How To Use The Constitution Against Democrats


Before a member of Congress or any President can be placed in office, they must give an oath that they will faithfully defend and honor the Constitution. Since they violate the oath so often, let’s use the Constitution against Democrats.

We already know Obama is ineligible, according to the writers of the Constitution, to be President since he is not a natural-born citizen. Of course, this is because his father was not an American citizen when Barack was born. But Republicans are guilty of not denying him the chance to run for President, so it would be best to hold Democrats accountable for not obeying the Constitution elsewhere.

Obamacare could prove to be the most destructive government program ever devised. It could also bring down a lot of Democrats in November. But the way Obama has unconstitutionally changed the law could do the most damage to Democrats. It could bring about the impeachment of Obama, and should.

If I attended a campaign rally of a Democrat politician, and I were allowed to ask a question, I would ask, “Do you believe a President should be allowed to violate his oath of office by violating the Constitution?”

After my attackers finished trying to shout me down, the politician would likely say they believed the President was not violating the Constitution. I would come back with, “Since Obama signed Obamacare into law a few years, and only Congress has the right to come up with or change laws, he is assuming the ability of Congress which is unconstitutional. Do you defend Obama’s assumed right to do what only the Congress has the right to do?”

The politician would either have to say yes or no. If they do what most politicians do and not answer the question, I would have to say they don’t support the Constitution because they allow Obama to violate it. They should be removed from office because they have violated their oath to defend the Constitution and honor what it says.

That would be the time they would pull out the race card. They would tell me I am racist since I believe Obama is a criminal. I would have to pull out the mirror card and reflect their response against them. I oppose Obama because he has done criminal acts. If they assume I believe blacks are criminals, I would have to throw this response back at them by saying that any person who violates the Constitution should be punished, and that they must believe all blacks are criminals–which is really insane to believe.

They might come back with, “You hate Obama because he is black.” I would use the mirror card against them by saying, “I would hate to have a nest of cobras in my house because they could kill me. Does that mean I am wrong to hate cobras?” If they reluctantly agreed with me, maybe I could destroy the race card by showing that they are the true racists.

I would also ask the politician if they support people who lie. They would be right to point out that I have supported people who lied in the past. But the difference between a liar and someone who lies is that someone who lies every now and then feels ashamed that they had to lie, or they can give a good reason for lying. A liar tells lies for no good reason and often believes their lies are more truthful than the truth. Liars habitually lie and attack those who point out their lies. Any politician who will stand beside Obama and support him despite his reputation must be considered similar to him and deserving to be removed from office.

When you’re sprayed by a skunk and don’t wash the stick off, you could be 100 miles away from the skunk; but the people near you will know where you have been. Democrats who don’t want Obama to campaign for them are like the ones who are sprayed by a skunk. He sprayed them; and even though he may not be around, his putrid aroma still sticks to them.

You can even use the preamble of the Constitution against Democrats. Has Obama helped maintain a more perfect union? Has he brought domestic tranquility? He has attacked our liberties on numerous occasions and used government to oppress those who oppose his views. And forget about our posterity. They say those born within the last quarter century will have a lower standard of living, and much of it can be blamed on Obama.

I would have to ask, “Has Obama made the prospects for success better for future generations or worse?” If Democrats can finally be honest, they would have to admit the latter. Why should we support Democrats who support someone who, through his policies, could destroy our future? Why should we support people who support such a destructive person?

When warning signs indicate that a bridge is out ahead, should we barrel down the road at full speed and hope we can jump the river if the warning signs are correct? Or should we pay attention to the warnings? Obamaniacs would say we don’t need to pay attention to the signs. It’s a conspiracy perpetrated by those who don’t like the road or bridge. But to foolishly believe them means you might drown in the river.

The Constitution applies to everyone. If people don’t want to support it, they must be removed from office. That’s why we should have a big turnover in November if we want to honor the Constitution.

This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Informing And Equipping Americans Who Love Freedom

The Golden Age Of Laziness

 Photo credit: terrellaftermath

When the CBO said that at least 2 1/2 million jobs would be lost by 2017 thanks to Obamacare, in a previous generation, that would have been a dire warning. But in this Obamanation, Liberals look forward to a golden age of laziness. With no jobs to keep people from doing what they want to do, millions are being liberated and allowed to be, maybe for the first time in their lives, happy. It’s as if Liberals are putting a silver lining on the black cloud of economic doom and gloom we have been experiencing since Obama was a Senator and supported the actions that collapsed the economy.

I have been unemployed since November 1, 2012 and have moved to Warsaw, Indiana, where the cost of living is much less than it is in New York State (where I lived from 1977 until this January.) The time of “liberation” allowed me to finish two Christian cantatas, some songs, about two hours of keyboard music, and a lot of writing on the Internet. I was more fortunate than many people because some of my investments have paid off; and unemployment pay has allowed me to be financially independent, to some extent. But despite the fact that I love composing music, I do it to possibly receive money for my compositions.

Liberals probably look back to the time when composers, writers, and artists had patrons. If you had talent, some rich person might support you financially and allow you to do what you love without worrying about poverty. Some of our greatest works of art and music were paid for by rich people. But if they had not been a part of the capitalist system, they wouldn’t have had enough money to support the artists and musicians. That’s the reason why this new golden age of laziness will fail.

Our economy took a one-two punch, with the great recession providing the first blow and Obamacare providing the second. Democrats are rejoicing, though. They are claiming victory over forced labor. A person like me is a champion. The problem is, I often feel like a failure because none of the material I have out there is paying off. I even gave a newspaper editor two of the books I have written, hoping that she would like my writing enough to hire me to write for the newspaper. I would consider my books an investment. I didn’t give a man who represented the Saint Louis Symphony around 2 1/2 hours of my compositions, just to have them performed (and maybe recorded.) I am praying that the Symphony likes my music enough to pay me for it. The same goes for the books I brought into SyFy and the ideas I gave to the EPA. It was a miracle that I was able to leave my material at all three places. But completion of the miracle would be if I received enough money to live comfortably and didn’t need to worry about running out of money.

If 60% of the people in America have to work hard to support themselves and the 40% who are not working, another economic collapse could switch the percentages; and this nation will not recover economically. Sure, Verdi could be paid the equivalent of $2 million to compose the opera “Aida.” But the return on the investment has far exceeded that generous amount. But would you like your tax money going to Joe No Talent to draw stick figures or compose noise instead of music? Besides, rap labels already have more than enough rap artists providing them with non-musical compositions.

Someday, I would love to make a lot of money from my material. I’ve been praying for that to happen for years. After working some jobs since I left eighth grade, not working and making money to pay my bills isn’t liberating. Even FDR had artists paid for their material. But most of them remained working artists who needed to have talent to remain paid artists. The ones who allowed them to have the time to benefit from their talent could obviously afford to keep them working. But in this new golden age of laziness, even the talented ones who may take all day to compose a few minutes of music, or from before dawn to after midnight to paint a canvas, are being resented by the taxpayers who are forced to support them with their taxes. The money supply is running low, and Liberals don’t seem to care.

What sounds truly crazy is that Liberals believe this new golden age of laziness will allow people to retire and live happily ever after. I see many of these “lucky” older people working at WalMart as greeters or stocking shelves for slightly more than minimum wage. Liberals remind me of the movie “The Aviator,” when Howard Hughes was with Katheryn Hepburn at her family home in Connecticut. Her mother said that she didn’t care too much for money. Howard told her that the reason why she didn’t care about money was because she had a lot of it.

Liberals seem to view Americans as the ones who have the money to “allow” millions to be happy being lazy. I hate being considered lazy because I am hoping that staying up until 5:00 AM working on a piece of music will pay off with a check for my work. Once the money runs out, this nation will collapse. Even great artists sometimes traded their works for food to survive. But when the cupboard is bare, even the Mona Lisa couldn’t give DaVinci a can of soup.

Pray that the next President will be an art lover. But pray more that he or she will love making it possible for thousands of artists to find jobs that will make their lives more comfortable and successful.

Will People Want Another Obama As President In 2064?


When Democrats talk about great Presidents they mention Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR).  He gave hope to America during the Great Depression, which Democrats made worst by raising taxes and Republicans made worst by supporting Smoot/Hawley which created a trade war with the world.  FDR might have been inspired by the employment program Hitler used to put Germans back to work improving Germany or maybe Hitler was inspired by Roosevelt who put millions of Americans back to work improving America.  Both men were idolized by the masses.  Hitler helped FDR become the savior of the world when Germany started WW II and allowed America to put people back to work in the factories to produce weapons of war to be used against Hitler.

Programs begun during the New Deal of FDR have cost this nation trillions of dollars.  The program both Democrats and Republicans embraced was Social Security which will go broke long before 2064.  LBJ came along a generation later and gave us the Great Society which cost us trillions more dollars.  Medicare was LBJ’s contribution to nationalized health care.  It is predicted to go broke before Social Security does.  Obama’s “Affordable” Care Act has the potential of costing us trillions of dollars unless it is abolished.  But Obamacare won’t go broke unless the nation goes bankrupt.

Republicans recognize Ronald Reagan as one of the best Presidents ever elected.  Some of his harshest critics say he might have been suffering from Alzheimer’s the last few years of his Presidency.  Granting amnesty for illegal aliens and raising taxes during those years might have been evidence of that.  But overall he helped the nation while he was President even during those last few years.  What do Obamaniacs blame for Obama doing so bad during his Presidency?  There are people in Germany that still believe Hitler was Germany’s greatest leader just like old people in Russia wish there were another Stalin controlling the nation.  But will people wish there were another Obama in the White House in 2064?

Let’s say in November enough fictional characters and dead people voted for Democrats and that warehouses full of uncounted ballots that favored Democrats were discovered like what has happened in the past?   The Democrats could have a death grip on the Senate and seize the House to give Obama near-dictatorial power.  What might he do during the last two years, barring martial law which could cancel the 2016 election?  Here is a list of what might happen:

(1) The coal industry is shut down and all coal-fired power plants are closed which would greatly increase electric rates.

(2) The EPA is allowed to regulate America to death and force us to stop using fossil fuels and switch to alternative energy sources which would be like exchanging the carriage horses in Central Park in New York City for starving poodles.

(3) Global warming has over a trillion dollars thrown at it to end it even though many experts say the sun will reverse global warming on its own for free.

(4) Conservative opponents will be investigated and charged with hate speech so they can be silenced.  If Putin can control the Russian news media that doesn’t support him, maybe Obama can control FOX News that doesn’t support him and imprison his critics for treason against him.

(5) The Departments of Education, Energy, the Environment, Housing, Agriculture, and Welfare receive much more money than the Pentagon.  Those in the military may need to be on welfare and the wounded warriors that will be forced to pay for their own care don’t seem to matter to Obama.  It’s as if those that take from the taxpayers are more honorable than those that served their country honorably.

(6) The Please-Don’t-Kill-Americans-And-Be-Nice-To-Us campaign Obama has been on since before becoming President will continue and our enemies will laugh and plan to attack America on American soil.  Obama doesn’t dare point out that Satan also hates America and Israel and that he smiles every time an Islamic extremist kills a Christian, Jew, or Muslim that may be in the wrong sect.  Obama would be indicating that he believes followers of Allah may in fact be doing the will of Satan.  That fact would be considered an insult and Islam is the only religion Liberals don’t dare get mad.  People can say Jesus is a bigot since he doesn’t approve of the homosexual lifestyle and a sexist since he disapproves of abortion.  But we don’t dare say that about Muslims.

(7) Tax rates on the rich will be increased to a “reasonable” rate and tax loopholes will be closed except for those that liberals use.  And if the economy suffers, tax rates will be raised higher.

(8) Obamacare will be expanded to cover more than medical care.  Every program to “help” people will be combined into Obamacare and the slogan may be OBAMACARE IS FOR EVERY AMERICAN BECAUSE OBAMA CARES.

(9) All economic news will be approved by Obama for fear the truth would upset most Americans; even Obamaniacs.

(10) The Liberal Information And Reporting Service (LIARS) will be instituted to disseminate all information Obama deems appropriate to report on.  But would you trust someone who came up to you and said, “I work for LIARS and want you to know the truth.”?

Obama has the potential of becoming the most hated man in America.  If he “succeeds,” the nation will fail.  I foresee riots in the streets as middle class people are thrown into poverty due to Obamacare and our enemies take advantage of the turmoil in this country to commit acts of terrorism.  If homeland security is lessened and political correctness allows those that hate America to enter to destroy it, Americans will blame Obama.  And then when their money becomes little more than Monopoly money and the economy collapses, Americans may blame Obama and his policies more than terrorists do.

You know you’re hated when people burn you in effigy.

“Duck Dynasty” And Christianity Vs. Liberal “Idiotology”

Photo credit: Rusty Clark (Creative Commons)

There are groups that like to declare certain people and organizations as Scrooges.  This year, if we don’t consider Obamacare and Obama as the Scrooges of the years since they are making millions poorer and generally worse off, the A&E Network and its firing of Phil Robertson of “Duck Dynasty” will be declared the Scrooge of the year.  To A&E, it was uncomfortable allowing Phil to lead his family in prayer at the end of the program each week.  But since he opposes homosexuality, that was the last straw.  A&E didn’t dare feature people in a reality program that honored God.  Political correctness forced A&E to risk losing their most popular program to another cable network, and the advertising revenue that would leave their network.

I blame Liberal “idiotology” for the reason why “Duck Dynasty” and Christianity are attacked.  Christians like Phil Robertson and his family are often considered idiots.  Political correctness must be adhered to.  You must remember that to be politically correct in Nazi-controlled Europe, you needed to hate Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals, and other people considered inferior.  The most politically correct were the ones who gassed these people in the death camps.  But since the New York Times didn’t believe the holocaust existed, Liberal “idiotlogs” scoffed at the notion that such a horror was being carried out in concentration camps.  Who in their right mind would commit mass murder?  Those who exterminated millions were not in their right mind.  They were in their “Reich” mind.

I have viewed movies and programs on A&E that can’t be seen on other cable networks.  Since A&E is part of the syndicate that has the history-related channels, “Duck Dynasty” might be moved to one of them.  I love watching programs like “Ice Road Truckers,” Axmen,” and “Pawn Stars” on the History Channel.  If the mini-series about the Hatfield and McCoy feud was willing to show Devil Anns turning to God and being baptized before he died, I don’t think the History Channel will mind Phil Robertson praying at the end of each “Duck Dynasty” episode.

Bill O’Reilly talks about Liberals waging war against Christmas, and Liberal idiotlogs say he is imagining things.  Since we don’t know exactly when Jesus was born, and Christmas was the Christianization of the winter solstice festival, Christmas is more a pagan holiday than a Christian one.  The pagan traditions like decorating a tree, cutting down a Yule log, and enjoying the traditional refreshments like eggnog and gingerbread have nothing to do with the birth of Jesus.  Many don’t want to call Jesus “Christ” because that would be acknowledging that he was the Messiah, and Jews would disagree.  But every time Liberals can prevent a manger scene from being erected for public view, prevent people from praying in schools, and keep traditional Christmas carols from being sung in “holiday” celebrations, they have forced people to bend to their will.

Jesus asked the question, “Is it better to honor God or  Caesar?”  He paid his taxes and that of Peter by pulling a coin from the mouth of a fish.  He also said, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and unto God that which is God’s.”  The Legislature is prohibited from establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion.  To be technical, the cross that could be removed from a veterans cemetery, due to separation of church and state, can remain since the cemetery sends no Representative to Washington to represent the dead.  Then again, since Democrats too often count the votes of dead people, they might dig up a Representative to make the cemetery a Congressional district.

I have pointed out in a previous essay that I doubt Jesus could be elected President because he would have too much opposition.  Liberal idiotology refuses to accept God and Godly morality because they are too restrictive.  You have to be a Believer in Christ in order to go to Heaven.  Even the Pope questions whether you need to be a Christian in order to go to Heaven.  That belief may cost him eternal life in Heaven unless he repents.  People must abstain from sex until they are married, and marriage must be between a man and a woman.  The Ten Commandments are not the Ten Suggestions and should be followed closely.  All Christians are commanded to spread the gospel to all the world and attempt to win people to Christ.  Thanks to the Internet, I do that on a regular basis.  I guess I’ll never be on a reality program on A&E.  I also try to treat people as I want them to treat me and will attempt to treat my enemies decently.  I guess I’ll never be on a reality program on Al Jazzera.

As a believer in the Bible as well as a devoted Christian, I believe that someday in the future, after the seven-year Great Tribulation and the Battle of Armageddon, Christ will establish his world kingdom for 1,000 years on King David’s throne in Jerusalem.  He will destroy his enemies, and those who have opposed Christianity will be punished.  Phil Robertson and his family might be able to continue their program, Lord willing, during those 1,000 years unless God abolishes duck hunting.  Then they might have to be satisfied with luring ducks to them and treating the birds like pets if mankind and animals are forbidden to kill one another.  If A&E exists in the future when the world is at peace, it will have to apologize to the Robertson family and all other Christians.  If it doesn’t exist, maybe the History Channel will feature it on a program titled “Punished By God.”

Photo credit: Rusty Clark (Creative Commons)

Could Jesus Be Elected President?

Photo credit:  tkw954 (Creative Commons)

(This is solely my opinion, and not necessarily that of Western Journalism.)

Could Jesus be elected president? You would think He would be a natural for President and would be elected by the vast majority of voters.  But you must remember how He was when He came to earth the first time to minister.  He wouldn’t have been a popular choice with some religious organizations and churches because when he condemned the Pharisees, people some looked up to, they had him crucified.  Roman Catholics might oppose Him because they have worshiped saints for centuries and pray through them and Mother Mary, which Jesus would condemn because you can only reach God the Father through Him and not saints.  Also, he would oppose churches that don’t believe what he believes and might be considered too judgmental to be a national leader.  Most Baptists would support him because they wouldn’t want to be considered anti-Jesus.  Forget about Islamic support because He would condemn Islamic terrorism and persecution of Christians and Jews since He was a Jew when He first came.  But since His ideology is basically ultra-Conservative, Jews would reject him like they did nearly 2000 years ago.

Homosexuals would oppose Him because He would oppose their lifestyle and hot button issues like gay marriage and adoption of children.  He would dare call homosexuals who flaunt their homosexuality “immoral.”  Feminists would oppose Him because He would oppose abortion and contraceptives that allow men and women to have immoral sex.  Jesus would support traditional family values that have men running the households, wives obeying their commands, and children honoring their parents.  He would also support prayer and Bible reading in the schools, which the ACLU, atheists, and school unions oppose.  Since He can read minds, lawyers would accuse Him of invasion of privacy.  Slip-and-fall lawyers who extort money from big cities would have their lies exposed, and the people who benefit from lawsuits would complain because they wouldn’t receive big paydays in court.

Farmers and grocery stores would oppose Jesus because He could feed every hungry person in the nation and not need them.  Lazy people would hate Him because He would insist they find jobs, or else they wouldn’t deserve to eat.  Medical associations and hospitals would hate Him because he could empty the hospitals by healing everyone inside.  Those collecting money for the treatment of various diseases would see their gravy trains derail because Jesus would heal all those with such diseases. Democrats and Liberals in general would oppose Him because they support so many things Jesus opposes.  They might even consider Him a fraud and would try to dig up as much dirt on Him as possible, even if they have to create the dirt.  They would show videos of Him dealing with alcoholics and prostitutes as He attempts to draw them to God.  Since Liberals might not exist if they had to rely on the truth, they would say the videos show that this guy who calls himself Jesus, the Son of God, associates with drunks and whores.  If any of the prostitutes flash him, Jesus would be condemned for soliciting.  Liberals might even have Him arrested.

Conservatives would embrace him, but not all Conservatives.  Those who are rich would be told to share some of their wealth with the poor and others who need money.  Jesus might be accused of being a Socialist for this.  When He exposed many for being hypocrites, they would turn against Him.  Even conservative women like Ann Coulter would be admonished by Jesus for wearing immodest clothing.  She would still support him.  But she might still keep wearing revealing dresses, only she would feel a bit self-conscious knowing that Jesus would see her and might condemn her.

The military might feel uncomfortable with Jesus, the Prince of Peace, supporting diplomacy over war when dealing with our enemies.  Our enemies would feel threatened because Islamic extremists don’t accept Jesus as the Son of God, and he could have legions of angels come down from Heaven to destroy them.  China and other totalitarian regimes would oppose Jesus and threaten retaliation in many areas if He were elected President.  If He debates Republicans in the primaries, his opponents would drop out because they would know whatever He promised, He would fulfill.  When He debated his Democrat opponent, he/she would complain that He could read his/her mind, and it would be unfair to elect Him since He could get things done without needing Congress to allow him to act.  He would control the weather and could make the earth like a paradise, which would upset those who believe in global warming.  And then the weather wouldn’t suit everyone everywhere.

One thing that would prevent Him from being President would be his ineligibility since he isn’t a citizen of America, and he was never natural-born since he was never born.  Not being natural-born didn’t stop Obama from becoming President, though.

It looks like Jesus will have to settle for ruling the world for 1,000 years when he establishes his kingdom in Jerusalem after the Battle of Armageddon, because he would have too much opposition to be elected President.


Photo credit: tkw954 (Creative Commons)