bless America!

Photo credit: formatted_dad (Creative Commons)


Related posts:

  1. Obama Campaigns For Violent Ideas Those of us who see Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul…
  2. Herman Cain Proves The Power Of Ideas In The Republican Race by Floyd and Mary Beth Brown America’s media is obsessed…