The Path To A Constitutional Convention

constitution quill pen SC The Path To A Constitutional Convention

A broke clock can’t fix itself.

The political process of the federal government is broken. The rule of law no longer exists in Washington, DC, and it will only return with a mandate from the majority of states that comprise the Union.

The Framers of the US Constitution gave the states a clear path to a Constitutional Convention with Article V. This particular provision allows the states with a majority to make Amendments to the Constitution, by application of a defined majority of our respective states legislatures.

The power of government is guaranteed to the people representing the majority of states legislatures by Article V. The men who built the framework for this country undoubtedly included this safeguard against tyranny as a result of their own struggle against a failed and corrupt government.

The case for a Constitutional Convention is solid, with the majority of Americans knowing that the federal government is bankrupt at every level.  With so many wrongdoings by a failed federal bureaucracy, along with mounting evidence of criminal & ethical malfeasance, only our respective state legislature’s can restore law and order to the United States.

The Petition at Change.Org that is calling for a Constitutional Convention is addressed to every state elected official in every state that comprises the United States. The federal government is broken and it’s now up to the states to protect its citizenry.

Remember, a broke clock can’t fix itself.       Sign The Petition!


Related posts:

  1. Will Obamacare Withstand Constitutional Scrutiny? The U.S. Supreme Court is now poised to review the Patient…
  2. A Real Constitutional Law Professor’s Take On The NDAA The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), recently adopted by Congress…

Obamacare’s America: Post-Election Layoffs

Obamacare In The Moon SC Obamacares America: Post Election Layoffs

The People have spoken, and business has replied. Layoff announcements are mounting at an unprecedented rate in response to Obamacare since President Obama won his second term Tuesday night.

Companies across America continue to defy the conventional “wisdom” of leading financial experts for the Obama Administration who have publicly stated that under the AHCA, or Obamacare, Americans would not be at risk of losing their jobs (but rather, the new law would herald in an era of new job growth and opportunities.)

As markets around the world fell upon the news of Tuesday night’s election results, businesses have shed nearly 20,000 jobs already this week, with job loss estimates that could reach as high as 150,000 by month’s end.

David Barr, an Atlanta-area franchiser of Taco Bell and KFC who operates 23 stores with a total of  421 employess (109 of which are full time) had this to say about business owners who thought that the reports of the devastating effects of Obamacare on their businesses were overblown.

“They had their head in the sand,” Mr. Barr said, who, using a Power Point presentation and basic mathematics, shows how Obamacare forces him to either pay an additional $315,000 a year for employee health care or cut their hours and replace them with machines.  ”Every business has a way to eliminate jobs,” he said, “but that’s not good for them or me.”

Who’s next is anyone’s guess.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Related posts:

  1. Post-Election State Of The Union Among conservatives and Christians in this country, the outcome of…
  2. High Gas Prices: Bad For America, Good For An Election I don’t need to use a lot of space telling…

Obama Administration Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit

Obama Presidential Seal Podium Speech SC 780x1024 Obama Administration Facing Massive Federal Lawsuit

A lawsuit seeking the return of $43 trillion (with a “t”) and an audit of all the TARP programs by an independent receiver has been filed against senior members of the Obama Administration and the New York group known as the “Banksters”.

The Wall Street Journal’s MarketWatch is reporting that the Spire Law Group, LLP has moved its mass tort action into the federal court in Brooklyn, New York. In this District Court lawsuit (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML), the Spire Law Group, LLP is acting on the behalf of homeowners across the country seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide until the return of the $43 trillion.

The independent audit the lawsuit is seeking of the TARP Program stems from a report by the former Inspector General of the bailout program, Neil Barofsky, who is countering the claims made by President Obama both publicly and privately to Congress that  the money has been paid back. Mr. Barofsky asserts that none of the money advanced by the Treasury has ever been paid back by the recipients of the program.

The Plaintiffs have established the location of the $43 trillion of laundered money in a criminal racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals:

Eric Holder

Tony West

Kamala Harris

Jon Corzine

Robert Rubin

Timothy Geitner

Vikram Pandit

Valerie Jarrett

Anita Dunn

Robert Baueras

The lawsuit alleges that the Obama Administration actively borrowed money from these “Banksters” to fund his political campaign in this 2012 Election and has not pursued any criminal charges against them

The lawsuit also claims multiple violations of the United States Patriot Act, along with the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and other State and Federal laws by the Obama Administration.

Learn more about what is allegedly the largest money laundering and racketeering scheme in history.

Related posts:

  1. Lawsuit Accuses DHS Of Humiliating Men, Favoring Women An employee’s lawsuit accuses Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security of…
  2. Anti-Abortion Grandpa Facing DC Clinic Lawsuit Dick Retta stands outside a Planned Parenthood clinic in downtown…

The Petition To Impeach Barack Obama

Impeach logo The Petition to Impeach Barack Obama

Americans are being systematically targeted and murdered by the Obama Administration on suspicions alone and without respect to Due Process of Law. There is no trial by jury and no appeal, just an execution that is carried out by agents of the US Government on orders of the President.

An “extrajudicial killing” is defined as the killing of a person by government authorities without any judicial proceedings or sanctioned legal process. It is by definition unlawful, as it bypasses the Due Process of Law in the jurisdiction in which it is carried out in.

When President Obama ordered the deaths of Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan for suspected terrorist activities, he conspired in the unlawful murder of American Citizens. These men, both Americans, were summarily executed along with others without any respect for the Law.

There is no question that Barack Obama conspired to commit the murders of Americans. Not only has he admitted his role in the deaths of these Americans, he has defended his participation in these unlawful acts against these Americans, deeming them a threat to the United States.

All Americans are at risk of “extrajudicial killing” if and when they are deemed a threat to the United States. Any citizen of this country may be put to death without Due Process of Law upon orders of Barack Obama.

To protect Americans from wanton murder at the hands of government agents , the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Congressman Lamar Smith, must propose a Resolution calling for the Judiciary Committee to begin a formal inquiry into the issue of impeaching Barack Obama for the crime of murder.

This is the only way for our elected officials to prove that no one is above the Rule of Law.


Related posts:

  1. Connecticut Congressman, Town Told “Impeach Obama” On January 9, John Karlson wrote the following letter to…
  2. Meet Barack Obama’s Worst Nightmare “Our only weapons in this fight are the weapons of…

An Interview With Our Founding Fathers

Declaration of Independence SC An Interview with Our Founding Fathers

Gentlemen, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you all for taking the time out of your busy schedules for this interview. As you all are aware, we are facing some tough times today with taxes, stifling government policy, and a faltering economy. I would like your opinions on these and other pressing issues.

Before we begin, gentlemen, is everyone comfortable? Coffee or Tea? Thank you. I will introduce each of you when you are posed a specific question in your particular area of expertise.

Ladies and Gentlemen, please allow me to introduce Samuel Adams. Mr. Adams is a former senator and representative from Massachusetts and a Harvard graduate who has excelled in the sciences at that fine institution.

Mr. Adams, you are a gun owner, sir, and there are elected officials in our government who would limit or abolish your constitutional right of private ownership of guns altogether. As a former representative of Massachusetts, what are your thoughts on this, sir, and where do you stand on the issue?

Mr. Adams
” And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions.”

Thank you, sir. As you are aware, Mr. Adams, the American people are becoming more disenchanted every year with the whole political process, and voting numbers are down. What is your message to the American citizenry who have the power to vote to engage them?

Mr. Adams
“Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual – or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.”

I think that all of us here would agree with you, sir. Voting is a tremendous responsibility. As I stated earlier when I introduced you, you are a Harvard man…what, Yale wouldn’t take you? No seriously, sir, you are an obviously well-educated man. Would you share with us your views on the impact of educating our young people as it relates to American society as a whole?

Mr. Adams
“If we continue to be a happy people, that happiness must be assured by the enacting and executing of reasonable and wise laws, expressed in the plainest language, and by establishing such modes of education as tend to inculcate in the minds of youth, the feelings and habits of “piety, religion and morality,” and to lead them to the knowledge and love of those truly Republican principles upon which our civil institutions are founded.”

Thank you for your candor, sir. It has also been noted that you are a religious man, Mr. Adams. To what extent, if any, do you think the moral decline of American values in general have affected our civil liberties?

Mr. Adams
“Revelation assures us that “Righteousness exalteth a Nation” Communities are dealt with in this World by the wise and just Ruler of the Universe. He rewards or punishes them according to their general Character. The diminution of publick Virtue is usually attended with that of publick Happiness, and the publick Liberty will not long survive the total Extinction of Morals.”

Thank you, sir. Our next guest, ladies and gentlemen, is the former President of the United States himself, George Washington of Virginia. Thank you for coming, sir. Your friends and colleagues have described you as a man of great virtue and a believer in justice.

Mr. Washington
“I hope that I shall always possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider to be the most enviable of all titles, the character of an honest man.”

Yes, yes of course, sir. I wasn’t suggesting otherwise. May I ask you, though, what is your opinion of our standing as a nation in the world?

Mr. Washington
“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations, which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity, it must be known that we are at all times ready for war.”

No offense intended, sir, but that is a little long winded… Would you care to sum your answer up for our audience?

Mr. Washington
“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.”

Aptly put, sir. As you are well aware, scandal in the White House is becoming commonplace. If you were to run again for office and elected to the Presidency, how would you handle your administration?

Mr. Washington
“The executive branch of this government never has, nor will suffer, while I preside, any improper conduct of its officers to escape with impunity.”

Hmm…very interesting, sir… Would you care to share your vision of what our national policy would be in your administration?

Mr. Washington
“The foundations of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens, and command the respect of the world.”

Admirable. sir…May I ask you to expand your views to include foreign policy also?

Mr. Washington
“My ardent desire is, and my aim has been… to comply strictly with all our engagements foreign and domestic; but to keep the United States free from political connections with every other Country. To see that they may be independent of all, and under the influence of none. In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home.”

Well said, sir. On a lighter note, I understand you have married the former Martha Custis and that she is reputed to be a woman of great beauty. How has married life been treating you?

Mr. Washington
“I have always considered marriage as the most interesting event of one`s life, the foundation of happiness or misery.”

Hahaha! Very funny, sir… I don’t think anyone could have said it better! Marriage can be both taxing and rewarding. On the subject of taxes, sir…how do you view our current tax system?

Mr. Washington
“No taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant.”

Yes Sir! No one invites the tax collector home for dinner, right gentlemen? Thank you so much for being here with us today, Mr. Washington. Your eloquent words have given us all a great deal to think about in these troubled times.

Our next guest today, ladies and gentlemen, is Boston native Benjamin Franklin. Mr. Franklin is also an inventor and newspaper publisher. Before the interview, Mr. Franklin, I was talking with Mr. Adams and Mr. Washington,and they tell me that you three share a secret. Would you care to elaborate on that, sir?

Mr. Franklin
“Three may keep a secret if two of them are dead.”

Watch out, gentlemen! He appears to have a strange-looking device of unknown origin with him! To be serious, though, Mr. Franklin, you yourself are a married man. Having heard Mr. Washington’s view on marriage, do you have anything that you would like to add to the subject?

Mr. Franklin
“Marriage is…the most natural state of man, and therefore the state in which you are most likely to find solid happiness…. It is the man and woman united that makes the complete human being….. man has not nearly the value he would have in the state of union. He is an incomplete animal; he resembles the odd half of a pair of scissors.”

Yes Sir…yes sir…as you are aware, Mr. Franklin, we have record unemployment rates in our country. How do we address the needs of our nation’s poor?

Mr. Franklin
“I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.”

Those are harsh words, sir…another question if you please.Do you have an opinion on how to lower the poverty level in America?

Mr. Franklin
“Finally, there seem to be but three Ways for a Nation to acquire Wealth. The first is by War as the Romans did in plundering their conquered Neighbours. This is Robbery. The second by Commerce which is generally Cheating. The third by Agriculture the only honest Way; wherein Man receives a real Increase of the Seed thrown into the Ground, in a kind of continual Miracle wrought by the Hand of God in his favour, as a Reward for his innocent Life, and virtuous Industry.”

The American People certainly wouldn’t go hungry, sir…a final question, Mr. Franklin. You speak a great deal on virtue, sir. Would you share your views on virtue with us?

Mr. Franklin
“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”

That is a frightening prospect, Mr. Franklin… Gentlemen, thank you again for taking the time to be with us today. You all have given us a great deal to think about. Perhaps we can learn to improve ourselves as Americans by implementing your thoughts and suggestions in our daily lives.

Photo credit: snowlepard (Creative Commons)

Related posts:

  1. Father’s Day-What Would Our Founding Fathers Say? An entire generation has been primed and prepped to reach…
  2. Obama: People Are Frustrated I Can’t Force My Will On Congress–Founding Fathers Made It Difficult Our forefathers designed a system that keeps this country free…